Talk:John Caudwell
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
| The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Caudwell Group edit
The biography is really unusual. Is that even true? "Goldigging" does not seem too reliable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcca0553 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
This article is almost entirely about the Caudwell Group with very little about the man himself. Can someone correct this please? --198.178.236.140 11:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
"With no new mountains to climb". Non-impassive voice sounds highly biased? --194.74.237.135 (talk) 08:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Caudwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160217152117/http://www.caudwellchildren.com/index.php/information/about-us/our-history to http://www.caudwellchildren.com/index.php/information/about-us/our-history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Caudwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/fortune-s-help-children/story-12531135-detail/story.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121029094402/http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/Tycoon-John-Caudwell-makes-figure-donation-secure/story-13665798-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/Tycoon-John-Caudwell-makes-figure-donation-secure/story-13665798-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Factual inaccuracies - tax status edit
Hello
I work for John Caudwell. Factual inaccuracies on his Wikipedia page are frequently cited in the media and cause enormous and unnecessary problems.
In the first paragraph, "He is known for being the UK's largest taxpayer.[5]" This cites a BBC News piece from 2013. This is no longer the case and hasn't been for many years. He does speak frequently in the press about tax as a moral duty, why he would never be a tax exile, and that the wealthy must pay their fair share
Can we please update this to reflect that it is historic? Also, it relates to him as an individual taxpayer rather than corporate tax.
"He was previously known for being one of the UK's largest individual taxpayers."
Inaccurate or misleading claims edit
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Hello, I work for the charity Caudwell Children which John Caudwell founded and he supports heavily but holds no official role within its governance structure.
- In the charity interests section there are references to a Times article which made speculative and unfounded claims about the services which would be provided at the Caudwell International Children's Centre and links to individuals with views that are no supported by the charity. The article uses the Times article to claim that the charity promotes unproven and dubious health practices and has aligned itself with antivaccinationists.:
- The charity strongly refutes the claims and has repeatedly evidenced the contrary, which has been supported by subsequent inspections by the Care Quality Commission. These accusations are potentially damaging to the charity's ability to support children with special educational needs and disabilities.:
- [1][2][3]:
Bensutcliffe78 (talk) 16:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
References
Not done: The sources provided do not refute the Times article. PK650 (talk) 22:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I will not pay for reading the article that is put back after i removed it So i can not comment on the content https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/caudwell-children-autism-charity-a-magnet-for-quack-therapies-0cdh36gb8
The National Autistic Society and John Caudwell work well together I do not see anything relevant in wikipedia accusations The National Autistic Society will deny the desinformation in that article
Why is it necessary to destroy the good relation in charity ? Johnvandeput (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Biography must not be abused to harm charity association. edit
This is clearly a personal attack
Edwardx never gave an explanation for removing my changes
Why do Edwardx and Fram insist on harming a charity association ?
Where do i file a complaint about Edwardx and Fram ?
I do not know how to start a complaint, so I invite Edwardx and Fram to start a proper complaint about me Johnvandeput (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please see WP:NPOV. We represent what reliable sources have written about article subjects. While we keep out tabloid sources (e.g. the Daily Mail about the court battle between Caudwell and his ex), we include reliable, reputable sources like The Times, per WP:NPOV and WP:RS. The charities are being discussed in this article and carry his name, so including criticism of them (at an appropriate place in the body of the article, as is done here) is normal. Fram (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)