MarchOfTheGreyhounds
Welcome! edit
|
Disambiguation link notification for July 30 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gus Fleischli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, JonnyDKeen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Stats updates edit
Hi, I noticed you updated the international stats at Alec Mudimu. Please ensure you also update the timestamps in the infobox in order for other users to know when the stats were last updated. These fields are club-update for domestic statistics or ntupdate for international statistics. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 15:05, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Charlie Scott edit
Do you have a source for his return to Newcastle Town? GiantSnowman 12:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Kallum Mantack edit
I've semi-protected the article for a week, see if that puts them off... GiantSnowman 19:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, JonnyDKeen
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheAafi, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ryan Shanley, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheAafi}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Dylan Reid for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Regarding proposed deletion of Michael D Norton page. edit
Dear JonnyDKeen, that is extremely helpful constructive criticism that I will integrate into further revisions of the article, immediately!
Thank you for not being dismissive.
Norton is relatively new and upcoming as a public figure. I've been following him on social media for a while now and have communicated with him through messaging. That's probably where my own perceived bias is coming from. I've been honest about this in the choices of my connection to the subject when first uploading the article.
Any extra additions to his personal life probably came from me just watching him, which I acknowledge can be improved in the article. So, I will definitely trim down the personal life aspect and focus more on his accomplishments.
He's made innovations to AI, a device called the uRay (which has received some news coverage I haven't linked in his Wikipedia article yet). He's working on some kind of new engine that TechTimes has mentioned and Fast Company Magazine is about to.
He is self-promoting in general. He's built a personal brand with a growing social media audience. However, this Wikipedia article is genuine, written in good faith, and I am merely new.
What I can do is focus primarily on what his company, Wolven Industries, is doing. Apparently, Forbes is about to publish something on him. TechTimes and several other magazines already have, such as InsightsSuccess Magazine acknowledging him as an entrepreneurial leader of the pandemic.
I believe he is worthy of being listed on Wikipedia because his accomplishments as an entrepreneurial scientist are having and will likely continue to have a very positive aspect on society. Judging from his trajectory as public figure, I just wanted to be the first to cover him.
ArcticFox55 (talk) 14:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Award time! edit
|
The Guidance Barnstar | |
| Thank you for leaving the detailed, helpful message at User talk: MarkMck16 that I should have, but I was looking at the clock and didn't have enough time to really think through the message. —C.Fred (talk) 15:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC) |
My first ever barnstar! Thanks for making my night and also letting me know I was doing the right thing, since I wasn't entirely sure. JonnyDKeen (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Dylan Reid stats edit
Hi there, it looks like on Soccerway Dylan Reid now has four league appearances? One last season and three this season? Cam (talk) 10:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Rick Oginz page edit
Hi there, I saw you reverted back my changes to the bio I had been working on for the Rick Oginz page. My intention was to make the bio more professional and concise. After my edits, an editor put a general bio guide at the top of the page (c. Fred?). My edits were to conform better to the biographical format. Would it be possible for you to revert the bio back to my last edit? And by doing this do you think an editor will end up doing the same thing again and pasting the general bio guide article to the top again? I know I’m too close to the subject, but until we find an unrelated editor I’m just trying to streamline the bio so it’s not as wordy and more objective. Thanks very much and have a good day. Benoginz (talk) 23:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Benoginz! I think you may have made a mistake, as the last edits you made turned the Rick Ogniz article into an example biography featuring placeholder text and a picture of Socrates. I did post on your talk page about having reverted it. Did you realise these were the changes you'd made?
- I'm more than happy to help you streamline the bio, or whatever else you need. Just post here and I can help. But an article that's live on Wikipedia can't be left as an example page. If I were to revert to your edit, another editor would indeed come along and change it back.
- Also, ping to :@C.Fred: who may understand what's going on here better than I do. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your response, my last edit had the example page pinned to the top, but the actual bio with my last edits was at the very bottom as it’s own entry Benoginz (talk) 03:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I see! Right, I'll take a proper look in the coming days, see if I can cut down the existing bio (making use of your content if appropriate) and get back to you. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 23:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harvey McCreadie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hibernian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Russ McCloud, I hope I spelled his name right. The decision was made to move away from participation based inclusion. So I think it is worth brining to AfD. If you made an honest attempt to find sources and did not succeed I would nominat it at AfD.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Referencing edit
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I noticed people filling out my bare URLs, so I'm trying to learn how to make properly formatted citations. But I'm having a lot of trouble understanding the process. I've been trying to use the templates on the page Wikipedia:Bare URLs but every time I try, something goes wrong. Could someone point me in the direction of a simple guide or tool for creating good citations so I can make better contributions?
Sorry if I shouldn't be using this template since I've been around a while but I'm not sure where else to ask. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Depending whether you are editing with the Visual Editor (the <Edit> tab), or the WikiMarkup Source Editor (the <Edit source> tab), here are guides for each one:
- If you want more specific help, stop by the Teahouse or Wikipedia's live help channel to ask someone for assistance. Scottyoak2 (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Barnstar edit
Thank you, much appreciated. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Redbank Plaza edit
No issue with your nomination, but knew a PROD patroller would decline given prior deletion, so figured easier to set the right seven-day clock. Star Mississippi 22:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Appreciate it! I thought it was okay due to it having been created again after deletion. Lesson learned, thanks. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 09:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think any past deletion/discussion renders it PROD ineligible, but I may be wrong. Pinging @Liz who is among the most active PROD patrollers I know in case she can advise. Star Mississippi 01:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Books by women writers edit
Hi there, MarchOfTheGreyhounds, and thanks for all the books by women writers you have created, both this year and last. You seem to be aware of WikiProject Women in Red but as far as I can see you are not yet a member. If you are interested in joining, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. In any case, I look forward to your future contributions. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! Funnily enough, when I resumed my creation of these articles, I had no idea there was an editathon going on until I saw a tag on the talk page. I will sign up now, thanks for the recommendation. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 09:08, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- So I can now officially welcome you as a member of Women in Red. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look at our essays, perhaps starting with the Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
A barnstar for you! edit
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| Thank you for all of the articles you have created on novels by female writers. You should be proud of the work you do here: every article helps to combat the gender bias on Wikipedia. Keep going! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 22:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you so much! I'm aiming for a total of 20 new articles about nominees for the Women's Prize for Fiction before the end of the month. 14 more to go.
- And thank you for reviewing two of the articles. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 23:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023 edit
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023 edit
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023 edit
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Barack Obama's tickle fight in Indonesia edit
Hi. I've noticed that you removed the content on tickle fight article about Barack Obama's tickle fight he had in Indonesia. There was a source to that text published by The Huffington Post, which is to my understanding a credible source. Here is another source by New York Magazine, which also is credible source. So why exactly did you remove that content? Just curious, since I can't figure out why you did so. --Pek (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hey there, first of all thanks for being collegial and asking about my edit! Secondly, thank you for creating a new section with such an amazing heading.
- I ought to have been clearer in my edit summary. The reason I removed this section was because it seemed to give undue weight to an isolated incident. Even though there are sources, this incident seems a bit gossipy; one of the sources makes no reference to tickling and the other is a bit vague. Both are lighthearted pieces too.
- Looking at the article again, the entire thing is along these lines. A Wikipedia article like this shouldn't just list a few times something happened and got mentioned in the news. Instead, it needs exploration of the concept itself. Look at the references used for the article tickle torture and see how different they are from the references in tickle fight.
- I don't think the subject is notable and it should likely be redirected to tickling. Would you contest this or do you prefer I open an AfD discussion? MarchOfTheGreyhounds 06:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Pek what do you think? I will probably do something with this article in the next few days. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 20:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024 edit
 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024 edit
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024 edit
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging