Talk:Jif (lemon juice)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Northamerica1000 in topic GA Review
Good articleJif (lemon juice) has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 5, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 4, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the lemon-shaped container for Jif lemon juice was one of the first blow moulded polythene containers used for food applications?

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 15:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Engvar edit

As Jif seems to be marketed only in the UK and Ireland, should the article not use British English? Optimist on the run (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes. I will copy edit the article to remedy this. North America1000 14:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks - I've updated today's DYK hook to "blow-moulded". Very interesting article BTW. Optimist on the run (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jif (lemon juice). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jif (lemon juice)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 01:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

  • You may add a logo if you desire, but can see both ways if it's necessary or not: since it is easily visible in the picture included of the Jif lemon, you can see the logo, but I don't know if you want to have an independent image or not; it's up to you
A logo is difficult to find on the Unilever website (I remember looking before). There is a document in PDF format available on the site, but the logo is not very visible, and the images are too blurry. North America1000 06:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, like I said, the included image is pretty self-explanatory. Carbrera (talk) 06:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • You can remove the unneeded parameters:
  • Discontinued
  • Related
  • Trademarkregistrations
  • Ambassadors
  • Tagline
  • Website
  • Module
  • Module1
  • However, since you mention in the lead below that the US company "Borden" introduced "similarly-shaped plastic lemon containers", you could probably add it to the "related" parameter
  • Similarly, is there a "Jif" website? If so, add it to the "website" parameter
  • I checked and could not find a "Jif" website so ignore the following suggestion. Carbrera (talk) 06:18, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
The above have all been done, except that I left the website parameter in place, just in case Unilever ever creates a website or webpage about the brand. That way, another user could then add it, even if it's years later. North America1000 06:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • The statement "Unilever acquired the Jif brand in 1995 for £250m, when it purchased Colman's of Norwich." looks a bit misplaced since it is a singular statement, does it even need mention here?
I have integrated this information into the Jif brand section. North America1000 06:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Packaging edit

  • The final statement regarding the "World War II" mention could be added to the paragraph above it
I prefer it as a standalone paragraph, because the previous paragraph is about the development and production of the packaging, whereas the third paragraph is about the potential of similar packaging. North America1000 06:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

History edit

1970s edit

  • Is this short statement even necessary? If so, I'd perhaps add on to to it?
I have moved the sentence to the Jif brand section of the article. North America1000 06:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

See also edit

  • Definitely add "Borden" to this list please
This may be too vague of a link. Borden used to own the brand, but it's now owned by Dr Pepper Snapple Group. ReaLemon is already linked, which includes information about Borden in it. North America1000 06:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
My bad! Carbrera (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

End of GA Review: edit

Definitely one of my smallest reviews ever, likely due to the fact that this article is fantastically written, and contains details that are worded well and with spot-on accuracy. I will place it on hold for seven days and feel free to ping with me with further questions or once you have completed any changes. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 04:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC).Reply

As you have likely noticed, I haven't done much since this review so I've been paying attention to your edits. I would be happy to pass this article and will do so now. Great work as always! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 06:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC).Reply
@Northamerica1000: Is where I placed it here correct? Please change it if so. Thanks! Carbrera (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Carbrera: I moved the entry to the Food section on the page (diff), because it's not a company, but rather is a brand of a food product. Also, Thanks for the very timely review. You were already responding here right after I began work addressing your points! Thanks again, and keep in touch. North America1000 06:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply