User talk:Bilby/Archive 18
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 |
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
Technical news
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
Arbitration
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
This Month in Education: February 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 2 • February 2023
- A Strategic Direction for a Massive Online Course for Educators in Brazil
- Alliance Funding for Wikipedia as a school resource in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland, New Zealand
- Call for Submissions to Wiki Workshop 2023
- Collaboration with Charles University on the creation of Czech Wikipedia started in January
- Open Education Week 2023 in the Wikimedia Mexico Education Program
- Wikiclubs with different schools in Albania
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
Removal of information
Why are you removing information that has source of reference?. 1keyhole (talk) 11:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ossy, I thought that was clear by the edit summaries. If you are interpreting sources to come up with a new conclusion not contined in either, you are performing original research. So when you wrote "What's notable about the article is that it emphasizes that CEDU was not working with addicts or delinquents" you are editorialising, especially given that the article did not emphasis that at all. In regard to the second claim, "The original CEDU program did not believe in the use of medicine.", I could find no mention in the source of "medicine", nor a claim that they didn't belive in it. - Bilby (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 April 2023
- From the editor: Some long-overdue retractions
- News and notes: Sounding out, a universal code of conduct, and dealing with AI
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" case is ongoing
- Featured content: Hail, poetry! Thou heav'n-born maid
- Recent research: Language bias: Wikipedia captures at least the "silhouette of the elephant", unlike ChatGPT
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages
- Disinformation report: Sus socks support suits, seems systemic
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
Technical news
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
Arbitration
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
This Month in Education: March 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 3 • March 2023
- Audio-seminar project of the Wikimedia Mexico Education Program
- Empowering Nigerian Female Artists: Through Art & Feminism Edith-A-Thon at KWASU Fan Club
- Exploring How Wikipedia Works
- Florida graduate students complete Library History edit-a-thon for credit
- Improving hearing health content in Brazil
- Media Literacy Portal to become a key resource for media education in Czech Libraries
- Wikeys in the Albanian language
- Wikimarathon is an opportunity to involve students and teachers in creating and editing articles in Wikipedia
- Wikimedia Polska short report
- Wikimedia Serbia participated in the State Seminar of the The Mathematical Society of Serbia
The Signpost: 26 April 2023
- News and notes: Staff departures at Wikimedia Foundation, Jimbo hands in the bits, and graphs' zeppelin burns
- In the media: Contested truth claims in Wikipedia
- Obituary: Remembering David "DGG" Goodman
- Arbitration report: Holocaust in Poland, Jimbo in the hot seat, and a desysopping
- Special report: Signpost statistics between years 2005 and 2022
- News from the WMF: Collective planning with the Wikimedia Foundation
- Featured content: In which we described the featured articles in rhyme again
- From the archives: April Fools' through the ages, part two
- Humour: The law of hats
- Traffic report: Long live machine, the future supreme
Hello, Bilby,
Thank you so much for fixing this article. I don't know how I missed that it was a 20 year old article and shouldn't be moved to Draft space. I just looked at state of the article and it looked like so many of the recent student projects that are getting put prematurely into main space at this time of the school year. Thank you for correcting my error. It's appreciated! Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- No worries! I have it on my watchlist and thought we had a difficult set of circumstances - a student project that broke the article, coupled with an unnecessary page move, with some text that just didn't hang together. I absoltutely understood where you were comming from, but thought that reverting the student changes with a page move would solve the problem. If it wasn't a topic I was very familiar with I would probably have gone the same way. So all is good!
- Just as a matter of odd coincidences, I was going over a lecture I'm supposed to give tomorrow and saw that it started with TAM, so strangely this all works together. :) - Bilby (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
Arbitration
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
Miscellaneous
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
This Month in Education: April 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 4 • April 2023
- Auckland Museum Alliance fund project update
- Introducing Wikipedia to Kusaal Language Teachers
- KWASU Fan Club Leads the Way in 21st Century Learning with Wiki in School Program
- On-line Courses for Educators in Poland
- Online meeting of Ukrainian educators working with Wikipedia – four perspectives
- Wikiclubs Editathon in Elbasan, Albania
- Wikipedia at the Brazilian Linguistics Olympiad
- Wikipedia at the University of Łódź Information Management Conference
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
 | Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Bilby! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! Dinoz1 (chat?) (he/him) 15:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC) |  |
Olya Zueva
Hello there, and happy adminship anniversary! Since a template was put by you on the respective page saying it might have been created against undisclosed payments, I am afraid if if my account is at risk. MrAnmol (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
Miscellaneous
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Unblock request of Reunited7777
I'm reviewing an unblock request for this editor. It looks like they were blocked for socking, but I don't see any record of them at SPI or who the master is in the block log, and I'm not immediately familiar with the sockmaster. Could you clarify who you blocked them as a sock of? Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! Sorry, I should have added the SP tag - I'll fix that. The suspected master is User:Expertwikiguy, SPI [1]. Blocked on behavioural evidence, but you can see the standard paid editor model that the user employs: one edit to the user page with something innoculous to stop it being a redlink; edit in general for a short while to avoid looking like an SPA, then create the paid article in mainspace. - Bilby (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, definitely lines up once I know that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 00:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
Technical news
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
Arbitration
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
The Signpost: 3 July 2023
- Disinformation report: Imploded submersible outfit foiled trying to sing own praises on Wikipedia
- Featured content: Incensed
- Traffic report: Are you afraid of spiders? Arnold? The Idol? ChatGPT?
This Month in Education: June 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 5 • June 2023
- Africa Day 2023: Abuja Teachers celebrates
- From editing articles to civic power – Wikimedia UK's research on democracy and Wikipedia
- Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Program in Yemen Brings Positive Impact to Yemeni Teachers
- Using Wikipedia in education: students' and teachers' view
- The Journey of Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Lagos State
- WMB goes to Serbia
- But we don't want it to end!
Professor article
For Hans Bosse, I'm surprised that a dead social sciences researcher could be paid content. What's the evidence that it was paid?
I think we can try to clean it up if that's really the case.
He recently died, and it was pretty big news for ethnologists/anthropologists working in certain areas of social psychology. Noelicneon (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- It can only be cleaned up by someone independent of the subject, otherwise it simply compunds the issue. - Bilby (talk) 23:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm independent of the subject, but you seem to think that whoever created it probably isn't. I don't know who created it, and I have just asked him to address these issues. How did you figure out that the article creator got paid for it? Social sciences researchers, to be frank, are generally not known for being rich people who can afford to throw money at self-promotional pages. Noelicneon (talk) 23:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2023
- In the media: Tentacles of Emirates plot attempt to ensnare Wikipedia
- Tips and tricks: What automation can do for you (and your WikiProject)
- Featured content: Scrollin', scrollin', scrollin', keep those readers scrollin', got to keep on scrollin', Rawhide!
- Traffic report: The Idol becomes the Master
Speedy deletion nomination of Stoked On Fishing
Hello Bilby,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stoked On Fishing for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.
If you don't want Stoked On Fishing to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 11:47, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on CEDU
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page CEDU, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 August 2023
- News and notes: City officials attempt to doxx Wikipedians, Ruwiki founder banned, WMF launches Mastodon server
- In the media: Truth, AI, bull from politicians, and climate change
- Disinformation report: Hot climate, hot hit, hot money, hot news hot off the presses!
- Tips and tricks: Citation tools for dummies!
- In focus: Journals cited by Wikipedia
- Opinion: Are global bans the last step?
- Featured content: Featured Content, 1 to 15 July
- Traffic report: Come on Oppie, let's go party
Contemporary fantasy
Hi, you reverted my edit on this page. If you'd like to discuss the page, please could you do so at Talk:Contemporary fantasy. Looking forward to hearing from you. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Technical news
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
Arbitration
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Nomination of Contemporary fantasy for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary fantasy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
CohenTheBohemian (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit of mine that I had done as requested by an editor on the article talk page. Your edit summary was "needs to be added by someone independent of the subject". Was that aimed at me or at the editor who had made the request? Equine-man (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi! That was aimed at you - because of the ongoing issue with paid editors on that page, the text should really be added by someone independent. - Bilby (talk) 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Erm, I’m not paid, wish I was I’d be rich. I saw the edit request and checked the link and the edit request looked like what was said in the reference, I don’t understand the sport, so if the edit request was not in line with the reference or sourced properly, let me know. Equine-man (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I've been provided with evidence to the contrary. - Bilby (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Good. I don't like paid editors. I should have checked page history before doing an edit. Thanks for reverting. Equine-man (talk) 09:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I've been provided with evidence to the contrary. - Bilby (talk) 02:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Erm, I’m not paid, wish I was I’d be rich. I saw the edit request and checked the link and the edit request looked like what was said in the reference, I don’t understand the sport, so if the edit request was not in line with the reference or sourced properly, let me know. Equine-man (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
This Month in Education: July 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 7 • July 2023
- Wikimedia Kaduna Connect Campaign
- Wikimedia Serbia published a paper Promoting Equity in Access to Open Knowledge: An Example of the Wikipedia Educational Program
- Wikimedia and Education Kailali Multiple campus
- WikiCamp in Istog, Kosovo: Promoting Knowledge and Nature Appreciation
- Wiki at the Brazilian National History Symposium
- US & Canada program reaches 100M words added
- Renewed Community Wikiconference brought together experienced Wikipedians and newcomers
- Kusaal Wikipedia Workshop at Ajumako Campus, University of Education, Winneba
- Join us to celebrate the Kiwix4Schools Africa Mentorship Program Graduation Ceremony
- Activities that took place during the presentation of the WikiEducation book. Educational practices and experiences in Mexico with Wikipedia and other open resources in Xalala, Veracruz from the Wikimedia Mexico Education Program
- 62+ Participants Graduates from the Kiwix4Schools Africa Mentorship Program
- “Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom” course launched in Ukraine
- OFWA and Goethe Institute Host Wiki Skills For Librarians Workshop-Ghana
The Signpost: 15 August 2023
- News and notes: Dude, Where's My Donations? Wikimedia Foundation announces another million in grants for non-Wikimedia-related projects
- Tips and tricks: How to find images for your articles, check their copyright, upload them, and restore them
- Cobwebs: Getting serious about writing
- Serendipity: Why I stopped taking photographs almost altogether
- Featured content: Barbenheimer confirmed
- Traffic report: 'Cause today it just goes with the fashion
Placement of COI banners on articles
Moved from Talk:Edward Forman § Paid editing- @Bilby:, I do appreciate your message on my Talk page, as well as what you're trying to do. However, you simply cannot place that tag unilaterally with no evidence, especially when it amounts to an unsupported accusation against an editor and appears to be an assumption of bad faith. Your allegations so far are just that—allegations made by you, and nothing else. Please self-revert and remove this tag, or else provide specific evidence for it. Please do not ignore this message. Mathglot (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm a bit lost as to what you expect. There is a clear ad to edit this article on upwork; a contractor was hired to edit the article; that contractor was paid for their edits to this article; and a known and admitted paid editor was the only editor who made changes to the article from the time the ad was placed and the contractor was paid. It seems pretty clear to me. - Bilby (talk) 23:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure if you're giving me the runaround, or what. I expect you to place your evidence here, directly under this comment. I plan to take you to a noticeboard if you fail to remove the banner without providing evidence. The safe route is to just remove it for now, add your evidence, and then gain consensus for it. Mathglot (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- This isn't a matter of saying that the article was edited by a paid editor - the tag only says that there is reasonable suspicion of such. I have reasonable supicion of such. But I'll address this another way. I'll see what the edtor has to say, and based on that I'll take it to the next step - the obvious next step is a link to the job ad, although I don't like doing that due to a risk of outing, but that is better done at COIN than here. - Bilby (talk) 07:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- I've raised the issue at WP:COIN#Edward Forman. - Bilby (talk) 11:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is not even a living person, not sure where the COI comes from. I have been reading George Pendle’s Strange Angel and all my edit is based on that (Parsons and Malina pages were more complete, I started with Forman). And I believe I made some improvement, although I am still working on his works after the GALCIT period. Sabih omar 14:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- COIN is a good start; to avoid outing, you can email any admin by using the email link in the tools in the left sidebar (legacy 2010 editor); not sure where the link is in the current editor. Mathglot (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think I see the key point to this disagreement: we are arguing at cross-purposes. The nucleus of it is here:
the tag only says that there is reasonable suspicion of such. I have reasonable supicion of such.
- You are arguing about whether there is paid editing, but I'm not. I am arguing whether you have the right to unilaterally place a banner of this nature, without consensus. To me, you may be right about the paid editing, or you may be wrong, but that is beside the point. You, as an individual editor, have no right to place a banner on an article visible to everyone on the internet, based on your sole suspicion about some other editor; that is a complete no-go. That tag implies that *there is a consensus* at Wikipedia that there is paid editing on the article, not that one editor among 140,000 a active editors suspects that there is. That goes double, when some other editor has expressed their reservations by removing the tag, and you've doubled down and tripled down to reinsert it, in the face of opposition. In my opinion, you are in violation of several policies consensus and AGF prime among them, and while the discussion here or at COIN is going on, you should observe policy and remove the banner. It's fine to put it back afterward, if that's what the consensus is. Mathglot (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure if you're giving me the runaround, or what. I expect you to place your evidence here, directly under this comment. I plan to take you to a noticeboard if you fail to remove the banner without providing evidence. The safe route is to just remove it for now, add your evidence, and then gain consensus for it. Mathglot (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm a bit lost as to what you expect. There is a clear ad to edit this article on upwork; a contractor was hired to edit the article; that contractor was paid for their edits to this article; and a known and admitted paid editor was the only editor who made changes to the article from the time the ad was placed and the contractor was paid. It seems pretty clear to me. - Bilby (talk) 23:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
I realized that the discussion formerly at Talk:Edward Forman wasn't really appropriate at that venue, as it is a behavior/policy issue about placement of banners, and not really anything to do with improving the article itself; hence, it belongs here, and not on the article Talk page. Apologies for the wrong venue. As far as your issue, concerning the COIN discussion, I'll monitor it with interest. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Just noticed your comment at WP:COIN that you are an admin. That raised an eyebrow; per WP:ADMINCOND, you are held to a higher standard. How is triply inserting a template on an article page in the face of two reverts and Talk page opposition commensurate with that? Maybe there's something deep down in some guideline that gives admins wider latitude in placing templates of this sort; if so, please drop a link, and I'll stop bothering you. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like the COIN issue is settled, due to Sabih's disclosure at the noticeboard. Afaic, that settles it: the banner stays, and I'm happy to move on. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 02:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 August 2023
- From the editor: Beta version of signpost.news now online
- News and notes: You like RecentChanges?
- In the media: Taking it sleazy
- Recent research: The five barriers that impede "stitching" collaboration between Commons and Wikipedia
- Draftspace: Bad Jokes and Other Draftspace Novelties
- Humour: The Dehumourification Plan
- Traffic report: Raise your drinking glass, here's to yesterday
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
Technical news
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
Arbitration
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
Miscellaneous
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
The Signpost: 16 September 2023
- In the media: "Just flirting", going Dutch and Shapps for the defence?
- Obituary: Nosebagbear
- Featured content: Catching up
- Traffic report: Some of it's magic, some of it's tragic
A kitten for you!
YOU ROCK!!! Keep on editing :]
Babysharkboss2 was here!! 15:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2023
- News and notes: Wikimedia Endowment financial statement published
- Recent research: Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia; concerns about limiting "anyone can edit" principle "may be overstated"
- Featured content: By your logic,
- Poetry: "The Sight"
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text:
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Technical news
- Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.
Conektr Tech
Hello dear Bilby, I came across with a tag of undisclosed payment in one of the articles I created which is totally against the truth. I kindly ask you to review my previous contributions before claiming this! Thanks in advance! Worldviewfrom (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Draft: Together Price
Hi @Bilby! I noticed that you recently deleted Draft:Together Price, and I understand that it was due to my failure to comply with the necessary actions. I have already disclosed it on my user page using the PAID template. I've been away for a few weeks and just returned, so I wasn't able to disclose it sooner. I though that after submission, it would take four months for a review and didn't check afterward. I sincerely apologize for this. I'm hoping you could assist me in recovering the draft since I would like to work on it further. If it is not possible, could I still recreate the same page using AfC? Moving forward, I will ensure to disclose any paid contributions. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your response.~~~~ Sydneycindy (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
This Month in Education: September 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 7 • September 2023
- Inauguration of the Kent Wiki Club at the Wikimania 2023 Conference
- Letter Magic: Supercharging Your WikiEducation Programs
- Réseau @pprendre (Learning Network) : The Initiative for Educational Change in Francophone West Africa
- WikiChallenge Ecoles d’Afrique closes its 5th edition with 13 winning schools
- WikiConecta: connecting Brazilian university professors and Wikimedia
- Wikimedia Germany launches interactive event series Open Source AI in Education
The Signpost: 23 October 2023
- News and notes: Where have all the administrators gone?
- In the media: Thirst traps, the fastest loading sites on the web, and the original collaborative writing
- Gallery: Before and After: Why you don't need to know how to restore images to make massive improvements
- Featured content: Yo, ho! Blow the man down!
- Traffic report: The calm and the storm
- News from Diff: Sawtpedia: Giving a Voice to Wikipedia Using QR Codes
Ad verecundiam fallacy
Hello. Why do you keep deleting my changes? My version might not be perfect but it certainly is 1000 times better than the current one since at least it is truthful. You haven't fixed the article that states lies in months, and seem to defend it from saying the truth whenerver I try. Feel free to add sources; but only the last section I added is "uncited", since I could only cite examples. Besides, citebombing is useless and stupid. Adding multiple citations from cringe sources such as philosophy.org or something like that can never be better than quoting Locke. My article is definitely not "completely unsourced" at all; I just didn't abuse of it like the previous version that has 5 citations on each word.
Whatever change is for better should be kept even if it momentarily lacks of citations. Adolphitus (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2023
- Arbitration report: Admin bewilderingly unmasks self as sockpuppet of other admin who was extremely banned in 2015
- In the media: UK shadow chancellor accused of ripping off WP articles for book, Wikipedians accused of being dicks by a rich man
- Opinion: An open letter to Elon Musk
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2023
- News from Wiki Ed: Equity lists on Wikipedia
- Recent research: How English Wikipedia drove out fringe editors over two decades
- Featured content: Like putting a golf course in a historic site.
- Traffic report: Cricket jumpscare
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
- Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
- Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
- Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
- Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
- Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
- An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
Miscellaneous
- The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
This Month in Education: October 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 8 • October 2023
- 3 Generations at Wikipedia Education Program in Türkiye
- CBSUA Launches Wiki Education in Partnership with PhilWiki Community and Bikol Wikipedia Community
- Celebrating Wikidata’s Birthday in Elbasan
- Edu Wiki Camp 2023 - together in Sremski Karlovci
- PhilWiki Community promotes language preservation and cultural heritage advocacies at ADNU
- PunjabWiki Education Program: A Wikipedia Adventure in Punjab
- WikiConference on Education ignites formation of Wikimedia communities
- Wikimedia Estonia talked about education at CEE meeting in Tbilisi
- Wikimedia in Brazil is going to be a book
- Wikipedian Editor Project: Arabic Sounds Workshop 2023
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
Suspected sock puppet and COI complaint
Hi, I am complaining about the freelancer continuously publishing spams in return of payments. She is from Dubai and below is her Upwork profile where you can find the evidence:
https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01bfb4d3cfe85e7304
Below are the pages, she published in return of payments:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transkriptor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Penn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webz.io
Also, you can see the feedback on her profile which means she is continuously violating Wikipedia TOS. Also, she is created many accounts for publishing spams. 39.48.3.223 (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- @JJMC89, Girth Summit, and MER-C: (as others left messages by the IP). I've looked over the recent jobs by this user but I don't see anything that can links them to these jobs. Agree that they smell of UPE however! SmartSE (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I can confirm Transkriptor, as I was able to identify the job. I'd also add Draft:Simon Gillett to the list. I cannot confirm either Linda Penn nor Webz.io, but they don't seem impossible. I guess I should pass this on to en-paid. - Bilby (talk) 09:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
New message from Narutolovehinata5
Message added 12:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
About suspicious accounts
Regarding the account you've been asking about paid contributions, I had already come close to blocking it as a duck before the explicit claim that it is the only account of that editor, per the suspicious overlap in the history at Tom Malloy and at the deleted history of Jonathan Melton. In the case of Tom Malloy, the currently active account added a headshot and apparently also e-mailed VRT about it after the previous editor added a since-deleted headshot. There is also overlap in the style of talk page messages (grammatically rare use of the word "detail" in several instances). This could be taken to SPI if necessary or to look for sleepers, but I think it could also just be acted upon if you see the same things I see.
I was also bemused by the characterization of Quentin Bryce as uncited and of questionable notability.... Dekimasuよ! 13:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Cf. this and this with the two accounts editing in succession, which I only discovered after writing the previous message. Dekimasuよ! 13:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- They also overlap on multiple pages with [2], already blocked for undisclosed paid editing. Dekimasuよ! 13:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- I missed that you had added Leojuan, but I came across them independently, so that does seem likely if we both came to the same conclusion. I have a couple more acounts I could add, one of which I am certain of. I passed on the two accounts that I knew of to paid-en, so at this stage I think it might be best to sit on it, and then add any they might miss. The problem is that they seem backlogged, so I don't know how long until they are able to get to it. To be clear, though, I have no doubt about the UPE, and I think we can now add at least 4 socks to the list. - Bilby (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
This Month in Education: November 2023
This Month in Education
Volume 12 • Issue 9 • November 2023
- 4th WikiUNAM Editathon: Community knowledge strengthens education
- Edit-a-thon at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo
- EduWiki Nigeria Community: Embracing Digital Learning Through Wikipedia
- Evening Wikischool offers Czech seniors further education on Wikipedia
- Expansion of Wikipedia Education Program through Student Associations at Iranian Universities
- Exploring Wikipedia through Wikiclubs and the Wikeys board game in Albania
- First anniversary of the game Wikeys
- Involve visiting students in education programs
- Iranian Students as Wikipedians: Using Wikipedia to Teach Research Methodology and Encyclopedic Writing
- Kiwix4Schools Nigeria: Bridging Knowledge Gap through Digital Literacy
- Lire wikipedia en classe à Djougou au Bénin
- Tyap Wikimedians Zaria Outreach
- Art Outreach at Aje Comprehensive Senior High School 1st November 2023, Lagos Mainland
- PhilWiki Community holds a meet-up to advocate women empowerment
Happy Holidays!
Colman2000 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Colman2000 (talk) 07:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
Seasons Greetings
|
Merry Christmas, Bilby! Wishing you Season's Greetings and a Happy Winter Solstice! As the year comes to a close, I want to express my appreciation for your dedicated efforts on Wikipedia and extend heartfelt thanks for your assistance throughout the years. May the holiday season bring you and your loved ones abundant joy, good health, and prosperity. |
.jpg)
|
Season's greetings
Happy New Year 2024!
|
Happy New Year! |
Hello Bilby: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this messageCAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Arbitration
- Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
- The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
Administrators' newsletter – February 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
- Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
- Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Joseph Phua
I have a conflict of interest for this article on Wikipedia and have been hired to request edits so that it meets all rules and guidelines of Wikipedia. The history shows you as the highest ranking person who edited the article. I was told by client that previous editors have attempted but did not disclose an affiliation so I am wondering if you can confirm that I did the proper disclosure. I made it to my userpage per the rules in PAYDISCLOSE. I am wondering if the article itself can be removed from Wikipedia and put into my sandbox space so that I can make improvements necessary for the Wikipedia community to review. GrantFortyNine (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am surprised that someone without prior Wikidpedia-editing experience was hired. Yes, the disclosure is correct, so thank you for doing that. No, unfortunately the article cannot be moved into a sandbox, but you can develop a new version in your sandbox at User:GrantFortyNine/Sandbox if you wish to do so, and then you can easily request people to check it through the discussion page at Talk:Joseph Phua. - Bilby (talk) 12:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I played around with Wikipedia when it first launched but that was more than 20 years ago. From what I see, it has developed quite a bit since then so will take me a minute to get acquainted. Also to be fair, I am not technically being paid (per se). I am working on another marketing project for client and when this was mentioned I told him that I would see what I could do to assist. If I read the terms of use correctly, I would still be considered a paid editor since I am being compensated overall. Thank you for the advice on the sandbox. I will start there and see how to move forward. --GrantFortyNine (talk) 03:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Am I allowed to edit Wikipedia outside of the Joseph Phua article? If there is something you recommend to help me get a better feel for editing I would appreciate the advice. --GrantFortyNine (talk) 03:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
I have requested the replacement of the current article with the one I edited in my sandbox. I think I did it correctly. Hopefully. Feedback is appreciated. --GrantFortyNine (talk) 00:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This Month in Education: January 2024
This Month in Education
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • January 2024
- Cross-Continental Wikimedia Activities: A Dialogue between Malaysia and Estonia
- Czech programme SWW in 2023 – how have we managed to engage students
- Extending Updates on Wikipedia in Education – Elbasan, Albania
- Reading Wikipedia in the Classroom Teacher’s guide – now available in Bulgarian language
- Summer students at Auckland Museum
- WikiDunong: EduWiki Initiatives in the Philippines Project
- Wikimedia Armenia's Educational Workshops
- Wikimedia Foundation publishes its first Child Rights Impact Assessment
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
James Baillieu
I am a colleague of James Bailleau and noticed that
 | This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (January 2024) |
had been added to the article.
Noting that there has been no edits since September 2023, I wondered why this has been added four months later.
It detracts from what is otherwise an interesting and well designed article.
What is needed to have it reverted?
CutiePieFYA (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- The tag is needed because the article was created and edited by multiple undisclosed paid editors and it has not subsequently been independently verified. The tag highlights the issue to allow independent editors to know of and address the concerns. - Bilby (talk) 02:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your quick response. How is the article independently verified? Is this something as an independent editor that I could help with? I'm am quite willing to spend the time to assist James to resolve this issue.
- Do I attempt to find these undisclosed paid editors? Is there a tool that can help me?
- CutiePieFYA (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Please respond to my message of 13 days ago.
- CutiePieFYA (talk) 22:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Reversion of source addition on Ross Coulthart page
Hi Bilby, regarding your revert on my source addition. Can we come to a compromise? I believe the source I included added context to the original source for that sentence. The original only cited the Australian Skeptics as the source for the claim that Coulthart believed that governments around the world including the Vatican had suppressed information regarding UAPs. My source confirms that he believes that certain governments are suppressing UAP knowledge and, in my interpretation, he appears to support the claim that the Vatican was involved too. At the very least he didn't push back on his interviewee and carefully reiterated the interviewee's claim regarding the Vatican later on. True, it doesn't support anything regarding the bent spoon but it does help add context to the second half of the sentence. What do you think, is there room for compromise here? OneUpOnUs (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- The source failed validation. It needed to a) mention the bent spoon award, b) include the quote, or c) show that he actually belives that the Vatican is supressing claims about UFOs, rather than simply interviewing someone and saying "if they are correct". We need to be very clear with BLPs to avoid harming the subjects. - Bilby (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Bilby, They're back at it again, removing sourced material from the article with no explanation and no prior discussion. See Special:Diff/1208676162.
Regards, TarnishedPathtalk 13:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Saw that. I think a block is warranted - thanks for letting me know! - Bilby (talk) 13:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bugger me you were fast. Your block notice showed up at the same instant I left them a message. TarnishedPathtalk 13:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I saw the edits and was considering what to do. Your comments made it easier. I hate using WP:NOTHERE, as I think that is the most misused block rationale. But in this case I think it very much applies. - Bilby (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I think it was pretty clear they were an SPA, and the project needs those like I need a hole in the head (not at all). TarnishedPathtalk 13:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- I saw the edits and was considering what to do. Your comments made it easier. I hate using WP:NOTHERE, as I think that is the most misused block rationale. But in this case I think it very much applies. - Bilby (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Bugger me you were fast. Your block notice showed up at the same instant I left them a message. TarnishedPathtalk 13:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Zygmunt Łanowski (d. 1989) and Alf Tergel (d. 2007)
You've tagged both of these articles as "undisclosed paid", based on the record of the now-blocked creator/editor. However, they are both close translations of the pre-existing articles (on the Polish and Swedish Wikipedias respectively), and they would not be much different, if at all, if an unpaid editor had translated / created them. What needs to be done to remove the tags? Thanks, Ingratis (talk) 16:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Quite often I find that one person is hired to do both languages, or someone was hired to do one language in the past and now someone else is being hired to translate it. That said, if you go over the articles and think they are fine, I have no problem at all with the tags being removed. - Bilby (talk) 06:51, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks - it just seemed unlikely to me that anyone, even their publishing houses, would think it worth paying for articles on dead translators. I'll check them carefully before de-tagging. Ingratis (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
- Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.
Technical news
- The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)
Miscellaneous
- The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
Hello, Bilby. Thank you for your recent edits to this article. I would like to draw your attention to this edit, where Jamesthepilot has posted similar material again. It looks like a POV rant to me, but I won't edit the article myself, because as a member of GSoW my judgement may not be impartial. I would be grateful if you take a look at it, and use your own judgement about what you think is appropriate. Gronk Oz (talk) 23:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Howdy!
Could you check out @Adarshalphons9's edit to Adarsh Alphons? He removed a COI template you added, and I'd just like your opinion. Cheers! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for opening this discussion. Unless there's a provable conflict, it would not be fair to go about marking random wiki pages with these conflict templates. The person marking templates as such should also address the larger question - are the contributions made up/ fabricated or are the contents independently verifiable? I would assert that all content mentioned can be corroborated via a legitimate publications. Please feel free to search on any search engine you prefer. Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I will not comment on article content, however another user seems to have been in contact with you way back in 2018. That implies at the very least an instance of COI editing, regardless of factual accuracy. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have continued the discussion on @Adarshalphons9's page. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- I will not comment on article content, however another user seems to have been in contact with you way back in 2018. That implies at the very least an instance of COI editing, regardless of factual accuracy. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out! Very interesting. I have no idea who this is. When I click on their profile, it goes to a blank page. Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Whom are you referring to? 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- User:Shaheba Sultana Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ah. See User_talk:Shaheba_Sultana#October_2018_2 specifically "So what can I do now? I gave much information whatever I know to verify this article! And Adarsh himself gave me his all information to make this page. People want this article in google so that they can search easily! Help me please! Thank you Shaheba Sultana (talk) 12:51 pm, 25 October 2018, Thursday (UTC−4)" 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- User:Shaheba Sultana Adarshalphons9 (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Whom are you referring to? 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 14:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
This Month in Education: February 2024
This Month in Education
Volume 13 • Issue 2 • February 2024
- 2 new courses in Students Write Wikipedia Starting this February
- More two wiki-education partnerships
- Open Education Week 2024 in Mexico
- Reading Wikipedia in Bolivia, the community grows
- Wiki Education Philippines promotes OERs utilization
- Wiki Loves Librarians, Kaduna
- Wiki Workshop 2024 CfP – Call for Papers Research track