ButterCashier

Please see private reply left on message sent to me

Please see a private reply messaged to you. Thank you so much Tacoginger26 (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Study invitation

Hey ButterCashier, thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 12:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi. That sounds interesting, I'm not sure whether I will be available for ten days but perhaps. It's nice to know some such study is going on. Thank you for informing me. Also, if you're interested in fixing mistakes, you should probably be aware that headings on Wikipedia use sentence case. ButterCashier (talk) 07:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing me to the page about using sentence cases! I just fixed the heading. Meanwhile, we reduce the study period from 2 to 1 week, where people may choose to participate in any 5 out of the 7 days. I hope that helps! Tzusheng (talk) 00:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for doing your best to stop the racist vandal User:JannieJ148. I have blocked this troll. Cullen328 (talk) 08:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

My pleasure! Thanks for helping. When a user does editing that is clearly unencyclopedic, I have to at least warn them once before reporting them, I sort of wonder if it would be better to just report them for editing such as that but using Rollback, one has to warn to level four first. Anyway, thank you and happy editing! ButterCashier (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

The four level system of warnings is fine for routine "goofing off" vandalism, but swifter action is called for when dealing with an egregious matter like this. You can report it immediately to either WP:AIV or WP:ANI. In this particular case, I would have recommended ANI where you would have gotten an rapid response. The bottom line is that you did well in this case and I thank you for it. Cullen328 (talk) 17:44, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! You do much in reverting vandalism as well. ButterCashier (talk) 07:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Uniform civil code

Hello ButterCashier, a few minutes ago, you reverted some edits I made to the page uniform civil code. You wrote that the edits were non-constructive. Could you kindly provide further details or clarification on this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Ummertheone (talk) 09:23, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for editing! Having a look at the Uniform Civil Code page, I reverted edits from an IP user's edit, which I deemed did not add anything constructive to the article. The page reverted to the most previous edit prior to their involvement, which is your version of the page. Hence, I have not actually reverted your edits, but another user's. I hope this helps. ButterCashier (talk) 10:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Got it. Thank u 27.63.10.7 (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

I got it. Thank you. I made that last "got it. thank u" comment from my phone where I am not logged in, so it shows my IP. Thanks again. Ummertheone (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

You could have waited.

You should have waited atleast for a minute after I removed the content at Next Indian general election. Please see the edit now. It is supported with a reliable source. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for editing! Concerning your edits on the Next Indian general election page, I saw you had removed some information and thought it erroneous, thus reverted the edit. Perhaps this was judged too hastily, based on your subsequent work. If possible, it's generally better to finish the full edit in one go, using the preview to see how your edit affects the page, rather than use multiple edits, leaving the page incomplete during the process, to leave the page in a superior state. I apologise about the revert and hope we may both learn from this experience. ButterCashier (talk) 13:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

The page was edited heavily. That's why thought to edit it in part. Sure we all learn from each other. Cheers buddy! Shaan Sengupta^Talk 14:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Sonic X-treme reversions

Please explain why you are reverting me with RedWarn on Sonic X-treme using an anti-vandalism tool on edits that clearly are not vandalism and leaving an inadequate edit summary in return. Red Phoenix ^talk 19:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I thought it was more standard to write the name of the company, in this case, IGN, rather than simply referring to the author. I used RedWarn since I am used to using it to revert any edits. This is a bad idea for non-vandalism, then? I suppose that ought to be self-explanatory. Sorry. ButterCashier (talk) 07:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

It’s absolutely an inappropriate use of RedWarn, for the same reason rollback can’t be used for anything other than obvious vandalism. For an edit like this, you should explain your change with an edit summary, and you can’t do that with a canned “reverting good faith edits”. I appreciate that you recognize the mistake and I’m sure you’ll use anti-vandalism tools well in the future.

On the subject of credit - yes, the publication should be mentioned, but if someone is credited in that article as having written the source, then that person should be credited for their words as it is presented as their words, whether or not it represents the journal as a whole. This should still come with recognition that said person writes for said publication in the text itself, of course, which in this case was done in the same main section two paragraphs above where it was acknowledged Travis Fahs writes for IGN. If there is no writer credited for an article or it’s just credited to “Staff”, then the claims can be said to be that of the publication itself. Red Phoenix ^talk 13:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Trout

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You got trouted for warning me about a test edit despite I reverting it. 85.101.217.58 (talk) 08:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for editing! Sorry about that. I saw you reverted it but wanted to write a message on your talk page about how edit tests should be done - using your sandbox, a good reason to use an account here. I'll revert my edit. ButterCashier (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. 85.101.217.58 (talk) 08:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

FYI, ButterCashier, that IP may or may not be a sock of either AudiGuy-1204 or Lithuaniaball2, and has been blocked as such. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 12:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Professor Layton and the New World of Steam

Hello, ButterCashier. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Professor Layton and the New World of Steam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)