User talk:Alex Bakharev/Archive26

Fair use rationale for File:Cheburashka.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cheburashka.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

• Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons

• News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more

• In the news: Wikipedia better than Britannica, Pending changes as a victory of tradition, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject U2

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

User:203.202.234.226

Your bot is logged out. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 23:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Newsflash! Ukrainian is not a Russian dialect!

Hello, Alex Bakharev. You have new messages at Talk:Georgy Voronoy.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 01:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:ANI#Disruptive editing by User:NCDane

You might want to comment in this AN/I thread since you have had interaction with NCDane regarding the same issue before. Nsk92 (talk) 03:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

It appears he settles now. Please let me know if he continues his disruption. Alex Bakharev (talk) 04:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

• Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content

• News and notes: 2010–15 plan, Smithsonian outreach, Teaching Wikipedia, brief news

• In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?

• Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative

• WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Bot logged out?

Seems like it - I have redacted the IP.  7  12:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

• News and notes: WMF expansion, community hires, award for MediaWiki, admin recall

• In the news: Accidentally anonymized donation, democratized learning and more

• Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature

• Features and admins: This week's highlights

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

A discussion regarding your bot

Howdy. You may be interested in this discussion.--Rockfang (talk) 03:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

NRHP and your bot

Hi, Alex. Is there a reason the recently added NRHP rules weren't taken account of in the latest bot run? I put "NRHP" at the end of the master list (though now it's moved up into alphabetical order), but the bot still didn't acknowledge it. Is there any reason? Thanks! --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 15:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

• The bot reads its configuratiopn files at the beginning and runs for about 36h. I guess it read the configuration without NRHP in the last cycle. Please wait until the new cycle Alex Bakharev (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Is a cycle both archiving and adding, or is each considered its own cycle? NRHP was added to User:AlexNewArtBot/Master at 23:37, July 7, 2010, and the first "from bot" edit the bot made wasn't until 22:50, July 8, 2010, nearly 24 hours later. As for the "archived" edits, they started at 18:07, July 7, 2010, so if archiving then adding is a single cycle, that makes sense. If not there's something wrong here, and waiting for the next cycle would just be a waste of time. Just bringing the dates/times to your attention since I don't know exactly what a cycle is. Thanks! --Dudemanfellabra (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

• UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups

• News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative

• In the news: Foundation plans, David Barton, dangerous occasional glitches

• Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

New article search results

Hi, mind if I ask a quick question? User:AlexNewArtBot/OxfordLog works fine, but User:AlexNewArtBot/OxfordSearchResult has never been touched by the bot (and was a redlink until I created it a couple of days ago to see if that made a difference). Have I done something wrong? Bencherlite^Talk 10:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

• News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia

• In the news: Wikimania, Former Wikimedia employee looks back, Editing controversial articles

• Vandalism: Vandalism edits fool media and a government, become object of bets

• WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Eastern European mailing list

Following a motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:

Remedy 20 of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list ("Miacek topic banned") is lifted.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW (Talk) 00:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Discuss this

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

• News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news

• In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade

• WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Nikolai Gogol. Why revert?

Hi Alex. I'd say those were sound edits by SteveStrummer... Garik 11 (talk) 07:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

• It looks like I have accidentally pressed a wrong button. I have reverted myself. thanks for catching Alex Bakharev (talk) 12:45, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

• News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports

• In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed

• WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Major MediaWiki release, password security, vulnerable MediaWiki installations, and more

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

• News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee

• In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more

• Admin stats: RfA drought worsens in 2010—wikigeneration gulf emerging

• Sister projects: Strategic Planning update

• WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

• News and notes: Book publisher apologizes for plagiarizing photos by Wikipedians, brief news

• Spam attacks: Large scale vandalism revealed to be "study" by university researcher

• In the news: Supportive communication and missing incentives on Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:38, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

cool pic

File:Olga kardovskaya portret ahmatovoy 1914 szh 16.jpg

very cool

Replaceable fair use File:BTR-90.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BTR-90.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Solid State Survivor (talk) 07:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Antarctika and Turkey ??

Hi Alex, Please see my noteArticles regarding to robot's edit on the new article announcement page of WikiProject Turkey. Have a nice day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:42, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Obruchev za tainami plutona.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Obruchev za tainami plutona.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 13:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

• News and notes: Pending changes poll, Public policy classes, Payment schemes debate, and more

• In the news: Zionist editing courses, newspaper denies editing candidate, net neutrality

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Filatov oranges.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Filatov oranges.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Filatov oranges.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Filatov oranges.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

• News and notes: Most linked websites on Wikipedia, New York Wiki-Conference, and more

• In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities

• Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000

• Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?

• Technology report: Reusability of MediaWiki code, Google Summer of Code: Interwiki transclusion, and more

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Portal:Speculative fiction

Hey, Alex. Just wanted to check and make sure I did everything correctly since the bot just finished its run and skipped over my new entry (see here). Here's the rules page I made, too. Please let me know if I made a mistake as this is the first time I've done this. Thanks! ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 06:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

• News and notes: Pending changes analyzed, Foundation report, Main page bias, brief news

• In the news: WikiLeaks and Wikipedia; Google–WP collaboration to translate health information

• Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky

• Dispatches: Tools, part 1: References, external links, categories and size

• WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force

• Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th

• Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more

• Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:David samoylov.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David samoylov.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

• News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes

• In the news: Public Policy Initiative, Houellebecq plagiarism?, Article revisions as book

• Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment

• Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration

• WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab

• Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Russia GA reassessment

An article that you have been involved in editing, Russia has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Philipmj24 (talk) 03:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Falk Self.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Falk Self.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Too wide scope

Hi Alex, please see my note on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ottoman Empire/New article announcements. Have a nice day. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

• From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost

• News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes

• In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories

• Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Falk bottles.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Falk bottles.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Bot question

Hi, Alex! I remember that when you first started to program the NewArt bot, you mentioned that there was no easy way to detect new articles which were created from redirects. From what I see, the bot still ignores those. Just wanted to point out that it may be possible now, since all redirects-turned-articles are now tagged by the Edit Filter (here's an example). Do you think you could make use of this new feature? Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); September 23, 2010; 13:31 (UTC)

Yes! This tag makes processing such pages certainly possible. I will do the development soon. Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

New article new feeds

Hi Alex, I'd like to request two new feeds for the WikiProjects I am involved in:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh (keyword Pittsburgh)
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology (keywords: sociology, sociologist, sociological)

Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

• News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more

• In the news: Wikimedia moves into India, critical conference, Vandalism detection contest

• WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Ru-wiki

Hi Alex, could you do me a cross-wiki favour? I am trying to clean up the mess left by banned "Wikinger" on almost all Wikipedias, in his obsessive disinformation campaign regarding the obscure topic of Greek characters. Ru-wiki is also affected, but I can't deal with the language there. Could you initiate a requested move for moving "ru:Дисигма" back to its proper name "ru:Сампи" please? The reasons are outlined here. Alternatively, could you point me to a local ru-wiki admin who'd be willing to discuss stuff in English? Cheers, -- Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

• News and notes: German chapter remodeled to meet Foundation requirements, and more

• In the news: Spanish police pursues BLP vandals, Jimbo interviewed, advice for experts and spammers

• Book review: Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, by Joseph Reagle

• WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes

• Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Russia

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found a number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Russia/GA2. I have de-listed the article but it can be re-nominated at WP:GAN when these concerns are addressed.. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

• News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more

• In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution

• Features and admins: Big week for ships and music

• Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Guberman.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Guberman.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:14, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

• News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief

• WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics

• Features and admins: A week for marine creatures

• Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review

• Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months

• Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

New article bot request

I would like to get a page of new Algae articles for Wikipedia:WikiProject Algae. Can you help me set this up? Thanks, --Kleopatra (talk) 06:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Gherman Titov.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gherman Titov.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Gevorkyan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gevorkyan.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

• News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced

• In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news

• WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?

• Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Is your bot broken?

Is your bot broken? It hasn't added anything to the FinlandSearchResult page in six days. JIP | Talk 06:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

• Hopefully, the problem is fixed Alex Bakharev (talk) 00:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Would you mind reading something?

Could you please read (or at least skim) this article: [1] and offer an opinion about whether it seems to be really biased or dishonest? And could you comment here:[2] about that (or, if you wish, create your own section in the talk page)? I know it might be a bit time consuming and it's cetainly understandable if you don't want to do it, but it would be helpful to get an uninvolved opinion as to whether this article is biased enough to be unacceptable for wikipedia, as some people are claiming. It's already been deeemed reliable by 2 uninvolved people on the reliability noticeboard (see here:[3]) but now its bias is being questioned. Thank you!Faustian (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Article of Andre Geim, winner of Nobel Prize

Hi, I am a foreigner and a simple reader of Wikipedia. Thank you very much for your job. Frankly say, Editing article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andre_Geim, is in a wrong way, by colluding of some editors and admins there. Their IDs are: Therexbanner, Gladsmile, Narking, Christopher Connor, RobertMfromLI, NickCT, Beetstra, 7. These Users are trying by reverting correct edits of the article, and doing a sort of anagram and "misusing" information in sources, show Mr. Andre Geim (winner of 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics) is not a Jewish and he has another ethnic. They seem like pure (but a bit hidden)vandalism. All correct RS sources, like:

- http://www.scientific-computing.com/features/feature.php?feature_id=1, - http://www.russia-ic.com/education_science/science/breakthrough/1176/, - http://www.forward.com/articles/131944/ - http://www.gazeta.ru/science/2010/10/07_a_3426604.shtml - http://www.kfki.hu/chemonet/osztaly/kemia/ih.pdf - http://onnes.ph.man.ac.uk/~geim/pt.html - http://www.forward.com/articles/131944/ - http://www.russia-ic.com/education_science/science/breakthrough/1176/ - …

clearly show that Mr. Andre Geim is a Jewish (he repeatedly mentioned about his Jewishness, [subject of self-identification]) in ethnical point of view and his family was originated from Germany(he also several times mentioned that his family are German [origin]). Nowadays German is a general word, which could means: Citizenship, Nationality, Origin, residentship, and so on. When Geim is taking about German being of his family, clearly and logically he talks about their origin before emigration to Russia. There is the same situation about Richard Feynman: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman. By the way in a reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Andre_Geim_interview_to_Yedioth_Ahronoth,_Oct_15_2010,_p._25.jpg, (that several times misused by above Users) Geim also said a story concerning Jewishness (clearly in religious point of view) of his grandmother, that of course it doesn’t mean that only his grandmother was a Jewish. Now in article as I checked the history of the article, above Users by reverting the correct edits there, try to present and show by their wrong way Mr. Geim an “ethnic” German person. The point is that in any RS sources, Geim hasn’t say that he has such ethnic, and he never used word “ethnic” there. Andre Geim won the Nobel Prize in the beginning of October; unfortunately, right after his winning until now, above Users kept the text of the article in a wrong position. In any case, if you have time, please check this Users carefully. By the way USER:Gladsmile, repeatedly reverted and undid the edits there, without any explanation(even wrong one). Personaly, seems like an extrimist Vandalism. Best —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander468 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

This is just another sock of the blocked user:Russian.science [4]. And this is his new attempt of canvasing [5]. Närking (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Bug in your bot

Looks like your bot has a bug. User:Cobbit created the article 4x4=12 on October 29, but your bot's User:AlexNewArtBot/AlbumSearchResult page shows it as "Article". Apparently your bot can't handle article titles with = signs in them. JIP | Talk 14:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

• News and notes: Foundation's finances, geodata milestone, interim counsel, museum conference

• In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric

• WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey

• Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails

• Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days

• Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Amendment request

Hi Alex,

I made a statement here. This is just to let you know if you wish to comment or ask any questions. Thanks, Biophys (talk) 23:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

• Fundraiser: November 15 launch, emphasis on banner optimization and community involvement

• News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity

• In the news: WP prose praised, Public Policy update, education debate, WP documentary

• WikiProject report: WikiProject California

• Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science

• Election report: The countdown begins

• Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:53, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Bot stopped?

Hi Alex, If you are away I guess you may not get this message for a while, but I wanted to let you know that at Project Gastropods we have not gotten any new listings from AlexNewArtBot for the last 5 days. I miss them because I really rely on them. Many thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 14:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Primakov Origin

Alex, Can you take a look at the second reference sited in the Primakov article? I think the information presented about Primakov's origin is credible and sufficient enough to change the information about his ethnicity. References 2 and 3 both support this finding. Do you agree?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yevgeny_Primakov

Reference 2: http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/4291 Thanks Igorf (talk) 21:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

• News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership

• In the news: How big can Wikipedia pictures get?; fundraising season

• WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon

• Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains

• Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process

• Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

New article announcement

Hi, please see my note on page WikiProject Turkey/New article announcements Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

• News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations

• In the news: Jimbo Wales interviewed and parodied; Wikipedia in politics

• Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder

• WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: Candidates still stepping forward

• Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Russian painters

I'd like to draw your attention to the thread here, about the editing activities of Leningradartist (talk · contribs). Any comments or advice relating to same would be mush appreciated. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 08:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Bot down?

Have noticed that User:AlexNewArtBot hasn't run the LGBT New Articles list in about a week. Just wondering if it's down for maintenance or if it needs a kick :) Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Project Gastropods has had no new listings in nearly 10 days. They are so useful; I miss them tremendously when they are not available. Invertzoo (talk) 22:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

• News and notes: Backlog drive; youth and confidence among Wikipedians, brief news

• In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report

• Interview: Interview with Johanna Niesyto and Nathaniel Tkacz from "Critical Point of View"

• WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: Voting in full swing

• Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Alex, I would like to ask you some help for my new article. Please let me know when you are available, or back from vacation. Thanks! Sausa11 (talk) 04:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Article not appearing in list of new articles

I created the article Röhss family on 23:56, 28 November 2010. A little later I moved it to Röhss (not sure this was a good move; I may move it back).

Now when I look at the recently posted version of User:AlexNewArtBot/SwedenSearchResult, I don't see this article there. The articles Harald Hjärne and Ragnar Josephson, created earlier the same day, are there, as is Carl Bildt (1850-1931), posted on the 30 December, but not Röhss.

It seems that the move somehow hid the article from being detected by the bot. or is there another answer to why this happens? Can it be fixed?

Articles being moved shortly after creation is probably not unusual, for a variety of reasons: misspellings, miscapitalizations, adjusting the the title to the scope of an article after some reshuffling of material, better English translation of a foreign term, etc. --Hegvald (talk) 10:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Request

I am of the opinion that the actions of several editors on Talk:Holodomor, most notably Petri Krohn, violate certain provisions of WP:DIGWUREN. I would like for you, as an administrator, to look into this and, if you feel it necessary, take action. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Хорошее предложение, поскольку блокировки за войну и оскорбления заслуживают многие, включая комментатора выше. Было бы неплохо если бы кто-нибудь объявил "брейк" на поле боя. Artem Karimov (talk) 15:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

It is very rude to talk about other people in languages they do not fully understand. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:56, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

It is my business to choose in which language I talk to my compatriots, OK? Artem Karimov (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

It becomes my business as well when you speak of me. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 19:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Are you some kind of authority above me? Artem Karimov (talk) 21:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I never said I was. I merely am requesting that you act civilly. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:46, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

I am hardly an uninvolved administrator on Talk:Holodomor, so I cannot use WP:DIGWUREN. According to my experience WP:DIGWUREN sanctions are rarely netto-positive, so I am trying to avoid issuing them anyway. You can contact an uninvolved administrator and he might consider an action. In my own opinion the discussion on Talk:Holodomor is within the pale, so I would not apply administrative tools here, although it is probably worth to make a warning. Artem is obviously of a different opinion, he was telling that he thinks that "many participants of the discussion (including the originator of this thread) deserve blocking. And calling a break in the battle would be advantageous". As I said before I disagree with him Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I will hold off on taking any further action for now, as the parties most responsible have either disengaged or calmed down. Thank you for your opinion and polite caution. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you misunderstood, but I was actually calling for a break. Artem Karimov (talk) 13:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

The article is named incorrectly. It should be "Golodomor" (from "golod" -- hunger), not "Holodomor" ("holod" -- cold). SA ru (talk) 02:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

You are wrong; read WP:UKR. Х=/x/=kh. Г(ukr)=/ɦ/=h. Ґ(ukr)=/g/=g. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 22:59, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

HanzoHattori

I think I've found another HanzoHattori (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) sock: [6]. The same topics: video games, japanese stuff, Caucasus insurgency. This comparison tells everything IMHO. And [7] (continuing an obscure article created by one of HanzoHattori's socks) makes it 100% clear. Can you please block him? Offliner (talk) 09:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

• I have blocked the sockpuppet Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

• News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive

• In the news: Amazon "shopping-enabling" Wikipedia; Al Jazeera interview; be like Wikipedia

• GLAM-WIKI London: British Museum hosts two days of talks between Wikimedia and the cultural sector

• WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak

• WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup

• Features and admins: Birds and insects

• Arbitration report: New case: World War II

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Dispute mediation

Hello, Alex.

I am currently engaged in a rather unpleasant dispute with User:Gmw112252 over the reversion of unencyclopaedic material from the page Ukrainische Hilfspolizei. This user has ignored polite requests from me to revise what was written, but flatly and uncivilly refused, preferring instead to edit-war. He also displays a strong battlefield mentality and never assumes good faith, denouncing those that disagree with him as part of some Ukrainian Holocaust-revisionism conspiracy. Since you are as yet uninvolved, I ask you to please help here.

Regards,
Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 23:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

• I have blocked the guy for 31h for violation of 3RR rule and tedious editing. I will write some encouragement to edit cooperatively but I am not sure he will hear me Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:27, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. The situation was becoming an impossible one. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk)

WP:WPSCHOOLS

Hi Alex. Schools is a vast project but at the moment in spite of over 300 members, I appear to be the only caretaker. I urgently need to track all newly arriving school articles. All the articles that arrive are generally uncategorised, unstubbed, and have no project templates on the talk page. I am only able to catch new pages by accident. I've looked at your AlexBot system, but I know nothing about regular expressions. Would you be able to you set this up for me? I could tell you the specific key words and I can create the destination page. I hope you can help. --Kudpung (talk) 07:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Deletions

Hi, Alex. Woland1234 deleted the relevant categories and assertions from the articles:

1. deleted Category:Phenomenologists from the article about the director of the Institute of Phenomenological Studies;
2. deleted Category:Libertarian socialist organisations from the article Zapatista Army of National Liberation;
3. deleted the assertion that Frantz Fanon was considered an important existentialist; this assertion was confirmed by source;
4. deleted Category:Existentialists from the article Frantz Fanon;
5. and so on and so forth.

I think Woland1234 deserves something special.Psychiatrick (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

• It looks to me as a content dispute on the matters there I am not sufficiently competent to separate trolling from constructive editing. Maybe you could engage him into talkpage discussions so he could explain his reasons? Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:32, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
  • I asked Woland1234 my question but did not get any reply. However, I have further information on Woland1234. Psychiatrick (talk) 14:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

• News and notes: Wikipedia articles expert-reviewed by Encyclopedia of Life, and more

• In the news: Confusion about Wikileaks continues, Wikipedia vs. Britannica in India, and more

• Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Election report: The community has spoken

• Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

• News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief

• In the news: Faulty story urges for advertising on Wikipedia; brief news

• Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland

• Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?

• WikiProject report: Majestic Titans

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Help on Article of a "Start: WikiProject Zoo"

Hi, I would like to collaborate to give more information and sub-articles to complement the entry for Africam Safari: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africam_Safari

We could give better content, photos and improve the article given of the valuable history and information of the park.

Here´s the website with more details: http://africamsafari.com.mx/english/sobreafricam.php Also it´s important to mention and create a new article on the founder: http://africamsafari.com.mx/english/sobreafricam3.php

Could you help? Let me know how I could collaborate, my email is jagabriel@gmail.com

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.88.39 (talk) 13:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Avraham Shmulevich

As a contributor to this article (and to its previous AFD back in 2006), you may be interested to know I have renominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avraham Shmulevich (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 03:33, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

• Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting

• News and notes: Director of Technical Operations hired; South Korean mayor sues; brief news

• In the news: Designing Wikipedia and the origin of page histories; brief news

• WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

An appeal for NewArtBot

Please please consider setting the newartbot on the toolserver so that it may run on a daily basis if possible. That or allow another editor to run the bot in your absence. Your bot is one of the most important that runs on WP. It saves countless hours in having to chase down unassessed articles months later. For wp:ships we average at least 10 new articles per day; over 300 per month and your bot is a huge asset. Brad (talk) 07:55, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gurchenko.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gurchenko.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Iran Azeri Cartoon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iran Azeri Cartoon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Addihockey10^e-mail 20:55, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Poland new articles updates failed?

I wonder... I hope my recent edits to that page have not broken anything? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Alex Bakharev/Archive26! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Problem with New Article Bot

I was going through the archives of your bot's output at User:AlexNewArtBot/NRHPSearchResult today, tagging articles for our project when I noticed that the archives are massive... so massive in fact that they exceed the post-expansion transclude size limit by a large amount. I thought it might just be an NRHP issue, but looking through Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded, it seems to be a widespread problem. Perhaps you should lower the limit on the size of these archives? I've fixed the NRHP ones, which resulted in filling up the then current archive3 and overflowing into a new archive4. In archives 1 and 2, I had to reduce the overall size of the page from 100K+ down to about 85K. I would suggest that if you judge the limit of these archive pages by size alone that you reduce the number from 100K to 80K to fix the problem. What is to be done about all the archives that are already affected remains unanswered. I was just bringing this to your attention. Thanks for the awesome bot!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

• 2010 in review: Review of the year

• News and notes: Record fundraiser celebrated and debated; Board-appointed Trustees; brief news

• In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news

• WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux

• Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year

• Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Serebryakova Harvest 1915.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Serebryakova Harvest 1915.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Brasova.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brasova.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

About NewArtBot

Hi Alex. I hope you are enjoying your vacation. I wanted to ask if NewArtBot can be adjusted so it always runs through the entire list of Projects? I think it fairly often stops before it gets to WikiProject Gastropods so we get no results. Currently we have not had any results since Dec 22nd. I rely on the results of your bot, not only so that I can fix up new gastropod articles and add them to the project but also so that I can identify new users and invite them to join the project. I would also endorse User:Brad's suggestion that it would be wonderful to have the bot run every day if at all possible. MAny thanks for your bot, Invertzoo (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Alex it does appear that the boot is suffering from common delays (User_talk:AlexNewArtBot). Could you either improve the automation, or consider giving some other editors controls so they can make it run on schedule? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

• News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news

• In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project

• WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways

• Features and admins: Featured topic of the year

• Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

New Years Message for WikiProject United States

With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Serebryakova Lit By The Sun.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Serebryakova Lit By The Sun.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 19:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Serebryakova CardHause.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Serebryakova CardHause.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 19:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:RTS2

A tag has been placed on Template:RTS2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

• News and notes: Anniversary celebrations; Foundation reports; local language problems; brief news

• In the news: Anniversary coverage continues; Thai government translates Wikipedia; brief news

• Sister projects: Upcoming steward elections, and a retrospective on stewards' work in 2010

• WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket

• Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons

• Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case

• Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Konchalovsky self.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Konchalovsky self.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Konchalovsky Alex Tolstoy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Konchalovsky Alex Tolstoy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Kryakutnoy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kryakutnoy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 13:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

• News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news

• In the news: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited; Wikipedia still failing to fail; brief news

• WikiXDC: Wikipedians celebrate anniversary with US National Archives in Washington, D.C.

• WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more

• Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

• News and notes: Executive Director travels; DMCA takedowns; fellowship clarifications; brief news

• In the news: Facebook hack; gender gap; What is the Wikipedia "community"?; brief news

• The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books

• WikiProject report: WikiWarriors

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

• News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief

• In the news: Wikipedia controversies about Mormon topics examined; brief news

• Gender gap: Widespread discussions about the low participation of women in Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Mikhail Kalinin

I see your revert, but do you have a page number for this bizzare defector claim about Kalinin [8]? IMHO, this isn't the kind of content most appropriate for encyclopedia, but it should definitely be removed if it can't be properly referenced anyway. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Kaveh Farrokh

Hi, There is a BLP issue and an RFC in here about Kaveh Farrokh. Regards, *** in fact *** ( contact ) 07:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot for psychology articles ?

any chance you could set up User:AlexNewArtBot to look for new psychology articles ? thanks. --Penbat (talk) 08:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

• News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news

• In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news

• Accreditation: Gaining accreditation as Wikimedia photographers at sports events

• WikiProject report: Articles for Creation

• Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought

• Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Our city

Hi, Alex!

I was pleasantly surprised to meet somebody from a known city working mostly for en-wiki. It's great that you find time to keep your keen eye at its history, and I fully agree with your comment upon some input of the recent user from L. A..

I reverted undid the latter edit he made after you, however I cannot but agree with one of your userboxes saying edit/revert wars are disruptive whatever warfare is used. Yet something is to be done. Taking your memo

the phrase is too long and of dubious historical correctness. The city was certainly build by civilians

— Alex Bakharev, the forementioned diff

as a starting point, I consider verifiable facts to be the most powerful 'weapons'. Passing to this statement:

The city was built by conscripted peasants from all over Russia; a certain part of Swedish prisoners of war were also involved in some years

— Petersburg

How do you think, what about adding there some exact figures of conscripted peasants from the reliable encyclopedic sources? (I may do that). In this light even the statement "certain" about 'Swedish prisoners' shall look more than a hyperbole.

Generally the whole Swedish source exaggerates the role of their "POWs" in the construction of Petersburg. It seems to be biased and thus unreliable. It becomes obvious if one shall take POW figures for the northern campaigns of Great Northern War (sending Swedes on foot to Petersburg from Poltava looks ridiculous). Comparing them to tens of thousands of peasants sent annually from continental Russia shall help to understand that even mentioning Swedish POWs among construction teams is nothing than a marginal POV-pushing.

All POWs need a strong guard 24 hours a day. Where to jail them? Peter and Paul Fortress is under construction — be that as it may, but in any way aliens can not be allowed to approach such strategic objects! Otherwise next campaign they shall be the main assault consultants to Charles XII :))). It would be a great thing synergizing our efforts to find a compromise solution to improve this important article. — Best regards, Cherurbino (talk) 08:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

P.S. See my 6,447 byte gift here. — Cherurbino (talk) 08:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Alex Bakharev. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

SA ru (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

KeepLocal image template

Hi Alex, I'm writing to everyone who commented (for or against) on the last deletion debate regarding the Keeplocal image template. This has been proposed for deletion again, and your input would be welcome. See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_February_20#Template:KeepLocal. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 22:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Newsweek preved.jpg

Hey, could you possibly clean up the rationale on this image/remove it from articles as appropriate? As I'm sure you're aware, each usage requires a separate, specific rationale, explaining what the image shows, why that needs to be shown and why that could not be shown without the use of non-free content. Template:Non-free use rationale may be useful. J Milburn (talk) 23:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

