This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
This date thing is a mess.
This page gives October 17, 1797
1797 gives September 7 - Treaty of Campo Formio ends the War of the First Coalition.
October 27 gives "1797 - Treaty of Campo Formio is signed between France and Austria."
Which date is correct??? --Ante Perkovic 10:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Treaty of Campo Formio was signed on October 17, 1797. Deucalionite 22:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
It's Campoformio not Campo Formio!!! Pan Brerus (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi Pan Brerus, the treaty was signed nearby the town that was then called Campo Formio (which later changed the name). "Campo Formio" is the exact form of the name used in the document. Regards, CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
CocoricoPolynesien,
regradless how it is referred by some, it is unevitable that the correspondent party is the Habsburg Monarchy, as I indicated with multiple references, as well the treaty itself, thus my edits were totally accuarate - you like it or not - also after your edits it is still linked to the Habsburg Monarchy.(KIENGIR (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC))Reply
1-No references were ever given.
2-You altered precised information found in the document. That does not qualify as "accurate".
2- No, that you claim is not written in the document (and I read everything you linked or was available).(KIENGIR (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC))Reply
1-Unsourced claims you make in a edit log have no historic authority, that doesn't work that way. Again, no references were ever given.
2-This is, because if you really had read the full 12 pages of the document, you would have seen it. So, why are you lying ? I can't understand such bad faith...
I did not lie, read back again if it was not clear: "and I read everything you linked or was available'". Moreover I don't have any bad faith, but unfortunately your continous insults seem like so, as well well in my talk page, so you'll get warned for incivility.(KIENGIR (talk) 13:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC))Reply
No insults were exchanged. You may stop making unfounded claims and restrain to use unrelated notices on others talk pages. You are not objective enough to do so. This thread is no longer related to the Treaty and should stop. Regards - CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
?? It would be enough objective to accuse me continously? Sorry, here is the diff ([1]), read please WP:Civility. I did not deteriorate from the topic, it seems you did with you continous accusations as well in my talk page, even don't know why you started discussions there, that would belong here.(KIENGIR (talk) 14:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC))Reply
