User talk:David Fuchs/Archive 15
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Halo series article to FA
Hey, I'm going to have some free time next week. Can you help finish up Halo (series) so we can nominate it for FA? (Guyinblack25 talk 21:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC))
- I've done about all I can think of right now, which isn't much since I'm not familiar with this series. Do you think a peer review would help before going to FA? (Guyinblack25 talk 18:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC))
- FYI- the peer review is located here, and has been included on the VG Peer review page as well. (Guyinblack25 talk 20:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC))
Poke
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Halo: Contact Harvest. Can you do a crop for the AoE FAC? Photoshop and me mix like...Halo and me. *flees* dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 02:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Gastornis
Yeah, I had it on my to-do list for too long. It's not quite done for the time being, there are 2 other (brief) references I'll add now, plus some more details on synonymy... at least the European species will be straightened out taxonomically. There is a comprehensive review for the American ones too, but unfortunately it's a thesis that was never published in digital form, so I have to guess at some of its contents - these will be sourced with subsequent papers from ppl who have actually read the thesis, but I have yet to review all the material. Gonna be some time. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 13:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- OK, so that's that (for starters ;-) ). Time to polish up the ole French skills. And actually I only wanted to add Cockerell (1923). But the eggs thing was too tempting to resist. And as I was at it, the footprints too. And so on. Enjoy! Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 22:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Smash Bros. Series
I believe all GA issues have been dealt with :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 14:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
I answered your question there. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 21:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- And done. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 03:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Signature
Just had to say that your current signature is about the most awesome ever. Cheers, Der Heimschütz (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't get it. :( dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Marvel 1602
Hi David,
I wonder if we can discuss the Marvel 1602 issue. You have twice removed the more detailed accounts that I and others have drawn up, not just of the main characters but also supporting ones like Foggy Nelson and the President-for-Life.
I happen to believe that a book like this deserves all the details it gets. It is not just a simple story which Gaiman came up with from off the top of his head: a great deal of research and investigation was made into the backgrounds of the various Marvel characters and of the Elizabethan period. I think a lot of readers would appreciate how much effort was put into it and how small details are actually important ones. Some people might wonder where James' loathing of tobacco comes from and if it is true or not and my account of him does show the truth of his opinion on the subject.
I did make the Characters section separate from the Plot section. I'm trying to convey how they develop and connect to the "regular" Marvel world, and our own: the connection between Fury and Sir Francis Walsingham, for instance.
Can we come to a compromise on this? Cheers,--Marktreut (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
StarCraft: Ghost GAN
I've had a go at trying to deal with the problems you've highlighted in the GAN review. Are they sufficient? Are there any more problems I need to take care of? -- Sabre (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Ocarina of Time FAC
I was wondering if you've had a chance to take another look at The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. (OoT FAC) I've removed an image and replied to your other concerns. Thanks, Pagrashtak 04:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Ninja Gaiden peer review again
Hi, Dave. I have revised the entire article with respect to grammar and prose. I used tools this time and according to the readability tool, the article is much better on reading. However, I would like your pair of eyes to go through the article again and confirm if the tools are not messing around with me (machines are not literary masters at the moment). Please take a look and sorry for taking up your time again. Thank you in advance. Jappalang (talk) 06:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Twilight Princess
Adressed your concerns (but plot), anything else to say? igordebraga ≠ 17:24, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess have been addressed. Please let us know if there are any new concerns or if you support or oppose the article. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Halo series
I didn't want to comment at the peer review and have people think it had been commented on because I only had one thought; it's 99% complete, probably 100, and the only thing left to think of is, what would need to be expanded so that this could function as the lead article in a movie, literary adaptation, and a machinima of the halo series featured topic? It looks good as is, but could use a look over. Also check the fair use rationales, be super specific about what they demonstrate and why they are crucial to use. Do that, and you should just launch the candidacy at any time, it looks ready. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Follow-up to the deletion of the James J. Flaherty page
Hello,
According to the procedures, I'm writing to you because I believe you were the deleting admin of the James J. Flaherty page. You wrote that there weren't enough reliable, 3rd party resources to confirm his notability.
I'd like to present you with some more sources that we've identified. Does this change your view?
1) Douglas Silsbee, an author of several coaching books, cite James Flaherty as a key influencer http://www.dougsilsbee.com/resources/links
2) Fast Company interviewed James Flaherty about how to find the right coach http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/05/coach4.html
3) In the mass compilation book called "Learning Organizations," James Flahery is cited as a key influencer on one author's work. http://books.google.com/books?id=-ZTIOvDMUWkC&pg=PP20&lpg=PP20&dq=james+flaherty&source=web&ots=f3tVsBqrjE&sig=_u8dbEpTVTDUjGie2qG4wDADzUs&hl=en#PPP18,M1
4) Integral Leadership Review, the world's premier publication of integral approaches to leadership, interviews James Flaherty about his book http://integralleadershipreview.com/archives/2004/2004_10.html#fresh
5) Several universities use James's book in their coaching certificate programs. + Georgetown University, Washington DC + Loyola University, Chicago + Royal Roads University, Victoria BC Canada + University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business, South Africa
6) The Shambhala Institute (that also has a widely known book publishing division) cites James Flaherty as one of the thought leaders in their authentic leadership training. http://www.shambhalainstitute.org/alia/2008summer/home.html
7) Two highly regarded academics, Peter Senge from MIT and Jerry_I._Porras from Stanford, favorably endorse James's work in the field of coaching. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/0750679204/ref=dp_proddesc_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books
Thanks for your consideration, Dubbgainer (talk) 20:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For putting up with the endless questioning of sources at FAC and the lack of caffeine. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC) |
Hi, do you yourself plan to redirect/merge this one? If not, I think perhaps it ought to just be an out and out delete, per the quite strong arguments for deletion that were made... I will watch here for responses. ++Lar: t/c 19:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't exactly see strong arguments for outright deletion, but I definitely agree the person is not notable by herself, and per DGG is should be renamed. If this does not occur in a day or two, I will delete it. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- The AfD did not conclude that a rename should occur. In fact, of the 11 people who voiced an opinion on the AfD, only one suggested a rename. There's no logical conclusion that indicates this article should be renamed. It also should not be deleted. The AfD on strict voting grounds was a a dead match at 50%/50%, 5 five keep five for delete and one neutral. There's no consensus from this AfD as to what to do with the article. There are four other AfDs, three of which concluded as keep. There's no outstanding reason that has not been addressed by the most recent AfDs or all prior AfDs supporting deleting this article. It would be improper for you to unilaterally decide the article should be deleted when five AfDs have not reached the same conclusion. I urge you to reconsider your planned actions. Thank you, --SpectralAgent (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Saying that AfD isn't a vote, and therefore by implication my concerns are invalid, takes a giant broom and sweeps five AfDs under the rug in a highly dismissive manner. Only one person the last AfD suggested a rename. One. In the prior four AfDs, nobody mentioned rename. Nobody. You can't hand pick the conclusion you want from the AfD and decide the fate of the article. In effect, you're eliminating the purpose of AfD. A number of strong arguments in favor of keeping the article were raised. You're dismissing those arguments in favor of one suggestion to rename. Renaming the article is not a consensus decision, which AfD does rely upon. --SpectralAgent (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- The BLP1E concerns were addressed on multiple occasions. I suggest you read all the AfDs to gain a better understanding of what you are doing. There is no consensus to rename, not even anything more than a suggestion by one person to do so. One person making the suggestion doesn't make consensus. Renaming of the article would be acting without consensus. --SpectralAgent (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Added criticism Gary King (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Can you please revisit the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare FAC? Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Spyro Blueprints
Better late than never! http://adylheim.com/spyro%20005.JPG PirateMink 15:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Myst
Greetings! I'd like to thank you for your work on the Myst article, it's looking great so far. :) Rehevkor (talk) 18:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
- On the subject of Myst, Talk:Myst (video game) still needs to be moved to Talk:Myst, I'll leave it to you as you have the power to delete the pages before moving etc (rather me just copy pasting). Ta! Rehevkor (talk) 00:31, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
In uploading a new version of this image (was there particularly any need? You cite no reason in your edit summaries...) you've rendered the fair-use rational void, as it states the source of my image, and not yours. Could you please update it to reflect your source. Cheers, TalkIslander 20:46, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Edge Review
I've emailed the Edge Mac Myst review to you. Drop me a line to let me know that you received it. - X201 (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Myst FAC
I have struck out some issues and replied. Just the Myst-Myst thing left to do. Great work. — Wackymacs (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Team up
I have left you a message in the thread on my talk page. — OranL (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I left you another message on my talk page. — OranL (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Please note that there is a DC Meetup planned for May 17th at 5:00 p.m., though a place has not yet been set. You're receiving this notice because you posted to the page for the prior meetup - Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 3 - but haven't indicated whether or not you're interested in attending this one. (Apologies if in fact you have.) BetacommandBot (talk) 01:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar for Myst (video game)
|
The VG Barnstar | |
| This is a barnstar for all your hard work and effort which went into the Myst (video game) article. Well done! — Wackymacs (talk) 08:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC) |
- But such a bad game! Almost as bad as Halo. ;) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:13, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess and copyedit it? It's at FAC right now at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Gary King (talk) 18:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Newspaper articles
Hey there, I noticed on the FAC page that you were saying that you don't have a way to get easy access to old newspaper articles. I have a subscription to ProQuest, an online newspaper search site that almost always has many full-text articles available online from papers like NY Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.. I can share the account with you if you'd like to search on there. Please send me an email if you're interested. — OranL (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for assistance
Hello there. At the moment, I am working on the Unreal Tournament article (want to get it to GA, then FA). So far, I have added a "Reception" section, and a new System Requirements table. Bits of the new re-written article are lingering in my sandbox at User:Wackymacs/Sandbox2- None of the new Gameplay section has been implemented yet. My goal is to get rid of the weapons/game types/special features lists, and then convert those to prose. I would most appreciate it if you could collaborate with me on this. Thanks! — Wackymacs (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
If we can get this to GA, we have a Halo 3 Featured Topic :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 01:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of 2old2play.com
I have nominated 2old2play.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2old2play.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Collectonian (talk) 02:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The WPVG Newsletter (May 2008)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
){kind=link}
Can I ask a favour?
I'm trying to cleanup Brood War for GA, but I'm really not satisfied with the synopsis section - it just doesn't seem to flow as naturally as I got it to for StarCraft. Would you mind giving it a look over and seeing if it all makes sense, possibly putting the plot section in particular through a copyedit for me? I'm sure I can lose some detail, but I can't see where. I'd also appreciate it if you could look over the development section: that's all the stuff I could find for it, is it sufficient? Lastly, as this is an expansion pack, there's not much I can say about gameplay that isn't already covered in the StarCraft article, but do you have any suggestions for expansion of the gameplay section? -- Sabre (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Fellow Myst fan, any progress on Kratos (God of War)? (and yes, that's a game I like!) dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: Myst
Well, I'm afraid I'm getting a 403 error (permission denied) on the url you've provided, so I unfortunately cannot comment on the alternate - I presume its of the library, like the other screenshot in the article? If it is, then the library comparison would be better due to its more recognised status in culture. However, what I had in mind was using the two screenshots alongside each other, allowing for easy comparison, as I've done on the right here. Naturally, you'll need to move the library shot up to replace it in the gameplay section. Depending on NFC requirements, you could always shove in a new image to where the library one currently is if you do this, a shot that's not in the Myst Age wouldn't go amiss. Oh, and thanks for indirectly getting me into playing Myst again, I've not played it in years... -- Sabre (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Riven
I've got the Edge review, I just need a little time to type it up. - X201 (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pokemon gb pokedex.png)
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading Image:Pokemon gb pokedex.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor | ||
| Wikimedia Board to expand, restructure | Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia | |
| Bot approvals group, checkuser nominations briefly held on RfA | WikiWorld: "World domination" | |
| News and notes: Board elections, milestones | Wikipedia in the News | |
| Dispatches: Did You Know ... | Features and admins | |
| Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation | |
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Sister Projects Interview: Wikiversity | WikiWorld: "They Might Be Giants" |
| News and notes: Board elections, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
| Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities | Features and admins |
| Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Requesting Peer Review of Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock
If you have time, could you please take a look at Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock and post any suggestions for improvement that you might have at Wikipedia:Peer review/Guitar Hero III: Legends of Rock/archive2? Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 01:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Video game FACs
I'm quite curious about your comments here. In particular, "Secondly, @Budding, one of the issues is that "this prose sucks" is not actionable; reviewers must provide concrete examples of what needs to be improved. Saying "the prose can be improved" is like saying to a woman "you could be prettier"- it doesn't offer ways for definite improvement." I sincerely resent your implications here. If you're implying that I go around saying only "this prose sucks" on video game FACs, then you are quite mistaken. Read my reviews, and you'll see I always give concrete examples of where articles can improved, whether I'm opposing or commenting. Moreover, I think you might want to read my posts again on the talk page; it doesn't seem from your misleading response that you understood what I was saying. BuddingJournalist 08:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- You should re-read my comment. I am asking reviewers to ask themselves "does the prose truly meet the required professional standard at WP:FACR?" when reviewing articles. BuddingJournalist 11:21, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, seeing as how you preface your comment with "@Budding", it certainly seemed your comment was aimed at me... BuddingJournalist 11:23, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I could do with some print sources. Gary King (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
HBOFF
Hey David. I was wondering, maybe we should describe some of the components on Halo.Bungie.Org in more detail. That is, create a separate section (== Section ==) for some of the site's more important features like the HSP and the Fan Fiction areas? --UNSC Trooper (talk) 18:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Orange Box
Can I ask a favour of you? You're good with graphics and images here, far better than I am. Would you mind seeing if you can't rustle something up for The Orange Box featured topic? Something involving a fancily done lambda symbol would work well. If you don't want to or don't have the time, don't worry as I've got a quick alternative ready, but it would be good to have a purpose done image for the topic. -- Sabre (talk) 21:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Explicit sexual content draws fire | Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia |
| Foundation receives copyright claim from church | Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy |
| Update on Citizendium | Board candidacies open through May 22 |
| Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area | New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks |
| WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton" | News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones |
| Wikipedia in the News | Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Locations in the Half-Life series
I'm trying to put together a merged article as Masem suggested, it should incorporate all the locations that we've currently got non-notable articles for. You can see the draft here. -- Sabre (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| For tireless contribution and an ever growing list of FAC contributions, Riven seems to be shaping up nicely too. The first barnstar I've given! Rehevkor (talk) 18:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) |