• News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news

• In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news

• Versailles: Six-month residence in the Palace of Versailles for a Wikimedian

• WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

re Alexander Ivanovich Galich

Thanks for your cleanup work on this article! Herostratus (talk) 15:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Close To Home (Band)

I was interested in making an article for the band Close To Home. You previously deleted the page when the band had no albums and little fans. The band now has 1 LP, an official music video, and Alternative press magazine put them in to top 100 bands to watch. I believe their noteworthy enough now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordan199311 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

• I concur, the band appears to be notable enough Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

• News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news

• In the news: Egypt and Jordan likely candidates for Wikimedia office; Sanger interview; brief news

• Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times

• WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases

• Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Stalingrad

Thank you for protecting the article. In connection to that, and taking into account that it is being persistently vandalised by various IPs, could you please keep an eye on it? This article has been semiprotected for several times, but admins seem to remove semiprotection after some period, which, imo, is not correct, because the article is very popular among vandals.
Regards, --Paul Siebert (talk) 03:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

• Admins are understandably hesitant over long semiprotections: they want new users to be able to be able to edit most of the articles.I have made it a patrolled revision for the new users indefinitely. Thus, the crap will be less visible. I will keep it semiprotected for a while so the vandals could settle a little Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

good idea. Thanks. --Paul Siebert (talk) 06:35, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

re Millionnaya Street

Yes, thank you for that correction (Миллионная улица = Millionaires Street). Everything in the context told me it should be "Millionaires", not "Millionth", but my dictionary stubbornly insisted on "Millionth", and I don't usually have the confidence to gainsay my dictionary.

By the way, I just finished translating Barbara Bakhmetev. An odd article, and in some ways a poor article - many statements need inline references, for one thing - but such a sad story, and just what one would expect to find in the background of a great Romantic poet.

One thing about the article is bothering me, though. At the end of the article, there is material saying basically "See how Lermontov often describes a dark-eyed blond woman, clearly this is Bakhmetev", and clearly блондинка = blonde. Yet the portraits we have of Bakhmetev show her as dark-haired. I can't understand or explain this, and I considered excluding most of the last part of the section Barbara Bakhmetev#Barbara Lopuchin in the works of Lermontov, beginning at "Lermontov's description of his female characters..." Maybe I should. But it's in the original article, and perhaps I am missing something... Herostratus (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Письмо

Я написал Вам письмо. Laargo (talk) 11:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Вы ознакомились с написанным? Laargo (talk) 12:37, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:20, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

• News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news

• In the news: "Truth in Numbers?" interview; 94% women; Google algorithm update; brief news

• Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community

• WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

• News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news

• In the news: Paying US$1,000 to correct a Wikipedia error; brief news

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem

• Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news

• Editcountitis: Report on Editcountitis. 27% of all edits have been done by just 4,000 editors

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot/AssociationFootballSearchResult

That's wrong with it? Half of the bottom page is "# Template:La by Template:User started at ...". Can it be fixed? And also why it shows only link (not the content) when using {{User:AlexNewArtBot/AssociationFootballSearchResult}}? Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

• News and notes: NPG copyright irony; Citizendium's finances; Credo accounts donated; brief news

• In the news: Ward Cunningham's rich child; Indian donations; data mining Wikipedia; brief news

• WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine

• Features and admins: Best of the week

• Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases

• Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Помогите мне, пожалуйста!

Здравствуйте!

Я Алексей Табович.

Я перевожу вход:

• Русский: Щукино
• Английский / English: Shchukino
• Китайский / 中文: 休金諾鎮

• Русский: Улица Маршала Конева
• Английский / English: Marshal Konev Street
• Китайский / 中文: 科涅夫元帥街

Китайский раздел был завершен, однако, Английский раздел не завершен.

Потому что я не могу создать страницу в Английской Википедии.

Можете ли вы помочь мне перейти эту страницу к Marshal Konev Street?

Спасиба!

-- Августу (Русский-English-中文) 03:00, 17 Марта 2011 (UTC-5)

Страница:

Shchukino

Shchukino (Район Щукино), the Town in the North-Western Administrative Okrug, Moscow, Soviet Union. South on Район Покровское-Стрешнево (Pokrovskoye-Streshnevo), East on Район Строгино (Strogino), North on Район Хорошёво-Мнёвники (Khoroshevo-Mnevniki), and West on the boundary between North-Western Administrative Okrug and Northern Administrative Okrug.

Shchukino was governed by the North-Western Administrative Okrug since 1988.

The name

In 1415, Василий I (Vasily I), the Grand Duchy of Moscow built a village in the east on Moscow River -- Щукино. In order to his son was born (this boy just is Василий II (Vasily I), the Grand Duchy of Moscow).

Shchukino began the District of the City since 1918, the KPSU implemented a new policy in this year.

The Tree of the Administration

The Administration about the Shchukino:

СССР USSR

Москва Moscow

Северо-Западны North-Western

Щукино Shchukino

Street

• Улица Ма́ршала Ко́нева (Marshal Konev Street), Another name of this street is: “Улица Министра (The Minister Street)”, because the all Ministers of the Government of Brezhnev lived in this street.

History

See

• Soviet Union
• Moscow
• North-Western

Marshal Konev Street

Marshal Konev Street (Улица Ма́ршала Ко́нева), the Street in the Schukino, North-Western Administrative Okrug, Moscow, Soviet Union. The direction is from west to east, East on Улица Расплетина (Raspletin Street), West on 1-й Волоколамский проезд (1st Volokolamskiy Avenue).

The name

In 1973, In order to remember Иван Степанович Конев (Ivan Stepanovich Konev), the Marshal of the Army of Soviet Union, the Soviet Government merged 2-й Волоколамский проезд (2nd Volokolamskiy Avenue) and 3-й Улица Октябрьского Поля (3rd October Fields Street), the new street named Улица Ма́ршала Ко́нева (Marshal Konev Street).

The Tree of the Administration

The Administration about the Marshal Konev Street:

СССР USSR

Москва Moscow

Северо-Западны North-Western

Щукино Shchukino

Улица Маршала Конева Marshal Konev Street

Others

Another name of Улица Ма́ршала Ко́нева (Marshal Konev Street) is: “Улица Министра (The Minister Street)”, because the all Ministers of the Government of Brezhnev lived in this street.

See

• Soviet union
• Moscow
• North-Western
• Schukino
• Konev

The Bot

Hi Alex, maybe you are away again? The bot has not given Project Gastropods any new results for the last 7 days, and I miss the results very much. Hope you come back soon or can fix this from wherever you are... Best to you, Invertzoo (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm seeing the same issue with Canada Roads. Sometime the results also disappear entirely for a day. Is it at all possible for the bot to run daily (if it's not set to do so already)? - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 15:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the machine I used to run the bot on has died. I have a backup for the source code but reviving it will require some work as it is sensitive to the version of Perl and installed packages. I will fix it ASAP Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Good luck, it is very important work that the bot does.--Grahame (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Oh yes, so many of us really rely on the results from AlexNewArtBot. Thanks for anything you can do Alex. Invertzoo (talk) 01:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I wonder if it would be possible to run it on toolserv? The bot is quite vital for many wikiprojects, and I'd hope some other developers would be willing to offer you a hand if needed... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

• The User:AlexNewArtBot/IndiaSearchResult (WP:INNEW) is too off since March 21, Thanks!--Ekabhishek^talk 03:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, I'm really missing it. I'd be happy to help or take over the bot- I have bot experience and have been a perl guy for over a dozen years. (I bought Randal Schwarz a drink last summer; Ward Cunningham bought me a drink at the same time; unrelated, Larry Wall and I have had a similar experience with our corneas). I can either take the code privately or you can open-source it. tedder (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

What has happened to your bot?

What has happened to AlexNewArtBot? It hasn't updated the FinlandSearchResult page in over a month now. JIP | Talk 19:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

I see from previous comments that the computer the bot used to run on has died. Sorry for not spotting it earlier. What is the situation with the bot? JIP | Talk 19:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Alex isn't replying here, and I haven't heard back on an email I sent through Wikipedia to him. I might start reinventing the wheel. tedder (talk) 19:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Looks like it is working again!!!!! User:Stone --13:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I wrote the replacement bot from scratch, I'm just posting the results to Alex's userspace. tedder (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Archived your talk

Alex, I have archived some of your talk page to User_talk:Alex_Bakharev/Archive26 as your talk page was getting to be a massive kb hog. Hope you don't mind me having done this, I know I have had to slap you in the past to do this ;) --Russavia ^{I'm chanting as we speak} 14:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Taras Shevchenko — UA, RU or UA+RU?

Any men can be any nationality and simultaneously as bright figure of some activity.
E. g., Marc Chagall is Jewish artist or Russian-French? Yes, he is Jewish by born, but RUSSIAN and FRENCH artist as the figure of arts! (Давайте происхождение и область деятельности разделять, как мухи и котлеты!) Shevchenko created in Russian much. That's why I'll undo your undo. --= APh =-- (talk) 00:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)