Welcome! edit

Hello, Siamfootball, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <RetroCraft314 talk/> 18:46, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Kritsana Daokrajai moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Kritsana Daokrajai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 18:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Yotsapon Teangdar edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yotsapon Teangdar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kevin Sangsamanan edit

 

The article Kevin Sangsamanan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yotsapon Teangdar for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yotsapon Teangdar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yotsapon Teangdar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:29, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Yotsapon Teangdar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kevin Sangsamanan for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Sangsamanan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Sangsamanan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NZFC(talk) 02:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Stéphane Porato, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Adisak Hantes moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Adisak Hantes, does not have enough content, sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nakin Wisetchat for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nakin Wisetchat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakin Wisetchat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nehme1499 (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nakin Wisetchat. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Count Count (talk) 19:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Transfermarkt edit

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sahawit Khumpiam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop citing Transfermarkt in articles. As I've explained, it is not a reliable source. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:15, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Thai League 1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chang, Sanwa and Grab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Eduardo Parreira, you may be blocked from editing. I've explained this to you twice already. Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. If you continue to cite the website in articles, you may be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Carlos Eduardo Parreira edit

Hello, Siamfootball,

Thank you for creating Carlos Eduardo Parreira.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 00:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Alef Vieira Santos moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Alef Vieira Santos, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 08:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sihanart Suttisak edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Govvy and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sihanart Suttisak, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Govvy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Govvy (talk) 13:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alef Vieira Santos. I've explained to you three times already in the last few days that Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source, and should not be cited in articles. If you cite it again, you will be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sihanart Suttisak for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sihanart Suttisak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sihanart Suttisak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Suwat Junboonpha edit

Hello, Siamfootball,

Thank you for creating Suwat Junboonpha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add multiple independent, reliable sources to help strengthen the page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 18:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Well done on all the new football articles! NonsensicalSystem(err0r?)(.log) 09:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Keeratikorn Nilmart edit

 

The article Keeratikorn Nilmart has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Interstellarity (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Saharat Kaewsangsai edit

 

The article Saharat Kaewsangsai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Interstellarity (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Chonlawit Kanuengkid edit

Hello, Siamfootball,

Thank you for creating Chonlawit Kanuengkid.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The page currently online lists Soccerway as external link. If it was used as a source, it should be listed as one. In addition, his loan to Phrae United is not supported by Soccerway, so a separate source for that information should be added as well.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MrClog}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MrClog (talk) 11:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jirattikan Vapilai edit

 

The article Jirattikan Vapilai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wuttikrai Pathan edit

 

The article Wuttikrai Pathan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dantrai Longjamnong edit

 

The article Dantrai Longjamnong has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nattakrit Thongnoppakun edit

 

The article Nattakrit Thongnoppakun has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pongsakorn Takum edit

 

The article Pongsakorn Takum has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Worawut Chansitha edit

 

The article Worawut Chansitha has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rungsak Kothcharak edit

 

The article Rungsak Kothcharak has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jenphob Phokhi edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jenphob Phokhi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wasusiwakit Phusirit edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Wasusiwakit Phusirit, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alongkorn Thongjean edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Alongkorn Thongjean, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alongkorn Jornnathong edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Alongkorn Jornnathong, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Theppitak Poonjuang edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Theppitak Poonjuang, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sirisak Fufung edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sirisak Fufung, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kirati Kaewnongdang edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nnadigoodluck and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kirati Kaewnongdang, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nnadigoodluck}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 15:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposing deletion edit

The {{prod blp}} template is not appropriate for user pages, please don't put it on editor's pages again like you did at User:Nnadigoodluck. Schazjmd (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nitipong Sanmahung edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Nitipong Sanmahung, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Thank you for creating 2020 Chonburi F.C. season.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

More RS needed. Also, official website is not RS.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 10:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pornthep Chankai for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pornthep Chankai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornthep Chankai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 14:37, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sirichai Phumpat moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sirichai Phumpat, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Surasak Koomgun moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Surasak Koomgun, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nopphakhun Uchareon moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Nopphakhun Uchareon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Peemvit Thongnitiroj moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Peemvit Thongnitiroj, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Chawanwat Srisook moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Chawanwat Srisook, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:10, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Chusana Numkanitsorn moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Chusana Numkanitsorn, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Panuwat Meenapa for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panuwat Meenapa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panuwat Meenapa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sirisak Musbu-ngor moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sirisak Musbu-ngor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Panuwat Meenapa. Praxidicae (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thailand national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira Nishino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nopphakhun Uchareon edit

 

The article Nopphakhun Uchareon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The player has played for just 2 minutes in his career (in 2017). While technically meeting WP:NFOOTY, clearly not notable enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrClog (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nopphakhun Uchareon for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nopphakhun Uchareon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nopphakhun Uchareon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MrClog (talk) 07:22, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Watchara Kaewlamun for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Watchara Kaewlamun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watchara Kaewlamun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thanathon Chanphet for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thanathon Chanphet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanathon Chanphet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 22:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continued removal of AfD templates by Siamfootball. MrClog (talk) 10:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for continuing to remove AfD templates from articles after previous warning.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 10:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Siamfootball (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have updated the pages with citations and I believe the AfD templates do no longer apply.

Decline reason:

You seem to be saying you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. The AfD notice clearly indicates "this notice must not be removed" (emphasis theirs). Yamla (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Just to expand on that: AfD templates should never be removed unless the AfD discussion is closed. For example, Nopphakhun Uchareon is currently nominated for deletion. If there is consensus among editors that the article shouldn't be removed, an uninvolved editor will close the discussion and remove the tag from the page. You are welcome to explain why you do not think the article should be deleted on the article's AfD entry (linked to in the notice), but cannot remove the AfD tag. --MrClog (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry edit

Nomination of Anisong Chareantham for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anisong Chareantham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anisong Chareantham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amkgp (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kittiphon Laengthaisong edit

Hello, Siamfootball

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kittiphon Laengthaisong, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Amkgp (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Phongsakon Trisat edit

 

The article Phongsakon Trisat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kritsada Nontharat edit

 

The article Kritsada Nontharat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Apidet Janngam edit

 

The article Apidet Janngam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thanadol Kaosaart edit

 

The article Thanadol Kaosaart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mehti Sarakham edit

 

The article Mehti Sarakham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thirapak Prueangna edit

 

The article Thirapak Prueangna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kittiphong Khetpara edit

 

The article Kittiphong Khetpara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Warakorn Thongbai edit

 

The article Warakorn Thongbai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sarawut Soawaros edit

 

The article Sarawut Soawaros has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jakkrapong Sanmahung edit

 

The article Jakkrapong Sanmahung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kritsada Nontharat for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kritsada Nontharat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kritsada Nontharat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 01:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chusak Sriphum for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chusak Sriphum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chusak Sriphum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hillelfrei• talk • 04:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Guinean expatriate sportspeople in Thailand edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Guinean expatriate sportspeople in Thailand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Poramut Krongborisut edit

Hello, Siamfootball,

Thank you for creating Poramut Krongborisut.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

'External links' means a link which is likely to have relevant information - what we need to know are your references/sources. Can you please clearly add them, or this is likely to be deleted, as it is an unreferenced biography of a living person.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Adisorn Daeng-rueng moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Adisorn Daeng-rueng, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Bernard Doumbia edit

Hello, Siamfootball,

Thank you for creating Bernard Doumbia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add clear references to all articles you create, especially on living people. 'External links' just gives suggestions for further reading - your sources need to b e clear and WP:INLINECITED.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Kittiphon Laengthaisong edit

Hello, Siamfootball,

Thank you for creating Kittiphon Laengthaisong.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Not notable, and containing only one self-interested source

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Seligne}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Seligne (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nopphakhun Uchareon edit

 

Hello, Siamfootball. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nopphakhun Uchareon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kittiphon Laengthaisong for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kittiphon Laengthaisong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittiphon Laengthaisong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Adisorn Daeng-rueng edit

 

Hello, Siamfootball. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adisorn Daeng-rueng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Poramut Krongborisut for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poramut Krongborisut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poramut Krongborisut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chaiyaphat Honbanleng for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaiyaphat Honbanleng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaiyaphat Honbanleng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chinnawat Wongchai for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chinnawat Wongchai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinnawat Wongchai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Peter Ormond 💬 19:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kritsada Nonchai edit

 

The article Kritsada Nonchai has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gageills (talk) 02:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Teerapat Chaichoedchu for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teerapat Chaichoedchu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teerapat Chaichoedchu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Anucha Kaenthongchan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anucha Kaenthongchan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anucha Kaenthongchan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sorasak Kaewinta for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorasak Kaewinta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorasak Kaewinta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yannasit Sukchareon for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yannasit Sukchareon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannasit Sukchareon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chayanon Khamkan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chayanon Khamkan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chayanon Khamkan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wasan Samarnsin for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wasan Samarnsin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wasan Samarnsin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply