Speedy deletion nomination of Janio Bikel edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Janio Bikel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jhill270 (talk) 09:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

A reply to your contestation of the deletion has been posted on the article talk page. Note that the discussion is eventually reviewed by an admin with regard to whether or not the page will be deleted. Jhill270 (talk) 10:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Fs player nat=Portugal name=Wilson Eduardo pos=FW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. IlyushkaTalk!Contribs 13:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BelovedFreak 13:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of Fernando Tomé edit

 

A tag has been placed on Fernando Tomé requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 09:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Virgílio Lopes edit

If you want the Virgílio Lopes article deleted, leave it with the pink CSD message rather than blanking it. --Rumping (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ajuda edit

Olá ALEXANDRE, suponho que sejas Português como eu,

Umas pequenas dicas para ajudar (a ti e ao site em geral): for favor, não deixes tantos espaços entre as coisas nos "infoboxes", não uses o traço "-" entre os anos mas sim "–", usa este formato para a data de nascimento ( (1980-10-19) October 19, 1980 (age 43), assim, quando a pessoa fizer anos, é actualizado, da maneira que tens não o é), e usa o seguinte formato para o "site" NATIONAL-FOOTBALL-TEAMS.com: copia por exemplo do Mário Jorge, que acabei de corrigir, e depois mete o código do jogador correspondente.

Em relação a espaços também, não deixes espaços entre os vários "external links", aparece sempre na mesma quando se vê o artigo, mas dá mais trabalho a corrigir e/ou adicionar coisas se estiver muito espaçado.

Cumprimentos, bom trabalho, apita se houver dúvidas, boa semana - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Sem resposta? Interessante...Já agora Alexandre, for favor repara como se faz o "link" de posicão de jogador correctamente: GOALKEEPER (ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL), DEFENDER (ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL) e FORWARD (ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL). No MIDFIELDER não é preciso nada entre parêntesis, basta a posição.

Até outra (caso o meu amigo assim o queira), boa semana - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Obrigado pela "resposta", não incomodo mais. Mas mais uma vez, o "link" de posição é MIDFIELDER só, não é preciso ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL entre parêntesis. Após a minha mensagem, fizeste o mesmo em Zeca (Portuguese footballer). Dá um pouco de trabalho a corrigir, sobretudo após ter tido o trabalho de entrar em contacto contigo...

Como já disse, não incomodo mais, adeus - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Fernando Gonçalves edit

 

The article Fernando Gonçalves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable athlete

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scray (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Mário João edit

Hello! Do you know the full name of this Portuguese football player? Many sources adfirm Mário Rodrigues João, while other ones state only Mário João. If you know something more, plese, write me here. --VAN ZANT (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Request - Pedido edit

Hi there ALGRIM, VASCO here,

I really don't know what your problem is. Not answering messages is not a problem, although i think it's not very polite. But not answering messages and continuing to add wrong wikilinks is quite another. Please, PLEASE, the wikilink for the player position is Midfielder, not Midfielder (association football), please!

If English is a problem, translation now: Realmente não sei qual é o teu problema. Não responder a mensagens não é problema, se bem que penso que não é muito educado. Mas não responder a mensagens e continuar a pôr "wikilinks" errados é outra bem diferente. Por favor, POR FAVOR, o "link" para a posição é Midfielder, não Midfielder (association football), for favor!

Greetings, from Portugal / Saudações desde Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled edit

 

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:20, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of João Reis edit

 

The article João Reis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who has not played in a fully-professional league and which also fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 05:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pedro Eugénio edit

 

The article Pedro Eugénio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who has not played in a fully-professional league and which also fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 05:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nuno Sequeira edit

 

The article Nuno Sequeira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not played in a fully professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL, and has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to pass WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 23:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miguel Vaz edit

 

The article Miguel Vaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not played in a fully professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL, and has not received any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject to pass WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 00:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Cardoso edit

 

The article Ricardo Cardoso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not played in a fully professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL, and has not received any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject to pass WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 00:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Anthony Lopes edit

 

The article Anthony Lopes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:GNG, as well as WP:ATHLETE having never made his professional debut.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JSRant Away 14:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ricardo Esgaio edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ricardo Esgaio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Quiggers1P (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. GiantSnowman 22:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Betinho (Portuguese footballer) edit

 

The article Betinho (Portuguese footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable youth player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 22:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Concerns regarding player notability edit

Alexander, I am writing to inform you that I am going to prod Hugo Sousa, Ricardo Sousa Esgaio, Tiago Ilori, Tiago Emanuel Canelas Almeida Ferreira and Betinho (Portuguese footballer), all created by yourself, because they do not meet criteria stated at WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. I am advising you to read them fully and understand what they mean. Some of your work is acceptable because they meet the relevant criteria, but many that have been deleted by me and others in the past have not and neither do the ones I've mentioned above. Previous attempts at communication by others have failed. Why I do not know, but I urge you to listen and digest what I have said, otherwise you will end up being blocked for failing to adhere to guidelines. That is not a threat from me, it is a friendly warning of what will happen if this continues. Thank you. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 22:58, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Adding Ricardo Araújo Cardoso, Rodolfo Lourenço, Afonso Taira, Ricardo Miguel Martins Alves, André Sousa, Luís Pedro Souto Gonçalves, Ludgério Silva and Fábio Fortes to the list. I also recommend that you read and bookmark this page which contains a list of fully-professional leagues. Relevant to you is Portugal, so anyone who has played in Primeira Liga and Liga de Honra would be acceptable for an article, but below that they fail WP:NFOOTBALL so you would need to show they meet the general notability guideline which would be nigh on impossible. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 23:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Araújo Cardoso edit

 

The article Ricardo Araújo Cardoso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 23:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

ANI notification edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:20, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I see you were doing this in July as well. Creating a bare minimum stub of this nature and not providing any information on WHY the player is notable is against policy. Many of your "articles" will probably be deleted either by PROD or by AfD. Please refrain from creating new pages for the time being and read up on the notability guidelines as well as the reliable sources guidelines to learn what kind of sources you can use to get information for articles you wish to create. If there is no information about someone online, don't create an article. CycloneGU (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Note that I have removed your auto-patrolled rights pending the outcome of this discussion. Given the large amount of your article contributions that have been deleted and the number of concerns raised here on your talk, it would be best that your new articles be reviewed through the new page patrol process for now. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Viegas edit

 

The article Ricardo Viegas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable youth player who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I have also nominated Fábio Sturgeon, André Viana, Fábio Moura, Eduardo Marques Castro Silva, Filipe Daniel Mendes Barros, Aldair Adulai Djaló Baldé, Paulo Oliveira and Vítor Bruno Rodrigues Gonçalves for the same reason. GiantSnowman 14:33, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of João Viana edit

 

The article João Viana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played above the third level of Portuguese football and fails our notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 21:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

New footballer articles edit

Hello. I noticed that you are creating a lot of new articles about young football players (especially those in the Portuguese leagues). While I'm glad that you are trying to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Portuguese football, please try and follow a few guidelines on creating new articles: try to demonstrate why the person is notable. For example, has the person played at least once in a fully-pro league match (usually the first or second level in Portugal). The article about João Viana doesn't show that he's ever played a league match, and I found no evidence that he has. Also, consider adding references that show the person is the subject of significant (not routine) coverage in the media. Please let me know if you have questions or need help. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of André Cacito edit

 

The article André Cacito has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who has never played in a league above the Portuguese third level and there is no evidence it satisfies the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vítor Bruno edit

 

The article Vítor Bruno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Carlos Henriques (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Silves
Pedro Rafael Amado Mendes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barreiro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pedro Miguel Sousa Freitas for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Miguel Sousa Freitas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Miguel Sousa Freitas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 21:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited André Almeida Pinto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portugal national under-23 football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Abel Pereira edit

 

The article Abel Pereira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:36, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cristiano Seixas edit

 

The article Cristiano Seixas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about an individual who does not meet WP:GNG and hasn't played football in a professional league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 08:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Smile! edit

 
A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.7.19 (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 30 edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pedro Filipe Barbosa Moreira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Paredes
Vasco Campos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Barreiro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Diogo Amado edit

Não vai servir DE NADA (quatro anos aqui e nem uma palavra trocada com NINGUÉM!), mas ao menos fica a mensagem e depois, se o meu caro repetir, falo imediatamente com um administrador. Os traços que separam os anos nos "boxes" são os que estão ("–"), não os pequenos ("-"). Pode ser ou não?

Boa semana - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 20:29, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vítor Gabriel Lourenço Viana edit

 

The article Vítor Gabriel Lourenço Viana has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 02:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ricardo Esgaio edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ricardo Esgaio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Pinto edit

 

A tag has been placed on Michael Pinto, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Daniel Jesus Moreira Carvalho edit

Thanks for creating Daniel Jesus Moreira Carvalho, Alexanderalgrim!

Wikipedia editor Ironholds has tagged the page as having some issues to fix. In addition, they wrote this note for you:

Please use references in the articles you've written; if the links you have provided are references, they should be marked as that, not as external links :)

The tags on the page can be removed by you or another editor when the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on Ironholds's talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the the Teahouse.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Tobias Figueiredo edit

 

The article Tobias Figueiredo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. tausif(talk) 13:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ricardo José Araújo Ferreira edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ricardo José Araújo Ferreira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ricardo Oliveira Fernandes for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Oliveira Fernandes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Oliveira Fernandes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 15:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rúben Pinto edit

 

The article Rúben Pinto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miguel Galeão edit

 

The article Miguel Galeão has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ricardo Janota for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Janota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Janota until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Dâmaso edit

 

The article Ricardo Dâmaso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joshua Silva edit

 

The article Joshua Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rui Raínho edit

 

The article Rui Raínho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pedro Branco edit

 

The article Pedro Branco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paulo Ricardo Gomes Campos edit

 

The article Paulo Ricardo Gomes Campos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Filipe Espincho edit

 

The article Filipe Espincho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of João Carlos Silva Reis edit

 

The article João Carlos Silva Reis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Diogo Coelho edit

 

The article Diogo Coelho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of João Paulo Ramos Barbosa edit

 

The article João Paulo Ramos Barbosa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ricardo Alves Coelho Silva edit

 

The article Ricardo Alves Coelho Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cláudio Ramos edit

 

The article Cláudio Ramos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Jesus Moreira Carvalho edit

 

The article Daniel Jesus Moreira Carvalho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tiago Jogo edit

 

The article Tiago Jogo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Agostinho Carvalho edit

 

The article Agostinho Carvalho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Diogo Moniz edit

 

The article Diogo Moniz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Oliveira Costa edit

 

The article Daniel Oliveira Costa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Filipe Campelos de Sousa edit

 

The article Filipe Campelos de Sousa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miguel Malheiro Fabião Maia edit

 

The article Miguel Malheiro Fabião Maia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bruno Varela edit

 

The article Bruno Varela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A footballer who has never played in a fully professional league and has received minimal coverage. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kosm1fent 08:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

DEFAULTSORT edit

FYI... there needs to be a space after the comma in defaultsort.... DEFAULSORT:Alves, Bruno Miguel Mendes Bgwhite (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Agostinho Cá edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agostinho Cá, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of João Pedro Almeida Machado edit

Hello Alexanderalgrim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged João Pedro Almeida Machado for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Travelbird (talk) 11:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tiago Cerveira edit

 

The article Tiago Cerveira has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. LlamaAl (talk) 16:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Aladje edit

 

The article Aladje has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mailó, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page São Vicente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

DEFAULTSORT edit

I've asked you before. There needs to be a space after the comma in the defaultsort. It screws up the sort order. Bgwhite (talk) 07:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Miguel Santos edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Miguel Santos should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Santos .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Op47 (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (João Pedro Gomes Camacho) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating João Pedro Gomes Camacho, Alexanderalgrim!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for doing this series of articles about Portuguese footballers.

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for May 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laurent Dos Santos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montmorency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nélson Alexandre Farpelha Estrela edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nélson Alexandre Farpelha Estrela, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nélson Alexandre Farpelha Estrela to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, JacobiJonesJr (talk) 06:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Besugo edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Besugo, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Besugo to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, JacobiJonesJr (talk) 06:09, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Hugo Rego edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Hugo Rego should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Rego .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, JacobiJonesJr (talk) 10:51, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiago Leão edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tiago Leão requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jab843 (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP Football/Portugal task force Invitation edit

RRD13 (talk) 10:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Filipe Nascimento edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Filipe Nascimento requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yacatisma (talk) 05:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rafael Moreira Araújo edit

 

The article Rafael Moreira Araújo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 21:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Carlos Daniel edit

 

The article Carlos Daniel has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GamerPro64 20:16, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Edson Almeida for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edson Almeida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edson Almeida until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 11:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rafael Moreira Araújo edit

 

The article Rafael Moreira Araújo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Janio Bikel edit

Hello Alexanderalgrim,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Janio Bikel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhill270 (talk) 09:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Miguel Rodrigues (footballer, born 1996)
added a link pointing to Portuguese
Olivier Custodio
added a link pointing to Portuguese
Rafael Kneif
added a link pointing to Portuguese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Pedro Nuno Fernandes Ferreira edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pedro Nuno Fernandes Ferreira. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pedro Nuno. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pedro Nuno – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. George Ho (talk) 07:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Francisco Santos (footballer) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francisco Santos (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisco Santos (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 20:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Barbosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amarante. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion edit

Good job adding Portuguese players' articles on the Wiki, but try adding at least an infobox to better display the information. That could help prevent your articles from being prodded. Best of luck! JTtheOG (talk) 02:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Pedro Miguel Oliveira Alves edit

Hi, I'm Thursby16. Alexanderalgrim, thanks for creating Pedro Miguel Oliveira Alves!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Add a football infobox

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Thursby16 (talk) 22:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leandro Borges edit

 

The article Leandro Borges has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. FiendYT 01:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage edit

Hello. It seems that your userpage is in a language not in English.

  • If it is what you want for your userpage, translate it to English.
  • If it is purely for testing, please move it to your your sandbox.

Thank you. NasssaNser (talk/edits) 03:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Michael Gonçalves edit

 

The article Michael Gonçalves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pedro Teixeira (footballer) edit

 

The article Pedro Teixeira (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miguel Rodrigues (footballer, born 1996) edit

 

The article Miguel Rodrigues (footballer, born 1996) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Zidane Banjaqui) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Zidane Banjaqui, Alexanderalgrim!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 15:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Domdeparis. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Diogo Mendes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 16:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pedro Neto edit

 

The article Pedro Neto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NFOOTY, no claim of playing in a fully professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of João Queirós edit

 

The article João Queirós has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NFOOTY, no claim of having played in a fully-professional league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Nuno Tomás edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Alexanderalgrim, thanks for creating Nuno Tomás!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. All biographies of living people need their sources WP:INLINECITED. This has an empty references section, indicating that no sources were used and this is WP:OR. I think it is likely, however, that the 'external links' should be in the references box. Please also be aware of WP:BLPPRIVACY re using full DOB.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Figueira edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Figueira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dark-World25 (talk) 06:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nuno Jorge Sousa Soares edit

 

The article Nuno Jorge Sousa Soares has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, hasn't played in a fully professional league. Appearances to date have been in the Campeonato de Portugal, the third tier of Portuguese football which is not fully professional. No evidence of passing WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 14:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Barroca for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barroca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barroca until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 19:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Balacó edit

 

The article Balacó has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable football player. No evidence of independent significant media coverage. External links point to the identifiers included in wikidata, but the only reference included on wikidata is "important from English wikipedia", despite this article lacking any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 01:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Ricardo Rodrigues edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim,

Thanks for creating Ricardo Rodrigues! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add WP:INLINECITED referneces; these are a requirement for biographies of living people. 'External links' just means suggestinos for further reading, but your sources need to be clear.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Rodrigo Borges edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim,

Thanks for creating Rodrigo Borges! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Anthony Paulo Rodrigues Correia edit

Hello, Alexanderalgrim,

Thanks for creating Anthony Paulo Rodrigues Correia! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Rodrigo Borges moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Rodrigo Borges, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:50, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Anthony Paulo Rodrigues Correia moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Anthony Paulo Rodrigues Correia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:51, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Djibril Sarr for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Djibril Sarr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djibril Sarr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hugo Seixas for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugo Seixas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Seixas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Adílio Varela for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adílio Varela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adílio Varela until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Glaceon (talk) 02:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vasco Braga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barcelos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Adílio Varela for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adílio Varela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adílio Varela (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

José Gralha moved to draftspace edit

An article you created on 07:43, 14 October 2010, José Gralha, is not suitable as written to remain published. This article is Stub-class and listed in Category Orphaned articles from December 2010. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeNMLC (talk) 06:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Joca (footballer, born 1998) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joca (footballer, born 1998), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joca (footballer, born 1998) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alex Azevedo for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Azevedo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Azevedo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nando Silva for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nando Silva, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nando Silva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Luís Oliveira (footballer, born 1994) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luís Oliveira (footballer, born 1994), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luís Oliveira (footballer, born 1994) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bruno Sousa (footballer, born March 1996) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruno Sousa (footballer, born March 1996), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Sousa (footballer, born March 1996) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Simão Pipo for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simão Pipo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simão Pipo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tico Fernandes edit

 

The article Tico Fernandes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor footy player with no significant coverage located on a search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 06:53, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cristiano Abreu for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cristiano Abreu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristiano Abreu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jota Agostinho for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jota Agostinho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jota Agostinho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jorge Abreu for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jorge Abreu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Abreu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:45, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of André Afonso for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article André Afonso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Afonso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ricardo Araújo (footballer, born 1992) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Araújo (footballer, born 1992) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Araújo (footballer, born 1992) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chuca (footballer, born 1994) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuca (footballer, born 1994) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuca (footballer, born 1994) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PMC(talk) 06:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pedro Alves (footballer, born 1996) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Alves (footballer, born 1996) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Alves (footballer, born 1996) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hélder Arruda for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hélder Arruda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hélder Arruda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dani Alves (footballer, born 1993) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dani Alves (footballer, born 1993) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dani Alves (footballer, born 1993) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miguel Assunção for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miguel Assunção is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miguel Assunção until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ismael Pinto edit

 

The article Ismael Pinto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 7 professional minutes of play

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of João Beirão for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article João Beirão is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Beirão until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fábio Jorge for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fábio Jorge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fábio Jorge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ismael Pinto for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ismael Pinto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ismael Pinto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Adílio Varela for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adílio Varela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adílio Varela (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Besugo for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Besugo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Besugo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pedro Batista for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Batista is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Batista until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Raul Moreira edit

 

The article Raul Moreira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer. Only routine coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fábio Marques for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fábio Marques is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fábio Marques until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 15:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Raul Moreira for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raul Moreira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raul Moreira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Samuel Biscaia for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samuel Biscaia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Biscaia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Betinho (footballer, born 1994) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betinho (footballer, born 1994) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betinho (footballer, born 1994) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fábio Santos (footballer, born 1994) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fábio Santos (footballer, born 1994) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fábio Santos (footballer, born 1994) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Óscar Barros for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Óscar Barros is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Óscar Barros until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of João Bruno for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article João Bruno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/João Bruno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Afonso Caetano for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afonso Caetano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afonso Caetano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zé Miguel for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zé Miguel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zé Miguel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pedro Campos (footballer, born 1995) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Campos (footballer, born 1995) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedro Campos (footballer, born 1995) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rui Caniço for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rui Caniço is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rui Caniço until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Daniel Marinho for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Marinho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Marinho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply