Wikipedia:WikiProject Austria/Assessment

ProjectDiscussionOpen tasksAssessmentFeatured ContentMembersPortal

  • 2.3% List-Class
  • 54.3% Stub-Class
  • 32% Start-Class
  • 6.7% C-Class
  • 2.4% B-Class
  • 0.6% GA-Class
  • 0% A-Class
  • 0.2% FA-Class
  • 1.6% remaining

Welcome to the assessment department of the Austria WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Austria related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Austria}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Austria articles by quality and Category:Austria articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questionsEdit

How can I get my article rated?
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of the Austria WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.


Quality assessmentsEdit

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Austria}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Austria|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Austria articles)  FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Austria articles)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Austria articles)  GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Austria articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Austria articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Austria articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Austria articles) Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Austria articles)  FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Austria articles) List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Austria articles) Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Austria articles) Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Austria articles) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Austria articles) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Austria articles) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Austria articles) Project
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Austria articles) Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Austria articles) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Austria articles) ???

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scaleEdit

Importance assessmentEdit

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Austria}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Austria| ... | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scaleEdit

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Austria. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are included as sections of the main Austria article. A reader who is not involved in the Austria field will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Austria
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Austria.
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Austria. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Austria. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in the history of Austria will be rated in this level.
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Austria. Few readers outside the Austrian history field or that are not Austrian history students may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the Austria, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of Austria.

Requesting an assessmentEdit

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. You can also request an assessment on this page's talk page.

  • Wrote/translated the article for Schloss Eggenberg (Graz) as well as created some related articles in English, could another member of the project please offer assessments for this article and perhaps the related articles? Thanks! Smf77 (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! Somebody has assessed this article (Schloss Eggenberg (Graz)). The entry could maybe removed now, but I dont know what the usual procedure here is. Does anybody know? Best regards, Kmw2700 (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Rosenburg - I rewrote this article to improve the grammar, reading level, format, and references. Please note if it is at a B, C or START level, for I think it's past the STUB phase. I suggest maybe a LOW importance, unless it is known that the tournaments attract many visitors yearly - then MID. LTC (Ret.) David J. Cormier (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello there. I've translated the German Article of [[1]] to english Immofinanz and added some info in the Company infobox. Would be great if someone could check that one out. Thesteiner (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Assessment logEdit

Austria articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

June 4, 2023Edit



June 3, 2023Edit


June 2, 2023Edit



June 1, 2023Edit




May 31, 2023Edit





Popular pagesEdit

  • Popular pages: List of top articles with the most frequent views, updated monthly.