Talk:Royce Clayton

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Need reference for Jorge Sanchez edit

Also, the person to who the Jorge Sanchez link in the article leads may not be the right person, since their article does not mention acting or that movie. --DAW0001 (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Royce Clayton warming up

5x expanded by Muboshgu (talk). Self-nominated at 19:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC).Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
  • Other problems:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Good to go-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:20, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Royce Clayton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article to help reduce the backlog and gain points for the WikiCup. Although QPQ is by no means required, if you fancy returning the favor, I have a list of articles in need of review here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede edit

Early life edit

  • "and raised in Inglewood, California" → "and was raised in Inglewood"
  • "and switched to playing shortstop" → "and switched to playing that position"
  • Period where there should be a comma after "St. Bernard High School"
  • "which Smith was known for" → "something which Smith was known to do"
  • The link on "letter of intent" should be piped to National Letter of Intent, as currently it links to a non-athletics contract
  • "to play" → "and play"
  • Switch the order of sentences to clarify that his .513 average is from his senior year of high school, not college

Professional career edit

  • Broadly, every level 3 subhead in this section would do well to have a date range after the team name for signposting

San Francisco Giants edit

  • "Class A-Short Season" → "Class A Short Season" to avoid redirect in/for consistency with the link
  • Comma after "Clayton struggled initially"
  • The sentence beginning Starting the 1989 season is very long and can probably be split into two
  • "33 steals" → "33 stolen bases"
  • "and Shreveport won the Texas League championship" → "helping Shreveport to the Texas League championship in the process"
    • Done (helping Shreveport win the Texas League championship). – Muboshgu (talk) 04:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Two paragraphs in a row begin with "After"; recommend changing the one about his salary, as that one reads slightly more awkwardly
  • Link first instance of National League

St. Louis Cardinals edit

  • Kind of jumped out of nowhere that Smith was still on the roster, could use more signposting
    • I left out the detail that the Cardinals had tried to sign two free agent shortstops before trading for Clayton. Will add. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • Added that Ozzie had a perpetuating contract, that Greg Gagne and Walt Weiss passed on signing with the Cards because they didn't want the sideshow, and also more on why the Giants would trade Clayton (Aurilia, failing to come to terms on an extension). – Muboshgu (talk) 19:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • "LaRussa" → "La Russa" throughout
  • "LaRussa gave the starting role to Clayton. LaRussa gave Clayton the majority of the playing time." → "La Russa gave Clayton the starting role and the majority of playing time."
  • "Cardinals' fans" → "Cardinals fans"
  • And what were those numbers of RBI and XBH?

Texas Rangers edit

  • End sentence after "that nearly came to blows"
  • "after Curtis insisted on turning off rap music that Clayton was playing whose lyrics Curtis objected to." → "Curtis objected to the lyrical content of the rap music Clayton was playing in the room and insisted on turning off the player."
    • That's the one piece of text from before my expansion that I forgot to touch. I think I'll tackle that part tomorrow. – Muboshgu (talk)
    • Fixed. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chicago White Sox and Milwaukee Brewers edit

Later career edit

  • " who acquired him to have him serve"
  • Expand on retirement stats beyond hits and stolen bases. I'd include homers, RBIs, and maybe some defensive stats like fielding percentage, putouts, double players, errors, etc.
    • The reason that's all I had is because he's not the kind of player to have too many retrospectives, it seems. Those were the only stats Crasnick gave. I'll see what else I can find, or I'll improvise with B-Ref. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • I found and used this Perfect Game source for his BA and HR totals. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Post-playing career edit

  • Split paragraphs differently so that one is on his coaching career (Little League & high school) and one is on his business investments

Personal life edit

  • Clayton credited Davies with teaching him to keep his legs in condition with the longevity of his baseball career double "with" creates confusing syntax
  • "It was a speaking part" is redundant with the next sentence

References edit

  • Los Angeles Times is sometimes included with a preliminary The, sometimes not; for consistency with our article, it shouldn't have one
  • "ESPN.com" is in the publisher parameter in [83] but is used as "work" elsewhere
    • Not sure which option is best, but right now they're all in "website". – Muboshgu (talk) 04:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • [93] is missing a work
  • Remove the ".com" in Ventura County Star.com in [98]

General comments edit

  • Images are properly licensed and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Earwig score looks good; high numbers are due to proper nouns

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Please feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 17:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Very interesting to me to see what little things I missed in my expansion. I'll probably be finished with this tomorrow. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
GhostRiver, I believe I've addressed all points. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
All of my comments have been addressed, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 19:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply