Welcome edit

Hello, Sakthi swaroop, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ninney (talk) 17:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


Speedy deletion nomination of Vasudhaika software solutions edit

Hello Sakthi swaroop,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vasudhaika software solutions for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Buffalutheran (talk) 06:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Badam galli edit

Hello Sakthi swaroop,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Badam galli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Buffalutheran (talk) 06:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sakthi swaroop, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Sakthi swaroop! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 22:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Sakthi swaroop! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:48, Friday, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Sakthi swaroop! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:49, Friday, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalgudi edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kalgudi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rasel lio (talk) 05:50, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Roman Saini for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Saini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Saini (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackguard 06:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kavuri hills for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kavuri hills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kavuri hills until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 13:41, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removing AfD template edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kavuri hills. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasudhaika private limited edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vasudhaika private limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E 10:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sakthi swaroop! Thank you for your contributions. I am BeenAroundAWhile and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 08:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Benhur mahesh dutt ekka edit

Hello, Sakthi swaroop. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Benhur mahesh dutt ekka, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Benhur mahesh dutt ekka to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Jaaron95 (talk) 07:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 28 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M.N. Reddi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traffic policing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

thank you edit

fine , i will edit the link , thanking you , can i know how to insert images in to the article ?? swaroop 10:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Creating new articles edit

 

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Pishcal 13:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Nandan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Nandan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Template:User WikiProject History of India, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ninney (talk) 17:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Addanki sridhar babu edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Addanki sridhar babu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, Sakthi swaroop and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

Go through our online training for students.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Shrikanthv (talk) 12:39, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sridhar Babu Adhanki (August 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 23:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sridhar Babu Adhanki (October 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 16:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:IraSinghal.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:IraSinghal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:IraSinghal.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IraSinghal.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Commissioner.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Commissioner.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Roman Saini.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Saini.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka edit

 

The article Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mid level bureaucrat, nothing to show that GNG is met (by way of searches); does not meet any of the SNGs either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 17:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Swathi Lakra edit

 

The article Swathi Lakra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mid level police officer, nothing to show that the subject meets GNG (including via searches) or anything to meet the SNGs. The content and refs within are primarily related to governmental programs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —SpacemanSpiff 17:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Meet postponed edit

Hi, After a series of discussions, it was decided to conduct a joint English-Wikipedia and Telugu Wikipedia joint meetup. So the meetup date and time have been changed to 20 December 2015 at 10:00 AM IST. Please refer the Meetup page for venue details. I regret for the postponement. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 07:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Madanapalle edit

If you are interested in geo-related articles, can ping me, I'll guide you.--Vin09 (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Sakthi swaroop. You have new messages at Vin09's talk page.
Message added 17:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Vin09 (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sridhar Babu Adhanki has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sridhar Babu Adhanki. Thanks! Vin09 (talk) 17:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Nimmakayala_Chinna_Rajappa edit

See the example Draft:Nimmakayala_Chinna_Rajappa. I've improved this, but still it has some info to be added. So, the same way BLPs need to be taken care to be able get approval.--Vin09talk 05:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sridhar Babu Adhanki (December 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 08:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sridhar Babu Adhanki has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sridhar Babu Adhanki. Thanks! Vin09(talk) 09:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Mahender Reddy edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mahender Reddy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140603/nation-current-affairs/article/m-mahender-reddy-takes-over-hyderabad-commissioner.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahender Reddy edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mahender Reddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.deccanchronicle.com/140603/nation-current-affairs/article/m-mahender-reddy-takes-over-hyderabad-commissioner. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ira Singhal for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ira Singhal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ira Singhal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benhur Mahesh Dutt Ekka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 15:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Swathi Lakra for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swathi Lakra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swathi Lakra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SpacemanSpiff 15:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Nice work on biographies , keep going Ramsingh 08:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sakthi swaroop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't have any other accounts I use my own name "Sakthi Swaroop" As my user name, please do recheck... do let me know if i have any other issues . I Surely try to solve them ---swaroop (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are a confirmed sockpuppet; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sakthi_swaroop/Archive. Note that you need to explain how a completely unrelated person just happens to be operating from the same address and editing the same articles. Yamla (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sakthi swaroop (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The User was one of the Employee in my Small Firm (we use LAN connected desktops for our projects) , who was named "uday singh" with the user name " ram singh deena" who used to see my work and in the process of learning , he started stalking my profiles and wants to support or build his profile exactly like me (usually many new user's do ) and thats the reason he might have done those Edits. but it was not me maintaining seperate accounts . i wasnt aware of wiki rules completely. still whatever happened was a mistake . i urge i will not creeate anymore such disturbance again . At least i'll provide some refferrences to artilces if not creating newer ones to improve wiki. if its stil not possible to allow me . i will shift my work to any other section other than IAS , IPS Officers or you can give me other chance and can keep my name in watch list for some time untill you belive in me . Thanking you -- swaroop (talk) 07:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Interesting that this was not disclosed in your first request. I don't believe you for a second. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You say the other user (User:Ramsinghdeena) "was" an employee at your software firm. He clearly still is, per the checkuser's findings yesterday [1]. You also say he is a "new user". Can you please explain why both you and User:Ramsinghdeena created accounts on the same day in March 2015 within 3 hours of other [2] [3]? You each made your first edits to Wikipedia with 1 hour of each other the next day and you both spell "reference" as "refferrence" [4], [5] [6]. I also note that you canvassed editors to !vote "Keep" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ira Singhal (an article you created). [7], [8]. The IP 124.123.63.6, also canvassed support for that article [9] as well !voting "keep" , and of course so did User:Ramsinghdeena [10]. Voceditenore (talk) 10:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Answers for the Posed Question's. 1. we came to know about wikipedia , By an wikimedia Foundations Awareness programe & Meetup (it happens every month) . which gave us an hands on workshop last year . so that can explain . why the accounts were created on the same day and why the edits were Made on the same day.

2.why i called him as an "new user" , beacause once learning to write in Wiki, I progessed well with the help of senior editors . while he couldn't . he just made some few edits and was more happy in deleting or changing the articles .

3. Regarding the Canvassing i have gone through the line in Wikipedia itself which states " In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it be done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus.

I used the Talk pages to canvas .As a part of canvassing . that shows i was transparent .

As each and every part of wiki has its onw steps to learn , new rules to know .

i can conclude that i was unaware of much rules ,As i am a budding editor , i would surely follow the rules and learned much from this inicident . you can keep me on a watch list and can observe my future editings and article creations .

if you do have any other issues you can surely ask me . I will definitly clear the issue from my side --swaroop (talk) 12:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you both met and registered accounts at a WMF meetup in March 2015, where was this meetup held? User:Ramsinghdeena said last year that he's based in Hyderabad [11]. According to this, the last time a meetup was held in Hyderabad was in 2012. The next time was in December 2015. Yes, you were "transparent" about the canvassing although possibly not intentionally. You weren't simply notifying those editors about the discussion. You explicitly asked them to !vote "keep". I assume you now realize how inappropriate it is to try to recruit people to support your side in an AfD discussion. Just as it is entirely inappropriate for the person whom you say is your work colleague to vote "keep" in all the AfDs for your articles, i.e., here, here and here. Earlier, he had also removed the proposed deletion [12] from one of them. If you ever convince an administrator to unblock you, I suggest you read Wikipedia:COWORKER very carefully, and follow it scrupulously. Voceditenore (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Sakthi swaroop, the evidence does not support your allegations of co-workers. Interestingly, you glommed on to Voceditenore's point about the two accounts being created on the same day with your story about a meetup. I assume that means that at the meetup you and your co-worker used the same computer, and that after that you and your co-worker used the same work computer? Curious that these two sets of computers were identical in key ways. Not to mention that Voceditenore misread the creation dates of the two accounts. One was on March 4, 2015 (yours), and one was on March 5 (the "co-worker"). You may never be unblocked, but one thing certain is you won't be unblocked until you tell the truth.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


@Voceditenore and Bbb23: hi , there will be an indic wikipedian meet every month in hyderabad , one such link is here But i would surely accept that i did canvassing , i accept that and i wouldnt repeat it again . I tried my best to tell the truth and accepted whatever I did, still if you say both are operated by me, I'm helpless.--swaroop (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sakthi, "pings" won't work unless you sign your message in the same edit that added the ping. I'm here because I have this page on watch. I'm not sure what the Telgu Wikipedia workshop announcement has to do with this. Neither you nor User:Ramsinghdeena have edited the Telgu Wikipedia. You didn't even create an account there until December 2015. Anyhow, I'm not an administrator, so couldn't unblock you even if I thought it were appropriate. However, Bbb23 has given you some good advice if you want to get unblocked. Voceditenore (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

hi , yep i never created or contributed to telugu wikipedia for long time . but the meet was held . and as in initial stages , we never know that we should sign or we should have talk page etc . we never signed in it . and coming to the "truth" . i accepted i canvassed . as i mentioned it earlier also . i would urge to give an other chance . you can keep my account in watch list .so that i can start improving articles or shift my focus on other genre of articles etc... - swaroop (talk) 15:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello, thanks for contacting me on Facebook. For transparency, let me write here the suggestions I have given you (over email):

Hello

Sakthi Swaroop,
they have blocked me as i have canvassed for my article whihc i did unknowingly do help in this issue

--​ Actually you have been blocked as a sockpuppet, and sockpuppet block is one of the most complicated blocks. I have worked in such environments, but I must tell you, in such situation an admin has very little to do.

Vin09 contacted me yesterday on this, and I'd suggest you the same things I told him:

  • Read what they are saying, and answer accordingly
  • If you are really a sock, admit it, there is no use of denying
  • If you are not a sock, read the help pages linked in those block message (and discuss accordingly).

Let me know if you have questions. I'll post a copy of this message on your Wikipedia talk as well.

--Tito Dutta (talk) 06:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Sridhar Babu Adhanki concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sridhar Babu Adhanki, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Adieu Wikipedia edit

@Voceditenore, Bbb23, Vin09, Sitush, and SpacemanSpiff:

I want raise some points . I know the so called top level admins wont consider it. But if you consider . They really matter .

1. How come you people Doesnt know ?? that there are some meetups which will be happening every month may be indic or telugu or tamil and due lack of systems they give us chance to edit from same system ???? which will have same IP .

A) we new users when we first visit an workshop , we dont even know how and where to sign. so how we will ??

Sol . Ask wiki guys to give more systems or Ask the so called Admins to know the practical issues.

2. We surely accept our Mistakes . but if you bring some unrelated proofs and ask us to admit it . We are not going against our self respect . May be it is wiki or some thing else .

A} if supporting my article is called "sockpuppet" , then you should surely block other users like 1bandsaw , northamerica etc .. who supported my article . are you going to do that ???

Sol . Dont ask any guy to admit some thing forcefully , that never works !!!!

3. How come porn stars are so notable , than An prestigious IAS or IPS officers who are protecting our Society . there is an seperate section of pornstars where every pornstar is notable .

but in case of a Civil servant or a patroit or a Military guy . why these people are called MId level officers or not notable even they have Media presence . I dnt know!!!!


Finally, I have made a few Articles like Roman Saini , Ira Singhal , M.n.Reddy , Swathi lakra , Srikanth Bolla ... who paid so much back to the Society , Who are the real Patriots , who can develop the society .

I am proud of my contributions and my articles talk for themselves ...

For Example when i started roman saini i got notable issues , but now he is changing the country with free education . i bet no one can say that the article is useless .

I would thank all the senior Editors who helped me to grow in Wikipedia . I loved this platform very much .

I would Ask wiki to make an User freindly platform for the new comers . Explain them the rules . Atleast give an satutory waring or a chance if they do a mistake. guide them instead of blocking them .

Because every veteran editor started with Mistakes and all kind of scrap . before they reached this position .

Bye wikipedia ..one day surely come when i will be back ...I am bit notable in startup eco system too . you can visit my webiste @ [13]

Thank you vin09 for being my mentor and Titto Sir for your Guidance

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Adieu !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --swaroop (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:SakthiSwaroop.jpg edit

 

The file File:SakthiSwaroop.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused personal photo - out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XXN, 00:41, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of M. N. Reddi for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. N. Reddi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. N. Reddi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aronitz (talk) 12:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply