User talk:Solavirum/Archive 3

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anar Novruzov

The article Anar Novruzov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't see significant coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG. His rank is not sufficient to satisfy WP:SOLDIER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dumelow (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Military units and formations of the First Nagorno-Karabakh War

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations of the First Nagorno-Karabakh War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Steverci (talk) 01:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:SMALLCAT

Please do not set categories up until there are at least 10 members and going to be at least 20, with articles still to be created. A regiment would simply go in the Az land forces category and category Category:Infantry regiments. Happy New Year!! Buckshot06 (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Alright, got it. Thanks for the heads-up and happy new year! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

CE

Can you please tell me what does CE mean? I know people use it to indicate that they corrected spelling mistakes but don't know its meaning.--Visnelma (talk) 12:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Hi Visnelma, I hope Solavirum won't mind me jumping in to help you. CE/ce is an abbreviation for copy edit. You can read more at WP:CE. Cheers, Jr8825 • Talk 14:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Seeing with clear eyes

Hi Solavirum, I appreciate your work within the Azerbaijan-Armenia topic area and wanted to offer some advice. With the greatest respect, if you can't see how Aliyev's statement isn't applicable for the lead of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (after I've now highlighted the policies to you) I suggest you step back a bit, have a quick (re-)read through the explanatory supplement on advocacy (it's not a long page) and reflect on how it may be hard for you to write neutrally on this topic. I'm not suggesting that there aren't pro-Armenian editors who find it equally difficult to write neutrally, or denying that there are other editors who are much more disruptive because of their biases in this area – I'm not questioning your good faith. However, I think it's important that everyone with close ties to the topic understands this difficulty and tries to recognise when their views are preventing them from writing sufficiently neutrally. All the best, Jr8825 • Talk 13:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I've just seen the thread at AN/I about you, and want to reiterate that this is general, personal advice that I think you should consider, I'm not trying to suggest that you've been deliberating pushing an agenda. Jr8825 • Talk 13:55, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I got it. Thanks for the advice. I'm trying to be neutral as possible and grasp more of the existing guidelines as I proceed. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 19:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Heads up

Heads up I’ve IBAN’d someone from interacting with you (diff). Nothing you need to do now, but that you should probably know. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 22:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

House of Khurshidbanu Natavan

Hi. I won't make an issue if it's left as 18th century, but the article says that it was built for Khurshidbanu Natavan (born in 1832) by Karbalayi Safikhan Karabakhi (a 19th century architect). Given that I don't have access to the sources used, I assumed that you converted by mistake 18xx something to 18th century instead of 19th. Hemşinli çocuk 04:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Well, the sources say 18–19th centuries, and doesn't specify if the house was built as an ordinary residential building in the city, or specifically for Natavan. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 04:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Do you have any quote from that source? The Azerbaijani version of the article says 18th century, I was not able to find that source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermenermin (talk • contribs) 02:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Ermenermin, RusWiki says so, and cites a Soviet-era book. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 17:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but it's not the same source, both are different authors, as it stands wrong author is cited. Hemşinli çocuk 18:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

my bad, there are two sources provided, of I see. Hemşinli çocuk 18:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

I have left a message in the article talkpage. Hemşinli çocuk 19:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Request for Third Party Opinion

Please be advised that I requested a Third Party Opinion on Talk:Fuzuli International Airport. Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

July 2020 Azerbaijani protests

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article July 2020 Azerbaijani protests has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist, hi. Cheers, and thank you for the helping hand! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Azerbaijan Democratic Republic

Prior to the ADR established in 1918, what sovereign, independent state used the word Azerbaijan in its name? Yes, there was the region in northwestern Iran, but in that region there didn't exist a country called Azerbaijan. There was no "Azerbaijan Khanate", there was the Tabriz Khanate, the Urmia Khanate, the Ardabil Khanate, etc. but none of those states ever coalesced to form a united Azerbaijan Khanate. And the Shirvanshahs, the dynasty that ruled the region for centuries, from the Abbasids (800s) to the Safavids (1500s), never called the land they were ruling Azerbaijan, instead, they called it Shirvan. My point is that the last state to use the name Azerbaijan was the province Adurbadagan in the Sasanian Empire in Late Antiquity. Oghuz Turks didn't begin settling the region until the 1000s with the arrival of the Seljuks, so prior to the Turkic invasions of the 11th century, the region was inhabited by Arabs and Iranians. And even after the Seljuk conquest of 1066 and the ensuing Turkification of the region, no Turkic country called itself Azerbaijan, instead, the name Azerbaijan was used for historical purposes until 1918. So how am I wrong to say that no Azerbaijani-speaking state with Azerbaijan in its name existed from 1066 until 1918? Epitome of Creativity (talk) 19:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:UNDUE, and take your issue to article's talk page. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 19:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 17:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Azerbaijan Barnstar of National Merit
		By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your great work on articles connected with Azerbaijan. It is appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention, Gog. Really appreciate it. Cheers! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Solavirum. Thank you. --Steverci (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Agdaban massacre

Hello, Solavirum,

Thank you for creating Agdaban massacre.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Either the title of this article isn’t the commonly used one, or the event isn’t a notable one(which seems unlikely) I noticed it had been deleted 9 years ago because it didn’t have enough reliable sources substantiating what was written in it, & it seems this may be the case even now(9 years after) Secondly could you adjust the tone of the article? Thank you

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Celestina007 (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Celestina007, I know that there were a few to none RS mentioning it, but I've found a BBC article covering the topic. Isn't it making it notable enough? Also, how can I improve the tone? I've only cited RS when it comes to historical/controversial areas. Only Azerbaijan-based sources are for the village's geographical features. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 18:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay I was optimizing the google translate tool, the piece is borderline-ish, it looks like an opinion piece. Also, just to let you know, A BBC source doesn’t equate a reliable piece. I myself, I’m also baffled as to how such an event has me digging deep for sources when such an event ought to be raining sources, I’d take a look at google books and if I find good stuff I’d mark it as reviewed. Celestina007 (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I just took a second look and in my opinion, i think the problem is with the title, a search under the name Agdaban massacre brings up nothing concrete in google books. At a point google proceeds to ask me if I mean something else. Celestina007 (talk) 18:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Celestina007, I've found this: "From early February onwards, the Azeri villages of Malybeili, Karadagly, and Agdaban were conquered an their population evicted, leading to at least 99 civilian deaths and 140 wounded." I think I can do deeper search, and yeah, Agdaban massacre seems to be a not appropriate common name. Maybe, a naming like here would be more fitting? --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 18:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

It seems to a quote from Svante Cornell's work. He's a RS. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 18:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

honestly I think you should look for the most common name for that event, when you do so, I believe the issue of RS wouldn’t be an issue anymore, search deeper, I’m sure there’s a common and appropriate name for that event, it’s not plausible that such an event should lack RS, when you find a common name, ping me to move it for you and mark it as reviewed. Celestina007 (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Maraga massacre

@El C: Hey, as you recently handled the incident report that I opened against Solavirum, I wanted to ping you over this edit [1] on the Maraga massacre article. I hope that posting this on Solavirum's talk page is not an improper way bring the issue up - but whatever intentions behind the recent edit, if an editor cannot understand how it is improper to put a battle-type infobox with the description of an "Azerbaijani victory" for an article regarding a massacre of Armenians, then I believe (in very mild-worded terms) that the editor in question has a lot to learn. I don't believe it would ever be proper to do the same for the Khojaly massacre for example, which was a massacre of civilians that was also characterized by armed combat. AntonSamuel (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Solavirum, why are you adding the "victory" parameter to a massacre? And while an AE complaint about you is still pending? I'm sorry, but that does not inspire confidence! El_C 19:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

AntonSamuel, and El_C, please see my reply here. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 19:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Steverci (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic-banned from any pages or discussions relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan (WP:ARBAA2), broadly construed

You have been sanctioned per this AE complaint. Needless to say, acute problems have been identified. Your continued presence in this fraught topic area has been deemed damaging both to the verifiability of content as well as to the project's reputation. Multiple instances of tendentious (or incompetent, whatever it is) editing has been documented in the AE report, including even ones occurring while the AE proceeding itself was ongoing. In short, you have proven to be a liability for this topic area, which is why I have put this total prohibition into immediate effect.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final_decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 22:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

El_C, does this apply to Armenia–Azerbaijan topic, or Armenia and Azerbaijan topic? Like, am I blocked for creating an article about a building in Baku? Also, what will happen to my current and future (the ones that are getting copyedited) GANs, as all of them are related to the NK conflict. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 22:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Solavirum, it applies to pretty much anything that is related (whatsoever). The countries together, apart and anything in between — that is the meaning of WP:BROADLY. El_C 22:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Just a note to say I appreciate this must be tough given the amount of work you've done on this topic. I encourage you to not see this as permanent, but as an opportunity to step back and take a break from this contentious area. Perhaps some broader reading and participation will mean that in the future you'll have the experience to contribute to the topic neutrally and you can appeal. N.B. Sorry about the edit summary, I messed it up as I was reverting your edit to the list of Armenian massacres in a separate tab at the same time. Jr8825 • Talk 01:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Jr8825, with all respect, I understand your points. Though it is hard to make divinely good edits within such a topic, also regarding that the topic itself attracts other users that might or might not be pushing harsh amount of POV. My edit on the list of massacres of Armenians was per this discussion ("massacres are quite normal in war, it does not necessarily indicate anti-sentiment against a certain ethnicity"). --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 09:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Shusha (2020)

The article Battle of Shusha (2020) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Battle of Shusha (2020) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Haydar Pamuk -- Haydar Pamuk (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Polad Hashimov

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Polad Hashimov has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Operation Kalbajar

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Operation Kalbajar has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

AE block

RE: User_talk:Jr8825#BBC_Azerbaijani. Solavirum, don't test the boundaries of WP:BROADLY. Don't even mention the topic area in any way, whatsoever. Don't tell other contributors you read what they said about the topic area. And definitely don't coordinate off-wiki communication about the topic area on-wiki. None of that. What were you thinking? Because there is an important ANI discussion involving you at the moment, I left you the ability to edit project pages so that you can continue contributing it, but otherwise, this would have been a sitewide block. El_C 03:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

El_C, really? I thought the ban was only for articles and article talks, didn't knew that it passed over to user talk pages. I told Jr that I'm not too aware of the ban's boundries, so I can't even talk about a source's reliability? Again, don't get me wrong, I just don't know the boundries. Moreover, does this also include the situations where I'm tagged somewhere regarding the topic, and talked about (in a right or wrong way)? Also, the only interaction between me and Jr about the topic was the comments you see on-wiki, we didn't do anything off-wiki, as Jr8825 can say. So, just to understand the topic ban, am I prohibited to use the word Armenia and Azerbaijan anywhere on-wiki? --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 07:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Solavirum, you're asking "really?" — realy? Maybe you should have kept the ban notification as a reminder, because what further explanation do you need when its message states: You have been indefinitely topic-banned from any pages or discussions relating to Armenia and Azerbaijan (WP:ARBAA2), broadly construed. El_C 11:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

El_C, got it. Thank you for notifying. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 16:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

@El C: I think some degree of responsibility goes to me as well, as I suggested an off-wiki email. Although Solavirum obviously shouldn't have left me that message, I should've been a more direct about it violating Solavirum's topic ban, instead of understating my concern. Apologies to both. Jr8825 • Talk 17:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Osman Erbaş

On 2 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Osman Erbaş, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lieutenant General Osman Erbaş was one of 11 Turkish military personnel killed in a 4 March 2021 helicopter crash? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Osman Erbaş. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Osman Erbaş), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for 2021 TAF AS532 crash

On 2 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2021 TAF AS532 crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lieutenant General Osman Erbaş was one of 11 Turkish military personnel killed in a 4 March 2021 helicopter crash? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Osman Erbaş. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2021 TAF AS532 crash), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anti-Azerbaijanism in Russia

A tag has been placed on Category:Anti-Azerbaijanism in Russia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Steverci (talk) 16:19, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Use of ranks in Battleboxes.

Hello Solarium, I have been looking at your past edit summaries on Ukranian 2014 conflict articles,regarding ranks in Infoboxes, and why them should be avoided, but in the main WP:MOS article and in the Infoboxes MOS article, didn't find any reference for ranks. Could you tell me where is located.Mr.User200 (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Nevermind, I have been checking other Battleboxes and they dont use ranks they use instead the current position/or charge in the army. I will selfrevert dont worry.Mr.User200 (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Castle Wolfenstein

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Castle Wolfenstein you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Milliy TV moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Milliy TV, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:05, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2021 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan conflict

On 3 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan conflict, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Dumelow (talk) 10:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gugark pogrom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gugark pogrom, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gugark pogrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Graham Phillips (journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Phillips (journalist), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Phillips (journalist) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Irtash

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Irtash has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, widely appreciated. --► Sincerely: Solavirum 19:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Steverci (talk) 03:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating a topic ban, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Drmies (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Drmies, I just realised that the article itself directly falls within the scope of WikiProject Armenia. Well, in this case, this is violation of the topic ban. Because of this, I accept punitive actions. Thank you. --► Sincerely: Solavirum 14:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

• I'm sorry--but yeah, that seemed kind of obvious to me, and I guess to others. The letters "armen" occur 71 times in the article, if I remember correctly. Well, the block is for two weeks and that's not very long, and I wish you the best. But please be mindful of how you address your opponents/fellow editors; charges of a witch hunt are quite serious. Take care, Drmies (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Steverci (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Yaduvanshi

Dear solavirum, please update Yaduvanshi page, this page not showing goggle, and fixed this page connection site

Your GA nomination of Kenneth MacAlpin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kenneth MacAlpin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 12:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kenneth MacAlpin

The article Kenneth MacAlpin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kenneth MacAlpin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Irtash

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Irtash you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 01:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Irtash

The article Irtash you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Irtash for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 11:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Good luck

With the exams! Jr8825 • Talk 20:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! --► Sincerely: Solavirum 20:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 04:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan

The article Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fakhr al-Mulk Ridwan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Castle Wolfenstein

The article Castle Wolfenstein you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Castle Wolfenstein for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Blue Pumpkin Pie -- Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Solavirum. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Irtash

The article Irtash you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Irtash for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Milliy TV

Hello, Solavirum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Milliy TV, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:July 2020 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes

A tag has been placed on Category:July 2020 Armenian–Azerbaijani clashes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Milliy TV

Hello, Solavirum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Milliy TV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)