Wikipedia

Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination/Archive 1

< Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol‎ | Coordination
(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Archives/Coordination/Archive 1)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Kudpung in topic According rights

Coordinator elections 2017

NOMINATIONS ARE NOW OPEN: You can nominate a candidate or nominate yourself here.

  • Eligible candidates are any user who is a member of the New New Page Reviewer group and who is not blocked, nor suspended from reviewing, and all admins and bureaucrats.
  • Eligible to vote are any registered, autoconfirmed users.

A short description of why the candidate fits the role followed by your signature as nominator or self-nominator. Nominated candidates must accept or decline the nomination. Begin each new nomination with an asterisk (*).
VOTING DOES NOT BEGIN YET.
Note: User:Kudpung will not be running in the election, but will remain as coordinator emeritus for up to 12 months.

  • Nomination period: Sunday 5 February to 23:59 UTC Sunday 19 February
  • Voting period: Monday 20 February to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March

This first election will be coordinated and the results announced by Admins Kudpung and MusikAnimal.

Coordinator Voting begins now until 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March

Latest comment: 7 years ago166 comments82 people in discussion
Voting is now closed. The results are:
  • Robert McClenon: 45
  • samtar: 57 (withdrawn)
  • JB Hunley: 28
  • Chris troutman: 22
  • Arthistorian1977: 1
  • Spike789: 1
According to the objective of the election, Robert McClenon and Jbhunley will share the task of leading New Page Reviewing and New Page Patrolling foewards towards achieving some solutions for the challenges of maintaining a clean Wikipedia, and one that encourages good faith new editors. Thank you everyone who participated. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nominations have now closed. Eligible to vote are any registered, autoconfirmed users. These are your candidates. This is not RfA, there will be no 'oppose' voting. Just vote for whomever you wish, and if you like, add a few words why you think your candidate(s) should help keep NPP and NPR together. First past the post. The two with the highest scores are going to coordinate these new page control systems until they can find a way to persuade the community and/or the WMF to break the deadlock of the backlog and software development or call a new election. It's up to them. Being a coordinator accords no additional or special user rights.
This first election will be coordinated and the results announced by Admins Kudpung and MusikAnimal.
You can vote for one or more candidates.
Please place your vote with a '#' hash mark followed by a short comment (if you wish) and your signature by typing 4 tildes (~~~~)

Jbhunley

  • Jbhunley Has a good understanding of the process. Has been an invaluable support to the sytem in getting recent developments off the ground. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Accept nomination Yes/No + signature - Yes Jbh Talk 18:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Kudpung thank you for the nomination. I am going to consider it for a bit before I accept or decline. There is quite a bit I would like to see happen with NPR/P and I would like to help as much as possible but I also have another large volunteer commitment so I need to think of how much time I can reliably give to the project. I do not want to commit to something and end up doing a poor job. However it works out I will support the project as best I can, either as a Coordinator or helping with stuff as much as the Coordinators want. Jbh Talk 00:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  1. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  2. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  3. Mz7 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  4. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  5. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  6. – Joe (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  7. ~ Rob13Talk 16:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  8. ~Kvng (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  9.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  10. Ueutyi (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  11. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  12. I'm hoping that the Dream Ticket are ready for it. And thank you Kudpung; your service to the Republic is noted. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  13. Cabayi (talk) 20:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  14. Miniapolis 22:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  15. Lourdes 02:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  16. lNeverCry 05:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  17. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  18. MusikAnimal talk 23:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  19. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  20. Euryalus (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  21. Rschen7754 06:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  22. I do not understand why we are faced with a choice between 4 equally able and willing volunteers. I would prefer that they all worked on this. Leaky Caldron 08:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  23. Slashme (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  24. — Sam Sailor 17:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  25. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  26. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  27. Fyddlestix (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  28. /wiae /tlk 13:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Robert McClenon

Accept nomination Yes Robert McClenon (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  1. JTP (talk • contribs) 15:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  2. Drm310 (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  3. Mz7 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  4. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  5. DGG ( talk ) 15:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  6. – Joe (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  7. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 16:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  8. Devopam (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  9. DarjeelingTea (talk) 17:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  10. ~Kvng (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  11. Pinguinn 🐧 17:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  12. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 17:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  13. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  14.  sami  talk 18:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  15. Atsme📞📧 18:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Well-versed, seemingly never-ending energy.
  16. Ueutyi (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  17. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  18. Theroadislong (talk) 19:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  19. Neonorange (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  20. Cabayi (talk) 20:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  21. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 00:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  22. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  23. Support – He is an excellent new page reviewer. J947 02:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  24. I've had a few chances to interact with Robert and think he's fine enough for this. Lourdes 02:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  25. Support – I cross paths (in a favorable way) with Robert often on NPP, we've tag teamed on problematic spammers a few times. He's good fore this IMO. JamesG5 (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  26. lNeverCry 05:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  27. Prof TPMS (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  28. Jim Carter 10:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  29. Yeah. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 10:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  30. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  31. /wiae /tlk 20:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  32. MusikAnimal talk 23:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  33. CapitalSasha ~ talk 02:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  34. Euryalus (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  35. Rschen7754 06:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  36. I do not understand why we are faced with a choice between 4 equally able and willing volunteers. I would prefer that they all worked on this. Leaky Caldron 08:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  37. Slashme (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  38. — Sam Sailor 17:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  39. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  40. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  41. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  42. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
  43. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
  44. Jianhui67 T★C 11:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
  45.  {MordeKyle}  ☢ 20:32, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Chris troutman

Accept Chris Troutman (talk) 06:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
  1. Mz7 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  2. Jianhui67 T★C 15:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  3. DGG ( talk ) 15:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  4. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 15:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  5. – Joe (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  6. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  7. DarjeelingTea (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  8. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  9.  sami  talk 18:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  10. Ueutyi (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  11. Worldbruce (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  12. Neonorange (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  13. Flat Out (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  14. Full RuneSpeak, child of Guthix 21:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  15. Have interacted with Chris. Would be quite capable. Lourdes 02:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  16. lNeverCry 05:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  17. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 10:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  18. MusikAnimal talk 23:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  19. I do not understand why we are faced with a choice between 4 equally able and willing volunteers. I would prefer that they all worked on this. Leaky Caldron 08:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  20. Slashme (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  21. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  22. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

samtar

WITHDRAWN
Due to external constraints out of my control I will unfortunately not have the time to commit to this role. I wish the other coordinators the best of luck and would like to make them aware that both my talk page and email are always open. Thank you all for your votes of confidence -- Samtar talk · contribs 12:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Happy to help -- Samtar talk · contribs 10:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
  1. Jbh Talk 15:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  2. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  3. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  4. Mz7 (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  5. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  6. Jianhui67 T★C 15:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  7. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 15:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  8. – Joe (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  9. – Juliancolton | Talk 16:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  10. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 16:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  11. CatcherStorm talk 16:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  12. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  13. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  14. ~ Rob13Talk 16:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  15. Eyesnore 16:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  16. Atsme📞📧 Gotta appreciate Samtar's being happy to help, not to mention being qualified. I'm of the mind to grab the happy ones & put 'em to work while they're still happy! 😉
  17. Drm310 (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  18. RES2773 (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  19. Fantastic candidate. Always happy to help, considers all sides of every discussion, and very diligent. Waggie (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  20. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  21. ~Kvng (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  22. Pinguinn 🐧 17:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  23. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  24.  sami  talk 18:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  25. Ueutyi (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  26. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  27. Neonorange (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  28. Dream Ticket... well, the stub that you find in your jacket the next day... ;) O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  29. Full RuneSpeak, child of Guthix 21:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  30. Miniapolis 22:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  31. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  32. AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 00:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  33. Support – Awesome candidate; Kudpung's nomination sums it all up. J947 02:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  34. As in the case of Chris and Robert above, I've interacted with sam and believe this desk will be in safe hands with him (although I wonder sometimes how the two selected will find additional time over what they're already doing). Lourdes 02:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  35. Natureium (talk) 04:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  36. lNeverCry 05:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  37. Mkdw talk 05:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  38. Is also a volunteer developer. I'm sure he is able articulate the technical needs of NPP and get some of the necessary software development done sooner and more competently via the back door (i.e. without having to wait for the WMF). MER-C 06:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  39. Support - wholly suited to the role. DrStrauss talk 09:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  40. Jim Carter 10:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  41. Aye. Nick (talk) 13:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  42. Support Clearly qualified. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  43. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  44. MusikAnimal talk 23:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
  45. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  46. Euryalus (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  47. Rschen7754 06:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  48. I do not understand why we are faced with a choice between 4 equally able and willing volunteers. I would prefer that they all worked on this. Leaky Caldron 08:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  49. Slashme (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
  50. Support Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 08:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  51. Nördic Nightfury 09:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  52. — Sam Sailor 17:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  53. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  54. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
  55. -- numbermaniac (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  56. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
  57. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Arthistorian1977

  • Arthistorian1977 Nominating myself. Active wikipedia editor for 2 years and active New Page reviewer. I started my activity in Wikipedia from new pages patrolling and I have deep understanding of the process. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  1. Devopam (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Spike789

  • Spike789 I am nominating myself. I edit daily and i have been a reviewer for over 3 months. Spike789 🇺🇸 17:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
  1. Devopam (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

According rights

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At their discretion, admins are perfectly free to accord the right on a probationary period , or even reduce an existing right. This does not require any changes to policy because the discretion exists already, so we can implement this immediately following the newsletter. Two boilerplate messages need to be created for this:

1. Alternative template when according time limited right at Template:New Page Reviewer granted (limited). We'll have to ask MusikAnimal if it's possible to automate that message when according the right.

2. Message to inactive or low-activity users:

Hi, New pages patrol/Coordination We have noticed that you have made few or no patrols since your account was add to the New Page Reviewer user group. Your membership of this group will therefore expire in 90 days. on [dda.mm.yy] . You will then be able to make a new request at WP:PERM and the number and quality of your patrols will be reviewed.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Coordination/Archive_1&oldid=1142664263"