Welcome! edit

Hello, Tortie tude, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Artemisia borealis. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jackson Peebles (talk) 04:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Nice to see you are back edit

I was missing your excellent plant articles! Ruigeroeland (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The same! I've been missing you. Choess (talk) 22:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes indeed! Had seen you around and admired your work, but only just now realized who you are. Welcome back! Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:41, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I appreciate it! -Tortie tude (talk) 14:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tortie tude, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi Tortie tude! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Tortie tude. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lupinus arcticus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Alpine, Lupine and Hybrid
Eriophorum scheuchzeri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Circumpolar and Arctic islands
Juncus trifidus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Alpine and Talus
Carex rufina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alpine
Dryocosmus kuriphilus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hybrid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page you started has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Paronychia franciscana, Tortie tude!

Wikipedia editor FoCuSandLeArN just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article! Remeber to place the appropriate WikiProject tag when possible, in this case the Plants WikiProject.

To reply, leave a comment on FoCuSandLeArN's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for May 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leymus mollis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stress and Lupine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Crurifarcimen edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Re: DS9! edit

No problem, I'm just glad to improve a subject area which was rather under-represented in terms of quality content as compared to other major television shows of a similar era such as The X-Files or The Simpsons. I've identified another ten DS9 episodes should be expandable enough to meet the DYK requirements. There's some surprising ones in there, such as "Trials and Tribble-ations" (although that one is a technicality as all that stuff in bullet points counts as a list and therefore isn't included in the original article size count for comparison purposes), and "Tears of the Prophets" (which is the episode where Jadzia Dax is killed). I'm also thinking that "The Adversary" and "Homefront" might make a nice double hook as they're the two first episodes about the Changeling infiltration of the Alpha Quadrant.

Unlike the ST:TNG episodes I've been taking through GA, I'm really not doing the DS9 articles in any particular order - mostly either those ones for expansion purposes or if I stumble across a really useful reference I can use (which was the reason for improving "Blood Oath". I've got a copy of the sourcebook by the Reeves-Stevens which is about the first season, so I'm intending to create a first season article at some point as the only other season article for any of the ST series is the TNG first season (which I created last year, and I must get around to improving and taking through the GA process - as its one of five articles I need to improve further and nominate for GA in order to get the entire TNG first season at GA, and then nominate it for a GT). The Enterprise articles really are just me dabbling in something that is quite easy to do as the sources are all online once you work out where to pull them out of archive.org. Annoyingly though they didn't put the production notes for the first season of that online and never produced any companion books to the series, so its unlikely that the majority of Enterprise s1 can be improved. There is exceptions, as for example "Dear Doctor" has been mostly sourced from interviews rather than production notes - which reminds me, there was only a couple of things I wanted to do to that article before I nominated it for GA.

I think I might be babbling. :) If you want to try your hand at any ST article improvement then feel free, there's years of work due to the number of episodes and there's always potential DYKs lurking in surprising areas (i.e. Harry Kim). Another pleasing avenue of work is the improvement to the Portal:Star Trek that Cirt has just done. He's worked on a whole bunch of featured portals, so I'm hopeful that once finished (mostly once I add the content) that we'll be able to take it through that process too. Miyagawa (talk) 08:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Centruroides gracilis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Roach and Shock
Thonningia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Congo and Mutualism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Acanthogobius flavimanus edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page you started has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Astrocaryum standleyanum, Tortie tude!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article!

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DYK for Gloriosa superba edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trachinotus goodei may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hemidactylus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prosopis alba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |status_ref = <ref>World Conservation Monitoring Centre' 1998. [http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/33953/0 ''Prosopis alba''. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Platonia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • resembles a [[papaya]]. The rind exudes a yellow latex when pressed.<ref>Rogez, H., et al. (2004). [http://www.springerlink.com/content/w21p893a7jukfl1p/ Chemical composition of the pulp of three

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Euchiton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ', a new genus of Gnaphalieae (Compositae).] ''New Zealand Journal of Botany'' 41(4) 603-11.]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Incarvillea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2&taxon_id=116396 ''Incarvillea''.] Flora of China.</ref><ref name=chen>Chen, S., et al. (2005). [http://www.amjbot.org/content/92/4/625.full Molecular phylogeny of ''Incarvillea'' (Bignoniaceae)
  • 92/4/625.full Molecular phylogeny of ''Incarvillea'' (Bignoniaceae) based on ITS and \[bu100\)TRN\(cmL-Fsequences.] ''Am. J. Bot.'' 92(4) 625-33.</ref> of [[flowering plant]]s in the family [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Thonningia edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

IUCN template versus manual entry edit

Hi there, is there a reason for replacing the IUCN template form references with free form text? If the ID is failing or if the format is not consistent it would be better to discuss at the template for a change. The reason why the template is preferred is due to past problems with link changes on the IUCN site. With the template it is a single point change to fix the thousands of places where it is used. Shyamal (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • The template is messy, ugly, hard to update, and sometimes broken. It always needs copyediting. When people who aren't familiar with it try to use it, it ends up looking odd. But feel free to replace my links anywhere you would like. -Tortie tude (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. The ugly part can be discussed on the template talk. The rest can at some point be bot-maintained - the broken link is thanks to an IUCN update and that is also why the template is preferred. Shyamal (talk) 09:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cirrhilabrus cyanopleura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rasse
Gloriosa superba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Yam
Lagodon rhomboides (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bait
Oxyjulis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fusiform
Paphinia herrerae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Isotype

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Haemulon edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sicyonia ingentis edit

I've just seen your new article on Sicyonia ingentis – good work! I've made a few changes, but mostly cosmetic. I assume you'll be taking it to DYK; I would do so, but I don't want to tread on your toes. --Stemonitis (talk) 05:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Ah please take it to DYK if you would! Thank you! - Tortie tude (talk) 05:47, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it may be a bit more complicated than I thought. I was looking for some more up-to-date fisheries figures. FAO statistics for the years 1995–2003 show very low levels of fishery in recent years, and a California government source covering the years 1974–2006 suggests that landings were a fraction of the figure quoted by Pérez Farfante (maximally 1,565,000 pounds or 710 tonnes in 2000). I'm not sure what to do about this, but it looks at the moment as if Pérez Farfante's quote was wildly inaccurate. Actually, reading off the graph in the modern Californian source, it looks like the value for 1982 might well be 127,000 lb; if three spurious digits were added to the end, this could become Pérez Farfante's "127,000,956 pounds". While that is a serious error, it does seem to be the most likely solution to me at the moment. --Stemonitis (talk) 06:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Just read your new article, Borrichia frutescens. Very nice work. You deserve congratulations.
FalkirksTalk  21:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aeonium arboreum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Webb
Cookeolus japonicus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cebuano
Eufidonia convergaria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to White pine
Lophocampa caryae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cocoon
Probole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Taxonomy
Rypticus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Stress
Scorpaena guttata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Life span

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Reuben T. Durrett edit

I noted you put a BLP template on the talk page. There isn't a living person mentioned anywhere in the article, so I didn't understand. 7&6=thirteen () 21:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done. I just wanted to call it to your attention. Happy editing. 7&6=thirteen () 23:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Oxyrrhis marina edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 18 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cryptobia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anorexia
Desmothoracid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lorica
Dichanthium annulatum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Turf
Kinetoplast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Trypanosome
Komatsuna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Variety
Oxyrrhis marina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Growth

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Incisitermes minor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bait
Nabkha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chihuahua

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mahonia fortunei may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''holly grape'''.<ref name=flori>http://www.floridata.com/ref/m/maho_for.cfm ''Mahonia fortunei''.] FloriData.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Codonopsis pilosula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''Codonopsis pilosula'' ssp. ''pilosula'' ({{zh|c=党参(原亚种}}, dang shen, yuan ya zhong)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Calendula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Image:Calendula officinalis and sky.jpg|''Calendula officinalis'')

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Páramo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Flycatcher
Silene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Xhosa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adenophora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cyme
Asclepias verticillata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Native American
Euonymus americanus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Peduncle
Fuchsia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pedicel
Indigofera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sundanese
Lactuca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Congo
Lobelia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Malevolence
Mouse Moth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Artemisia
Scarlet lily beetle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Antenna
Setaria megaphylla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Canary
Tropaeolum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Trellis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Anisota virginiensis edit

Sorry about that, was still sleepy and wasnt paying attention. Will make a gallery as you suggested, that indeed seems better. Sorry again and keep up the good work, love your articles! Ruigeroeland (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 16 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bryobia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Clone, Currant and Taxonomy
Festuca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Turf and Taxonomy
Heuchera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Colville and Taxonomy
Curly top (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cucurbit
Hemaris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sclerosis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK edit

I'm just letting you know that I nominated an article you started for DYK - Template:Did you know nominations/Anoplophora. SL93 (talk) 01:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Nice work on Gratiana boliviana!  TOW  talk  09:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pyrrhalta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your DAB page edit

Hello,when patrolling new pages,I found you created a DAB page,Pycnanthus,which lists no links to existing Wikipedia articles.Are you planning to create one of the articles listed in the DAB page?If not,I'll tag it for speedy deletion per CSD G6.Lsmll 05:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

  WikiProject Forestry
Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.
Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Anoplophora edit

The DYK project (nominate) 22:18, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Scapteriscus edit

Orlady (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Pycnanthus angolensis edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of woods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kingwood
Sacramento, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of the Pacific

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Castilleja neglecta may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • usda>[http://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=CAAFN2 ''Castilleja affinis'' ssp. ''neglecta'').] USDA PLANTS.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cuyamaca Rancho State Park may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | [[Layia|tidytips]] (''Layia'' spp.)|| [[clematis lasiantha|virgin's bower]] (''Clematis lasiantha''|| [[solidago|goldenrod]] (''Solidago'' spp.)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Citropsis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • progenies for clarifying the phylogenic relationship between ''Citrus'' and ''Citropsis'' species.]] ''Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science'' 131(6), 764-69.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zographus regalis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • This species can be found in [[Senegal], [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Sierra Leone]], [[Liberia]], [[Ivory Coast]], [[Togo]], [[Benin]], [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Liatris may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''''Liatris''''' ({{IPAc-en|l|aɪ|ˈ|æ|t|r|ɨ|s}};<ref>''Sunset Western Garden Book''. 1995. 606–07.</ref> is a genus of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Galium may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • with a tiny bedstraw. ''[[Asperula]]'' is also a closely related genus; some species of ''Galium'' (such as [[Galium odoratum|woodruff]] (''G. odoratum'') are occasionally placed therein.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthrenus flavipes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bassia hyssopifolia edit

Alex ShihTalk 04:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aegiphila rimbachii (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bolívar Province
Artemisia (genus) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dusty Miller
Physocarpus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dehiscence

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons-inline edit

Tortie tude, your edit to Packera paupercula broke the link to its Commons gallery.[1] Thanks for adding information on conservation and common names. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hypoxis edit

I do appreciate the work you did on Hypoxis, but I'd like to make a couple of points. Firstly, there's a view which I don't always accept, but which has some validity if you read WP:RS, that primary sources shouldn't be used to establish the existence of a species – once it has been accepted by a secondary source, then primary sources can be used to provide details. Secondly, the material you added re use in South Africa is problematic according to WP:MEDRS, which insists on the use of secondary reviews before allowing any medical claims. Saying that there isn't yet any scientific evidence or adequate study doesn't get you off the hook, as I know from personal experience. I've discussed how to add ethnobotany information at WT:MEDRS but the editors there are quite clear that no medical claims can be made without secondary sources. Don't shoot the messenger! :-) Peter coxhead (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I made no medical claims. I don't do that, because I rarely believe them myself. I "claimed" the following:
    • 1. The plant plays "a role in traditional African medicine"... this is true, you can't just say it isn't. Fact: people take the plant for health reasons. Source cited.
    • 2. "H. hemerocallidea and H. colchicifolia are the best known species used to make medicine and teas." Well, there's a bit of a judgment there, who can say what the 'best known' species are; maybe Barney down the street "knows" a third plant better. Regardless, that's what the reference (which is reliable enough IMO, but then, you probably don't think so) says, I don't care if it's a primary source or a secondary source. I cited it.
    • 3. The plant is "used in the treatment of AIDS". It is, it really is. I wouldn't use the plant to treat AIDS, but people in Africa do. That's all I said. Source cited.
    • 4. "the plant has been called a "wonder herb" and "miracle cure". Did I call it that? No. Somebody did, they were quoted, I found that vaguely interesting, and I put it in the article in case someone else might find it vaguely interesting. Source cited. If I ever say "this plant cures AIDS", feel free to delete that.
    • 5. "touted as boosters of immune system function in AIDS patients by the media and even by the South African Ministry of Health". I haven't personally read the media that touts the plant, I'm just citing what the reliable-enough-IMO-reference stated. I did not read the South African government press release that told people to take the plant to treat their AIDS, I'm trusting the reference on that. Sometimes you just trust the reference. Cited properly... at least I think so.
    • 6. "This claim has not been tested in research." Well, I don't know, maybe it has since that article was published. If so, I'm a filthy liar. Source cited... you don't have to believe it.
      • In conclusion, I don't make this shit up. Wikipedia is not written by botanists or for botanists. The Average Joe reading a Wikipedia article can make what he wants of the information. If I state "people in Africa eat this flower to cure AIDS", I'm not being irresponsible. If you want to argue about what an appropriate source is, thanks but I'm not up for it. I can cite botanical garden websites and published journal articles and government sites if I want to. I won't destroy the scientific community. If that makes me a Neanderthal, maybe avoid me and go clean up the thousands of plant articles that are utter garbage. Nitpicking my fairly reasonable, good-faith work isn't really an efficient use of time, in my insignificant personal opinion. Thank you for trying to help, though. -Tortie tude (talk) 18:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Polygala senega edit

Alex ShihTalk 12:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bruchus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sclerosis and Circumscription
Bidens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Taxonomy
Callosobruchus maculatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cassia
Spiranthes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Polymorphism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bruchus edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Proboscidea louisianica edit

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dioscorea trifida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Trellis
Lablab purpureus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Telugu
Planococcus citri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cocoon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Stachys floridana edit

Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Alysicarpus vaginalis edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Succulent plant may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //florabase.calm.wa.gov.au/ FloraBase - The Western Australian Flora] Retrieved on 2010-1-1</ref>) ''[[Atriplex]]'', ''[[Chenopodium]]'', ''[[Dissocarpus]]'', ''[[Einadia]]'', ''[[Enchylaena]]'', ''
  • | [[Euphorbiaceae]] || > 1000 || Stem and/or leaf and/or root|| Australia, Africa, Madagascar, Asia, the Americas, Europe

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Veronicella may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The land Mollusca of Dominica (Lesser Antilles), with notes on some enigmatic or rare species.]] ''Zoologische Mededelingen'' 83(13), 615-50.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sarasinula may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The land Mollusca of Dominica (Lesser Antilles), with notes on some enigmatic or rare species.]] ''Zoologische Mededelingen'' 83(13), 615-50.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Urera may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • circumscription, rosid ancestry, and phylogenetics based on rbcL, trnL-F, and ndhF sequences.]] ''American Journal of Botany'' 89(9), 1531–46.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Succulent plant edit

It's long been on my "to do" list to tackle the long list of genera, so I was very pleased to see that you have been doing it! Excellent work; long overdue. I'm still bothered that there's no proper sourcing of this list. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Canavalia cathartica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Lei and Glomus
Argulus foliaceus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Stress

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pictures edits edit

Dear Tortie Tude, Thanks for your recent edits, I understand this is not my personal web site, but one should not be prejudice. I want to add that non of the pictures are my personal, best wishes take care. Aftab Banoori 09:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Canavalia cathartica edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Planococcus citri edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Evania appendigaster edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Nice gastropod stubs! edit

Hello Tortie Tude, I would like to give you hearty thanks for those much needed gastropod genus stubs! We can always use valuable help like that. I am giving you this invitation:


 Wikiproject Gastropods
I've noticed your edits on pages relating to Gastropods; perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Gastropods?
If you would like more information, please visit the project page or the project talk page.


Very best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 00:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Thanks! I find those very entertaining to write about. -Tortie tude (talk) 06:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mermis nigrescens edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Epicauta vittata edit

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Asiloidea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • to the [[Empidoidea]] and the [[Cyclorrhapha]].<ref name=el/><ref>Trautwein, M. D., et al. (2010). [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20399874 A multigene phylogeny of the fly superfamily Asiloidea (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Haematopota grandis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • biodiversity/uk-biodiversity/uk-species/species/haematopota_grandis.html ''Haematopota grandis''.] Natural History Museum, London.</ref> It is native to [[Europe]], where it is distributed in [[

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:23, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rhinogobius may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * ''[[Rhinogobius ponkouensis]]'' <small>[[S. P. Huang & I. S. Chen, 2007</small>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of freshwater fishes of Korea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • # ''[[Opsariichthys uncirostris]]'' ((Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) – three-lips ([[wikt:ko:끄리|끄리]])
  • # ''[[Gymnogobius macrognathos]]'' ([[Bleeker, 1860) - ([[wikt:ko:왜꾹저구|왜꾹저구]])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of edible seeds may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ]), such as [[Acacia aneura|mulga]] (''Acacia aneura''), [[Acacia cowleana|Halls Creek wattle]] (''A. cowleana'', [[Acacia estrophiolata|southern ironwood]] (''A. estrophiolata''), [[Acacia

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dasymys may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], the Old World rats and mice. The genus is [[endemism|endemic]] to [[Africa]].<ref name=mam>[[http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/biology/resources/msw3/browse.asp?id=13001318 Monatsb. K.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Monomorium destructor + ant task force edit

Hello Tortie tude! Good job on the Monomorium destructor article. I've added it to the ant task force's list of expanded articles. It's nice to have a goal (75 expansions before 31 December), but we mostly keep the list just for fun and to give other editors interested in ants a chance to discover new articles. You are very much invited to the task force, but feel free to add articles to the list even if you decide to not "join". Happy editing, jonkerztalk 01:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Monomorium destructor edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ficopomatus enigmaticus edit

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Hylastes ater edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sharpnose Shiner edit

Please check in at {{Did you know nominations/Sharpnose Shiner}} for a small citation issue. It's big enough to prevent the page from appearing at DYK in its current state, but it's small enough that you should be able to fix it quickly. Nyttend (talk) 13:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sharpnose Shiner edit

The DYK project (nominate) 08:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Citation details edit

Please do not remove or "simplify" citation details from articles, as in this edit. They do no harm, and can be exceedingly useful. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Right, well, the full-text articles are linked right there. If you're having trouble finding them, I'm not sure how to help you. Adding Peter and Sammy's first names won't be exceedingly useful, it's actually a bit unprofessional and dare I say cheesy. Wikipedia isn't a scientific community, it's for a general audience. Also, your citation of Worms is wrong, if you want to change it back. Thanks for not simply hitting "revert" on my entire edit, though... such a pain in the ass when people do that. Have fun. -Tortie tude (talk) 19:48, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

But what about eliding the contributions of Danièle Guinot and Peter Davie in the vastly significant Systema Brachyurorum paper? Wikipedia is not limited by space, so there's really no need to omit or abbreviate any citation details. First names, for instance, can be very useful for distinguishing between authors with similar names, even if you personally find it "cheesy". --Stemonitis (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Leavenworthia crassa) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Leavenworthia crassa, Tortie tude!

Wikipedia editor Gruekiller just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment on Gruekiller's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DYK for Leavenworthia crassa edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:32, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Red links for taxon authorities edit

Tortie,

You recently removed the red links for the taxon authorities in the article for Alburnoides. I use the red links to allow readers to see the full names of the taxon authorities. This also gives other users an idea as to individuals who have contributed significantly to taxonomy and has already resulted in articles being added to Wikipedia to cover some of these individuals. Thus I would ask that you not remove the red links in these articles as they serve a positive purpose.

Thank you,Divingpetrel (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • You don't need to redlink one name 20 times in one article. That's pointless, as well as distracting for everyday users who are looking for species links and have to look through a bunch of red links to find them. This isn't an ichthyology directory, it's an encyclopedia for regular people. Furthermore, most of those contemporary authors are not notable today and won't have an article for another 20 years, if ever. And finally, don't hit "revert" just to remove one of my changes to an article. In doing so, you removed all my other changes, which were useful. That is rude and lazy. Thus, I would ask you not to do that in the future. Thanks. Tortie tude (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Impressive work on the Muscardine article edit

It appears from the page history that you are the sole editor of the named page. Thank you.

I'm not convinced your use of the reference used to support the statement, "Fungicidal agents such as azadirachtin and phytoallexin have been used against some muscardine pathogens.[9]" is accurate. My read of the referenced abstract suggests that the researcher was testing the compatibility of a insecticidal preparation of muscardine causing organisms with the azadiractin and phytoallexin, and found the azadirachtin did not inhibit the effectiveness of the insecticide preparation. Not having read the full article, I can't specifically say that, but the abstract certainly suggests that. Azadirachtin typically wouldn't be considered an antifungal agent, so wouldn't likely be used in control of the insect disease.

The compatibility of azadirachtin and an insecticidal preparation of muscardine causing organisms is noteworthy, but might be more suitable in the Beauveria bassiana article. SL1358 (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply