Talk:Kyte (band)

Proposed merge with Dead Waves

Does not appear to be notable by itself. Your Friendly Neigborhood Wikipedian (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

I found a few reviews of the album ([1], [2], [3], [4]) so there's scope for expansion, but I agree it could be covered within the band article. --Michig (talk) 19:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

• Support - slam dunk. Wwwhatsup (talk) 05:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to one external link on Kyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090208222352/http://www.channel4.com:80/blogs/page/music?entry=high_as_a_kyte_or to http://www.channel4.com/blogs/page/music?entry=high_as_a_kyte_or

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Kyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160113173301/http://www.kidsthelabel.co.uk/blog.htm to http://www.kidsthelabel.co.uk/blog.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160113173301/http://www.kidsthelabel.co.uk/blog.htm to http://kidsthelabel.co.uk/blog.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 6 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerium (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

---

• Kyte → Kyte (band)
• KYTE (disambiguation) → Kyte

– I strongly doubt this band is the primary topic. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Vacated closure
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz💬 00:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 07:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support seems like a no-brainer. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 16:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. 87 percent of pageviews are for the band, which is over 11 times more views than the second-most viewed topic (the river). Even taking the basename bump into account, the band article clearly has more views than all the other topics combined. The status quo is best for readers and editors alike. Dohn joe (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

  Support per above and WP:PTOPIC. Mast303 (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support per nomination, Ortizesp, Jauerback, 162 etc. and Mast303. There are seven bulleted entries listed upon the KYTE (disambiguation) page, with the Leicestershire rock group's historical renown failing to overwhelm the combined notability of the remaining six entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 04:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

• They wouldn't dare do this to The Rutles. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support no PT. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

 Comment: I strongly doubt the importance of WP pageview statistics here. A Google search on 'Kyte' reveals exactly 0 results about the band on the first page. The first and almost only result about the band is, as expected, the Wikipedia article at 'Kyte'. This suggests that there is no PRIMARYTOPIC, 'Kyte' being an ambiguous term. (in conjunction with move closing) Silikonz💬 00:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Discussion relisted by consensus at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2023 February after a previous closure of "moved". Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support. I !voted in the MRV to relist, and I'll stand by that... but now, looking at it, there is no way that an ephemeral indie band outweighs an eight-hundred-year-old village or a 30-miles-long river. That is, support per long-term significance. Red Slash 19:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

  See, I think actually cuts against a significance argument. The hamlet and river have had hundreds of years to do something significant, yet both articles are essentially stubs that say "these things exist" - whereas the band at least is covered by multiple reliable sources with some amount of analysis. Dohn joe (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

  Fair point about the river, but like, the hamlet is in a country that doesn't speak English in the middle of nowhere; just because something hasn't been noted (in English) doesn't necessarily mean it's not noteworthy Red Slash 07:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Enough bytes wasted on a forced relist leading to the same result, in Gbooks no PT means no PT In ictu oculi (talk)

• Support. There's no primary topic, and the disambiguation page should not be at an upper case title. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
• Support - per nom and above. Estar8806 (talk) 03:53, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
• Suppoort. It doesn't seem like the band is the primary topic for long-term significance. As for usage, the pageviews by themselves mean very little. More relevant is the Wikinav data: more than 10% of the visits to Kyte have resulted in a click through to the dab page, which gives a very strong signal that most readers who search for "Kyte" are instead looking for some other topic with the name. As for the title of the dab page, it should be in lower case per WP:DABNAME. – Uanfala (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.