User talk:Secret Saturdays/Archive 1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Secret Saturdays
My archive is being renovated. If you have any ideas, please put them on my talkpage .

Welcome to my first archive! Please browse around and enjoy my old messages! Secret Saturdays (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Secret Saturdays. You have new messages at Darren23's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Darren23 (Contribs) 21:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Message

edit

To apply to become an administrator, you may nominate yourself at WP:RFA. Keep in mind, however, that candidates rarely pass RfA with fewer than 3,000 or 4,000 edits, and you only have 59 contributions. Regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 21:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Would you care to expand your comment?

edit

Hi, thanks for your comment, I notice you are a new editor to this wikipedia, would you please explain your comment a little more, as to why you think Julian would make a good bureaucrat, Wikipedia:Requests_for_bureaucratship/Juliancolton#Support (Off2riorob (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC))Reply

How to create a bot.

edit

You would need to be quite advanced in computer programming and code writing, which I am not. If you are and you want to know more about it, you could try asking User:Henrik as I know he has made one. Good luck. (Off2riorob (talk) 23:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC))Reply

This page might be useful..Wikipedia:Bot_policy (Off2riorob (talk) 23:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC))Reply
This is useful too: Wikipedia:Creating a bot --87.173.243.209 (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Deleting stuff

edit

Well, only sysops have the ability to delete pages or files, but there are appropriate venues for non-admins to request deletion, depending on the nature of the content. See WP:DEL for more info. Cheers, –Juliancolton | Talk 02:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

cmt. at Jimbo's talk page

edit

Do you mean this? Griffinofwales (talk) 02:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'll second that, although I think the name of "Questions" rather than "Village Pump" might be more accessible to newcomers. :-) In any event, I don't get involved with such things as naming pages and figuring out what links should be on the home page.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 11:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, we already have Wikipedia:Questions. The English Wikipedia is significantly larger than Simple English Wikipedia, so we've created several pages for questions and divided them by topic/category. As noted above, the "Village Pump" is the most similar to SEW's "Simple Talk", which is more about discussion, whereas the help desks are specifically for questions. Lara 15:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, resolved...

edit

At least as far as the Help Desk is concerned because you were referred to the proper place to make your proposal. – ukexpat (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXVII

edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

August 2009

edit

  Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Olympic symbols. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You've been adding unsourced, conjectural material to articles. Please use reliable sources, per WP:RS. Binksternet (talk) 00:09, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ku Klux Klan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey!

edit

Sorry, I've been very, very busy the last few months and had practically no time to check in on Wiki. Is there anything I can do to help you out? :) Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 18:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

That one's not bad at all, don't be silly! :) I had one storyboarded out from before, but I never had the chance to make it. Basically, here's how it goes;
(shot of a Greek statue, GFDL of course) "From the hands of the ancients..." (font in the same colour as the backdrop behind the statue, picture pans to the side and the statue reveals the words. Fade text and change to picture of Vancouver games 2010 logo) "... to the hands of the future..." (pan text, now white, in same fashion; fade, change to picture of Olympic rings) "One thing remains the same; their future is in OUR hands." Rings gleam once, then all text is replaced by "Join Wikiproject Olympics today!"
How does that sound? :) Feel free to change anything if you'd like, and tell me when you'd like me to make it; and yes, I know that it's quite lame. :P Cheers! Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 18:42, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
File:Qxz-ad187.gif
There you go! I included the image you requested. How does it look? Feel free to suggest any changes. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :D 22:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of ~~Signature~~

edit
 

A tag has been placed on ~~Signature~~ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. BrianY (talk) 23:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I've moved this to your userspace, since it looks like you mean to use it as your personal signature. Don't forget to substitute it, if that's the case. AnturiaethwrTalk 23:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thanks for signing in my guestbook!

 
The Autograph book barnstar

I also see that you are really interested in Userboxes. Please join Wikipedia:WikiProject Userboxes and make significant contributions regarding userboxes. --Srinivas (talk) 07:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Signature transclusion

edit

I've noticed that your signature is a transclusion of User:Secret Saturdays/Signature. However, signature transclusion is not allowed for many reasons (see Wikipedia:SIG#NT). Please substitute the signature with {{subst:User:Secret Saturdays/Signature}}. Thank you. Shubinator (talk) 01:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXVIII

edit

Delivered by –Juliancolton | Talk at 15:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

More evil than satan himself listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect More evil than satan himself. Since you had some involvement with the More evil than satan himself redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Shubinator (talk) 04:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Ipod Touch 1st Generation.JPG

edit

Hi! I just want to give you a heads up that just because you say you own an image doesn't mean you do, and that the file is improperly licensed. I can keep a secret, but sooner rather than later someone will discover your iPod Touch image, tag is as improperly licensed, and have it deleted. Don't take it personally - they are neurotic about copyright here and (especially) on Commons. An image very similar to yours was uploaded to the English Wikipedia, but was recently deleted. I contested it; they deleted using an automated tool that didn't care. I'm going to work some template magic here, but don't expect it to survive long on Commons. HereToHelp (talk to me) 01:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi Secret Saturdays! You are receiving this message because we've noticed your excellent edits on iOS-related articles. We need your help at the iOS task force! There is much work to do, so please head over to the project page and help us enhance and increase the coverage of iOS related articles on Wikipedia!


Your IP

edit

Is this you just not signing in, are you doing it in purpose, or it's not you doing these edits? Please don't take any offense in this. Thanks. Darren23 My Edits 23:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Word Association

edit

Hi. You played two words in one go here, [1], so I've rolled the game back. Please only play one word at a time, Thanks. Hiding T 10:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply




Speedy deletion nomination of Doodle Jump

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Doodle Jump requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 23:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:Doodle jump icon.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Doodle jump icon.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nintendo task force membership update

edit

It's that time again to update membership status with the Nintendo task force, which we try to do every 3-4 months to keep our membership up-to-date.

All participants have been placed on an "Inactive participants" list. To confirm that you're still a member of the Nintendo task force, simply go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo#Members and move your name from the "Inactive participants" list to the bottom of the "Active participants" list. If you are no longer an active member in the task force, you may simply remove your name altogether. After 1 month, on October 1, all entries under the "Inactive participants" list will be removed. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Nintendo-related articles. Regards, MuZemike 17:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Family Guy

edit

Hey secret saturdays, let me ask you a question are you good at family guy articals. --Pedro J. the rookie 03:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Me and some friends are tryin to make it a GA, and i could use some help. --Pedro J. the rookie 01:17, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Doodle Jump

edit
  On September 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doodle Jump, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jake Wartenberg 11:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXX

edit

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 19:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.Reply

DYK for Wii Zapper

edit
  On September 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wii Zapper, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jake Wartenberg 06:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Classic Controller

edit
  On September 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Classic Controller, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 07:08, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Reply

edit
 
Hello, Secret Saturdays. You have new messages at Nihonjoe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Instanbul

edit

Re: Your new userbox added on 17 Sept over at WP:Userboxes/New Userboxes - a rouge n has got in there... Plutonium27 (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rouge is for rogue (its why I linked it) - anyway its an internets mispelling term like 'teh' or 'pwned' and doesn't really matter. The rogue is the extra 'n' in the new userbox you designed. It has Istanbul spelt incorrectly - you put 'Instanbul' instead. Plutonium27 (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bollywood Wikipe-tan

edit

I saw your message in my talkpage, Secret Saturdays. Sorry for my late reply.

I have little knowledge of Bollywood clothing (though I know what Bollywood is). Are they the same thing as the traditional dresses of India? Or, more strange ones? Could you show me the photos or illustrations of typical Bollywood clothings? The more sources the better.--Kasuga (talk) 16:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Uh...sorry. I saw your materials and worked on some sketches for the work for these three days. But I couldn't finish your request. Bollywood clothing is complicated, and my knowledge and art-skill are not enough for them. Please give me the time for study and training a bit more. --Kasuga (talk) 10:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please change your signature

edit

Your signature as it is now displays the current time, rather than the time you wrote down each comment. I can see that you're trying to fix this, and I can help you fix it: you need to put the word "Subst" after each {{ in the template for it to work the way you want.

But your signature is still too long (it should not be more than 255 bytes, and is currently almost double that (see here). And as mentioned before, you shouldn't be subst'ing a sig from a subpage anyway. So please revert back to the signature you had before you had started using the fancy subpage. If you have any more questions you can ask me on my talkpage. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 23:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your signature...

edit

...is beyond broken. Firstly, when I reply, the last thing I want to see is a massive block of text-

[[User:Secret Saturdays|<font color="orange">Secret Saturdays</font>]] ([[User Talk: Secret Saturdays|talk to me]]) <span style="border: 3px solid #7FFF00;">
<span style="background: gold; color: Black;">{{CURRENTDAYNAME}},
<span style="background: black; color: yellow;">{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}
{{CURRENTDAY}},
<span style="background: #ED1C24; color: #66023C;">{{CURRENTYEAR}}
<span style="background: #6050DC; color: #004953;">{{CURRENTTIME}} (UTC)

Secondly, your signature updates, depending on the time the page is loaded (which obviously defeats the point) as you are not subst'ing your date templates. Thirdly, your "green box around the text" thing doesn't close, which means subsequent comments also get it. While I'm here, this talk page is massive (due in part to the ridiculous userpage content at the top- use your user page for that stuff) and the unarchived newsletters, and the centralised formatting makes it difficult to read... J Milburn (talk) 21:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It took me a full eight seconds to load this talk page in order to respond. I didn't mean to anger you, but I do think you are overreacting a little. Talk pages are intended for communication- if there is any biographical information at all, it should really be quite brief, and probably restricted to a header/edit notice; not the several sections you have. Also, newsletters are typically very large (the WikiCup newsletter is one of the larger ones) and so removing/archiving as soon as they have been read is perhaps a good idea. J Milburn (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Motto of the Day

edit

Hello I am contacting you because you seem to be active recently in WP:MOTD. There has been a lack of interest lately, and I would greatly appreciate it if you responded to my comments on the MOTD talk page. Cheers. --LAAFansign review 03:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Double Association

edit

Please play a second word to go with the first word. Thanks!

GAN

edit

Per this edit I feel as though you need to know that the article won't be reviewed unless you add it to WP:GAN and follow the directions on how to list the article and how to add the GAnom tag to the article talk page. PS can you please move the userboxes etc. on the top of your talk page to your userpage. It took forever for it to load.--Giants27(c|s) 23:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your user talk page

edit

If you are not going to listen to my advice about your userpage, you can at least listen to policy. I have removed several non-free images that were in use in your userspace. Per our non-free content criteria, non-free content may not be used outside of the article space. J Milburn (talk) 21:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Dennis Ferguson

edit
  On September 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dennis Ferguson, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 04:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

RE: Ad

edit

Sure! :) Anything specific you want in it? Sorry for the long response time, pretty busy. Cheers, Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 16:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXXII

edit

WALL-E

edit

I have removed your nomination of WALL-E at featured article candidates. Only significant contributors to the article should nominate it for FAC. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Secret Saturdays. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
Message added 01:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Dabomb87 (talk) 01:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Robert E. Cox

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Robert E. Cox at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Beardmore Relics

edit
  On September 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Beardmore Relics, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 20:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK problem with Otter Centre

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Otter Centre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nice article and hook with a mayor problem: no inline citation at all. Fails criteria 3: The hook fact must be cited in the article with an inline citation, since inline citations are used to support specific statements in an article. Sebastian scha. (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

User:Secret Saturdays/PS3 and Wii are superior!

edit

Your user box was moved from User:Secret Satrudays/PS3 and Wii are superior! to your user space User:Secret Saturdays/PS3 and Wii are superior! Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:Please review History of the flags of Romania

edit

Done. --Pedro J. the rookie 00:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congrats your artical has become a GA. --Pedro J. the rookie 00:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Pedro J. the rookie 02:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Secret Saturdays. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
Message added 02:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Dabomb87 (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

GAN:FA

edit

I nominated fg to a ga so can you review it. --Pedro J. the rookie 23:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

FAMILY GUY. --Pedro J. the rookie 00:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

So whats the overall. --Pedro J. the rookie 17:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Time edit

edit

I'm not sure what you mean, but if you are talking about how to only display the time in your signature, add 5 tildes (~~~~~) and it will appear like this:

22:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is not what you mean, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Nocturnal Wanderer 22:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions for the WALL-E film article

edit

Hi User:Secret Saturdays,
Regarding the plot section, take a look here --> Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary#Length.
It tells you how much words you can have, because the plot is very long.
Also think about just what's really important to keep.
Otherwise, the article looks great to me!
Good luck, and if you have any questions, you can ask me.
ATC . Talk 00:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Did You Know problem

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Ibn al-Nafis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 17:25, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of The cartilige family

edit

I have nominated The cartilige family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ceranthor 01:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

edit

Hi Secret Saturdays! I have a question, how do you make a picture for the userboxes cause I need a picture for my creation of a userbox. Thanks! RuneScape Adventure Sign! 00:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination/reviewing activity

edit

A friendly advice. Please

Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Robert E. Cox

edit
  On October 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert E. Cox, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

SoWhy 16:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Otter Centre

edit
  On October 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otter Centre, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks ... Do think about one for Halloween! Victuallers (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Dean L. Hubbard

edit
  On October 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dean L. Hubbard, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (see the pageview stats(?)) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈ Chamal talk ¤ 18:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

United Arab Emirates Good article

edit
 
Hello, Secret Saturdays. You have new messages at MoHasanie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GA Review Comment

edit

Hi Secret Saturdays! Please don't add {{GAReview}} tags to articles that you have nominated on the GAN page, as you did to United Arab Emirates. Users are not allowed to review the articles that they nominate, although you are more than welcome to review other articles. Dana boomer (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXXIII

edit

St. Johns River

edit

Hey. Thanks for the review here. Did you forget to promote the article per the GAN page pass instructions? --Moni3 (talk) 21:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Review

edit

Hey! I'm just running out of the house, so I can't review right now; I made two minor fixes, so look those over if you'd like. I promise I'll get to it when I get home. Cheers, Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 22:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Evolution

edit

This is a featured article. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Scribblenauts GA

edit

Go right ahead, I think there may be a few things to be done but a good GA reviewer will help catch those. --MASEM (t) 23:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Permission to make Barack Obama presidential primary campaign, 2008 a FA

edit

I don't think that would be a good idea. Shouldn't you try for the "good article" distinction first? I can't see any major problems in a cursory overview, so I don't see why that would be difficult. johnpseudo 00:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You certainly have permission to nominate it to be a GA. Good luck! johnpseudo 01:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thanks for nominating some pictures over at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Unfortunately, several of these nominations were not promoted (speedy close) due to obviously failing the Featured Picture criteria. Before you nominate any more images, please take a look at those criteria. If you're not sure if an image meets the criteria, head over to Wikipedia:Picture peer review, where experienced FP contributors will give you their opinions about the image and suggestions for improving it. Thanks again for your participation at FPC. We hope to see you around there again in the future. Regards, Makeemlighter (talk) 04:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Olympic Bid

edit

Feel free to nominate. I don't think it has a great shot, but go for it. The effort will likely raise the quality of the article. Ping me when it is up so I can watch it (and maybe help out a little).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Secret Saturdays, would you consider withdrawing the nomination? It's clearly not ready, and the FAC is quite frankly a drain on reviewer resources, which could be spent on more prepared nominations. In addition, I don't want to come across as harsh but your past two nominations (Wall-E and this) show why it's really not a good idea to nominate articles you haven't worked on (even with the primary contributor's permission), as you don't have a good sense of how ready an article is when you aren't intimately familiar with the subject matter and probably do not have access to all the necessary sources. There's nothing to stop you from working with the primary contributor to improve the article, though. Thanks for your understanding, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed major reforms to decade articles

edit

Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky (talk) 08:51, 17 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Love? (album)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Love? (album) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 02:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Morocco

edit

Hi there. I notice you recently passed the article Morocco as a GA, but I'm afraid I have opened a GA reassessment on the article as it does not meet the GA criteria in a number of essential areas. Please see my comments at GAR and the failed review of the article by an experienced reviewer three weeks earlier (Talk:Morocco/GA1) for pointers on where these problems are.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXXIV

edit

Process

edit

You need to learn the article review processes. At FAC, you should take articles that you are very familiar with and for which you are likely to be able to address the concerns of the community. At GAC, you should also post articles that you are familiar with and await review by someone qualified to review it. I am not qualified to review the article that you have pinged me about.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your second wave of FP nominations

edit

These images are still not quite "there", as it were. I suggest you stick around FPC to see first hand the kind of things that do and don't pass, and get an idea for what people are looking for. Obviously, you don't have to be certain an image will pass to submit it, but the pictures you are submitting at the moment are way below the FP line. J Milburn (talk) 00:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

edit

Interviewing Sandy

edit

If you'd like to interview Sandy (assuming she's up for it), it's pretty much totally in your hands; just update the Signpost interviews page when you have something ready. Alternatively, after you make sure she's on board, you could draft up some questions and ask for feedback and suggestions from other Signpost writers before you start with the interview.--ragesoss (talk) 13:44, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's probably not the best time for me to try to carve out time for this ... maybe in a month or so? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Secret Saturdays

edit

The RfA is malformed. Do you want us to delete it or fix it? And one off topic note, I suggest you archive your talk page, it is getting really long. Darren23Edits|Mail 22:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:I need your opinion.

edit

No, it'll have no chance at FPC- the technical quality just isn't there, and the composition isn't great- the museum itself is hard to see due to the people and cars. It's also a strange angle, and the lighting in the sky is a bit strange. I doubt it will have a chance at valued pictures, but it may have. I'm not really involved in VPC anymore. J Milburn (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

General advice

edit

Hi Secret Saturdays. I see you are very keen to get involved in Wikipedia. Well done on the enthusiasm! I have just become aware of your GA review of Morocco. This has been challenged, and is about to be overturned. I also noted that you had not removed the article from the nomination list (I have now done this). When you next do a Good Article review, let me know and I'll give you some advice and assistance. When clicking on your name people land on your user page. Currently it is very rich with userboxes so it takes a considerable amount of time to load. I would strongly advise you to cut back on the userboxes. It is also helpful to archive your talkpage so people find it easier to navigate. I can show you how to do this if you wish. I also note above that you nominated yourself for adminship, but the page was not completed properly. You have the option of finishing it off or having the page deleted. As people with less than 12 months experience do not get accepted for adminship - and it wouldn't be a comfortable experience for you getting rejected at this stage - it would be best for the page to be deleted. I can do that for you. Please get in touch with me on my talkpage to discuss any of these matters. Regards SilkTork *YES! 18:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Ultra Hand.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ultra Hand.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 22:33, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Atari-Cosmos.jpg

edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Atari-Cosmos.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 22:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

"You have new messages"

edit

I noticed you have a fake "You have new messages" sign on your userpages. Could you remove them? Per Wikipedia:User page, simulated Mediawiki interfaces shouldn't be used outside of testing. Shubinator (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter XXXV

edit