Hello, Akib.H, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 70.50.151.11 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous
Teahouse logo
Hello! Akib.H, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Welcome! edit

Hello, Akib.H, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Akib.H, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure! edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi Akib.H!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

--


December 2013 edit

  Your addition to Shipbuilding in Bangladesh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hitro talk 17:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Akib.H. You have new messages at HitroMilanese's talk page.
Message added 18:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Hitro talk 18:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please take a brief survey about The Wikipedia Adventure edit

Hi! Thanks for playing The Wikipedia Adventure, or at least considering it. We'd like to hear about your thoughts and feelings on the game, to help us improve it. Please take this brief survey: 10 minute survey.

--thanks and cheers, Ocaasi 20:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Real estate in Bangladesh edit

 

The article Real estate in Bangladesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to be a collection of information that could be better placed in other articles, and is not notable in itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Shipbuilding references edit

The references from the deleted article on shipbuilding in Bangladesh:

Huon (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

I don't want to be notified when an article created by me gets linked from another article.

You can turn off that feature at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo. Huon (talk) 19:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey thanks Huon, you have been helping me a lot! Thanks.

"Pran" edit

As you seem to be interested it in, can you upload pictures of various PRANs? For instance Pran Cola doesn't have a picture, while your PRAN and PRAN-RFL Group are using the same picture. Would these two entities use different pictures? -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok I'll try to upload some pictures for these articles. Akib.H (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Animation and Cartoon Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rangpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Video gaming in Bangladesh edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Video gaming in Bangladesh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  SAMI  talk 12:22, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Video gaming in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

Please someone look at the prose of Video gaming in Bangladesh. It is currently under Did You Know nomination. Akib.H (talk) 15:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've looked at it, and it seems to be free of any overt errors. Note that {{help me}} is to be used when you have a question, not for having more editors to look at a subject. You could contact relevant WikiProjects to come take a look. WikiProject Video Games might be of use here, instead. Tutelary (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Video gaming in Bangladesh edit

  Hello! Your submission of Video gaming in Bangladesh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Video gaming in Bangladesh edit

  Hello! Your submission of Video gaming in Bangladesh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! czar  16:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Video gaming in Bangladesh edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 3 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangladeshis in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faridpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akib.H (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I want to write new articles but I'm unable to do so. Akib.H (talk) 08:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I have checked the IP address you gave me in your email, and I confirmed that it is an open proxy. (There is no doubt at all about that: I was able to access Wikipedia via the proxy myself, and see the block message that you described.) If you are trying to edit via an open proxy, then unless you give us a very good reason why you need to do so, you can't. If, on the other hand, you are not editing via a proxy, then you are editing from a computer which is also acting as an open proxy for other people. Sometimes that happens because someone has compromised the computer, and maliciously set it to work as an open proxy; if that is so, you should get the computer checked for malware as soon as possible. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Could you post the entire block message you're seeing? PhilKnight (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

"The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are using an open proxy you will need to turn it off to edit Wikipedia. If you believe you are not running an open proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. If you are using a Wikipedia account and wish to keep your IP address private you can email the functionaries team.

More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). In some cases, this can be remedied by logging into the secure server. For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies."

This is the entire message, PhilKnight. Akib.H (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • That will not be the entire message. Above that, there will be something like "Editing from 11.22.33.44 has been blocked (disabled) by [administrator's name] for the following reason(s)". It is the IP address (in my example, 11.22.33.44) that we need in order to trace the block: we don't actually need the rest of the message. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
JamesBWatson, can you give me your email address? Akib.H (talk) 14:10, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I don't post my email addresses on public web sites. However, if you enable email on your Wikipedia account, you can send me an email. To do that, click the "preferences" link at the top of the page, and find the option to enable email. Once you have done that, when you look at my talk page, in the "tools" box on the left hand side, you will see a link "Email this user". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
JamesBWatson, you have got a new mail, please check it. Akib.H (talk) 15:46, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
JamesBWatson, I have checked for malware and all the malwares have been removed, could you please unblock me now? Akib.H (talk) 22:56, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
I'm afraid there are still uncertainties about this case, which means that you will have to wait a bit longer to have the matter settled, which must be very frustrating, but I hope it won't be too long.
At present I am not able to connect to the proxy, but proxy access is quite often intermittent, sometimes connecting and sometimes not, so the fact that I can't access it right now is not conclusive proof that the proxy will not be open again. There are still three open ports, leaving the possibility that open proxy access may return. Is the computer or router that connects to the internet in use as any sort of proxy, not necessarily an open one? Is it intended to be possible to connect to the computer or router from another computer, either on the internet or on a local network? If that is intended, then it may be that the access was unintentionally set up in a way which allowed anyone to log in, rather than just authenticated users, and possibly now the set-up has been corrected: that would explain why there are open ports, but I can't connect. If, on the other hand, it is not intended that there be any network access to the computer or router, then there is probably a problem with the network settings on the device, as there probably should not be open ports.
My inclination is to check a few more times at intervals whether it is possible to connect, and if not, then unblock the IP address. However, there are many things about proxies that I don't know, so in this situation I normally post a message about this to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies, to see if anyone can see anything which I can't, and which will help decide the matter. On this occasion, though, since you sent me the IP address by email, you presumably don't want it posted publicly, so I can't do that. I can email a regular proxy checker to ask for a second opinion, if you give me permission to pass the IP address on. Once again, I am sorry you are having to wait so long to get the matter sorted out. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
JamesBWatson, please pass on the IP to the proxy checker through email if that helps. I'm not much knowledgeable about the technical bit, I'm using a LAN broadband. I'm also running a hostednetwork in my laptop, is this the reason? Also, you said there might be problems with the network settings on the device, how can I fix it? Akib.H (talk) 15:38, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
The bad news is that I am now able to connect via the proxy again, so the IP address is still hosting an open proxy, and can't be unblocked. Since you are running a hostednetwork in your laptop, it must be possible for people to access it from outside, which explains why there are ports visible to the outside world, but it should not be possible for members of the public to use it as a proxy, as I am able to do. I guess there must be some problem with the set up of that hosted network, but I'm afraid I have no personal experience of running one, and I can't offer any suggestions about what setting may need to be changed, or how. There may be help online for the particular software you are using to host it: very likely there will be a forum for it. The only other thing I can think of is the possibility of giving you IP block exemption on Wikipedia, but I once got told off for doing that without first consulting a CheckUser, so I'll email a Checkuser to ask for help. I am unfortunately completely out of time now, but I will get onto it as soon as I can. I am sure it must be frustrating for you to have yet another delay in getting this sorted out, but I can only ask you to try to be patient. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:53, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
JamesBWatson, it looks like it has been fixed, I can edit now, thanks for your time. Akib.H (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
You must have moved to another IP address then, because the one you gave me is still blocked. However, as long as you can edit again, all is OK. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:13, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Good work on Kazi Nazrul Islam Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much Vinegarymass911. It means a lot. Akib.H (talk) 15:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assume good faith: do not mistake a content dispute for vandalism edit

  Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Kazi Nazrul Islam, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I will keep that in mind. Akib.H (talk) 07:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of PRAN edit

 

The article PRAN has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only a single ref - an editorial article. Nothing that suggests any significant notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  Velella Talk   22:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


Article Title Change of Muslin Trade in Bengal edit

Hi Akib, I believe the page's name should be Muslin Trade in Bengal because there was no Bangladesh at that time and the region was known as Bengal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tahmina.tithi (talkcontribs) 18:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your personal attack in the Kazi Nazrul Islam page edit

Please refrain from making edit summaries like this.--Vaza12 (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Akib.H. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources and edit warring edit

This is a caution regarding your recent edits in Pahela Baishakh article. Per WP:PSTS, tertiary sources may be used, but wikipedia cannot be cited as source for other wikipedia articles.

Quote: "Reliable tertiary sources can be helpful in providing broad summaries of topics that involve many primary and secondary sources, and may be helpful in evaluating due weight, especially when primary or secondary sources contradict each other. Some tertiary sources are more reliable than others, and within any given tertiary source, some entries may be more reliable than others. Wikipedia articles may not be used as tertiary sources in other Wikipedia articles."

Please review the WP:EDITWAR policy, particularly when you are deleting sources and sourced content from a wikipedia article. Your cooperation is requested. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Replied in article talk. Akib.H (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Pahela Baishakh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please also read my reply to both you and Ms Sarah Welch on my page. Bishonen | talk 22:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

  It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 03:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN talk to me 03:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bengali calendar edit

Hello. An editor is claiming on Talk:Bengali calendar that it is a modern Bangladeshi invention. Articles like this http://www.dhakatribune.com/opinion/op-ed/2017/04/17/akbar-invented-modern-bengali-calendar/ represent mainstream views. Wikipedia is contradicting the mainstream view. The article is in very poor shape and I worked for hours to improve it, only to be reverted wholesale. What are your thoughts on this?--ArmanJ (talk) 02:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Monno Ceramics edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Monno Ceramics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   11:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hatirjheel: Dream Begins edit

 

The article Hatirjheel: Dream Begins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The three cited sources are at worst press releases, at best primary coverage without significant critical commentary. Searches of the usual Google types, EBSCO, HighBeam, and ProQuest, found only two other sources - passing mentions of existence in articles about other games.[1][2] This doesn't satisfy WP:NVG; self-promotion is not the route to an encyclopaedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 04:35, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply