Talk:South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 20:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  

QPQ:   - in progress
Overall:   Interesting hook, and everything looks to be in order. Just waiting on QPQ. (Sidenote: I ought to watch more cricket.) MSG17 (talk) 23:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Passed MSG17 (talk) 13:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:South Africa women's cricket team in England in 2018/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • " 9 – 15 June 2018" should be unspaced. Might be the template, but that needs to be addressed.
    • Yeah, it's the template. I need to look at some coding in other templates to see how to make this work. I'll come back on this one later. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
      • Okay, worked this out and fixed now. Harrias (he/him) • talk 10:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Venue table could use row and col scopes.
    • Yeah. Any thoughts on that? I'm not even convinced that I like the table: I added it on a whim to see if it seemed useful. I sort of think it is, and sort of think it isn't. I can't see any realistic way to make it accessible (which isn't actually a GA requirement, but I would prefer to if possible.) Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • And the map image needs a caption explaining what we're seeing, people unfamiliar with the geography of the UK may not even realise what they're looking at.
  • "their tour of England" I would reinforce the subject in this opening para, and say "their 2018 tour of England"
  • "May: omitting" strange tense after a colon, perhaps replace with a comma.
  • Link wicket-keeper.
  • "Brits was suggested" by whom?
  • "Syd Egan's preview" who is he and why is his opinion noteworthy?
    • Expanded this slightly to provide more context. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "14 player squad" 14-player
  • "The first match was .." I'm not sure you've explained/linked WODI in the main body (you did in the lead) so here would be a good chance to do that.
  • "played at New Road, Worcester" could add the date here too in the prose (and for each subsequent match).
  • "first bowling change" what style of bowling?
    • Is this necessary? I don't think the article notes what style of bowling any of the players have? Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Suné Luus is missing a diacritic here.
  • "and Suné Luus inside" linked in the previous para (see point preceding).
    • Nice spot for this pair. I missed the first, and the duplicate detector didn't flag it up because they were different! Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "be caught out by" this means different things to different people, perhaps just "caught" or "caught off the bowling of..."?
    • Removed "out", how is that? (So to speak.) Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "two balls later" repetitive "balls", maybe deliviries.
  • Should link Century (cricket) in both lead and here.
    • Gah, I though I'd got all the jargon! Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "were losing regular" regularly losing...
  • "hit the wickets" do you mean stumps?
    • They're the ones, changed. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "also out , stumped" remove first space before comma.
  • "were unable to add much to the" did not add
  • Notes b and c are fragments so do not need full stops.
  • Ref 4: SHOUTING.
    • Changed to Title Case. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "2017–20 ICC Women's Championship" usage throughout should be "2017–2020 ICC Women's Championship" as MOS has changed a while back for year ranges.
    • All uses in the article already matched that. Changed the navbox, but I haven't touched the category, which is beyond the purview of the article anyway. (I'll get to it, but categories are a pain...) Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's all I have. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 08:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Cheers, replies above. First couple are outstanding as described. Harrias (he/him) • talk 09:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
I think, having added col scopes, and given the images have alt and there's now a label for the map (which I added with the scopes), it's as good as it can be for what it is, and as you say, not GA criterion in any case, so I'm good to go with this. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:28, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

BBC match reports edit

Hi. For info, I found the match reports from the BBC:

Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply