User talk:Zoe Trent Fan/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, LPS and MLP Fan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: I had checked Wikipedia:Vandalism, but I did not see exactly where the content in my essay appears in that policy. Can you clarify, and maybe review my other draft? Thank you. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 00:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Children of Willesden Lane (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

@Theroadislong: What do you mean that it has been covered by WP:Vandalism? I cannot find anything my essay covers in there. Can I just instead move this to my user space? Please tell me how. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 14:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

you can click on the link "more" and choose "move". Theroadislong (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else. Thanks! Whispering^(t) 18:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi there. Just thought I'd drop by and politely ask if you had considered how hard your signature might be for some users to read unless they've got perfect vision? Your old one of white text on dark purple was so much easier to read than your current one of light purple on dark purple. I'm not suggesting you're doing anything wrong - just that you might want to think about it how it now looks to others, especially with all your current helpful posts at the Teahouse. Kind regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 21:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

My draft page

Please reply me on the teahouse question. Radioactive Uranium, 92 (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC) @Radioactive Uranium, 92: I did reply to you. Go check the Teahouse for my reply. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 14:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@LPS and MLP Fan: I didn't see your reply. Maybe you didn't check my reply instead. Radioactive Uranium, 92 (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jenkem, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Auric talk 15:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:9 Months That Made You

Hello, LPS and MLP Fan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "9 Months That Made You".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Pings and Teahouse

Hello LPS and MLP Fan,

I love that your helping out at the Teahouse, but there is one thing I would like to do differently, when you answer questions at the Teahouse, please make sure that you are pinging the person that asked the question and leave a talkback message on their talk page. This indicates that questioners that their question has been answered at the Teahouse. Please let me know if you have any further questions and I will be happy to help. :-)

Many thanks, Interstellarity (talk) 21:07, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar!!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 14:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

@Path slopu: Thank you so much! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 19:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for your prompt and kind help. Hello-Mary-H (talk) 22:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trent (name) (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trent (name) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trent (name), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, LPS and MLP Fan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Climate change?

So on a TALK page (not the page mind you) a comment regarding an issue of language usage (consensus) with respect to science, is to be censored? Really? And why are you the censor? I thought Wikipedia was an egalitarian contribution? No? Are you a paid employee? Please explain. Because this makes no sense at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.210.138.199 (talk) 01:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@32.210.138.199: Well, first, I am not a paid editor. Second, McSly replied to you saying your edits have been answered in the FAQ you can read at the top of the page. You can try again, and I won't revert you this time. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 14:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

yes IP, you were able to ask your question. That question happened to be common enough that it was added to the FAQ for the page. Question 5 specifically addresses it. You can see the FAQ at the top of the article talk page or in full here. So any problem you may have had is now completely resolved and your question has been answered. --McSly (talk) 14:59, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trent (name) has been accepted

Trent (name), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 23:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Keep up the great anti-vandalism work! You are very persistent in attacking bad faith editing, and such dedication should be rewarded. :) KingofGangsters (talk) 04:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

hi , have a kitten:)

Coolabahapple (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane

hi LPS and MLP Fan have stumbled across your declined Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane (via your "support" at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Girth Summit of all things!), i reckon the book is wikinotable for an article, and note that you have added some more info since the 12 August decline. Anyway, here are some notes/suggests that should bolster its wikiarticleness:

• "Publication history" (place between "Plot" and "Reception"), i note that it was orignally published in 2002 - WorldCat details here, with a children's edition published in 2017 - WorldCat details here, i use this format:

year, country, publisher, pages ISBN (use Template:ISBN) (any extra info in brackets ie. "Children's edition")

• "Reception": Common Sense Media (CSM) review is ok (yes i reckon its a "review" ie. "A book review is a form of literary criticism in which a book is merely described (summary review) or analyzed based on content, style, and merit." - from Book review, with its "What Parents Need to Know", "Whats the Story?", "Is It Any Good?", and "Talk To Your Kids About..." sections, i do however, agree that there needs to be more reviews to show that the book meets WP:NBOOK, like the following: BookTrust - here, Publishers Weekly - here, Reading Time - here, Jewish Book Council - here, and from the Chicago Tribune - that its being used as a teaching tool,
• "Awards" - i have amended info about the SBA to reflect more accurately ie. it is a SBA notable book.
• "Adaptions" add that The Hollywood Reporter - states BBC Films has the film rights,
• have added a new york times review reference to the play, incidently with all the other reviews around ie. here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here (need subscription), mentions sell out runs here, here (need subscription), here, here (phew! think thats enough:)), it could have its own standalone wikiarticle,
• "References" need more information ie. author, title, date, website, plus accessdate if it has a url, otherwise a reference error will appear, the common sense media reference under reception is a good example (i have added an accessate based on the draft edit history),
• talkpage: have added some appropriate projects, i reckon the more the merrier as this may/will(?) attract editors interested/knowledgeable in the subject (although whenever i do this, i check each project scope to ensure article is indeed covered:)).

sorry, i may have gotten carried away but hope that these suggestions help. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC) @Coolabahapple: Thanks for the kitten earlier and this! I will be sure to add them later. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 15:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Help on my Signature!

Hello, I am quite new on Wikipedia, and I was hoping that you would help me with helping prevent vandalism, but the question I am asking is, how do I make a cool signature? ActualJoe (talk) 14:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello ActualJoe! I would like to help you prevent vandalism! To answer your question, you can customize your signature in your preferences. Try to use hex codes you can copy and paste from online. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 18:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Children of Willesden Lane (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello, LPS and MLP Fan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 02:26, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello LPS and MLP Fan: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Everedux ^(talk) 18:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Help on adding/removing details and citing sources

Hi LPS and MLP Fan, thank you for adopting me! I hope you're doing well. This is the first time I will consult you for a concern. I have four articles that are flagged with multiple issues due to details and sources. The articles are listed below. I admit that the first 3 have the same source because I did not have the time to fetch news links, but the last one has multiple sources from different news outlets. May I have your feedback regarding this? Thank you!

• UNTV Cup Season 5
• UNTV Cup Season 6
• UNTV Cup Season 7
• UNTV Cup Season 8

elivic (talk) 17:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Dealing with vandalism reverted by someone else, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

	Teahouse Barnstar
	Thank you for helping in the teahouse, it helped a lot. Thanks you! 194.75.231.3 (talk) 11:50, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Can you take a look at....

Hi LPS and MLP Fan, you may have more expertise in this area. Can you take a look at SuperSmashUltimate567's contributions? They are mostly adding genders to animated characters. I have reverted many as unsourced but would like another eye. Thanks. S0091 (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello S0091. I took a look at the editors contributions, and it appears that most are made in good-faith. However, some of the contributions, while not necessarily helpful, are not necessary. I suggest that you carefully reevaluate the user's contributions. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 00:21, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. That's the direction I needed. S0091 (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@S0091: You are welcome. PS: Keep fighting vandalism! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 00:26, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Fighting vandalism and the like can taint one's view on occasion which is why getting another pair of eyes is helpful. Thanks again. :) S0091 (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

What the hell?

You can't see this edit any longer, because I was obliged to oversight it, but the content you restored was a) blatant defamation of the worst kind and b) not in any way supported by the sources - did you even bother to check them? Please be more careful in future. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

New Adoption for Huntington family page

I don't know how to accept your adoption for our Huntington Family page. We are posting here because we do not know How To Do This. We have an Editor who is Vandalizing our Huntington family page and want to submit to 3rd Party Opinion and have gathered our Source Materials. We are going to request this Editor be Blocked from the Huntington family page after we have reinstated deleted sections, sources and photographs have it Salt Locked. We would like your Help with this. Thank You jjjheart — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjjheart (talk • contribs) 16:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Children of Willesden Lane has been accepted

The Children of Willesden Lane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear LPS and MLP Fan,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:09, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Newsela concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Newsela, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Zoe Trent Fan/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Newsela has been accepted

Newsela, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 00:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Zoe Trent Fan/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Adoption request

Hello, my name is Pink Saffron. I am a relatively new editor on Wikipedia, and I would be glad if you could adopt me. Pink Saffron (talk) 03:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Pink Saffron: Hello there. I'm willing to do so! After exploring various things on Wikipedia, I come to realize that fighting vandalism on Wikipedia is my best ability on here. Because of this, I can teach you how to do so. I also had some experience writing articles on the encyclopedia. Anyway, let me know if I can help you any more. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 20:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Wikipedia mini globe handheld

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Seeking Adoption

Hello! Can you please adopt me? ♠Devan Lallu ^Talk 07:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Devan Lallu: Sorry I didn't reply immediately, but I personally decided to stop taking on adoptions, as I haven't been interacting with the people I have adopted. I signed up to adopt others because I was curious about it, and wanted to try anything. However, I realized that my true calling lies within another field, fighting vandalism on Wikipedia (I actually recommend doing that on here). I hope you understand that I think it's in my best interests to stick to what I do best, and I'm sure you can find someone else to adopt you. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 16:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your work keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism. Avitus27 (talk) 17:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Avitus27 (talk) 17:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Reverting vandals

07:19, 11 August 2021‎ LPS and MLP Fan talk contribs‎ m 17,834 bytes −2‎ Reverted edits by 2A02:8440:3140:F326:A5D2:2886:A9A2:28ED (talk) to last version by Tbhotch rollback: 1 editundothank Tag: Rollback

Hi. After reverting a vandal, please always check their contributions. Quite often they frolick on several pages; some of them are with few watchers and may remain damaged for a long time. Lembit Staan (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I realize you have a ton of these already but I have to say I enjoy seeing you on duty doing counter vandalism. Your username always makes me happy and I wanted to wish you a very safe and happy day. Ifnord (talk) 15:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

I would like to second what Ifnord said. I've found myself consistently getting an edit conflict notice when cleaning up vandalism, only to notice that you already got there first. Keep up the great work! Chrisanthusjohn (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

A pie for you!

I would've given you a barnstar but since you already have a ton I decided to give you a pie! You are really fast at reverting vandalism! InterstateFive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 16:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

InterstateFive Thank you very much! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 16:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

New discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Emir Shane (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Body Modification

Hi, you recently undid my edit on the body modification article. The recent I'd removed much of the content was because I'd split the article between a list and the main article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notcharizard (talk • contribs) 01:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Notcharizard Hello, and thank you for reaching out to me. I apologize for reverting your edit. To avoid another situation like this in the future, I suggest using the edit summary. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 01:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll be sure to try and make my summary's more clear in future! ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 01:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Here's a beer on me! Thank you for thanking me on my reverts of vandalism. I hope to continue the good work :) Pulpfiction621 (talk) 22:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Cheers for you! You absolutely deserve those thanks. Let's keep up the great work! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 23:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Treats!

It's a pleasure to work alongside you! LizardJr8 (talk) 21:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Agreed! Thanks for the cookie! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

LizardJr8 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

A cupcake for you!

You deserve it for your valuable work in combating vandalism on Wikipedia. Happy editing! :) -Alabama- (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

@-Alabama-: Thanks a ton! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 22:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Mistake message

Hi You messaged me on the 18/5/22 saying that I had edited a document on the Christian Diet and I did not edit this, Just letting you know Thanks -user 77.75.244.3 (talk) 12:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@77.75.244.3: It's possible that your IP address is shared, so you did not make the edits. If that's the case, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 12:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	How the heck are you able to revert vandalism so quickly.... great job Kadermonkey the monkey (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Kadermonkey: Thanks for the barnstar! I use Rollback and patrol recent changes to seek and revert vandalism (and other kinds of unhelpful edits). --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rob Paulsen Filmography has been accepted

Rob Paulsen Filmography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

PK650 (talk) 06:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Split of Rob Paulsen article

I undid the WP:BOLD WP:SPLIT basically because the source article is too small to need sections moved to other articles. See WP:WHENSPLIT for guidelines on size splits. They go by readable prose and point to tools to use to determine that. If you still think a split is desirable for this article, start a discussion on the talk page to gain consensus. Also please look at WP:CWW for what is needed when you copy stuff from one article to another. It is a Wikipedia license requirement to retain attribution history in some way for all content. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for fighting transphobia, vaccine denial and conspracy theories! <3 Theo(talk) 21:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

@TheoCourt: Thanks for the barnstar! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 21:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Hot dry rock geothermal energy

An article that you have been involved in editing—Hot dry rock geothermal energy—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Nibbi loves tmkoc

Sonu is gold digger and tapu sena is unemployed Medjay to no pharoh (talk) 14:53, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

@Medjay to no pharoh: Honestly, I did not want to revert your edits because it wasn't clear if they constituted vandalism. However, this edit is clear-cut vandalism. Also, please be mindful of your edit summaries. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 15:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Cookies for you!!!

		Cookies!
		Hello LPS and MLP fan. You revert a lot of vandalism. Here are some cookies for you. I appreciate your work. Keep it up. Train and unicorn fan🦄🚆 talk 02:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

@Train and unicorn fan: Thank you! I also wish you a belated welcome! Perhaps you can help with the vandalism reverting by heading to Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 05:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Train and unicorn fan🦄🚆 talk 05:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	10,000 Edits
	Cheers! Victor Trevor (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

@Victor Trevor: Thanks! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 15:05, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Username report

Hi. That's not a username issue - that's vandalism. That board is only interested in dodgy usernames, ie if the name itself is problematic or disruptive. Secretlondon (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice

Hello, I'm not sure if you noticed but me, you and another admin have been harassed by an IP. Don't worry as the IP has been blocked for 1 week. If he continues I will suggest a rangeblock on him. Dinoz1 (chat?) 12:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

@Dinoz1: Thanks for the notice. My notifications have told me that I’ve been left messages, but they were reverted and revision-deleted, so I couldn’t see what was in them. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 12:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Yeah.. I asked an admin what was in them and I will get back to you soon. We were both most likely given different messages according to the bytes. But if he comes again, and you see their messages, don't feel discouraged. I assume its just some kid who has nothing better to do in his life. You're a very dedicated and wonderful editor! Dinoz1 (chat?) 12:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks again! You are just as wonderful, especially through your anti-vandalism work. No vandal's attacks can ever stop us from doing the right thing on here. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 13:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry to make the conversation go longer, but I looked into it and there's another IP that geolocates to the same area. I don't think any personal info was leaked and it was just basic harassment. Thanks! Dinoz1 (chat?) 13:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

No worries, and thanks again for the information. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 13:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for your speedy reverts on vandalism like on Tom Cotton! Your swift action is appreciated. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You do a lot of great work here, particularly in helping to defend the site from vandals. It's appreciated by countless users, even if they don't all let you know what a great job you're doing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

@Hey man im josh: Thanks so much! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 15:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Sneaky Barnstar

		The Sneaky Barnstar
		You have been awarded a barnstar for editing because it is 100% clear that your edits are amazing. (Seriously, you're so underrated! Keep up the amazing work). Dinoz1 (chat?) 15:28, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Sorry if this made you a little scared, atleast your edits are appreciated! Once again, thanks! Dinoz1 (chat?) 15:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@Dinoz1: That didn’t scare me, but that was a good one! Thanks for this unique barnstar! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 15:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm sure you've received this barnstar before, but I've seen your name around several times while patrolling recent changes. Excellent work on this and I look forward to seeing you around! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 20:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

@Spf121188: Thank you! --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 20:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Sport

Just so you know, the IP you reverted there is the permanently banned vandal WP:LTA/GRP. If you see his IPs add spam links anywhere, don't bother warning the IPs; they are open proxies. Just report the IPs to AIV. Thanks! JavaHurricane 08:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

@JavaHurricane: Thanks for the heads-up. --SunilNevlaFan✨ 14:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Happy Fourth First Edit Day!

Hey, SunilNevlaFan. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: Thank you so much! --SunilNevlaFan✨ 15:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Username

Hello, SunilNevlaFan,

I just noticed that you changed your username! It's like I'm getting to know a new person. I changed my name soonafter I started editing Wikipedia regularly. I hope you like it! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@Liz I'm enjoying the new name, but I'm going to change it again in the future. I didn't know that you changed your username early on; I think that's cool! SunilNevlaFan✨ 14:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		. Thank you so much for your anti-vandalism work! AGuy271 (talk) 22:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

@AGuy271 Sorry for not replying to you earlier; I was quite busy. Anyway, thank you for the barnstar! SunilNevlaFan✨ 14:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing SunilNevlaFan a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 17:15, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: Thanks so much! --SunilNevlaFan✨ 21:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

IP talk page disruptive edit

Please request the talkpage for page protect. I didn't understand how could they do nonsense edits even having range block. DMK-C5 (talk) 15:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

@DMK-C5 I reported the IP at WP:ANI earlier. I’m still waiting for an admin to revoke their talk page access. SunilNevlaFan✨ 15:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, it is necessary for TPA revoke since they have a range block already. DMK-C5 (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

 Thank you very much!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia and my talk page. ButterCashier (talk) 12:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC) ButterCashier (talk) 12:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@ButterCashier: You're welcome! Anti-vandals always have each other's backs. SunilNevlaFan✨ 14:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)