User talk:Philosopher/Archive 13

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 29 August 2021
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 20

US National Archives collaboration

 
United States National Archives WikiProject
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.

There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Matt Windschitl
Janet Petersen
Steven Olson
Manning Marable
Jack Gordon (Mississippi politician)
Jim Lykam
Frank Wood (Iowa politician)
Kurt Swaim
Tom Sands
David Hartsuch
Roger Stewart
Mary Gaskill
Jim Van Engelenhoven
James Flynn (politician)
Allyson Hennessy
Arnie Roblan
Robert C. Chambers
Cindy Winckler
Ron Wieck
Cleanup
Mary E. Kramer
Dominique Strauss-Kahn
Tim Carpenter
Merge
Death of Osama bin Laden
Tooele Applied Technology College
JoAnn Wilson
Add Sources
Terry Branstad
Matthew Shultz
Patrick Henry
Wikify
Julio Robaina (legislator)
These Simple Truths
Harvey Dorfman
Expand
Philippe Adnot
Sudanese refugees in Egypt
BYU School of Accountancy

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:25, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Legislators

Hi-I came across an article about Fred Townsend who served in the Iowa Senate. His father John Selby Townsend served in the Iowa House of Representatives and I started that article. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Cool. Once again, thanks for the initiative and thanks for the heads up!  :) --Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Edward Hirst (cricketer)

You deleted a new article for this individual under the notice of '09:17, 24 October 2008 Philosopher (talk | contribs) deleted "Edward Hirst (cricketer)" ‎ (A7 (bio): Doesn't indicate importance or significance of a real person)'.

I would like to create such an article, as the said E.T. Hirst played twenty one first-class cricket matches for Yorkshire County Cricket Club between 1887 and 1888. It is all part of my attempts to complete the names on the List of Yorkshire County Cricket Club players and [Category:Yorkshire cricketers] which contains others of similar notability.

I have a number of reference sources, such as this - [1] Could you please advise me. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Having waited for over three days for a response, I have edited in the new article. You are welcome to berate me when you have the time to assess the new article ! I am going away for a few days from tomorrow - hence the 'urgency'. Regards,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the late response, RL caught up with me yet again. I originally deleted the article because the article didn't seem to claim that he was notable. Your new article fixes that problem. As to whether he actually is notable - if the other players are notable, he probably is as well. As far as that goes, however, I have no idea whether the others are notable or not, as I don't know the first thing about either cricket or English sports. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Well, under this Wiki guideline [1] then Hirst, plus all his fellow cricketers, "has appeared in at least one major cricket match since 1697 as a player or umpire". So I am assuming that it will pass the notability criteria. Thanks anyway,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
John Putney
Brent R. Appel
Joyce Appleby
John A. Tory
David Wiggins
Michael L. Fair
Jeff Angelo
Bill Heckroth
Richard Drake
Larry Noble
Brynle Williams
Dave Mulder
Lisa Carlton
Barry Potomski
Andrew M. Maynard
Becky Schmitz
David A. Vaudt
Anthony Bucco
Sadiq Ali
Cleanup
Narnia Character Portrayals
Joseph A. Palaia
Dean Heller
Merge
VCU School of Medicine
Fifth grade
Dixie Applied Technology College
Add Sources
Ed Fallon
Majority leader
Mary Hodge
Wikify
Jeff Whitham
Robert Bacon (writer)
Stephen Morris (politician)
Expand
Wilton, Iowa
Tom Schueller
Vittorio Arrigoni

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

How many updates have you made now? You deserve a cookie.

  I finally got an account and apparently, I can send people digital cookies thanking them for the work they do on Wikipedia. You've done a ton, so keep it up! AdamTReineke (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 01:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

And thanks from me as well

Thanks for the AWB approval. I hope to use it wisely. Regards, Buster40004 Talk 12:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Sally Mason
Graham Walker (academic)
Skip O'Brien
Kenneth Kester
Vasilijs Stepanovs
Nelson G. Kraschel
Ranking member
Prince Caspian/The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1989 TV Serial)
Mike Connolly (Iowa politician)
Jeff Lamberti
Jerry Lawson (engineer)
Walter Gage
Joseph Sweetman Ames
Gene Fekete
James Allen Williamson
Murray Silverstein
John L. Valentine
Mark Davitt
Ralph Osborn
Cleanup
Osama bin Laden
Mack Mattingly
National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research
Merge
Classical education movement
Hostess (brand)
United States Senate elections in Indiana
Add Sources
Charles Lindbergh
Buzz Thomas
Emmetsburg, Iowa
Wikify
Maudelle Shirek
Robert Wallace Webb
The First Cathedral
Expand
Kentucky
Chariton, Iowa
Roland Courteau

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:59, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

AWB

Hi, I have seen your comment on my request for permission. I would like to point out that out of my 400 or so vandalism reverts, I have only received 4 negative responses. --Miguel AG(talk) Review me! 00:18, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

I agree that you seem to know what you're doing, and some false positives are to be expected ... but with bots and tools that allow bot-like editing, people tend to get pretty finicky about false positives. Since I'm no longer a "regular" at the AWB approvals, I'm not sure where they're drawing that particular line these days (or even if they are), hence the request that another admin handle it. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 07:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Appreciate your response. Thank you for reviewing my request. Miguel AG(talk) Review me! 07:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

John Catlin

Hi-I noticed the comments about James Clarke and the Iowa Territory. I started an article about John Catlin the last secretary of Wisconsin Territory. Part of Wisconsin Territory (now eastern Minnesota) was not admitted as part of the new state of Wisconsin. Congress neglected to organize that part into a new territory. Consequently Catlin became acting governor of Wisconsin Territory when Henry Dodge became an US Senator from the state of Wisconsin. Okay-Catlin went to present day Stillwater, Minnesota taking the Wisconsin Territory seal with him and issues a writ of election for the Wisconsin Territory Congressional Delegate. Henry Hastings Sibley gets elected and after some debate Congress seats him. Sibley was able to organized the Minnesota Territory and eventually became the first governor of the state of Minnesota. In 1846-1849, there was confusion about the status of unorganized territory. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:04, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Ken Kostick
William E. Peterson
Morton O. Schapiro
Iowa Democratic Party
Teemu Hartikainen
Philip Wise
Wes Boyd
Bill Wendt
Joe Sweeden
Cary Nelson
James G. Jones
Charles W. Shields
Rocco Grimaldi
R. Stanley Williams
Harry M. Philpott
Bruce Patterson (Michigan politician)
H. Marshal Ward
Frank H. T. Rhodes
Doug Berger
Cleanup
Kate Swift
Ronald Calderon
Micheal R. Williams
Merge
Creation Science Movement
Soulforce (organization)
Aqualung (musician)
Add Sources
University of Northern Iowa
Raymond E. Basham
Robert Martin (New Jersey politician)
Wikify
List of committees of the National Assembly of Nigeria
Jay Garner (actor)
JCI Senate
Expand
Linn County, Iowa
Omdurman Islamic University
University of Medical Sciences and Technology

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

  Thank you for approving my AWB request! I promise i will be using it for good. Once again, Thank you Anirudh Emani (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

for your suggestion re: citation templates. At this point I think I'd just confuse my students more by pointing it out to them, since they were already taught to add their references manually. I'll keep it in mind for next time, though! Sgelbman (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Hope you have a great semester! --Philosopher Let us reason together. 13:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Removing edit

Had Twinkle do something very odd just now... first of all, it issued the wrong warning, then it recorded my IP address, which I haven't used since my account was created since I've gotten into vandalism reverting. Could this edit please be removed from the history. Thanks. Calabe1992 (talk) 14:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you; appreciated. Calabe1992 (talk) 14:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Since the deleted information would still be visible to admins, I've forwarded the request to the oversighters for full removal. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 14:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Need license template help

This brand new user has created a template that can easily be confused with the actual character license template. It's been showing up at promotional images backlog and I need to now go back and re-do everything because it appeared that this was the character template to me until moments ago. It looks to me like this could cause a lot of confusion because it states it is not a license. Will go back and "undo" everything I've done re: promotional licenses for characters. Will change them to the real character license, but think someone needs to know about the template as it's so easy to believe it's the character license. Thanks, We hope (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

It looks like WP:T3 (duplicate template speedy criterion), so I've tagged it as such. At a guess, I'd say that if/when it is deleted, it should be replaced by {{Non-free character}}. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Did change everything that had been tagged with it to non free character, so as far as it goes now, it should be out of use. Thanks! We hope (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

You got it done!

Congratulations on reworking the template Compact election box to include a no change aspect per our previous discussions several months back. I only noticed because I have Swati Dandekar on my watch page. By the way congrats on how you improved her article changing the lists of facts I had put there into readable prose, it greatly improved the article. Dandekar was one of my first articles I worked on and I have learned much in the 11 months I have been editing on Wikipedia (5,700 edits if it means anything) - but I digress. In my back tracking to learn how you changed the coding for the template to make it a no change template and then other edits you made to various pages using the new {{Compact election box no change}} I discovered you have made a typo in your reference for the 2010 elections, you have it stating Official Results Report, General Election held November 2, 2011 instead of 2010 and you can see this @ User:Philosopher/Republican Example and as you do the copy and paste method like I do, this typo has spread. As you probably know you can use the Pages that link to search tool and insert Template:Compact election box no change in the search field to locate those articles.
The second part of my contact with you has to do with making a new page for Iowa House of Representatives elections, 2010 and possibly redoing the Iowa House of Representatives elections, 2008 and Iowa House of Representatives elections, 2006 into the same {{Compact election box no change}} format, allowing for a copy and paste for individual Representative's articles. Also maybe doing previous years before 2006 and of course the same for Iowa Senate elections. Have you started any of these? Thoughts? Maybe we can enlist others to help? Otherwise it will be a hodgepodge of articles with and without the standardized layout of the {{Compact election box no change}}.
I prefer not having fractured conversations so please respond here. I will watch your talk page for the duration of this conversation.
THANKS—RifeIdeas Talk 17:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that! I'll go through and fix them. Since I don't have that many yet, I'll do it manually, but there's always AWB if I make too pervasive of an error *crosses fingers*. As you figured out, I'm using User:Philosopher/Republican Example and User:Philosopher/Democratic Example to standardize my references and templates across articles - guess that means I'm standardizing the bad along with the good, but at least it means it's easy to fix the errors when they're discovered. Sorry for the long reply, but here's what's on my mind as far as this goes. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Dandekar

I'm glad to see you approve of my changes to Swati Dandekar - it was that article that actually kick-started this project, as I was updating it following her resignation from the Senate and thought "Why not put an election template on here" only to remember that I'd forgotten to make it. So I'm doing it now. As a side note, Dandekar might make a good candidate to see what a B-class Iowa politician article might look like - it's only one criterion short of that class, imo - and the only C-class state legislative article I've found so far - so if you have any suggestions for improvement, or can improve it further yourself, that'd be awesome! I'm afraid I'm going to be tied up with a project for a while, so won't be improving it much myself in the near future. Which brings me to that big project itself, the Bio project. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
In my review of her article since your response I re-added the sources for her committee assignments. I also upgraded the bare pdf url's of the election results to template cite web style for consistency. I also added the page #s since there is the thought of elevating the article above C-class (this may not be needed for a standardized reference for the mass Politian articles). In doing so I using your sources @ User:Philosopher/Democratic Example when I noticed that your choice for the 2008 election was a html url and not a pdf url. I changed Dandekar's to the pdf url because I think that source will be less subject to change than the html one. I also tracked all of the references and external links and corrected the non-viable links to new viable ones. I removed all the quotation marks from the <ref name=> as I found out after 100's of my own edits using them that the quotation marks are unnecessary. In checking the references I found changes in her board appointments, so I updated them. I now think the lede paragraph is a little heavy and wonder if the board membership details should be put into it's own section under a heading of Occupation or Community leader as that is what is listed as her occupation on the legislature website. You may want to check my changes for accuracy and readability. I do not know if it is relevant but there is some personal information available on her constituency site about her husband and children we could add. Any information leads you could give me to expand the article will be appreciated.
Keep up the good editing. —RifeIdeas Talk 17:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
As far as the html vs. pdf url goes, I used the one available on the Secretary of State's directory. The pages should both be static, I don't know why they have 2 (2008 general and 2010 primary) as html files and the rest as pdfs. It's interesting to know that you don't need quotation marks for <ref name=>, I wasn't aware of that.
As for the rest, a family/background section could be useful if there's enough verifiable information about it to create such a section. Dandakar's been profiled by several magazines/newspapers, so maybe you could glean enough information, I'm not sure. As for the organizations, I don't know - I've got a gut feeling that such a section would need to be more than a bare list of organizational involvement, but am not sure how I would expand it. Guess I haven't expanded enough articles yet.  ;) --Philosopher Let us reason together. 08:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Bio project

At the moment, I'm going through Category:Members of the Iowa House of Representatives in reverse alphabetical order by surname, excluding members who haven't served in the past decade or two, and adding the results to their pages. I'm also making a series of standardized fixes to each page, including several that probably aren't obvious from the editing history (they may not apply to every article and include a few changes to commons:), checking SoS and news records for primary challenges and special elections, etc. A good idea, I already discovered and fixed a serious error I'd made to Roger Wendt's article while applying these changes. It'll take me a little bit, but it'll be worth it to have each article standardly improved! (I plan to do Category:Iowa State Senators afterwards, but that shouldn't take much additional time, as many of its members are also members of Category:Members of the Iowa House of Representatives.) --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
As a side note, and at the risk of appearing to violate WP:OWN, I'm going to be checking each individual article for these improvements myself, so while you can join in the project, the effort would be largely redundant. There are a few pervasive and possibly-pervasive issues in the articles that I just need to assure myself have been fixed, if only for my own piece of mind, and there's no better time to check/fix them than when I'm going to be editing each of them anyway. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Election page project

As for the elections pages, those should be really fast and easy to make when I'm done - just copy-and-paste the appropriate electoral section from the member articles, add a header, and voila! The same goes for the special election sections and pages - and since I'm checking for them with each candidate, we can just cycle through the articles and not have to worry about missing one.  :-D --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
You method of operation is just the opposite of my thinking. I was thinking of doing the various year elections first and then copy and paste the information into the individual Politian's articles (making them easy). My reasoning is that the SOS pdf's are already listed by districts so it would be easy to copy and paste these results one after another into a page format that has been standardized for all election years. The election years page format could include a section for primary challenges with possibly a marker for this in the main election results (like the asterisk for incumbents). This may result in less searching for the individual Politian articles. However since you are undertaking the entire project I defer to your judgment. I do feel your knowledge about political articles far exceeds mine and am glad you are willing to undertake such a large undertaking and as you are the one who has done so much in the past on these articles you should be able to spot things that need corrected or improved upon much better than anyone else.
Again keep up the good editing.—RifeIdeas Talk 17:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyjou*

Hello. I replied to your comment at AfD. Since english is not my mother tongue, I probably haven't made myself clear: I was talking about spam, not copyvio and I didn't check for copyvio on google. The google results are mostly copied from each other, not the wikipedia article. In any case, thank you for the comment. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Attack, with full name

Have an edit here that Cluebot picked up on right as I did. Full name used as an insult. Calabe1992 (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision deleted. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion declined

Please do not replace declined speedy deletion templates (for the same reason, at least) as you did at List of cities, towns and villages in Burma: B and Template:Lists of Burma locations. Also, as WP:G7 is for author-requested deletion, please don't use it on pages you haven't edited previously, as you did at List of cities, towns and villages in Burma: Y. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

You are causing disruption by removing my speedy tags. Proper lists are being created by township and I have a right to place db-author deletion tags on redundant lists I virtually am the sole author of.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Not at all, once a speedy deletion is declined, the deletion request should be taken to another forum. The request had already been declined for two of them. As for the "Y" one, even if the header was deleted, you didn't even edit the article, so db-author was clearly inappropriate. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Just so the reasoning is out there, this is because speedy deletion is for non-controversial requests. At an absolute minimum, the earlier removal of the tag indicated that another editor disagreed with you about the deletion request, hence it was not a non-controversial request. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
All true, but this multi diff leaves Dr Blofield as the sole author of the template at the time of the deletion request, something that was not obvious to the admin who made the first decline. As such I would have been tempted to delete anyway if the template was not still included in the other articles where after Dr Blofield's edits there was a spattering of disambiguation edits which could be contrued that he was not the sole editor but it could also be arued that the disambiguations where not substantial leaving Dr Blofield as the author. What do you think? That would still make it un-controversial on the assumption that the first declining editor checked the history but not the diffs (it would be too much to ask) Agathoclea (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I've asked Calliopejen to AFD the lists but it is disruptive keeping a bunch of unwikified lists when they are being replaced with township tabled lists. Its just a waste of time having to take your own lists to AFD. Thanks. If you actually looked at what happened in the history I am really the sole author of them, except the Y page which has just one village listed!!. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Agathoclea, I'll grant most of that, but you still have the "Y" one, which was created solely by a different author and who clearly intended it to be part of this series. Thanks for pointing out the diffs (I hadn't noticed them either). Knowing that, maybe the template could have been deleted ... but perhaps the template is also essential to the "Y" one? In my mind, it's a close case - and also, to my mind, Speedy isn't for close cases. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Dr. Blofield, Perhaps I am being overly cautious here. Sorry if that's the case. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Well you could make amends by notifying the other "contributors" of the the db-author and whether they object or not..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

You've got mail

{{You've got mail}}David M Levy 15:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Replied. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AlexandriaHappyme22RexxS

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

  Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

  Arbitration


19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Michael Flynn on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

16:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lauren Ridloff on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

  •   The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
  •   Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  •   Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  •   Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
  •   Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
  •   Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
  •   Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
  •   Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  EnchanterCarlossuarez46

  Interface administrator changes

  Ragesoss

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

  Arbitration


15:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Draft talk:Glenn Youngkin on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

13:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AshleyyoursmileLess Unless
  HusondMattWadeMJCdetroitCariocaVague RantKingboykThunderboltzGwen GaleAniMateSlimVirgin (deceased)

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

  Arbitration


Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ilhan Omar on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Emmanuel Macron on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Philosopher! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|Philosopher|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

  •   The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
  •   Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  •   Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
  •   Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
  •   Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
  •   BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

  Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

  Arbitration


17:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

15:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

21:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

  Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

16:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

16:00, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

  1. ^ Warner, David (2011). The Yorkshire County Cricket Club: 2011 Yearbook (113th ed.). Ilkley, Yorkshire: Great Northern Books. p. 383. ISBN 978-1-905080-85-4. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthor= (help)