Nd12052010

Welcome

Hello, Nd12052010, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Janapriya Multiple Campus moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Janapriya Multiple Campus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon 13:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janapriya Multiple Campus (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janapriya Multiple Campus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janapriya Multiple Campus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬 15:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Janapriya Multiple Campus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janapriya Multiple Campus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janapriya Multiple Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMySon 16:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Namaste, Rnischal1993! You are cordially invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Nepal. You are invited to join the new WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 article creations. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for Nepal on Wikipedia! Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by using:

{{subst:WikiProject Nepal/The 10,000 Challenge Invite}} ~~~~

Thanks.

nirmal (talk) 06:05, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Kaski Modernized Academy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaski Modernized Academy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 02:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Siddhartha Chowk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Siddhartha Chowk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 06:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, I wanted to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, but I have noticed you have been creating some articles which may not meet the Geographical notability. I urge you to take a look WP:GEOROAD to learn how your articles may meet the Geography notability. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SiddharthaCahowk

A tag has been placed on SiddharthaCahowk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 03:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Siddhartha Chowk

A tag has been placed on Siddhartha Chowk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 03:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeewan Gurung for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeewan Gurung is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeewan Gurung until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for contributing to the 10,000 Nepali Challenge. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 19:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Janapriya Multiple Campus. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok Nd12052010 22:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lakeside, Pokhara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandaki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Navigation

Hallo, Thank you for creating Rapti, Dang . When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name, by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 22:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Stub tags and categories

Thank you for creating so many articles about places in Nepal, but please now stop and learn about categories and stub tags, then go back and correct the articles you have created.

Looking at Babai, Dang in the state you created it:

1. You added Category:Province No. 5, Nepal geography stubs. That's wrong, stub categories should never be added directly. Please add {{Province5NP-geo-stub}}, which adds the category and also creates the visible footnote at the bottom of the page. As you can see, another editor later added {{stub}} because they could see that the article didn't have a stub footnote.
2. You added Category:Dang district. This is the category for a district in India. You should have added Category:Dang District, Nepal ...
3. ... but really you should have added Category:Populated places in Dang District, Nepal
4. And you should not add Category:Province No. 5 because that is a "parent category" of the Dang category, and there are only a few special cases where we add a parent category as well as the most precise category.

There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it is an interesting journey. Best wishes and Happy Editing.

Looking at a random earlier article you created, Lamachaur, Pokhara, I'm sorry but I find even more problems:

• It looks as if you have used {{subst}} to expand what should appear as {{Pokhara-geo-stub}} and {{Pokhara}}, the stub template and the "Navbox". These should not be substituted, as that means that if a change is later made to the template it would not be picked up in this article.

No, more complicated; it looks as if you have added the "navbox" as a chunk of code, not as a template, because {{Pokhara}} does not exist. Or rather, did not exist, because I have now created it as a navbox template. The idea of a template is that it is a standard piece of code, outside the individual articles, which can be re-used in many articles, and can be updated just the once to affect the way it appears in all of those articles. Please go back and use the template wherever you have added the code instead.

• Category:Places of Pokhara is the only one needed here, because Category:Pokhara,Category:Kaski District and Category:Gandaki Pradesh are all parent categories.

I have fixed both problems in this article: please go back over your work and fix the other articles where you have got things wrong. Thanks. PamD 23:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Please slow down a bit

You know you are working too fast when you create two articles on the same topic in less than 50 mins and don't even notice (Mayadevi Rural Municipality, 23:55, 8 July; Mayadevi, Rupandehi, 00:39, 9 July; befuddling still that the two don't agree on coord, area or population). I don't want to nitpick further but you'll see you've introduced a multitude of careless errors in your articles (mostly by failing to update all the parts of the template you are using). Please stop creating new ones, and take a day or two to review corrections I (and others) have made to your existing articles and fix them all. Don't get me wrong, your contributions are very much appreciated; it just seems to be taking as long or longer than it does for you to create the articles themselves, to fix the errors that you should not be making in the first place, by which I mean the kind of errors that have nothing to do with the Wikipedia learning curve. Please do not hesitate to ask about corrections you do not understand or anything else at all. I'd be happy to try and help with anything you might have questions about. Best Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

By "template", I mean the one you are using to create the articles, not the Wikipedia templates of "Template:" namespace that is used in them. Usedtobecool ☎️ 06:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok I got it, Thank you very much. Nd12052010 06:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Can you please go through Lakeside Pokhara article once and Suggest me suggestions if required. Nd12052010 06:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Lakeside, Pokhara

Having a quick look at this, problems include:

• Inaccuracy: "located in Pokhara, the capital of Nepal. Really?
• Spelling: "Boundries of Lakside" for a start
• Over-linking: don't link Nepal every time it is mentioned. Indeed as a major geographical entity it needn't be linked at all. See WP:OVERLINK
• Headings: "Major Attraction" should be "Major attractions" - plural, no capitals beyond start
• Categories: you listed:

[[Category:Tourism in Nepal]]
[[Category:Pokhara]]
[[Category:Gandaki Pradesh]]
[[Category:Tourist attractions in Nepal]]
[[Category:Kaski District]]
[[Category:Ward of Pokhara]]
[[Category:Places of Pokhara]]
[[Category:Pokhara geography stubs]]
[[Category:WikiProject Nepal]]
[[Category:Nepal]] 

As has already been explained to you,

• Never add a stub category directly, like Category:Pokhara geography stubs
• Do not add a "parent" category which includes the smaller one: so don't add "Nepal", "Gandaki Pradesh" or "Kaski District" because "Pokhara" is included within both of those.
• Lakeside does not seem to be a Ward, so don't add that category
• The WikiProject category is not added to individual pages - you need to add {{WikiProject Nepal}} to the talk page.
• I could find more to comment on but ...
• I've just now realised that Category:Places of Pokhara is yet another category created by you but not added to any parent category. Please stop creating categories until you understand how they work. You have created a lot of work for other editors to tidy up. If this continues you will be reported to ANI to consider blocking you to save the encyclopedia from your editing. I can see that you mean well, but you seem unwilling to listen to and learn from the advice you are given. PamD 07:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I got it, thank you very much. I really appreciate your help. I have made all changes. (Nd12052010 02:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC))

Ok, let's take it slow; talk one at a time. To start, the listed as major attractions are scattered all over Pokhara; how are they attractions of Lakeside? Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Taking about Major attractions Fewa Lake, Tal Barai temple and Basundhara park located at lakeside, but other places like Sarankot, Shanti Stupa David's fall and Gupteshwor cave are near by. (Nd12052010 08:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC))

The places that are "near by" are actually in Pokhara, but most definitely not in Lakeside, Pokhara, is that not so? And we just so happen to have an article on Pokhara. So, obviously, we have a problem of WP:SCOPE. I don't know where Basundhara Park is and I don't intend to investigate, but putting Fewa lake and Tal Barahi Temple within Lakeside is contradictory to your own article, because it says Lakeside is bounded by Fewa lake, meaning Fewa lake is not inside Lakeside. We also have the article, Phewa Lake, in which to write about Fewa lake, and Talbarahi Temple would be an attraction of Fewa lake. Similarly Fewa lake and Lakeside would be places in Pokhara. What you've done is akin to listing Darjeeling as an attraction of Nepal; it is nearby and it is strongly connected to Nepal but it is not a place in Nepal or an attraction of Nepal.

The whole idea of "attractions" in itself is hardly encyclopedic. The article currently looks like a tourism brochure, giving tourist destinations nearby, transportation facilities, internet service providers, shops and restaurants. That is not at all what an encyclopedic article should be about. Please carefully consider what the scope of the article should be, and which of the aspects of Lakeside are going to be of lasting importance and interest (knowledge worth knowing; WP:NOTEVERYTHING). A list of ISPs is most definitely not one of those things. Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok Nd12052010 11:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish with Amarsingh Chowk (edit summaries would help), but please know that it is ok to make mistakes, and when you do, you can ask any experienced user for help, or go to the WP:Teahouse, or use the {{help me}} template to summon editors who would help, either to your own user talk page or any other relevant talk page. In fact, not seeking help can sometimes lead to disruption. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 18:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I have removed lists of ISPs, banks, health cares from Amar Singh chowk. And also I want to ask you something, Do you know why I can't find Amarshing Chowk Wikipedia article while searching in google. (Nd12052010 20:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC))

Google doesn't show articles that have not been formally approved by more experienced/trusted editors. See WP:NPP. If no one approves or deletes an article, it will start to show after 90 days from the date of creation. Since you don't know what NPP is, I suggest you withdraw your request for the "new page reviewer" right that you just made. You are not quite there yet, and trying to get it before you are ready is likely to hurt your chances of getting it easily when you do become ready. In my previous message, I meant about the repeated moves that you were doing with that article. Were you trying to see if it shows up in google when it is in "Wikipedia:" or "Draft:" space? Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 21:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I got it. I have withdrawn my request for a " new page reviewer". Ya, I have tried that to see it whether it shows up in google or not. Thank you very much for your help. (Nd12052010 04:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC))

Category:Chowks of Pokhara has been nominated for deletion

Category:Chowks of Pokhara has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 07:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Ward of Pokhara has been nominated for deletion

Category:Ward of Pokhara has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 07:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Places of Pokhara has been nominated for deletion

Category:Places of Pokhara has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 07:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Pokhara geography stubs has been nominated for merging

Category:Pokhara geography stubs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amarsingh Chowk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nd12052010, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Gupteshwor Mahadev Cave have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:20, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jude Bellingham, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Sandip Chhetri moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sandip Chhetri, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS ^💬 15:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

753 local units

Please note that there are a total of 753 local levels in Nepal, not 744 units as you have mentioned in many articles. Sarisavila (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

• Hi! I noticed you were making corrections to your articles, presumably based on this. I do not know where you are exactly in this endeavour, but could you also change the "VDSs" to "VDCs" while you are at it, preferably also linking the term to Village Development Committee (Nepal)? Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lakeside, Pokhara

Hello Nd12052010,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lakeside, Pokhara for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amarsingh Chowk

The article Amarsingh Chowk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable interchange.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Birauta

The article Birauta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable roundabout.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sandip Chhetri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandip Chhetri. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 03:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sandip Chhetri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sandip Chhetri. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandip Chhetri (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandip Chhetri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sandip Chhetri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Nd12052010! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 01:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kaski Modernized Academy

Hello, Nd12052010. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kaski Modernized Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kaski Modernized Academy

Hello, Nd12052010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaski Modernized Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sandip Chhetri

Hello, Nd12052010. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandip Chhetri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sandip Chhetri

Hello, Nd12052010. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandip Chhetri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members list.

Hi Nd12052010! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)