Захумље
Hum
Zahumlje
Zachlumia
Principality of Serbia[1] (839-960)
Independent (fl. 913-926)
Byzantine annexation (960-1038)

Kingdom of Serbia (Duklja) (1038-1112)
Grand Principality of Serbia (1112-1217)
Kingdom of Serbia (1217-1318)
Kingdom of Croatia (1318-1322)
Serbian Empire (1325-1358)
Kingdom of Bosnia (1358-1434)
Administrative Unit of Medieval Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia
839–1435

The Serb lands according to Constantine VII (945-959)
Zahumlje in pink
CapitalSton (1166-1192)
Historical eraMiddle Ages
• Forming of Unit
839
• Becomes Herzegovina of Bosnia
1435
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Dalmatia (Roman province)
Duchy of Saint Sava

Zahumlje or Hum was a medieval region, administrative unit and principality, which was part of the Serbian Principality, Serbian Kingdom, Croatian Kingdom and Bosnian Kingdom, at brief times independent. It was located in modern-day regions of Herzegovina and southern Dalmatia (today parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, respectively).

Name (Etymology) edit

The principality is named Zahumlje or Hum in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian (Serbian Cyrillic: Захумље, Хум). It is Zachlumia in Latin, Хлъмъ in Old Church Slavonic, and Ζαχλούμων χώρα ("land of Zachlumians") in Greek. The names Chelmania, Chulmia and terra de Chelmo appear in later Latin and Italian chronicles.

South Slavic Zahumlje got its name from the mountain of Hum (za + Hum "behind the Hum"), above Bona, at the mouth of the Buna. Hum in turn derived its name from Vulgar Latin (Vlach) culme (Latin: culmen) meaning "Hill".[2]

Geography edit

Constantine described the administration of Hum under Časlav Klonimirović (927-~960), when it had the cities of Ston, Mokriskik, Josli, Galumainik and Dobriskik.[1]

The 1300s Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja described the geography under the rule of the South Slavic rulers, Hum had two major cities: Bona and Hum. The main settlements in Zachlumia were Ston, Ošlje, Dobar, the towns of Mokriski and Glumainik. The Principality sprang from Dalmatia (Croatia) to the northwest and Pagania to the west; to the mountain of Kalinovik and the Field of Gatak, where it bordered Travunia. The most eastern border of Zahumlje went along the line Popovo-Ljubinje-Dabar and met with the Travunian border at the City of Ragusa, which had to pay the annual tax mogorish of 36 pieces of gold to the Zachlumian rulers and at times accept their rule. Zachlumia was split on 9 Zhupanates: that of Ston, that of Popovo, Dubrava's, Luka, Dabar, Žapska, goričku and Večenik around Neretva. Zahumlje had access to the Adriatic Sea with the Peninsular of Rat and faced Serbia northwards.

History edit

Historians recognize mediaeval Zachlumia politically as "Serbian".[3][4][5] Constantine VII (r. 913–959) in his De administrando imperio describes Zachlumia as a Serbian land, inhabited by Serbs[6][4], Pagania to the west and Travunia to the east as well, he continues with the realm of the Croats, which ended to the north, with the cities: Pliva, Livno, Imotski.[1]

"From Ragusa begins the domain of the Zachlumi (Ζαχλοῦμοι) and stretches along as far as the river Orontius; and on the side of the coast it is neighbour to the Pagani, but on the side of the mountain country it is neighbour to the Croats on the north and to Serbia at the front."
"The Zahumljani (Захумљани) that now live there are Serbs, originating from the time of the prince (archont) who fled to emperor Heraclius"
"The land of the Zahumljani comprise the following cities: Ston (το Σταγνον / to Stagnon), Mokriskik (το Μοκρισκικ), Josli (το Ιοσλε / to Iosle), Galumainik (το Γαλυμαενικ / to Galumaenik), Dobriskik (το Δοβρισκικ / to Dovriskik)"
De Administrando Imperio by Constantine VII[1]

The history of Zahumlje begins with the region being part of the Unknown Archont's dominion, which in Byzantine sources was called "Sclavinia" (Slavdom, i.e. Slav territory) which came to be ruled by the Vlastimirović Dynasty, that established the First Principality of Serbia (768-960).[1]

9th century edit

Charlemagne, King of the Franks from 768 until his death in 814, expanded the Frankish kingdom into an empire that incorporated much of western and central Europe.[7] Dalmatia which was southeast of the Frankish empire, was in the hands of the Croats and Serbs.[8]

Radoslav of Serbia or his son was the ruler of Serbia during the uprisings (819-822) of Ljudevit Posavski against the Franks. According to the Royal Frankish Annals, in 822, Ljudevit went from his seat in Sisak to the Serbs who controlled a great part of Dalmatia ("ad Sorabos, quae natio magnam Dalmatiae partem obtinere dicitur").[9][10] Although some historians have concluded that Ljudevit was Croat, there is no contemporary mention of the ethnonym "Croat" in Dalmatia, only "Slavs" and "Serbs".[10]

In 866, a major Arab raid along Dalmatia struck Budva and Kotor, and then laid siege to Dubrovnik in 867. The city of Dubrovnik appealed to Byzantine Emperor Basil the Macedonian, who responded by sending over one hundred ships. Finally, the 866–867 Saracens' siege of Dubrovnik, which lasted fifteen months, was raised due to the intervention of Basil I, who sent a fleet under the command of Niketas Oryphas in relief of the city (Zahumlje, Travunija and Konavle aided the intervention[11]).[12] After this successesful intervention, the Byzantine navy sailed along the coast collecting promises of loyalty to the empire from the Dalmatian cities. At this moment the local Slavic tribes (Travunija, Duklja and Zahumlje) also accepted Byzantine suzerainty. Afterwards, the Slavs of Dalmatia and Zahumlje took part in the Byzantine military actions against the Arabs in Bari in 870-871. The Roman cities in Dalmatia had long been pillaged by the Slavic tribes in the mountaines around them. Basil I allowed the towns to pay tribute to the Slavic tribes to reduce the Slavs raiding. Presumably a large portion of this tribute went to the prince of Dalmatian (Littoral) Croatia.[8]

In late 870s, the Theme of Dalmatia ("thema Dalmatias") was established, with the strategos seated at Dubrovnik (Ragusa, Ragusion). These small cities in the region (also Dyrrachium) did not stretch into the hinterlands, and had none military capacity, thus Basil I paid a tax of '72 gold coins' to the princes of Zahumlje and Travunia.[13][14]

10th century edit

Knez Mihailo edit

 
Map of Michael's territorial extent over Chelmia (Zahumlje), between the Kingdom of Croatia and the Bulgarian Empire.

The history of Zahumlje as a greater political entity starts with the emerging of noble Mihailo Višević (a Serb[3][15][16], the DAI says he descended from the Litziki of Upper Vistula), who during the rule of Prince Petar Gojniković (892-917), brakes away and gains independence.[17] His realm was under papal jurisdiction[18] (Pope John X), he maintained relations with Bulgaria, giving information on a planned attack by Serbia, he later received the titles of proconsul and patrikios by the Byzantine Emperor, suggesting he maintained diplomatic relations with all major political entities.

Serbian Archont Petar (Vlastimirović dynasty, r. 892-917) started to expand his reign at the expense of Zahumlje at the end of the 9th century, calling upon his old Grand Princely right of Zachlumia being historically only a Serbian fief. He pressured Mihailo Višević, pushing him to the islands, re-taking mainland Hum. Grand Prince Petar later met and negotiated with the Byzantines in Pagania, planning an attack on Bulgaria, the Bulgarians were however warned by Mihailo.[19] In 912 Mihailo kidnapped the Venetian Doge's son Peter Badoari that was returning to Venice from Constantinople and sent him to Tsar Symeon as a sign of loyalty; he generally maintained a pro-Bulgarian foreign policy hoping that it would help restore power in his realm. After the Bulgarians deposed Petar, they put Pavle Branović (r. 917-921), the Great Prince Mihailo was able to restore the majority of control. In the following several years Mihailo reigned peacefully and carefully whilst the Vlastimirovid cousin princes battled eachother for the throne.

According to a 16th-century[20] manuscript, in 925 Prince Mihailo attended the Ecclesiastical Council in Split, together with Tomislav of Croatia. Zahumlje may have been under papal jurisdiction (Archbishopric of Split), but remained a separate political entity to Croatia and Serbia.[21] After the Italian city of Siponte was heavily jeopardized by the raiding Arabs and Langobards, Mihailo ousted a magnificent military victory by taking the city upon the recommendations from Constantinople and orders from his ally, King Tomislav Trpimirovic, but didn't keep it permanently. Mihailo Višević entered into closer relations with the Byzantine Empire, after the death of Bugaria's Tsar Simeon. He gained the title patrikios and hypatos, officially recognizing him as the ruler of his land in Byzantine name.

Shifting rules edit

 
Realm of Časlav Klonimirović, ca 960.

After the death of Mihailo, Hum was re-integrated to the Principality of Serbia of Časlav Klonimirović, the last of the Vlastimirović dynasty. With the death of Časlav, Serbia disintegrated and Duklja absorbed most of Rascia along with Zahumlje and Trebinje.[22] The Catepanate of Ras was established during the rule of John Tzimiskes (r. 969–976).[23]A seal of a strategos of Ras has been dated to Tzimiskes' reign, making it possible for Tzimiskes' predecessor Nikephoros II Phokas to have enjoyed recognition in Rascia.[24][25] In the meantime,

The title Prince of Hum given to son of Petar of Serbia, Dragislav Petrović, with the zupanias of Stantania, Papava, Yabsko, Luca, Vellica, Gorimita, Vecenike, Dubrava and Debre.[26]

According to the the 13th-century work Historia Salonitana by Thomas the Archdeacon, when describing the reign of Croatian king Stephen Držislav (r. 969–997) in late 10th century, notes that the Duchy of Hum was a part of the Kingdom of Croatia.[27]

In the 990s, Bulgarian Tsar Samuel made client states out of most of the Balkans, including Duklja and Zahumlje.[28] In 998, Samuel launched a major campaign against Jovan Vladimir to prevent a Byzantine-Serbian alliance. When his troops reached Duklja, Vladimir withdrew to the mountains, Samuel left part of the army at the foot of the mountains and led the remaining soldiers to besiege the coastal fortress of Ulcinj. In an effort to prevent bloodshed, he asked Jovan Vladimir to surrender, but Jovan refused, some Serb nobles offered their services to the Bulgarians and, when it became clear that further resistance was fruitless, the Serbs surrendered. Jovan Vladimir was exiled to Samuel's palaces in Prespa.[29] The Bulgarian troops proceeded to pass through Dalmatia, taking control of Kotor and journeying to Dubrovnik. Although they failed to take Dubrovnik, they devastated the surrounding villages. The Bulgarian army then attacked Croatia in support of the rebel princes Krešimir III and Gojslav and advanced northwest as far as Split, Trogir and Zadar, then northeast through Bosnia and Raška and returned to Bulgaria.[29] The Croato-Bulgarian War allowed Samuel to install vassal monarchs in Croatia.

11th century edit

Dragomir Hvalimirović, ruled Travunia with Hlevna (Livno) before 1018.[30][31] He was the last prominent ruler of John Vladimir's family and ruled Travunia and Hum until his murder in Kotor, in 1018.[32]

Hum was annexed together with the rest of Serbia by the Byzantines in 1018. With the revolts of Vojislav of Duklja in the 1030s, Duklja managed to free itself from Byzantine rule, he had by 1040 had a portion of Zahumlje, as well as Trebinje and Duklja, as far north as Ston to Scodra in the south.[33]

Ljutovid[34] held the title of governor as "protospatharios epi tou Chrysotriklinou, hypatos, strategos" of "Serbia (Rascia) and Zahumlje" in 1039 under Constantine IX. In 1042-3 Ljutovid (now princeps of Chelmana) assembled a combined army of Rascia, Bosnia and Hum to tackle Vojislav of Duklja (fl. 1018-1043), he was unsuccessful, and Vojislav proceeded to take Hum from the Byzantines when defeating Ljutovid.[34]

 
Realm of Constantine Bodin, ca 1080.

During the rule of Constantine Bodin (r. 1081–1101), neither Bosnia, Rascia nor Zahumlje was ever integrated into Doclea, each retained its own nobility and institutions and simply acquired a Vojislavljević to head the local structure as Prince or Duke.[35]

Soon civil war broke out among Bodin's relatives, which made Rascia, Bosnia and Zahumlje seccede from Duklja. Rascia became the center of the Serbia (as it was prior to 960). Bodin's heirs recognized Byzantine overlordship. Vukan of Serbia (r. 1083-1115) emerged as the most powerful of the Serbian royalty.[36]

12th century edit

Kočapar, the Prince of Duklja (r. 1102–1103), ruled in the name of Vukan of Serbia. There was a split between the two, and Vukan sent forces to Duklja, making Kocapar flee to Bosnia and then Zahumlje, where he died.[37]

Zavida (Vojislavljević) ruled Zahumlje before getting into a conflict with his brothers, resulting in him being exiled to Duklja, where he would have the title of Lord of Ribnica.[38]

Grand Princes Desa I (r. 1148-1162) and Uroš II Prvoslav ruled Serbia together 1149-1153, Desa had the title of 'Prince of Duklja, Travunija and Zahumlje', mentioned in 1150 and 1151.[39]

Slavogast is mentioned in 1154 confirmed as a Count (Ban) ("Banus Slauogast cum filiis et omnibus Zachulmie nobilibus") under Desa of Serbia (Dessa Dioclie, Terbunie et Zacholmie dux).[40][41]

Stefan Nemanja and Miroslav edit

 
Miroslav Gospels, 1180, one of the oldest Serbian manuscripts.

After Stefan Nemanja attacked Kotor in 1181, also seizing Bar, he installed Miroslav Zavidović as Prince of Hum, at the same time the Bosnian Banate is formed with lands to the north border of Hum.[42] Miroslav built the Monastery of Saint Peter on Lim. He married a sister of Ban Kulin of Bosnia. Following the death of Emperor Manuel, Miroslav put the Narentine Kačić family under his protection, the orchestrators in the murder of Rajneri, Bishop of Split and kept the Bishopric's money for himself also reluctant to allow Catholicism prosper in his region which made him excommunicated by the Papacy in 1181, as a gesture, the Bishop of Ston abandoned his seat and since then the Bishopric of Ston has remained vacant.[43][44] The Miroslav Gospel is the oldest Serbian Cyrillic document, the Gospel was very likely produced for the Church of St Peter in Lima, commissioned by Miroslav.[45]

In 1190-1192, Stefan Nemanja briefly assigned the rule of Hum to his son Rastko Nemanjić[43] (Saint Sava, the first Patriarch of the Serbs), meanwhile Miroslav held the Lim region with Bijelo Polje, Rastko however took monastic vows and Miroslav continued ruling Hum after 1192.[46]

Miroslav died in 1198 of old age, his son Toljen Miroslavljević succeeded him as Prince of Hum ca 1192-1196, the younger son Petar Miroslavljević took over ruling until 1227. Miroslav's descendants had the level of local nobility.[47]

13th century edit

When Rastko becomes the first Patriarch of Serbs in 1219, he appoints Ilarion as Archbishop of Hum.[48]

Andrija Mirosavljević is entitled the rule of Hum, but the Hum nobility chose his brother Petar. Andrija is exiled to Rascia, to the court of his cousin, the Grand Prince Stefan Nemanjić. In the meantime, Petar fought successfully with neigbouring Bosnia and Croatia. Stefan Nemanjić sided with Andrija and went to war and secured Hum and Popovo field for Andrija sometime after his ascession. Petar was defeated and crossed the Neretva, continuing to rule the west and north of the Neretva, which had around 1205 been briefly occupied by Andrew the Jerosolimitan.[49][50]

Toljen Toljenović, the son of Toljen I, succeeded as Prince, ruling 1227-1237.

Andrija's sons Bogdan, Radoslav and Djordje succeed as Princes of Hum in 1249, Radoslav held the supreme rule. During the war against Ragusa, he aided his kinsman Stephen Uroš I of Serbia, at the same time sworing liegance to Béla IV of Hungary. Following an earthquake in the Hum capital of Ston, the Orthodox bishop of Hum moved to the church of St Peter and St Paul built on the Lim River near the Serbian border in the 1250s.[49]

Stephen Uroš I of Serbia (1243–1276) unified the Serbian titles (of "Hum, Trebinje and Zeta") into "King of all the Serbian and Maritime Lands".[47] When he dies, the Queen Helen of Anjou rules Zeta, Travunia, Plav and Poibarje.

14th century edit

 
Kingdom of Serbia, at the end of the XIII century and early fourteenth: 1 Stefan Uros II Milutin territory; 2 Stefan Dragutin's state; 3 Milutin's acquisitions up to 1299; 4 Temporary loss of land in the Hum, at the beginning of the fourteenth century.

The Croatian Šubić family allied themselves with Charles I of Hungary during the civil war between Árpád and Anjou. Charles later awarded Paul Šubić all Croatia from Gvozd to the Neretva.[51] In 1299 he becomes the Lord of All Bosnia.[52]

In the course of the war between Stephen Uroš II Milutin and Stephen Dragutin, Ban of Croatia Paul Šubić (r. 1299-1312) expanded not only into western Hum, but also beyond the Neretva river to take the region towards Nevesinje and Ston. When Mladen Šubić succeeded Paul in 1312, "Hum" was added his title. In 1313, Milutin and Dragutin made peace, and Milutin went to war against the Šubićs, and during the war took captive the brother of Mladen; for his release Mladen restored part of Hum to Milutin. After this agreement in 1313 the Neretva again became the border between eastern (Serbian) and western (now Šubić) Hum.[53]

Branivojevići and Bosnian annexation edit

After the death of Milutin, civil war broke out among Serbian nobles, the situation was particularly intense in Hum. By 1325, the Branivojevićs, based on the lower Neretva and holding Peljesac with a major court in Ston had asserted their control on several other Hum nobility. Although they had taken advantage of Serbia's difficulty to assert independence, they called themselves vassals and supporters of Serbia. They plundered Dubrovnik several times, and with their behaviour, they had stirred opposition among the Hum nobility.[54]

According to Mavro Orbini, their power and behaviour had made them rule Cetina river to Kotor, thus having most of western Hum. They had also put the former ruling family under their vassalage, with Peter and his sons Toljen and Nikola continuing to rule only Popovo polje and the coastal lands bordering it.[54]

In 1322 the Branivojevići murdered Crep, the deputy of Trebinje and Gacko, and took his lands. In 1326, the Hum nobles that had been dispossessed after the assassination of their deputy, turned against Stefan Decanski, because he had by now been able to tackle this problem, but did not intervene, seen as a gesture of support to the Branivojević. The Hum nobles turned to the other strong ruler in the area, Stephen Kotromanić, the Ban of Bosnia. Kotromanić allied himself to various noble families in Hum and Dubrovnik, and dispatched two armies, annexing most of Hum in April-June 1326. Two of the Branivojević were killed. Relations between Bosnia and Serbia were extremely tense in the years that followed.[54]

The eastern parts of Herzegovina, upper Drina and Lim, with Gacko, was in the Serbian state, headed by Vojin, a loyal commander (caesar) of Emperor Dušan the Mighty.[55] Vojin plundered Dubrovnik's territory in August 1325, resulting in Venice banning trade with Serbia.

The Draživojevići of Nevesinje as vassals of the Bosnian Ban, became the leading family of Hum in 1330s. Because of the war in 1327-1328 between Serbia and Dubrovnik, Bosnian lordship of inner Hum and the war in Macedonia, Stephen Uroš IV Dušan sold Ston and Pelješac to Dubrovnik, and turned fighting to east in Macedonia.[55]

15th century edit

 
Zahumlje divided between the realm of Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić and duchy of Sandalj Hranić around 1412 - principality toward it's end

In the begining of the 15th century, Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić ruled over the western Hum, and Sandalj Hranić Kosača ruled over its eastern part, while the Neretva river remaind a border between thear possessions.[56]

Bosnian vassal Stephen Kosača who ruled over Hum, in 1448 dropped his title "Vojvode of Bosnia", assuming the title "Duke [Herzog] of Hum and the Coast". He changed it again in 1449 to "Duke of Saint Sava" in recollection of the Serbian saint. This title had considerable public relations value, because Sava's relics were consider miracle-working by people of all Christian faiths. His lands were known as Herzog's lands or later Herzegovina.[57][58]

Demographics edit

12th and 13th century edit

Most of Hum's territory was inhabited by Serbs and belonged to the Eastern Church after the Great Schism (under the Archbishop of Ohrid until 1219, and afterwards under the Serbian Orthodox Church).[59] Hum's coastal region, including its capital Ston, had a mixed population of Catholics and Orthodox.[59]

14th and 15th century edit

In the 14th- and 15th centuries, there was an influx of settlers from the oblasts of Trebinje (the region around forts Klobuk Ledenica and Rudina) and the Hum lands (Gacko and Dabar) to Kotor. The people from Hum were mostly girls from Gacko, who took up working as servants to wealthy families.[60]

In contrast to Bosnia, where Roman Catholicism and Bogomilism (see Bosnian Church) was firmly established, Hum was mostly Orthodox. The Bishopric of Hum, seated in Ston, was part of the Archbishopric of Serbia. The Catholic West referred to Hum Orthodox Christians as "Greeks" and "Rascians" (Graeci, Rasciani) or "schismatics", with the Orthodox religion being called "Rascian religion". The Hum Orthodox came into conflict with the Catholics, especially during the last years of the Bosnian Kingdom.[58]

List of rulers edit

This list should only be of people having the title of Zahumlje/Hum, thus, rulers of states annexing the region should not be part of the list.

Hum edit

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b c d e DAI, pages 33-36
  2. ^ Stoianovich (1994), p. 127.
  3. ^ a b Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Kaiserl. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. K. K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei, 1856. p. 413-414
  4. ^ a b Mitja Velikonja, Religious separation and political intolerance in Bosnia-Herzegovina, p. 44. ISBN 1585442267, 9781585442263
  5. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 53: "They (Serbs) were settled in [...] Zahumlje [...] regions which had been made desolate by the Avars."
  6. ^ Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250, page 210: "...the Slavs [...] of Zahumlje descended from Serbs..."
  7. ^ Ross 1945, pp. 212–235
  8. ^ a b The early medieval Balkans, p. 257
  9. ^ Nachrichten von der Georg-Augusts Universität und der Königliches Gesellschaft der Wisenschaften zu Göttingen, Vol 11, 1865, p. 59
  10. ^ a b When ethnicity did not matter in the Balkans, p. 35
  11. ^ Rastko: Pokrštavanje Južnih Slovena
  12. ^ Norris (1993), p. 24.
  13. ^ The Serbs, p. 24
  14. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 258
  15. ^ Theodor Schieder, Handbuch der europäischen Geschichte: Europa im Wandel von der Antike zum Mittelalter, Union Verlag, 1976. ISBN 3129075305, 9783129075302. p. 891: "Bischöfen auch Tomislav und der serbische Fürst von Zahumlje sowie der Bischof Gregor von Nin teilnahmen"Google Books
  16. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 160: "The other Serbian state of this period was that of Michael of Zahumlje."
  17. ^ Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250, page 210: "Michael of Zahumlje [...] was nevertheless an independent ruler..."
  18. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 160: "Both rulers (Tomislav and Michael) was under papal jurisdiction"
  19. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 149
  20. ^ When ethnicity did not matter in the Balkans, p. 54-5: "John the Deacon [...] makes no mention of either council", "manuscript from the 16th century Historia Salonitana maior has long descriptions of the two councils" and "the labels of identity [...] represent views from no earlier than the late 13th century, and possibly the 14th, 15th and 16th"
  21. ^ The arly medieval Balkans, p. 160
  22. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 193
  23. ^ GK, Abstract: "the establishment of catepanate in Ras between 971 and 976"
  24. ^ Stephenson, Paul (7 August 2003). The Legend of Basil the Bulgar-slayer. Cambridge University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-521-81530-7.
  25. ^ Paul Magdalino, Byzantium in the year 1000, p. 122
  26. ^ BBF, p. 121: "King Predimir sired four sons [...] the third Dragislav [...] (who held) ...the region of Zahumlje...
  27. ^ Archdeacon, Thomas of Split (2006). History of the Bishops of Salona and Split – Historia Salonitanorum atque Spalatinorum pontificum (in Latin and English). Budapest: Central European University Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 9637326596, 9789637326592. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  28. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 274
  29. ^ a b Šišić, p. 331.
  30. ^ Hankey, C. P. (August 2008). Lives of the Serbian Saints. Bungay, Suffolk: Richard Clay & Sons. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-44371-621-5.
  31. ^ Houtsma, Martijn Theodoor (1987). E.J. Brill's First Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1913-1936. Vol. Vol. 9. Leiden: Luzac & Co. p. 199. ISBN 90-04-08265-4. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  32. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 202
  33. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 206
  34. ^ a b Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250, page 269: "Ljutovid, the ruler of Zahumlje" and "[Vojislav] invaded Zahumlje, incorporated into his own polity"''
  35. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 223
  36. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 224
  37. ^ The early medieval Balkans, p. 231
  38. ^ The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 3
  39. ^ "Bosnia & Hercegovina".
  40. ^ Academia scientiarum et artum Slavorum meridionalium (1892) Monumenta spectantia historiam Slavorum meridionalium (Zagreb), Vol. XXIII, Actæ Bosnæ, X and XII, pp. 2-3.
  41. ^ "Bosnia & Hercegovina".
  42. ^ Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250, page 339
  43. ^ a b The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 19-20
  44. ^ Steven Runciman, The medieval Manichee: a study of the Christian dualist heresy, p.102, 1982, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0521289262
  45. ^ The Encyclopedia britannica, Vol 20
  46. ^ The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 52
  47. ^ a b TLMB, page 203
  48. ^ Serbian Orthodox Church (Official), Захумско-херцеговачка епархија
  49. ^ a b The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 52-54
  50. ^ The Serbs, p. 37
  51. ^ The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 208
  52. ^ The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 209
  53. ^ The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 258
  54. ^ a b c The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 266
  55. ^ a b The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 267
  56. ^ Zlatar (2007), p. 555.
  57. ^ The Late Medieval Balkans, p. 578
  58. ^ a b Religious separation and political intolerance in Bosnia-Herzegovina, p. 38
  59. ^ a b Van Antwerp Fine, John. (1994). The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest. The University of Michigan Press. p. 20. ISBN 0-472-08260-4.
  60. ^ Tošić, Đuro. Trebinjci i Zahumljani u srednjovjekovnom Kotoru, work in Istraživanja, 2005, br. 16, str. 221-227.
  61. ^ The Kingdom of Montenegro; House of Petrović-Njegoš

Sources edit

External links edit

[[Category:Medieval Serbia]] [[Category:Medieval Croatia]] [[Category:Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina]] [[Category:Serbs of Croatia]] [[Category:History of Bosnia and Herzegovina]] [[Category:History of Dalmatia]] [[Category:History of the Serbs]] [[Category:Former Slavic countries]] [[Category:Former countries in Bosnia and Herzegovina]] [[Category:Former countries in Croatia]]