Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brands

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Brands page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

(Rated Project-class)

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Project	This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4

Sections older than 120 days days may be automatically archived by .

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!Edit

Hello,
Please note that Google, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
_{Delivered by — MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team}

The picture of a another Camera, a Zeiss Ikon is very misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:82CF:1800:84:70DA:FFEE:7C85 (talk) 11:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sourcesEdit

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Waldorf–Astoria (1893–1929)Edit

Should Waldorf–Astoria (1893–1929) have a dash or a hyphen? Comment at Talk:Waldorf–Astoria (1893–1929)#Shouldn't it be hyphen?. GA-RT-22 (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)