User talk:Crest of London/Archive/2009

From Time Immemorial

Hello, Crest of London/Archive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Prolog 20:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Talk pagelogo123.png

Thanks for uploading File:Talk pagelogo123.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons

Hiya, cheers for your pictures of Harringay railway station. Can I encourage you to upload then direct to Wikimedia Commons, where they will reach an even wider audience. The process is just as easy. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Stub templates

Please don't create your own stub templates without discussion, as you did here. Although it seems at first glance like bureaucracy, we have quite strict rules on what stub categories are appropriate, to stop the creation of categories with only a couple of members and to stop the list of stub categories from getting unmanageably large. If you want to propose the creation of new categories, please discuss your proposed new category at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals to gain a broad consensus for it.

Thanks! – iridescent 20:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  – iridescent 20:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

If you claim you got the owners permission, you're going to have to show some pretty serious proof, given that Transport for London and Wikipedia never allow permission to use their logo (hence the rather peculiar logo for WP:WikiProject London Transport) and I find it hard to believe that either Microsoft or Adobe have granted you permission to release their logos into the public domain. You are obviously here in good faith; please don't put me in a position where I have to block you from editing to stop you getting us into trouble or disrupting other editors' work. – iridescent 21:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Reply by L07ChLeo3

I am sorry for any inconvenience I have caused all if not most of the problems with my article have been rectified once again I am very sorry L07ChLeo3 21:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Talk pagelogo123.png

Thanks for uploading File:Talk pagelogo123.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Wikimedia Commons

Hiya, cheers for your pictures of Harringay railway station. Can I encourage you to upload then direct to Wikimedia Commons, where they will reach an even wider audience. The process is just as easy. Railwayfan2005 (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Stub templates

Please don't create your own stub templates without discussion, as you did here. Although it seems at first glance like bureaucracy, we have quite strict rules on what stub categories are appropriate, to stop the creation of categories with only a couple of members and to stop the list of stub categories from getting unmanageably large. If you want to propose the creation of new categories, please discuss your proposed new category at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals to gain a broad consensus for it.

Thanks! – iridescent 20:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Talk pagelogo1234.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  – iridescent 20:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

If you claim you got the owners permission, you're going to have to show some pretty serious proof, given that Transport for London and Wikipedia never allow permission to use their logo (hence the rather peculiar logo for WP:WikiProject London Transport) and I find it hard to believe that either Microsoft or Adobe have granted you permission to release their logos into the public domain. You are obviously here in good faith; please don't put me in a position where I have to block you from editing to stop you getting us into trouble or disrupting other editors' work. – iridescent 21:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Reply by L07ChLeo3

I am sorry for any inconvenience I have caused all if not most of the problems with my article have been rectified one again I am very sorry L07ChLeo3 21:35, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to WPLT!

Welcome!

 

Hi, and welcome to the London Transport WikiProject!  We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of London's transport system.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• You may want to join or create a task force which attempts to drive the improvement of articles within a smaller scope.
• The project also provides templates to help you make the perfect article.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles?  Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
• Want to know how good our articles are?  The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every London transport article in Wikipedia.
• You can vote for the London Transport portal's selected article and selected image of the month here.
• Submit your interesting London Transport facts at Portal:London Transport/Did you know for our portal.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you.  Again, welcome!  We look forward to seeing you around!

— From the members of WikiProject London Transport

UNI^|SOUTH 19:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Tottenham and Hampstead Junction Railway

Hi L07ChLeo3,

I see that you changed the boxes on the Tottenham and Hampstead Junction Railway station articles to show that the route forking after St Ann's Road railway station to Tottenham Hale or to South Tottenham. This is the same thing I did when editing the articles initially but then I decided that I was probably mistaken. You see, St Ann's Road only opened in 1882 and the route to Tottenham Hale seems to have finished in 1870 (after the first incarnation of the line had been a commercial flop). By the time St Ann's Road opened the line was running on its current route via South Tottenham. If I am right then Haringey Green Lanes was the station before Tottenham Hale at the time that Tottenham Hale was in use. Does that make sense? More to the point, is it correct? Was there a post 1882 service on the line which served Tottenham Hale that I am not aware of? If so then the boxes are correct as they are. If not, then I think we should change them back. What do you think? 

BTW: It would be very useful if there were some old timetables we could use to check these things against. Do you know of any good sites for these?

--DanielRigal (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you I am mistaken sorry I don't know any good websites... thanks for the notification L07ChLeo3 18:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

File:A sign of Harringay railway station on one of its platforms.JPG

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:A sign of Harringay railway station on one of its platforms.JPG. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#I8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

London Buses

I am aware that you are a major editor of London Bus articles. I have therefore decided to let you know that the following bus routes have been merged into one article, London School Buses:

1. London Buses route 603
2. London Buses route 605
3. London Buses route 606
4. London Buses route 611
5. London Buses route 616
6. London Buses route 632
7. London Buses route 640

Spacevezon (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for the information I will help out by finding more or making constructive edits. --L07ChLeo3 (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2009 (UTC)L07ChLeo3 22:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Image:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. §hep^Talk 00:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Reply

A:please take into note the rule of this page you have clearly done this without taking this rule into consideration B:It is my work and is designed for my user page only; I seriously doubt that it can be used in any more articles

L07ChLeo3 (talk) 11:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

CODE 2000

I see that you use code 2000.

Another useful font which covers less characters (but more Latin and Cyrillic letters/glyphs) is Doulos SIL. It can be downloaded here: [1]

GNR

A new template has been created:

Feb metro

Simply south not SS, sorry 14:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, thank you for the prompt. Simply south not SS, sorry 14:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

New York World-Telegram and Sun – PD

In the media

Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV

Plus, tribute songs and shout-outs outweighing vandalism and hoaxes, a dispute about the real king of the platform and other bits of news.

Giotto – PD

News and notes

A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law

Plus, new updates on the privacy and research ethics whitepaper and the graphs outage situation, and an Iranian former steward is globally banned from Wikimedia projects

Fuzheado – CC0

WikiConference report

WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap

Outcomes of the event including newly published videos and photos, the archived conference website and program, and some attendee reflections on its significance.

Masketta man – PD

WikiProject report

WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)

A WikiProject report on the 📰🌍 globe's finest news source!

Sérgio Valle Duarte – CC 3.0 BY

Recent research

New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users

And other recent research publications

Acabashi – CC-4.0

Traffic report

O.J., cricket and a three body problem

Plus Godzilla meets Francis Scott Key!

Single-page edition

The Signpost is looking for new talent.

Home

About

Archives

Newsroom

Subscribe

Suggestions

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account.  Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it.  Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page.  I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback.  Happy editing! PeterSymonds (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi

I suggest you state your months of activity in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Requests_for_Coaching. Sorry I do not know how to move 1 of your section to the archive and hence I have to break the 10 sections rule. Syjytg (talk) 14:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

You seem to be ignoring my advice. Syjytg (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry I haven't had the time to fix that error it has been rectified now thanks L07ChLeo3 (talk) 19:54, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Noticed you had problems with the syntax, I have helped you done it. Syjytg (talk) 08:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles: 

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 02:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA

I reverted your edit to the RfA page because it is incomplete. If you wish to request adminship, please follow the instructions on that page. However, I strongly suggest you reconsider such a request. For a very recent example of a user making that request prematurely, please look at his talk page. Also, you just got rollback privileges last week, and also requested coaching...it seems a little early to be requesting adminship at this time. If you have any questions, please let me know. (I'm watching your talk page.)  Frank  |  talk  19:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, why me? Syjytg (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Simply a very recent example. I think you'll agree that your experience was a bit unpleasant (it certainly looked that way from the outside), and I'm trying to avoid another, similar situation.  Frank  |  talk  21:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 20:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Your RFA

I'd suggest you have a quick look at WP:NOTNOW and some of the links from that page. Your RFA stands almost no chance of success, and it may be better to withdraw gracefuly than end up getting irritated by a host of opposes and neutrals. Sorry to be so negative. Pedro :  Chat  22:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

I have taken your edit here as a sign that you wanted to withdraw this request. I have thus closed it accordingly. I hope you will continue to work on Wikipedia and retry with improved odds in a few months. Regards SoWhy 00:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Please don't take your RFA as being personal; it isn't! RFA on enWP is a very hard thing to pass. I've been here since 2006 and haven't tried yet because I'm not sure I'd pass; and I'm an admin at simple.wikipedia.org Take a couple of days off from wikipedia and just enjoy your real-life. Your on-life will be here later :) All the best!! :-) fr33kman -s- 03:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

File:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. §hep^Talk 21:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

ACC Tool

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. Unfortunately I was unable to process your request. The ACC tool is a powerful program, and at the present time your account is either too new for us to determine whether you would know how to properly use the tool or that you have not attained the necessary level of trust to be granted access. Please don't take this personally and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. FunPika 00:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Frequently used idea and approved areas

The Frequently used idea are needs updating seriously and now the future of the approved area is questioned. Please see the discussions at Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations#Help with FUI and Approved area discussion. 

I am also exceedingly busy at the mo. 

Simply south (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Unsubscribe · Single-page · Full edition »

  — 16 March 2009

• News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
• Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

List of scholarly publications by Norman Wengert

I gather you just tagged this page for speedy deletion, at the same time I placed a substantial number of references on the page. Now they have all dispappeared, and were removed from the Norman Wengert page. Do you know how to recover them? I do not, and I'm not looking forward to making the list up again from scratch. Please? Mervyn Emrys (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The references are still there don't worry. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Where? Can't see them. Checked. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 00:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I concur that the information seems to have disappeared from both the article and the relevant edit histories, an act which I am puzzled by, yet would appear to be the case.  LO7ChLeo3, I accept your reasoning for tagging the article for speedy deletion.  However, I believe you should have given more time to allow the creator a chance to develop the article further before tagging.  I have also advised the creator to employ an under construction tag in future.  Allventon (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry for the information I was merely hasty but the reason why the edit history may have gone is because an Oversighter must have deleted it; they have the power to delete pages PERMANENTLY which would explain why the history may have disappeared however I will see what I can do. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: NewPageWatcher

 Done. Sorry for the wait. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

NPP

Do carry on the new page patrolling but please note that ham prefix was most certainly not nonsense. Also please always provide an edit summary - there is a flag in your preferences that you should turn on to remind you about it. 

Please don't try and apply a rule such as ten articles. I am most certainly not going to do any archiving for you. If you won't do your own archiving then use MiszaBot. See also this re SHOUTING. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Thanks for telling me. Spacevezon (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

stubs

Hi, Please don't add {{stub}} to articles like Passy-Kéli when they already have categorised stub tags - it just wastes the time of people at WP:STUBSORT. If you feel the article needs expanding, Wikifying, etc there are plenty of other templates you can use. Thanks, PamD (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

ACC

{{helpme}}

Hello whenever I try to make an account on the ACC (Account Creator Control) interface I am told I already have an account on it and that my username is already registered but on the message I was sent about a week earlier it says that my account wasn't ready for creation which means that my account hadn't been made on the ACC so why am I getting that Error message! Can anyone help please? Thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

You should ask this question at WT:ACC. //roux   20:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Charlie Sheen's Brother

Just letting you know, I've replaced your speedy with a prod, because it doesn't look like its advertising the game at all, it just looks completely made up, but it isn't speedy material. Keep up the new page patrolling! Regards, FingersOnRoids♫ 21:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

• From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
• Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
• News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

 

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Crest of London/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am a user with some +1750 edits to Wikipedia who has not done anything wrong, I am affected by a hardblock please grant my account an ip-block exempt. Cheers. P.S. The ip address that I am blocked from is as follows 82.198.250.2

Decline reason:

Since you are on the same checkuser-hardblocked IP address as User talk:Spacevezon, who made a very similar request at exactly the same time, I've blocked you directly for abusing multiple accounts. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 08:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you post identical unblock requests then? You've also suddenly come up on an IP address blocked by a checkuser in response to severe abuse of multiple accounts. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 08:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

We were merely nearby each other. We are both avid contributors to Wikipedia. When we try to edit Wikipedia from our school ip address we can't as it has been hardblocked and I got the idea from him to request ip block exemption when I saw him requesting it thus I tried to do it, I can say, truthfully and honestly that we are not the same person. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 08:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the unblock I am sorry for any confusion caused, I don't mind that the bot is blocked as the source code is taking a while to construct and it won't be finished for some time now. Anyway I'm babbling too much. Cheers. --L07ChLeo3 (talk) 11:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

File:W4 Bus whl.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:W4 Bus whl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 16:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Palmers Green station Platforms looking Northbound.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palmers Green station Platforms looking Northbound.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Platforms facing Southbound at Palmers Green station.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Platforms facing Southbound at Palmers Green station.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Crest of London/Archive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

79.66.119.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jokers1234". The reason given for Jokers1234's block is: "Creating attack pages and/or nonsense pages".

• Blocking administrator: Mentifisto (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: I'm pretty sketpical here. The blocked editor created Lucy Pierce at 20:16; then you marked it for deletion at 20:20; then he created it again at 20:23, all this from the same IP with all indications it is the same person doing all the edits. Either you're playing games with Wikipedia, or your computer is insecure; in either case, you'll need to at the very least sit out the autoblock until your friends go away. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

Hello, I have a question, how do I persuade my friends and others to not vandalize Wikipedia as they keep doing it, can anyone give some answers. Thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

You tell them not to. In any case, that's probably not something you should ask using the helpme template. Killiondude (talk) 21:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

ok thanks. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I can honestly say that I have not vandalized Wikipedia I am sorry if people from my ip address are causing distress they often bully me for having an interest in Wikipedia and thus I am often the subject of their random attacks but I can honestly say I do not vandalize Wikipedia, I'll wait for the autoblock to lift if I have to but I do not like people thinking that I am a dishonest Wikipedian. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

• From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
• Special report: Community weighs license update
• News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

 

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

• Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
• News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
• Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
• WikiProject report: WikiProject China
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

 

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

April Metro

Btw, if you or OllieFury, as you may know this newsletter is meant to be monthly but i have been unable to do so. Are you or they or both interested in creating Issue 13 (which if on track should be at the start of May)? Simply south (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

• License update: Licensing vote begins
• News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
• Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

 

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

• Book reviews: Reviews of The Wikipedia Revolution
• Wikipedia by numbers: Wikipedia's coverage and conflicts quantified
• News and notes: New program officer, survey results, and more
• Dispatches: Valued pictures
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Film
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

 

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

• Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
• News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
• WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

 

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Crest of London. You have new messages at Wuhwuzdat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Simply south (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

May Metro

As Simply South is busy, I've stepped in for this one; this is my first time, so feel free to fix any mistakes or let me know of anything I've missed. – iridescent 20:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --L07ChLeo3 ^(T|C|A) 19:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

• News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
• Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by L07ChLeo3 ^(T|C|A) at 19:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

• From the editor: Writers needed
• Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
• Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
• News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:06, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

MOTD

Would be gatreful if you have any ideas for mottos. Please help at WP:MOTD/N. Also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day/Nominations#Archival Simply south (talk) 22:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

No. 14

Closer to the time, i was wondering whether you would like to do the June Metro. I know you previously had an interest in this. Though it would normally be designed\updated a few days before or at the start of the next month. If you are interested, please drop me a line and i will help out with what i can. Simply south (talk)

If it is okay I'll give you the links now. I am going to be off the grid for a week. It may be easier to copy the previous issue and replace the sections with what needs to be updated and that. For how to do the editorial sections, see User talk:Simply south/February_to_August_2008_archive#The Metropolitan and User talk:Unisouth#Metro. For sources of various pages you need to check for developments and that see Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/The Metropolitan/sources and check other relevant pages. This will be the June Metro. And start it in a few days time. Simply south (talk) 22:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Probably to avoid the newsletter getting too large, i would delete the content from last month, except that which you feel is most important. I've noticed in the news section, there is a heading for June but unless you have links to future news articles that have either the incorrect date or have not been published, they should still be in May. Also, i would check every now and then seeing as this has been done early until June 1st (the next publication date) if there are any updates. It does look good so far. Btw, i am gong to be intermittent for the next week. Simply south (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I see your point, I have fixed the problems, so now I just wait until June 1st in case new info comes out. Crest of London ^(T|C|A) 11:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Saw it deleted. It updates every month after people have chosen or it is meant to (Pic of month that is). Simply south (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

talkheader

Howdy. There is a strong discouragement on adding the {{talkheader}} template to any pages that don't need it. See that template's documentation for details, (eg. "This template should be used only when needed. There is no need to add this template to every talk page."). See the template's talkpage for numerous and ongoing discussions about same. Thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 05:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

June Metro

:) Crest of London ^(T|C|A) 22:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

July Metro

Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 21:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Talk_pagelogo123.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Talk_pagelogo123.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 08:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

File:London Bus 236 at its terminus at Finsbury Park Station.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:London Bus 236 at its terminus at Finsbury Park Station.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Crest of London. Please note that this image is now on commons as File:London Bus 236 at its terminus at Finsbury Park Station.jpg which is why you see a redlink above. I've updated your gallery to match. Happy Editing - Peripitus (Talk) 06:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

• From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
• Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
• Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
• Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
• News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
• Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 10:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Metropolitan - Issue 16

--DavidCane (talk) 00:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

• Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
• News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

• From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
• Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
• News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

• News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
• Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

• Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
• Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
• Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
• News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
• Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 17:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

September Metro

Simply south (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

• From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
• News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

• Opinion essay: White Barbarian
• Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
• Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
• News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

• New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
• Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
• News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:616 bus at Church Street.JPG

File:616 bus at Church Street.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:616 bus at Church Street.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:616 bus at Church Street.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

• From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
• Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
• Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
• News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
• Dispatches: Sounds
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

October Metro - better late than never

Simply south (talk) 21:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

• News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
• In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

• Interview: Interview with John Blossom
• News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
• In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

• Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup

• Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia

• Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report

• Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway

• Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall

• News and notes: Strategic planning, November conference, brief news and milestones

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:39, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

• Fundraiser: Controversial "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser to start 10 November

• New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol

• German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists

• Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris

• Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November

• Book review: Review of Connected Minds, Emerging Cultures: Cybercultures in Online Learning

• News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more

• In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more

• Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Nov Metro

Simply south (talk) 00:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

• Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins

• Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award

• Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing

• News and notes: Kiswahili contest, new advisory board members, Foundation-l and more

• In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more

• Sister projects: Wiktionary interview

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day contributions

This is a general message to get people to contribute as we are running out again so if you could please do. Please also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day#The Future. Note to anyone who reads this, WP:MOTD/N. Simply south (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

• Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts

• Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24

• Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues

• News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more

• In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

• Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll

• News and notes: 35k donated, WikiProject for Wikipedia-Books, 2M rated articles, and more

• In the news: Reports of Wikipedia's demise, prescriptions for its ills, and more

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

December Metro

Simply south (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

• From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost

• Editorial: A digital restoration

• Election report: ArbCom election in full swing

• Interview: Interview with David G. Post

• News and notes: Wikipedia's death report premature, fundraiser, usability, new CSD, noms, and more

• In the news: Ron Livingston sues vandal, disclosure of IP address ordered, brief headlines

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

• Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections

• News and notes: Mapping geotagged articles language, import sources enabled, and more

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

• Election report: ArbCom election result announced

• News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more

• In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

• News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news

• In the news: Criticism from climate change sceptic, decade in review

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)