User talk:Edwardx/Archive 42
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Edwardx. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | ← | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 |
Chelsea Manor Street
Thank you for your "thank"! Forty years ago I lived in Chesil Court, and WP:OR forbids me to add that so did the Longfords. I recall seeing them hovering in the lobby in evening dress one night and I legged upstairs to peer over the balcony to see whom they were waiting for. It was the then Prince of Wales. Also resident in the block were Cecil Madden and Harry Fowler, but alas I have no citation. I used to see Humphrey Lyttelton in the lobby sometimes, but I don't know if he maintained a flat there in addition to his main home in Barnet. Tim riley talk 22:50, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- And thank you for thanking me for thanking you, Tim. I have been slowly creating articles for Chelsea streets, living nearby. Almost all have notable people and buildings. Sat next to Frank Longford at dinner many moons ago. Quite a character. Chesil Court always has a fine Christmas tree in the lobby this time of year. According to Cracrofts Peerage, his son Patrick lived at 24 Chesil Court. And Roy Strong's diaries mentions a dinner on 7 July (year?) at the Longford flat. Sounds like we have some article expansion to do. Edwardx (talk) 11:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Natasha Farrant image
You added an image to Tash Farrant article here. I'm pretty sure that it's not the correct person- the article you added it to is about a 26-year old cricketer, and I guess that image is about a writer [1] who's older than that. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, Joseph2302. You are quite correct. I will have to start Natasha Farrant (author) if I am to use that image. Perhaps having just added my photo of another cricketer, Isabelle Westbury, contributed to my misidentification. Edwardx (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Isabelle Westbury doesn't look like the same person either. File:Isabelle Westbury running.jpg is of the cricketer, which is not the same skin colour as File:Isabelle Westbury 20191205.jpg. Looks like you need to create a Isabelle Westbury (author) article too ;) Joseph2302 (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- If you look at her Instagram, esp the third one down on the left wearing a cricket cap, I think we have the correct Isabelle Westbury. Do you want to check my other photos at User:Edwardx/people? Edwardx (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yep the Westbury is fine, my mistake. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. The image of her running could be almost anyone. Well, not me - insufficient hair. Edwardx (talk) 11:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yep the Westbury is fine, my mistake. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:37, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you look at her Instagram, esp the third one down on the left wearing a cricket cap, I think we have the correct Isabelle Westbury. Do you want to check my other photos at User:Edwardx/people? Edwardx (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Isabelle Westbury doesn't look like the same person either. File:Isabelle Westbury running.jpg is of the cricketer, which is not the same skin colour as File:Isabelle Westbury 20191205.jpg. Looks like you need to create a Isabelle Westbury (author) article too ;) Joseph2302 (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Oskar Hartmann
- Hallo, Edward
- Ich finde die Artikel, die Sie auf Wikipedia erstellen, veröffentlichen und bearbeiten, sehr schön. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zillah_Byng-Thorne Ich habe mich gefragt, ob Sie einen Artikel über Oskar Hartmann, Unternehmer, Business Angel und internationaler Investor, schreiben und in der deutschen oder englishen Version von Wikipedia veröffentlichen könnten?
- Der Artikel sollte seinen beruflichen Werdegang, seine Investitionen und seine Lebensphilosophie widerspiegeln. Ein Beispiel für einen Text, der mir angemessen erscheint
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
- Mein Name ist Emma Rogers
- Ich freue mich darauf, von Ihnen zu hören. Können Sie eine solche Aufgabe übernehmen. RogEmma (talk) 11:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, RogEmma. There is not enough coverage in reliable sources to merit an article about Oskar Hartmann. And frankly, he is neither rich enough nor significant enough to interest me. Edwardx (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ach, schade. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, RogEmma. There is not enough coverage in reliable sources to merit an article about Oskar Hartmann. And frankly, he is neither rich enough nor significant enough to interest me. Edwardx (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Piers Court
Hi Edward, First, apologies. I got a a bit carried away with Piers Court. I hope I’ve not trodden on your toes too much! I think I’m about done for now, but I have left a query on the Talkpage. I think I might have been a bit too definite about the fate of the library. The problem is that the sources use “library” interchangeably both for Waugh’s books, and for the library fixtures and fittings, e.g. the bookcases. So it’s not clear whether both went with Waugh to Combe Florey, or whether he had another constructed at CF and the Ransom Center then bought both - and the books. I shall do some more digging. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, KJP1. Kind of you to apologise, but I am honestly delighted that another editor has come along and done the heavy lifting. I have plenty of other articles in need of creation or expansion. The library ambiguity is interesting. Edwardx (talk) 17:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Now look what you've made me do! KJP1 (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oops. I did have a quick look yesterday, and saw it was created in 2007. Now I realise that 2007 was a redirect, and you've done the whole thing from scratch. Impressed. And they are both up for sale. But which one to buy? Edwardx (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- In my humble opinion, Piers Court is the more attractive house. And it’s £2.5M cheaper. But then there is the small matter of the sitting tenant, and their, umm…, chequered history! According to Rightmove, Combe Florey’s under offer, [2], so you’ll need to be quick. What both those articles really need are images. KJP1 (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- And handier from London for a weekend break. Or just buy both so that we can get some photos. The things we do for Wikipedia. Edwardx (talk) 14:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- In my humble opinion, Piers Court is the more attractive house. And it’s £2.5M cheaper. But then there is the small matter of the sitting tenant, and their, umm…, chequered history! According to Rightmove, Combe Florey’s under offer, [2], so you’ll need to be quick. What both those articles really need are images. KJP1 (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Oops. I did have a quick look yesterday, and saw it was created in 2007. Now I realise that 2007 was a redirect, and you've done the whole thing from scratch. Impressed. And they are both up for sale. But which one to buy? Edwardx (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Now look what you've made me do! KJP1 (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Infobox question
Hi. Could you please take a quick look at the infobox for Park Ji-hyun (politician) and let me know if it looks ok and/or how to improve? Cielquiparle (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec22}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
ϢereSpielChequers 23:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
|
Season's Greetings | |
| Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Magi by Luca Signorelli is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC) |
.jpg)
|
A Christmas hot chocolate for you | |
| Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and best wishes for the New Year! Thank you for all you do. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2022 (UTC) |
Compliments of the season
|
Compliments of the season |
| Wishing you a cracking festive season. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC) |
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Artie Minson Page
Hi Edwardx - first, thanks for all you do for the Wikipedia community. Reaching out as I've tried to update Artie Minson's wikipedia with current information regarding his role and history several times. Each time I've updated the page for recency and accuracy, you've reverted the content back to previous roles making the page outdated. Is there something I need to do in order to have my updates stay live? 11201PM (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- 11201PM First, you need to make a declaration, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI. Then read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. I am an unpaid volunteer. Sorry, but the onus is on you to make the effort. Edwardx (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 January 2023
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Happy New Year, Edwardx!
Edwardx,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
DYK for Peter Strausfeld
On 4 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peter Strausfeld, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after fleeing the Nazis in 1938, Peter Strausfeld befriended the manager of London's top art house cinema and designed their posters until his death in 1980? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Strausfeld. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Peter Strausfeld), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
This Month in GLAM: December 2022
| ||||||
Dominic Cummings
I sort of see your point but I don't think your edit quite covers your meaning. I have done another edit which may help. Since the lead is supposed to summarise the rest of the article it might be useful to add some more of his criticisms since the Kuenssberg interview of July 2021. Do you have any details and sources? I believe there have been some but don't have the material to hand.Spinney Hill (talk) 11:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Books & Bytes – Issue 54
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
- New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
- 1Lib1Ref 2023
- Spotlight: EDS Refine Results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
"Constance Marten" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Constance Marten and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 24 § Constance Marten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Belbury (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Chris Plumridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of notability under GNG or WP:AUTHOR
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 19:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Bruce W. White has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non notable person
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
KBEs
Im unclear as to the reversal of the edits to various pages containing KBEs and other such titles. You state that if it’s from another country it is not applicable but that is not stated in Wiki rules or true in reality either. You might be referring to how in the UK non UK citizens cannot be referred to as Sir or Dame and the associated OBE but the designation of KBE was made for non UK Citizens and can be used freely. I will add back in this association on various pages as hopefully this clarifies the point. SamuelFisherman (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- SamuelFisherman Policy on this is clear. Please refer to the first sentence of MOS:POSTNOM (which I have linked to in my edit summaries), "When the subject of an article has received honours or appointments issued either by the subject's state of citizenship or residence, or by a widely recognized organization that reliable sources regularly associate with the subject, post-nominal letters may be included in the lead section." None of the people concerned are or have been British citizens or residents. Edwardx (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The policy may be clear but I unfortunately dont agree that your read of it is complete.
- Two points:
- You are crucially missing the second part of the sentence in your analysis which is "by a widely recognized organization that reliable sources regularly associate with the subject". First part: I think the UK being a recognised organisation is obvious. Second part: In your case both Ralph Lauren and Paul Polman have clear associations with the UK with Polman even having run the UK largest company. Both maintain foundations in the UK and even own companies based in the UK.
- You also are assuming the country of residence for none of these are the UK. Polman specifically runs a UK based company called Imagine and Lauren has been UK resident in the past.
- Regardless of if you agree with point 2 or not, which no reason why you shouldn't, point 1 is strong enough that the KBE should be re-instated. They clearly would not have won the award had there been no UK association.
- Interesting exercise to think through this however. SamuelFisherman (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- You have misunderstood the second part of the sentence. "or by a widely recognized organization ... " means post-nominals associated with organizations such as the Royal Society (eg John/Jane Doe FRS etc). When was Ralph Lauren a UK resident? Nothing about this in his article. As for Paul Polman, was he ever formally a UK resident? Is Imagine UK-based? Sources? And where are the details of these foundations and companies in their articles? As always, we must observe Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Citing sources, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Edwardx (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- A VERY quick google and you can find the information. For example the linkedin page of Imagine showing its London location.
- I understand there is an element of learning and I appreciate the patiences in teaching. This should now be settled as it relates to Biographies of living persons. SamuelFisherman (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- According to LinkedIn, London is their primary location. For LinkedIn as a source, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - "is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the post is used for an uncontroversial self-description." So, okay for the London claim, but not much else. In any event, on Imagine's website Polman is listed as "Co-Founder & Chair Emeritus", so this makes no tangible contribution to his "state of citizenship or residence" for the purposes of MOS:POSTNOM. Edwardx (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Polmans own linkedin account states him as based in United Kingdom. His identity as owner of the page can be confirmed and thus is considered reliable.
- It is uncommon to question that somebody would live in a country in which they ran a large company for 10 years and subsequently co-founded a company. There are countless links for both Polman and Lauren...again neither would have received a rare award if that was not the case.
- Again, assuming no further comments I will leave it to you to revert or I can attend to it in time. SamuelFisherman (talk) 20:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- According to LinkedIn, London is their primary location. For LinkedIn as a source, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - "is considered generally unreliable and should be avoided unless the post is used for an uncontroversial self-description." So, okay for the London claim, but not much else. In any event, on Imagine's website Polman is listed as "Co-Founder & Chair Emeritus", so this makes no tangible contribution to his "state of citizenship or residence" for the purposes of MOS:POSTNOM. Edwardx (talk) 13:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- You have misunderstood the second part of the sentence. "or by a widely recognized organization ... " means post-nominals associated with organizations such as the Royal Society (eg John/Jane Doe FRS etc). When was Ralph Lauren a UK resident? Nothing about this in his article. As for Paul Polman, was he ever formally a UK resident? Is Imagine UK-based? Sources? And where are the details of these foundations and companies in their articles? As always, we must observe Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Citing sources, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Edwardx (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Nazifuddin Najib
Reply to here: because it is the wrong way to sort Malay names, which I think you realized right away as you just removed the defaultsort in the next edit. Engr. Smitty Werben 00:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Bruce W. White for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce W. White until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Speedy deletion nomination of Leightons
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Leightons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VVikingTalkEdits 14:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
"Kota Eberhardt" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Kota Eberhardt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Kota Eberhardt until a consensus is reached. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 01:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Edwardx undoes changes without consultation
Biography must not be abused to harm charity association.
Edwardx does not even write a word when undoes changes.
How do i stop the abuse of Exwardx ? Johnvandeput (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Exwardx is always doing that, particularly when the edits are bad. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Edwardx has friends here
Can someone of his friends stop Edwardx ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnvandeput (talk • contribs) 14:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I am not the only long-established editor to have reversed your removal of well-cited content. Fram has kindly explained all of this to you at Talk:John Caudwell. Edwardx (talk) 11:07, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Category:Estonian fishers has been nominated for merging
Category:Estonian fishers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Fanous
Thanks for the revert in Fanous (surname). Definitely missed that somehow. Cheers, --Engineerchange (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Easily missed, Engineerchange. We could probably do with a page for Famous (surname), although it will likely need a bit of code to find the other Famous people. Edwardx (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Cheers!
|
Cheers! LavenderLion (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes – Issue 55
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
- New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
- 1Lib1Ref January report
- Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
DYK for Admiral's Walk
On 25 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Admiral's Walk, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an English country house was the location for the 1970s horror sexploitation films Virgin Witch, Satan's Slave and Terror? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Admiral's Walk. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Admiral's Walk), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
Some tea for you!
|
Herbal tea |
| Because maybe a white mug isn't all that after all. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC) |
- Thank you. Feeling much better today. Edwardx (talk) 21:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Brightwell Manor
On 3 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brightwell Manor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brightwell Manor was the home of a eugenicist clergyman who did not believe in democracy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brightwell Manor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brightwell Manor), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Added your house to the list! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. But it is not my house! Edwardx (talk) 21:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Of course not. It's too small. Cielquiparle (talk) 03:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2023
| ||||||
Rain Newton-Smith
Thanks for creating the article. I'd already done so, but then some busy-body deleted it before I'd had a chance to add a reference (he could have just added the reference himself - there are plenty now available). Wikipedia is so frustrating at times. Good idea to add that banner at the top to stop these over-enthusiastic users. Pikemaster (talk) 12:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
You're nicked!
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 01:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- In case anyone is curious as to what this "attack page" might be, it was a simple redirect from "Rich Boy Rishi" to Rishi Sunak. This was part of a batch created in October 2022, along with redirects prompted by Joe Biden's mispronunciation of his name as Rashee/Rashi Sanook, and redirects for his parents and children. Perhaps "Rich Boy Rishi" was a redirect too far, yet hardly an attack page. It was somewhat used at the time, but never achieved the popularity of say "Dishy Rishi". Edwardx (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- Are there reliable sources using "Rich Boy Rishi"? If not it seems like a bit of silliness that should be deleted. I have never heard the phrase. Agree the warning about creating an attack page is nonsense. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- The leading search engine returns 3,200 results for "Rich Boy Rishi". It does get at least passing mentions in reliable sources, but never achieved wide currency. Perhaps it was too obvious and a tad boorish. Rishi Rich was already taken, and Richie Rich has a long history dating back at least to a 1953 comic book, Richie Rich (character). The later may well have been inspired by the notorious Richard Rich, 1st Baron Rich (1496–1567). Edwardx (talk) 11:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- But plenty are "rich boy Rishi" and "rich boy" Rishi which are very different to "Rich Boy Rishi". Not sure if there is a rule about it but I would think that nicknames would need very strong evidence before being valid redirects, particularly as there are plenty of Richs and probably Rishis around. I will nominate it for deletion if I can find the button. Sophia Money-Coutts really exists and always makes me smile. But she's not nearly as wealthy as Rishi. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- No need, the redirect was deleted 33 minutes after the notice was posted on my talkpage. Edwardx (talk) 11:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- But plenty are "rich boy Rishi" and "rich boy" Rishi which are very different to "Rich Boy Rishi". Not sure if there is a rule about it but I would think that nicknames would need very strong evidence before being valid redirects, particularly as there are plenty of Richs and probably Rishis around. I will nominate it for deletion if I can find the button. Sophia Money-Coutts really exists and always makes me smile. But she's not nearly as wealthy as Rishi. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- The leading search engine returns 3,200 results for "Rich Boy Rishi". It does get at least passing mentions in reliable sources, but never achieved wide currency. Perhaps it was too obvious and a tad boorish. Rishi Rich was already taken, and Richie Rich has a long history dating back at least to a 1953 comic book, Richie Rich (character). The later may well have been inspired by the notorious Richard Rich, 1st Baron Rich (1496–1567). Edwardx (talk) 11:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- What a shame. I was hoping for some drama, like an attack page on Rahul Ligma. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:50, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- I assume one may say what one wants about fictional people. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:58, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can only offer my most humble apologies to anyone who may be disappointed by my abject failure to create a proper attack page. Edwardx (talk) 12:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's quite all right. Some skills cannot be taught. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- I can only offer my most humble apologies to anyone who may be disappointed by my abject failure to create a proper attack page. Edwardx (talk) 12:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Create a fictional character and get it all out of your system. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- I assume one may say what one wants about fictional people. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:58, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
- Are there reliable sources using "Rich Boy Rishi"? If not it seems like a bit of silliness that should be deleted. I have never heard the phrase. Agree the warning about creating an attack page is nonsense. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- In our household, he's known as Dishi Rishi and I find that we have a list of nicknames of prime ministers of the United Kingdom. Rishi's score is 4 so far... Andrew🐉(talk) 17:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
The Content Creativity Barnstar | |
| A belated thank you for your creation of Thomas Charles Sorby in 2016. After I expanded the article and it went to DYK, I requested an additional DYK banner for you as creator, on the grounds of original creation, but it appears that the rules have changed, and my request was denied. The thing is, your creation of the article established notability, gave me the basic facts to build on,, and inspired the expansion. So power to you, for your constant creation of useful articles and stubs, and for the interest and curiosity that they inspire. Keep up the good work!. Storye book (talk) 08:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC) |
New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Cini Boeri
Hello Edwardx, thank you for tidying-up the Cini Boeri (and Vignelli) articles. One of the awards may actually merit inclusion in the Infobox (and certianly in the article itself): the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic, which Boeri received in 2011 (this honour is presented by the nation's president in a ceremony at the Quirinale presidential palace in Rome, and is probably similar in importance to a KBE in the UK). -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
PS: I looked into this a bit more and learned that Boeri was also the recipient of the Ambrogino d'oro, which is a high civic award conferred by the mayor of Milan. I've added a note about these two awards on the Talk page of the article. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
After all, why not? Why shouldn't YOU accept this gift?
MrDragonBoi has given you some kittens! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companions forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else some kittens, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kittens}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message.
I know the talk page that you were helping me (no, NOT bossing around, I'm a rookie anyway situation was ages ago, but you shall not pass without these kittens! MrDragonBoi (talk) MrDragonBoi (talk) 19:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Slovak Freemasons
A tag has been placed on Category:Slovak Freemasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Doll's Hospital
On 8 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Doll's Hospital, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the owners of Doll's Hospital building were the penultimate victims of the Acid Bath Murderer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Doll's Hospital. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Doll's Hospital), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation