User talk:Renata3/archive13

Deleting Page

hi, I have noticed that you have deleted the of Dr. Naveed Iqbal. Was there any particular reason? If so, please explain. Also, if you think that the page had such no references, I would happy to provide you a links of the artcile. The reason I am telling you this is because I am considering of creating his page one more time. If you have any objection, please let me know as quickly as possible. Thank you!

Sincerly,

Wikipedia Contributor. XXX

R. Paksas

Gerb. Renata, Prašome neredaguoti Rolando Pakso en Vikipedijos puslapio, mes jį tvarkome ir taisome p. Pakso nurodymu, būtu paranku gauti jūsų e-meilą ar numerį, nes norėtume po pataisymų puslapį užrakinti.-> —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaalliant (talk • contribs) 10:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Images

Gerb. Renata, Kiek aš supratau, "non-free promotional" paveikslėliai gali būti naudojami tik tuo atveju, kai nėra nemokamos alternatyvos, pvz tokios kaip Creative Commons. Mūsų įdėtų medalių nuotraukų nemokamų alternatyvų nėra, todėl jas ir įkėliau su tokia licenzija. Ar aš kažką ne taip supratau? User_talk:Germantas —Preceding undated comment added 19:36, 18 October 2009 (UTC).

Images

Gerb, Renata,

Mačiau, kad ištrynėte visas nuotraukas išsaulės Šiaulių mūšio traipsnio. Tai kokia turite nemokama iliustracijos alternatyvą vaizduojančią Saulės mūšį? Liko tai tik žemėlapis kur pažymėta mūšio vieta... Pagarbiai, User_talk:Germantas —Preceding undated comment added 05:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC).

Reiskias yra dvi iseitys tik : susisiekti su taisykliu kureju ir paraginti, kad jas pakoreguotu, arba prie straipsnio prideti nuoroda i konkretu darba susijusi siu tuo straipsniu. Gal zinote kas atsakingas uz tu taisykliu kurima/redagavima? kazkoks turi buti main adminas ar kazkas panasaus.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Germantas (talk • contribs) 06:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Source question

Hey. Glad Oct 15th is history now? The question is this, are all websites that go city.lt, e.g. Garliava.lt [1], official govt sites? They'd be really useful if they were. Hope you get some fresh air, Novickas (talk) 22:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Well that's good news, thanks. Will add as ref to various articles. Later, Novickas (talk) 00:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

LITHCLEAN bot question

Hi R - this page seems to be under partial bot control. How often does it run? Triggered manually or automatically? Percentages updated manually/womanually or automatically? Don't want to waste effort updating entries there if not necessary. No hurry, Novickas (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, will be patient, it's long term. Novickas (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe not so long term given the BLP brouhaha. Would you be willing to contact the people who're creating project-based totally-unsourced-BLP reports to create a page for the LT project? Novickas (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Their gain, our loss :( I'll keep an eye on developments, probably the bot-assisted parts will get streamlined. The situation at LITH doesn't actually look too bad. Take care, Novickas (talk) 18:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

LITH not so bad, yay! We need to strain some obscure muscles by patting ourselves on our backs. Also when you have time pls remind me why we should care about WP. Novickas (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Prod'ing

Was way off my radar screen. Improvements long overdue. Perhaps we can get the production company to list on IMDB, there's certainly enough mention of the movie to be found.  PЄTЄRS VЄСRUМВА ►talk  04:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Listing in the IMDB does not confer notability, it is just a tool to assist in finding information like reviews, etc. --Martintg (talk) 08:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Another GA?

Shame Suwałki Agreement failed, but I think it could be renominated soon; hopefully it will be more stable this time. What about Talk:1919 Polish coup d'état attempt in Lithuania#GA class? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Karaite Judaism in WP:Lithuania

Why did you remove the article about Karaite Judaism from the Lithuania WikiProject? The Karaim are an ethnic minority that have lived in Lithuania since medieval times and practice this religion. Lithuanian Karaites have their own traditions that express their Lithuanian-ness, such as building 3 windowed houses (one of the windows represents Grand-duke Vytautas, who allowed them to live in the country). Lithuanian Karaite contributions to world culture include the classic book _Chizzuk Emunah_ (_Faith Strengthened_) by Isaac ben Abraham of Trakai, a rationalistic argument that Jesus did not fulfill the messianic prophecies outlined in the Christian Old Testament and that later Christianity made major departures from original Christianity. Isaac ben Abraham's book was praised by Voltaire and used by Enlightenment thinkers as a rallying point for secularism. It is still considered one of the great works of Jewish counter-missionary literature. Thus, I felt the article about Karaite Judaism belonged in WP:Lithuania, as Karaite Judaism is an interesting aspect of the country's culture and history. --AFriedman (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Here, I disagree--I think articles that discuss important aspects of Lithuanian culture are in the scope of WP Lithuania. This would include articles about a particular religion, including basic articles about Roman Catholicism (the majority religion of the country). The article about Lithuanian Jews is already in WikiProject Lithuania. On a related note, do you think the article about Crimean Karaites, who have an important population in Lithuania, belongs in this WikiProject? --AFriedman (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Lithuanian naval vessel categories?

Could you, perhaps, give me some background on your 1 November re-categorization of Flyvefisken class patrol vessel, HDMS Flyvefisken (P550), Grisha class corvette, and Vidar class minesweeper, which removed Lithuanian naval ship categories? I'm also curious about the almost simultaneous deletion of the newly emptied categories. Your edit summaries for the category deletions (from the deletion logs) indicate that you were claiming criterion C1 for unpopulated categories, but this is, according to the criterion itself, for categories "that have been unpopulated for at least four days". While continuing to assume good faith, I can't help but note that many of these were empty less than four minutes (much less hours or even days) before they were deleted. I've restored the categories on the article pages and ask that if you have any concerns about the categories themselves that you present your concerns about them in a WP:CFD discussion. — Bellhalla (talk) 07:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

You're invited!

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

No spam

Dear Renata3, in contrast to all the tourist links my links are not spamming. Many of theses articles are stub and my links are showing History, Geography and Genalogy of these places. Kaubri (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Julius Brutzkus

He is not mentioned as Minister for Jewish Affairs in Lithuania (he is actually even not mentioned at all) in European Politics: The Years of the First Republic, 1918-1940. Are you sure he was an incumbent for this ministry ? --Pylambert (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, sorry, I found an explanation, there seems to be an error in the abovementioned book, I found another source confirming Julius Brutzkus' brief portfolio. I modified in consequence the new article Lithuanian Ministry for Jewish Affairs. --Pylambert (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Ref reliability question

What do you know of mokslai.lt as a reference? Novickas (talk) 01:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Oh well. Was looking for refs for Lithuanian Tribunal, currently unref'd. Always so many websites to sift thru. Later, Novickas (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Kristijonas Donelaitis

On November 16, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kristijonas Donelaitis, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Eimantas Paltarackas

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Eimantas Paltarackas. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tim Song (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Deleted article of Eimantas Paltarackas

Hello,

Please, accept my apology for disturbing you but more than a week ago one of my articles has been deleted by you. Under the deleting it's been stated as "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion: total advertising".

By the user Protonk (On "request undelition" page) I have been told that "In order to meet our inclusion criteria, a subject must be covered in significant detail by multiple reliable sources".

Since I wrote this article I wasn't trying to advertise anything. Whole time I was concerned that this article would have to meet the Wikipedia guidance, including the inclusion criteria In this article I have provided a short biography about the radio and tv personality, outlined as Wikipedia:Notability (people). I read the list of what classifies as a people and there I'd found exact criteria that would subscribe to my article as "Creative professionals - journalist, entertainers".

Speaking about a subject who suppose to be covered by multiple reliable sources, there are many independent public media sources that clearly states about the identity and status of the subject from my article. Most of these sources are in native Lithuanian language, whatsoever, most of it can simply be translated into English. Please, find the links bellow.

• Information about the subject at the biggest Lithuanian daily news paper

• The completed entertainment projects, ideas (Note: Information at the bottom of the page). Official "Yearly city days" website supported by the local government

• Eimantas Paltarackas are the author of these all printed reports and interviews (The main news source in Lithuania)

And there are many other independent sources, entertainment awards that the name of Eimantas Paltarackas appears on it.

Currently, the person that I wrote this article about is working in United Kingdom, into the broadcasting industry. Including British Broadcasting Corporation, well known as a BBC. However, legally I don't have the approval to provide you yet with the information about this work with the BBC as it is the upcoming tv show project. Time by time he does cooperate with various Lithuanian media too.

Again, I honestly do apologise if this article has appeared as a total advertising. But please, can you look at the sources that I have provided to you and see if this article meets the Wikipedia inclusion criteria. I only wish that providing the story of someone's life from the Creative professionals sector will be accepted and available to the public.

Thank you so much for taking your time on this matter, deep down I really hope that you can help me. Regards, Sean. Sean Todd Lewis (talk • contribs) 21:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Greek-Kazakh relations

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Greek-Kazakh relations. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greek-Kazakh relations. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

FlyLal

Hi there, I moved the article to FlyLal as this appeared to be the most appropriate from reading the article. There seem to be two words, neither of which is an acronym, but they are rendered without a space. If you feel that Flylal is more appropriate, please feel free to change this. The only thing that should not be done is to use a lowercase "f". If you do make any changes, feel free to change the references I altered too, you are right, if the references are rendered in a particular way, then they can be styled this way, though it is not too important. I hope this helps, if not, please post again! Thanks Nouse4aname (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

If LAL is still currently an acronym, then yes, FlyLAL would be more appropriate. If however, it is no longer considered an acronym, then it can't be treated as such. Feel free to make the final decision on this, so long as the name is rendered with an initial capital, it is fine! Cheers, Nouse4aname (talk) 09:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Lovely

Thanks for this. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 06:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Friedrich Kellner

I just sent you an email, but in case it does not get through to you, I thought I should write to you here, as well. I am hoping you can help me with the Friedrich Kellner article, to translate it into Lithuanian. I have a condensed version of the article that I can send to you (about 1500 words). Thank you, Scott Rskellner (talk) 03:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Grinkiškis

Awesome - thanks for translating it. My great-grandmother was born there, and I've always wondered a bit about its history. (My grandmother was born in your hometown, actually...though she didn't live there long.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

My dearest

You should not believe in propaganda of 19th century an delete parts of those articles. + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaip%C4%97da_Revolt

Result "The at that time popular arguments about the "revolt" of Memellanders are still reiterated today as if Lithuanian achievements after 1990 are still not yet available and as if no conferences occurred between Lithuanian and German historians. In 1965 the former leaders of the "revolt" were the opinion to keep furthermore the secret about the real details because Lithuania could be compromised in admitting the scandal of the fraud and conspiracy." Source: Vygantas Vareikis, Ein zählebiger Mythos oder wer hat das Memelgebiet befreit?, p.195 in [2]"

I can tell you about Lithuania Minor-persons who voted for Lithuania, repatriated to Germany and emigrated to Canada. Do you really want to know this? Are your ancestors among them? I hope that you do not know what you are writing and deleting. Kaubri (talk) 23:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Nobody denies that the Lithuanian government was behind the revolt. Even my high school Lithuanian history textbook fully admitted that. However, whenever you write an article about Klaipeda Region/Memelland you do it with an agenda to prove that it wanted nothing to do with Lithuania and was all about Germany. That's your POV that you should leave outside Wikipedia. BTW, full re-write of the article is in progress. Renata (talk) 01:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Dearest Renata: I am glad to hear that the history of the Memel country has arrived with you. Just read history books once, and you will be convinced that the Memel country has nothing to do, absolutely nothing, with Lithuania. Simply do not believe in propaganda, and hold fast to facts. Kaubri (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Happy Holidays!

Linksmų Kalėdų ir laimingų Naujųjų Metų! Novickas (talk) 23:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

And now, for FV's traditional last-minute nonsectarian holiday greeting!

Here’s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Petras Cvirka

On December 26, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Petras Cvirka, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 03:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

What a nice surprise! Novickas (talk) 13:21, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

De moribus tartarorum, lituanorum et moscorum

Who said that the book was first dedicated to Sigismundus Augustus? In the 1615 edition I could only read dedication for Octavian August Prunskiene from Berestechko. Sincerely, Rembecki (talk) 21:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC).

Trubecki - one more time

You were active in the struggle with spammer Trubecki, so this could be interested for you: Talk:Nester_Trubecki. I know, that I should write this all on the page "articles for deletion", but I'm not sure how to do this (I'll be glad if can help me and past the information about the hoax on the right page). I'm not active in English Wikipedia, if you want to contact me, please do it through my discussion page in Polish Wikipedia (pl:Wikipedysta:Marcel_Duchamp). Best regards. --W Goslar (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Christianization of Lithuania

Christianization of Lithuania was the event that took place in 1387, initiated by the Grand Duke of Lithuania and King of Poland Jogaila Note that Jogaila was not a Grand Duke of Lithuania but Supreme Prince of Lithuania (Lituanie princeps supremus in Latin). Mathiasrex (talk) 13:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletes

Yes I have noticed it recently, it is very frustrating because I never actually delete anything. Do you know what could be the problem? Slaja (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

OK I will check this, thanks. On the Baltic States, was it you who wrote this; "According to IMF projections, the GDP based on purchasing-power-parity will contract 13–17% from 2008 to 2009."? Slaja (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

It seemed to me

that you were a bit trigger fingered about removing family info, and a lot of links, from Paolo Troubetzkoy. I plan on trying to salvage some of it but feel that it's prudent to discuss it with you first as you obviously (one of 23 words and phrases that mean "in my opinion") are not a vandal or even a haphazard editor . Life is supposed to be interesting. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me and thank you for trying to track down wikitrash the way that you have been doing. I'll not re-introduce anything without having a pretty good understanding of what it is. Carptrash (talk) 02:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Tõnu Trubetsky as Bloomfield

I was rather skeptical about Tõnu Trubetsky being Bloomfield - after all, Trubetsky is a long-time high-profile musician and to lesser degree, writer. There were rumors about his shaky mental state but I didn't believe them, after all, they were just rumors.

However, now Trubetsky has published a new book... with Cat Bloomfield as co-author. All the reviews I've seen ([2], [3], [4], [5]) consider Trubetsky to be the only author - and quite possibly Bloomfield is just his cat.

Just thought you might want to know.

--Sander Säde 09:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Very interesting. Some more pieces:

• Contact info for The Flowers of Romance (band 2). The speedied article listed Tonu as vocals + 9 other members (none other for vocals). Note contact info has email to Balckplait (another name for Tonu).
• Employee profile at UK charity
• Facebook profile
• Myspace lists Cat as vocals of some UK band

Hm... Renata (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't think UK charity, FaceBook and MySpace profiles are related to "our" Bloomfield, as it is a fairly common surname (Bloomfield#People) and Cat can be just a shorthand of Catherine. The Flowers of Romance singer is definitely Trubetsky - even the other members of the band are from Vennaskond. I seem to remember an interview about the band by Trubetsky, but I could be wrong.

In any case, if I can somehow help with the clean-up, just let me know.

--Sander Säde 16:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

I modified my WikiProject Estonia monitoring script to display changes in articles linked in your Bloomfield sub-page. That way I can see any changes in those articles every time I look at my watchlist - which is quite a few times in a day. If you would like to use the script, then this diff should give all the relevant code. All the best! --Sander Säde 10:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Unė Babickaitė

On January 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Unė Babickaitė, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Bloomfield

Good work on tracking down all the Bloomfield nonsense. It seems you got it covered and have dug much deeper into this than anybody else thus far. I'm going to keep an eye on Special:RecentChangesLinked/User:Renata3/bloom, that one is going to help a lot. Please feel free to notify me in case I might miss anything related to it in the future. Thanks!--Termer (talk) 04:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day NYC

Wikipedia 9th birthday coin

You are invited to celebrate Wikipedia Day and the 9th anniversary (!) of the founding of the site at Wikipedia Day NYC on Sunday January 24, 2010 at New York University; sign up for Wikipedia Day NYC here. Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Paksas

Working on this is a pain, because there's so much detail, but I'm glad you pointed me to it, because a major item looked to be, er, wrong. The article read [6] that the Vilnius District Court convicted him, he appealed using the best lawyers in LT, and the Supremes acquitted. That is backwards per [7] - the Law Library of Congress - states Vilnius court acquitted, Supremes Appeals Court convicted. One for the books, if anyone is keeping them, and if the LLC is correct. Later, Novickas (talk) 16:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

One question, is 15min.lt a reliable source? Used in the article, link [8]. Novickas (talk) 18:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Generally speaking 15min is as reliable as any other news portal -- i.e. not too much. They usually regurgitate other news sources and produce little original journalism. Supposedly this particular article is written by Aloyzas Sakalas, but it is a collection of half-baked political and personal rumors that run wild. I would not use it as a reliable source. The only thing that this could testify to that Paksas is accused of 100 different things, most importantly of strong ties to Russian oil money.

Thanks for taking care of this! My personal opinion of him is too negative to really adhere to NPOV :) Renata (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd have the same problem with some US politicians. Thanks for the final cleanup action. On the unref'd BLP flagging front, I tried to use "cat scan" [9] but no results after about 2 hours; it might could be swamped, or it might be picky about formatting, or who knows what. It may take a little while for E-Z project-based methods to show up. Till then the last Walterbot listing will do. Novickas (talk) 05:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

*Groan*.

Speaking of yuks, here's a great summation of WP naming disputes from [10]. Editor 1: "there are 5 gillion google hits for option A" Editor 2: "Encyclopaedia X uses option B" Editor 1: "Your research is flawed" Editor 2: "Your mother." Novickas (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: File:Skywarn.svg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Skywarn.svg

I was hoping you could fix some issues regarding this file, first the official image is not red, it is Blaze/Safety Orange RGB: 255,120,0 as seen here:

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/skywarn/

Also it is NOT PD, the license for usage of this image can be found here:

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/skywarn/resources/SKYWARN_branding_guidelines_v5.0_Oct08.pdf

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.48.253.34 (talk) 09:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Color updated. Please understand that copyright (public domain) is not the same as trademark. I added additional tag to indicate that on Commons. Renata (talk) 11:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Jeronimas Kačinskas

Hello Renata3: I noticed that you moved the Jeronimas Kačinskas list of compositions from the article to the talk page. I just wondered if there was a point for discussion, or other reason for this. Best regards, Hrdinský (talk) 06:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Your latest edit

[11] Could you advice me the source for text you've added -

• Soviet Union supplied Germany with raw materials in exchange for German factory equipment, installations, machinery and machine tools, ships, vehicles, and other means of transport worth 120 million Reichsmark.
• It was negotiated during from late 1938.

My sources - *Documents on German Foreign Policy, 1918-1945. Series D (1937-1945) Washington, D.C.: U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1949-64,

• Dokumente der Deutschen Politik. Reihe, 1935-1940. 8 Vols. Berlin: Junker und Dunnhaupt Verlag, 1942
• Schwendemann H. Die wirtschaftliche Zusamenarbeit zwischen dem Deutschen Reich und der Sowjetunion von 1938 bis 1941. Berlin, 1993
• ГОД КРИЗИСА 1938-1939 ДОКУМЕНТЫ И МАТЕРИАЛЫ В ДВУХ ТОМАХ ISBN 5-250-01092-X (с) Составитель МИД СССР. 1990

I can add a dozen more. Thanks Jo0doe (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

See replayJo0doe (talk) 21:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I responded on his page with direct quotes from the sources

Weird. The latter of the two wasn't even remotely controversial (not that the former was either). I'm incredibly busy right now and won't have time to engage in some huge wiki-argument about every quote in every article he may raise in the future. Mosedschurte (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

So so Wegner, p. 99 [4]

The Credit Agreement between the German Reich and the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics gave the Soviet Union an acceptance credit of 200 million RM over 7 years with an affective interest rate of 4.5 percent. The credit line was to be used during the next two years for purchase of capital goods in Germany and was to be paid off by means of Soviet material shipment from 1946 onwards.

While in article all given upside-down and "promices" affirmed in Feb 11 1940 given as The agreement covered "current" business, which entailed Soviet While - no in agrement text nor in secondary sources actually exist such explanation for - exactly the same story as DDR 1956 workers labled as "Nazi inspect Inspection of train with food" [12] - even it's clear at picture - no food at train exist :(Jo0doe (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Still guess - picture of Ju-90 and Me-109 in 1943 - which relation to Credit? It's well known that Ju-90 was not sold under Feb 11 1940 agreement. Nor produced in 1943 Me-109 G8. ThanksJo0doe (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

• I found really nice example -
  • Wegner, p. 101

in source

Immediately before the outbreak of the war in 1939 the Military Economic Staff in the Wehrmach (Wehrwirtschaftstab) High Command although thought that Germany could only be really from a blockade on the basis of close economic cooperation with the Soviet Union.

in article

The Wehrmacht High Command issued a report that Germany could only be safe from a blockade on the basis of close economic cooperation with the Soviet Union.

It's remaind me " White House Housekeeper believe in confirmed Giant monsters from Mars."  :)Jo0doe (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Destruction battalions

IP 70.51.28.70 (talk • contribs • info • WHOIS) (who is almost certainly permbanned RJ CG (talk · contribs)) has been making some major changes to Destruction battalions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article - mostly removing "unpleasant" facts & references and tagging sourced content with {{fact}}. But that is not what I came here to talk about - his changes made me analyze the article a bit more and it definitely could use expansion. Right now majority of the article deals with destruction battalions in Estonia, but as far as I know, the battalions were as active in Latvia and Lithuania - and even more active in Belarus and Ukraine. Also, the general description could use some work.

I do not know who could expand the article. Vecrumba is topic-banned, WikiProject Estonia has no history buffs and is semi-dead anyway. Zalktis (talk · contribs) and Peteris Cedrins (talk · contribs) are hardly active these days. Perhaps you know someone, who would be interested to expand the article - or even interested in it yourself?

--Sander Säde 09:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I really have to love the income tax system here in Estonia. Filling out the documents online takes about fifteen minutes, returns arrive within a week.

As for "history buff" - I did not necessarily mean you :) WikiProject Estonia would love to have someone with a passion to write articles about history. Alas, all such people have been driven away from Wikipedia. My own interest in history tends to be more about the Middle Ages - and even then, centered around specific people, buildings or places.

And I really cannot read/understand scientific level Russian anymore, too - too much time has passed since I had to actively speak Russian, now I can barely understand everyday phrases.

I think I will leave a short notice about the article to some users, if you don't mind? Perhaps Zalktis or Peteris Cedrins - or Philaweb (talk · contribs) might be interested and willing to improve the article.

--Sander Säde 15:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK credits for Lithuanian parliamentary election, 1990

On February 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lithuanian parliamentary election, 1990, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Gaspard Bauhin article

This is now a dog's breakfast - could you fix it? I don't know how to restore a version from a month ago; you could tell me how :) Novickas (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Ah, it requires the boldness to ignore the enlarged-font warning. Thx. Novickas (talk) 00:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Huh?

In all AGF what makes your project any different from all the rest on wikipedia? I know some russian project members fiercely resisted the idea of acknowledging they even had a project for a few years, but I am intrigued as to why white space seems so important on category pages for one particular project.

Rather than reverting all my edits with edit summaries only - you could at least have explained what makes your project different from the rest of wikipedia SatuSuro 02:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Category-Class_Death_articles - the coloured banner shows that well managed projects can have these types of pages for Wiki assessment that project space (ie can actually have category and project pages tagged) - is there something in the template of the lithuanian project templates that screw up in the face of extra tags - surely someone can tweak the template? or what? SatuSuro 02:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Personal? In the old days some projects actually used bots to maintain tagging - I am not a bot and I couldnt give a xxxx what some projects do . mandated - Wikiprojects are looked upon as the scourge of the universe by some eds who cannot handle being criticised for their stupidity from a subject knowledge base - their challenged geographical and general knowledge shines through when they get their bees and bonnets in a knot. however - a significant part of wikipedia is now inhabited by projects - and when they are not dysfunctional like wp:history where they cannot manage themselves - projects need tagging to actually find what they have in their scope. Leaving cats off in my experience is a bit like saying yes you have a kitchen but you deny you have a bathroom, but hey wp is a broad field of ideas. I'll leave it with you, and leave it at that - and I will make a mental note to note to avoid tagging anywhere too close (having just done art of estonia and latvia today) -('sfunny I was in helsinki last october thinking - shall I go travel through there for piccies, but in the end just flew to budapest instead) at least the russia project came good eventually - cheers SatuSuro 07:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Move

Hi, it seems I done with his, more or less. Could you move it to its permanent palace? M.K. (talk) 13:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi! As the creator of P:LT, i would love to hear your opinion on the matter in general> I also thinking to improving article Lithuania, but I need more hands, for the help. M.K. (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 21st, Columbia University area Last: 11/15/2009

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Tadeusz Kościuszko

I don't want this edit war, but they delete referenced information! I already complained on the topic but non admin intervented. Free Belarus (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

The fact he has Belarusian origins were referenced and discused on the talk page of the article, but some Polish nationalists ignore it and delete it! Free Belarus (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Reverts_and_vandalism_on_nationalistic_basis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Free Belarus (talk • contribs) 19:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations! Tadeusz Kosciuszko was belarusian(sic!). He has partly ruthenian roots, not belarusian, was Polish- Lithuanian!--marekchelsea (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

I haven't deleted he was Polish-Lithuenian, it was his citizenship, he was born in the Polish Lithuenian Commonwealth and faught for it, where did I delete that and argue with that? But he was ethnicaly Belarusian (at least partly! Unlike Polish roots that we don't have references showing he had), and Ruthenian is the same as Belarusian, just for the record. He spoke Belarusian (referenced), and he is considered Belarusian in many sources (which I gave there), so yes, he was Belarusian to (in fact, Belarusian ethnicity is the only ethnicity we know for sure he had). Free Belarus (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

RE: Lithuanian consorts

Hello, Renata3. You have new messages at Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A Request for Help

Hi there Renata3 :), I noticed your username on Translators Available Lithuanian to English. I was wondering if you could help with updating Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the Lithuanian Wikipedia? Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the English Wikipedia has been majorly revamped- particularly, its being treated as a BLP now, since no one has been able to find evidence of his death. I'm sorry to say I know little Lathuanian, so I'd really appreciate your help in this :), although I understand if you don't have the time. Thanks in advance! Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 04:50, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

German-German border

(Hello! Sorry if this is somehow in the incorrect format or style: am not a Wiki addict like some.) In your image to show Changes in German territory in the 20th Century you have the German-German border shown with a caption of "1945-91". This surely is wrong, as German reunification removed this border in 1990.

Hfossa (talk) 14:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC) [

Lithuanian painters

They really ought to all be expanded, but the interest on Lithuania in general is extremely low. Do whatever you feel is appropriate. Just don't delete the ones which have been expanded, even unreferenced ones. They can be salvaged. I expanded a few previously, so did User:Pohick. I just don't want people moaning at me about sub stubs again when I've spent the last nine months working very hard on expanding stubs and cleaning up content. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Pohick has said he will expand a few. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 12:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I hadn't realised you were Lithuanian initially; I think you are likely to know more about it than I do. If there are any you seriously doubt notability in and lack potental sources please draw up a list and those can be removed. I had initially thought they were all notable as I believe they have entires in the Lithuanian Encyclopedia. Somebody later said though that some of the articles included in there may not even be appropriate for wikipedia. Thanks Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Lietuvos futbolas

Labas, aha perskaiciau ta puslapi ir ten matau kad parasyta "all teams that have played in the the national cup" yra pakankamai svarbios, kad butu itrauktos. Tai kaipo viskas OK su tais Lietuvos klubais. AndPau (talk) 16:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination)

Hi, Renata3. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (3rd nomination), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Tylman (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Req

By moving back article name I left unwanted word "nobility" List of szlachta nobility. Could you eliminate it? Thanks, M.K. (talk) 14:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! M.K. (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome :) Renata (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kingdom of Lithuania (1918)

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22

New York City Meetup Next: Saturday May 22nd, OpenPlans in Lower Manhattan Last: 03/21/2010

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Ministries

Sorry about that...did a search for Ministries of Poland and that was the format they use. Looked over my watchlist today and saw Russavia fixed the defense ministry yesterday. So watchlist needs pruning.

Any chance you could do stubs on the missing ministries? I looked around some but could'nt find anything substantive beyond they exist and some current events. Hope you had a nice break, Novickas (talk) 18:20, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

You must be feeling brave. Thanks and best wishes, Novickas (talk) 23:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Renata3. You have new messages at TreasuryTag's talk page.
Message added 15:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

╟─TreasuryTag►constablewick─╢ 15:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Re Battle of Grunwald

You've improved it considerably - thanks! Early in adulthood I decided to stop trying to understand it. Too much exposure as a child to loud and lengthy arguments. After reading the most recent version, I have a much better handle on it in general, but would like to browse the subject some more - am not really comfortable copyediting without doing this. So need a week or two.

I'm always interested in public justification of wars. This seems to have been limited beforehand, apart from the accusations that Jogaila and Vytatutas were insincere Christians, at least I couldn't find any. The papacy looks to have been most unstable right then (Antipope Alexander V, Antipope John XXIII). So I wonder if that instability was a factor, not that there haven't been plenty of Christian v. Christian conflicts since then, but the Orders were directly subordinate to the Catholic hierarchy. But that's not necesary for a Good Article. Just wondering if you've encountered anything along those lines.

There was, however, a fair amount of just war discussion afterwards, esp. at the Council of Constance. [13], [14]. Could we put that in?

Overall, it looks great :) Later, Novickas (talk) 15:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Down to you now; hope the copyedits fairly represented the sources. Good luck and I'll be on call. Novickas (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Also thanks for the šašlykai! Novickas (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Maps of the Monastic state of the Teutonic Order

Hi, I have finished the maps you requested in their first versions. For your comments and the maps itself please see here: commons:User_talk:S._Bollmann#English_map. --84.185.90.89 (talk) 01:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC) respectively commons:User:S. Bollmann

Grunwald map

Hi, I have finished the first version of the Grunwald map. Please let me know your suggestions. commons:File:Grunwald_1410.png --84.185.118.193 (talk) 01:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

A new version of the map is online. Including your suggestions. I hope, all is fine now. --84.185.89.39 (talk) 19:53, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Melba1/Mindaugas_Piecaitis

HI Renata :) We haven't "met" before - I'm fairly new to WP (but fast getting addicted :/  ! ) I noticed you are Lithuanian, so maybe you can help me with editing my new article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Melba1/Mindaugas_Piecaitis I've had some advice from Chzz, and I've been corresponding with the subject [in English] in hopes that he could provide a Commons-licensed photo of himself and some links unconnected with the "Catcerto"' (I gather that if that's his only claim to fame he's not considered "notable".) I intend to remove the cat picture once I get one of him, as the cat Nora has her own page! I'd really appreciate your input if you have time. MP seems a delightful fellow who's done a lot for young musicians in Lithuania. The Catcerto is also delightful :) 14:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melba1 (talk • contribs)

Re: GA review for Battle of Szigetvár

Hello, Renata3. You have new messages at Talk:Battle of Szigetvár/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kebeta (talk) 10:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Paulius Galaunė

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

William de Ufford GA review

Thanks for your review. I have had a look at it, and will get to the revision shortly. Lampman (talk) 08:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay, I've done some work on it now. Lampman (talk) 03:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Valkininkai

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Chicken Tax

Thanks for the excellent feedback. I'll get right on it. Great questions! 842U (talk) 03:05, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

"I'm new" does not allow an editor to ignore WP:V / WP:NPOV

in response to your comment on my talk page. Active Banana (talk) 21:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

In recognition of your work on Vytautas Sakalauskas

Thanks for the sourcing upgrade on Vytautas Sakalauskas ! Active Banana (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

GAN of 1971 Iraq Poison Grain Disaster

Your thoughts wanted. What points still need covering? I found a little confirming the 1969 and 70 famines, but little else on that subject. - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 18:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

DO you have any more points to raise? - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 18:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Belarusians

Please see here [15]. Belarusian nationalists have inserted the map in which Vilnius (“Вiльня”) is “ethnic territory of Belarusians”. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.79.28.129 (talk) 15:18, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Liudas Gira

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)

Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Motiejus Šumauskas

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Seal of Mindaugas

Courcelles 12:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Saint Meinhard

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Problem with Paulius Galaunė

Sorry to bother you, but there is an article on the English Wikipedia which is suspected to be a hoax and I was hoping you could help, even if you dont know anything about the source material, because it has a counterpart on the Lithuanian wiki which appears to be well sourced. The article is en:Paulius Galaunė and it was brought up at en:Wikipedia:Edit_filter/False_positives/Reports#Anton_dvsk and en:Wikipedia:Help_desk#Where_do_I_report_hoaxes_.3F. While it is certainly not 100% false, there is questionable content including a possible copyright violation being claimed to be a painting by Mr Galaune and the fact that the photograph which currently appears on both wikis might not be him because of this diff in which the description is changed. I am hoping that you could see the truth and help us answer our questions. I found you because you are a highly active editor here and are able to speak Lithuanian. Please respond with whatever you can do. I have posted a similar request on lt:Naudotojo_aptarimas:CD —Soap— 23:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Patrikas

Hi, Renata. Could you please add the page to your watchlist? It's painful to look at. --Ghirla^-трёп- 09:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Paulius Galaunė

You probably deserve a barnstar for finding this - I thought I covered it up pretty well. Delete the lot, it's fake, refs and all. The museum website claims not to have been updated recently, but I remember the biographical entries being rather shorter before I wrote this. It's amusing it got past DYK though. Nefesf9 (talk) 19:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Renata3. Nice job. Thanks for clarifying the Paulius Galaunė article. I appreciate your riding to the rescue on the AFD. Unfortunately, now the rest of User:Nefesf9 edits will need to be checked for possible hoax or unsubstantiated additions. In particular, he mentioned Jonas Asevičius-Acukas as another hoax. Could you take a look at that one (as well as his other two article creations: Vytautas_Sakalauskas and Mečislovas_Gedvilas) when you get a chance? — CactusWriter ^(talk) 04:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for those two. I see that the Lithuanian Wikipedia has an article about Acukas with more info -- unfortunately, it is also without references. I would think that being knighted in the Order of Vytautas the Great would make him notable (if it's true). I searched for a database but found only this one which I assume only includes recent recipients. I don't know though. Anyway, the Acukas article is pretty benign so I'm not too concerned about it. Thanks again. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

If you want to see the full story, go to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#CU results. Claritas has been using bad-hand accounts. Uncle G (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Nieman

I know its Wilia but it matters about aftermath of demonstrations in Vilnius in 1861. Mathiasrex (talk) 21:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Lithuanian Socialist Soviet Republic

Please do not cancel my contributions in the manner previously witnessed. I know precisely what point I was making and if my revision is in any way flawed, you are free to edit, reduce or expand the text. But by blanking the version with no summary as you did marks me as unconstructive. It is illogical to say that the LSSR "regained" independence when it had already existed by that outfit. It is very complicated. The LSSR federal authorities declared independence; they took with them the region, and renamed the land "Republic of". As for regained, the so-called legal argument decrees that the territory was independent since second contact with Moscow WWII time; as for recongnition by former host, this would not come for another 18 months so whatever was de jure did not change in March 1990 (whichever you personally feel it to be); and what changed de facto did not do so fully until September 1991. You have to watch your ps and qs when editing sensitive material and Baltic issues for 1944-90 period are very itchy. This is why I added the link to guide the reader to what precisely took place in March 1990, and why I used the terminology "delcared fresh independence", ie. the same authorities that had governed the LSSR in the USSR continue to do so in new circumstances. That was all. Evlekis (Евлекис) 18:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Also, I'm well aware that Lithuanian topics are wholly within your catchment area as an editor and I haven't moved into the articles to claim superior knowledge to other users such as you. That is not the case. I am simply trying to uphold a level of realism in the articles, and that the land achieved full independence in March 1990 is somewhat misleading, and very similar to Kosovo's ugly affairs with which I am personally more familiar; Kosovo declared independence in February 2008 but more recently, I have been involved in occupation disputes with editors over Albanian affairs from 1912. They declared independence but no recognition ensued whilst other nations were scrambling for the same territory! This is not the case with transitional Lithuania 1988-1991 but to leave the statement at "Lithuania regained independence in 1991" is not only POV but it is in conflict with every other mention of the topic across the whole of Wikipedia, especially here where that feature is given as August 1991. When you return, by all means edit my contribution but please do not restore the previous version before my first impression, I'd be most grateful. I don't know whether you glanced at my loud summary and assumed the edit to be in bad faith but I ask of you this time to consider how you handle the presentation from this point. Many thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) 18:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

FORK

????? Whats up with you woman??? I don't follow. Professor Fairness (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16

New York City Meetup Next: Saturday October 16th, Jefferson Market Library in Lower Manhattan Last: 05/22/2010

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference NYC 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Ambassador Program and Wikipedia Academy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Ukrainians

No, that is your OPINION that it is controversial. I am enacting WP:BEBOLD. Prior to your move, not a single person PEEPED about the new list title. Get off your fucking high horse. Soundsboy (talk) 17:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Lithuania tagging

Sure Well, for what it's worth, I am done tagging with {{WikiProject Lithuania}}, so you don't need to worry about anymore of them being added outside of the main namespace. As far as your assertion that the WikiProject doesn't use the banner outside of the main namespace, I could find no reference to this in the WikiProject's documentation. Wikipedia:WikiProject Lithuania/Assessment (as well as the banner itself) even explicitly allows for class=Category, for instance. Where did you get the impression that the WikiProject does not tag outside the main namespace? Please respond on my talk, and thanks for your note. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Bloomfield once again?

Saidelson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). No longer active, but created Estonian Red Riflemen and Astra Randkivi. I am far from being an expert on the topic, but the sourcing is horribly bad even for Bloomfield. In any case, best to add both articles to Bloomfield watchlist, just in case. --Sander Säde 16:09, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'd keep those Estonian Riflemen created by his sock this time. Although both of the articles suffer from Bloom's usual problems it's still better than nothing. We can just delete whole portions of dubious material. I'm not sure on Astra Randkivi: it seems there are no google hits apart from Wikis, it doesn't seem to be a hoax either (the Soviet era book he cited definitely exists), but the notability is very dubious. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 15:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Actually, given the lack of coverage apart from Soviet propaganda sources Randkivi doesn't meet criteria for inclusion for English Wiki so deletion is a fair choice. There were simply so many anti-Nazi activists during the war in Europe, and the fact that Estonia lacked them doesn't make each and every Soviet partisan notable for English Wiki. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (t) 15:04, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

LST 1179:2005

I am not sure how much 23 Lts would be, but if there was something Wikipedia will easily find useful, it should be in this document. Please see http://www.lsd.lt/standards/catalog_en.php?ics=0&pid=619116. I would also like to see the two other withdrawn standards to see the changes made (other than ratio) at http://www.lsd.lt/standards/eshop.php?s=flag. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 08:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Siege of Szigetvár

Hi, I love your user page, especially the last graphic. I became involved in the Siege of Szigetvár article in response to a request for copy editing at the Guild of Copy Editors' page. I have started by addressing the punch list from the GA review. Mainly the work is done and I'm down to working through the writting issues. It would be nice to get your feedback on the porgress. Also, I have concerns about the whole section entitled: The powder magazine explosion. It seems that this is legend and it is unclear whether the source is reporting it as disputed legend or the WP editors are disputing the source's veracity. I'm inclined to want to yank it, or describe it as a legend. Your thoughts? --Kevin Murray (talk) 17:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)