I, Mike H, hereby award you this Working Man's Barnstar, in commemoration of your much-appreciated work on "years in television". So many people would be uninterested in such work but you seem to enjoy it; you also did all your additions and cleanups without being asked, which I find commendable.
I, Darwinek, hereby award you this beautiful barnstar for your tireless work on the Russian administrative divisions and towns. Your hard work in this area helps keep it clear and consistent. Darwinek 14:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For your great help in correcting all of the Nordic skiers of both Russia and the Soviet Union, I award the Hero of Soviet Union medal as an offer of thanks. Chris 14:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
For your patient, detailed and courteous replies on talk pages, and diligently doing The Right Thing when correcting articles. --Amir E. Aharoni 15:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
For being extremely friendly and helpful in all interactions with me and others. Offliner (talk) 15:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 
The most prestigious award a wikipedian can get. I rarely give out an award of this prestigious nature, especially as I am supposed to be hiding in the Himalayas and discarding the notion of material gain, but your recent commands to help me on my planned evil mission as Dr. Blofeld have not only given you a permanent place with SPECTRE (and a salary of trillions of yen) but an award to cherish for a lifetime. If you continue with this level of programming excellence and helpfullness you may even be promoted to number two, providing you wear the appropriate eye patch and grey nehru suit and polo neck jumper and get a tan like Emilio Largo. Thankyou. (Dr. Blofeld)
For the joy and fun of interacting with you. GreyHoodTalk 19:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC) 
For your helpfulness, reasonable and cold mind, hard-working and good-spirited character! Establishing the infrastructure for fifteen task forces in a short while is a great achievement! GreyHoodTalk 02:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 
For all of your hard work setting up pages of place names with the same name! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC) 
for your long-time work at WikiProject Russia and on the related articles. You have managed do perform large-scale improvements of content and standardisation within the project area almost single-handedly and you have always been a voice of reason in the discussions. Nanobear (talk) 00:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
For your excellent prolific quality edits on Russian articles. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
You commented on my talk saying that I should be criticizing Russians, if I say that Russians should not be allowed to criticize Ukrainians. Well telll your Russians colleagues to stop setting my spelling edits back to the wrong spelling of Kyiv, and I will stop my criticisms of Russians.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmhrycak (talk • contribs)
I dont know you nor have I interacted with you in any way that I am aware of, however since you invited criticism I thought you should know that your hedgehog looks stoned.
I wonder why you have deleted a link to "PEREVODOV-Omsk" company from the English version of the page about Omsk. Also, we would like to add some links about Omsk sights and landmarks. Will you delete them as well, mister?
I'm well aware of it. Troikas also operated on legal grounds, you know. When something is morally wrong, it's wrong no matter how many policies the "community" devises to make it look pretty. It's not about this particular case, by the way, it's about principles. I'd oppose a "community ban" of anyone.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 9, 2011; 16:36 (UTC)
Good answer. I guess I still have some feelings about ABD I need to work out. To return to your analogy, picking the kid up, giving him a swirly, and throwing locking him in the dumpster behind the cafeteria might be disgusting, but it would also be satisfying and in this case, overdue. Sometimes principle gives way to expedience. Dlohcierekim 16:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
In such matters, I'm not a fan of expedience. Lives may not be at stake here, but such hasty actions are still ignoble, base, cruel, dastardly, and overall despicable. Call me a snob, if you want, but I'd rather like to think that my fellow editors are better than that.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 9, 2011; 17:41 (UTC)
Actually, one doesn't need to be a specialist to blank the values of all parameters one can't fill out or verify :) The infobox was highly misleading because most its parameters were wrong, I had no time to correct them, and having an infobox in a stub consisting of a single line somehow feels like an overkill, so it was simpler just to remove it altogether. The location (and maps)—the few useful features generated by an otherwise empty infobox—are easily accessible via the coordinates. Anyway, if having an infobox on that particular stub is important to you, please let me know and I'll make sure set aside a moment to research and add one. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 28, 2013; 22:25 (UTC)
Worst parts of Russian and American besserwisserism. Iivarius (talk) 09:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ezhiki.