Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 |
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
RFC: Proposed renaming Breast binding to "Chest binding"
A proposal has been made to have Breast binding renamed as "Chest binding". You are invited to participate in this discussion @ Talk:Breast binding#Requested move 2 November 2022. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 09:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Peer review for Rosalie Slaughter Morton
I'm looking for peer review feedback on Rosalie Slaughter Morton, which I'd like to get to Featured Article status. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Peer review/Rosalie Slaughter Morton/archive1. Sam Walton (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
I. A. R. Wylie's article states that she is Australian-British-American. I have reviewed a number of the references but could find no mention that she was either a US citizen or a permanent resident. Could someone here take a look. Also see a couple of comments on the article's talk page. Thank you. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Recent edits to Dorothy Hodgkin
Please see Talk:Dorothy Hodgkin#Wiki Education assignment: General Chemistry I. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Business#Carla_Vernón we are trying to determine the first Afro-Latina CEO of a publicly traded U.S. company-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Mary Martha Sherwood
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Mary Martha Sherwood/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Kannst du Deutsch übersetzen? Pouvez-vous traduire le français?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Helene Lange § Citations available in German & French articles. Peaceray (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Naqiʾa#Requested move 16 January 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Naqiʾa#Requested move 16 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Mina (Italian singer)
Mina (Italian singer) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Request for additional input
There is a discussion at the Helms Amendment talk page which would benefit from input from people involved in this project, regarding the use of the term "anti-abortionist" to describe Jesse Helms. Wes sideman (talk) 14:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Anne Boleyn
Anne Boleyn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 12:12, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Possible article on Cambridge Law School for Women?
I was just updating the page of Isabelle Kendig today and stumbled upon this former (and sadly short-lived) law school (also known as CLSW), after finding a longish academic article on it.[1] Some preliminary digging and I found articles in the New York Times (also see here), Harvard Crimson, Law and Social Inquiry, Harvard Gazette, mention on page 61 of this article, Vassar Newspaper (also see here), American Law School Review, The Catholic Telegraph, Sisters in Law: Women Lawyers in Modern American History, The Harvard Graduates' Magazine, Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s, Harvard Alumni Bulletin, Annual Report - Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, The Intellectual Sword: Harvard Law School, the Second Century, and mention on the Cambridge Women's Heritage Project website. Other than the mention on Kendig's page, CLSW is briefly mentioned on the Law school in the United States page. Do you all think that's enough to start a page, or should I keep trying to find more sources? Historyday01 (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Kohn, Nina A. (2005). "Cambridge Law School for Women: The Evolution and Legacy of the Nation's First Graduate Law School Exclusively for Women". Michigan Journal of Gender & Law. 12 (1): 119–161. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
- There's some lengthy coverage in the academically published Sisters in Law: Women Lawyers in Modern American History, starting on page 161. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Harriet Tubman
I have nominated Harriet Tubman for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKay (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Good article reassessment for Lowell mill girls
Lowell mill girls has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
Concerto delle donne Featured article review
I have nominated Concerto delle donne for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Requested move at Talk:Joan Beaufort, Queen of Scots#Requested move 6 June 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Joan Beaufort, Queen of Scots#Requested move 6 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 15:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Women in the Popular Front in the Spanish Civil War#Requested move 13 June 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Women in the Popular Front in the Spanish Civil War#Requested move 13 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 15:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman
User:Buidhe has nominated Maria: or, The Wrongs of Woman for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hiya, women historians and historians of women. No judgments/subtext intended but—for those here who are interested in fashion and/or the women who martyr themselves on its altars—there's a small mystery at the Catherine de' Medici article.
The internet as a whole has absolutely fantastic blog entries (sample) about how this cuttingly intelligent but physically still-a-frickin'-14-year-old girl accidentally opened the part of Pandora's box that had been holding back high heels while trying to impress her older royal never-met-before husband-to-be and to intimidate his known-to-be-gorgeous mistress(es). Somehow that is what stuck from the era—not the foot-long pointed toes or foot-wide flippers—and, after spending an amusing interlude causing royalist cavalrymen to fall over a lot, became the women's footwear we all know and loave today.
Thing is, our Catherine de' Medici article doesn't mention her involvement in popularizing heels at all. Not in the (lengthy) article. Not anywhere in the (lengthy) talk page with no archives. I assume that means there's some solid reason to doubt the current internet lore but it's widespread enough across blogs, newspaper articles, and some histories of footwear and fashion that it's actually worth including a paragraph in the article even if it's wrong just to clearly debunk it. Anyone here know what's going on with that? Kindly respond at the talk page itself since I'll also crosspost this request to WPFASHION and WPFRANCE. — LlywelynII 12:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Adelindis von Buchau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
three different topics (person/festival/spring), none of which seem particularly notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Harriet Arbuthnot
I have nominated Harriet Arbuthnot for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Keisha Schahaff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not a notable person
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 67.70.25.80 (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Anastatia Mayers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not a notable person
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 67.70.25.80 (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
| Hello, |
September 2023 at Women In Red
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Questioning notability of Anita Bobasso
Partially copied from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Argentina
During arguments with another user over content within this article, I have performed a WP:BEFORE on this subject and could not find any sources to establish notability for either of them. While my next step is an attempt at deletion, I do not see any success with a PROD, and while I would like to send one or both of these articles to AfD, I am currently not inclined, as my search was only limited to English language sources. Is there anyone more experienced with this subject able to assess this article and see if it's possible to AfD? I will support deletion if the arguments are strong enough. Thanks! Jalen Folf (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Princess Frederica of Prussia (1796–1850)#Requested move 7 September 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Netball
Netball has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Romanian women's organizations
There's a merge discussion at Talk:Union of Antifascist Women of Romania which people here might have an interest in. Dsp13 (talk) 12:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Stub improvement drive
This week, WikiProject Stub improvement is holding its first weekly destubbing drive. Women's history has been chosen as the week's topic. You're invited to join in and expand stubs about women and women's history! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Featured Article Save Award for Harriet Tubman
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Harriet Tubman/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Dispute
There is a dispute in Talk:Germaine de Staël#Revert, can someone please give a third opinion? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 10:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Already notified WikiProject Sex and Sexology and WikiProject Law about this, but I think this and Female toplessness in the United States could do with some help regarding proper historical context and overview, as well as fixing issues with unreliable sourcing and other issues raised on the respective talk pages (as well as possible writing about women-related issues). GnocchiFan (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Marcia Falkender, Baroness Falkender#Requested move 3 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Marcia Falkender, Baroness Falkender#Requested move 3 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Christian head covering#Requested move 5 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Christian head covering#Requested move 5 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Maria Antonia Ferdinanda of Spain#Requested move 11 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Maria Antonia Ferdinanda of Spain#Requested move 11 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Hildegard of the Vinzgau#Requested move 11 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hildegard of the Vinzgau#Requested move 11 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Vilma Santos-Recto#Requested move 14 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vilma Santos-Recto#Requested move 14 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
FAR for Emmy Noether
I have nominated Emmy Noether for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Isabella II of Spain#Requested move 26 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Isabella II of Spain#Requested move 26 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 20:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging