Request on 05:19:33, 3 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by বাবুরব্লগEdit

My article has a duplicate submission issue. Article Name is Emilio Sempris How can I resolve this issue?

বাবুরব্লগ (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020Edit

Hello NotTheFakeJTP,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.


New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Moving my userpageEdit

Hi, I realized that you moved my user page. Just to notify you that I moved it back because I was doing some experiments. Thanks. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) (Report false positive) 16:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

@The Lord of Math: If you're doing experiments, don't put an AfC submission tag on it. That puts it in a maintenance category that tells reviewers to move it to draftspace. JTP (talkcontribs) 17:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
I'd try to avoid this, but the AFC tag is part of the experiment...(pre-[4-1]) tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) (Report false positive) 01:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

/* Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2020 */ (MrBeast)Edit

Hey! I have recently added a submission in which you have reviewed haven't verified. I don't know if this is how Im supposed to contact you (I'm new here), but I am anyways.

I wanted to add a submission to the Mr. Beast's (Jimmy Donaldson) article. Under the Content and Style header, I wanted to add a brief paragraph explaining his Last To Leave series, which is a big portion of the content he has made in the past year.

I don't know if the reason is that I didn't format correctly, because the statement wasn't approved. The main two reasons are as follow:

You say it is not clear what changes need to be made, and it isn't in a proper X to Y format. Can you elaborate on what this means? I've tried looking it up on the site but I can't find it, as well as it doesn't make sense to me.

You also say sources might not be reliable. I tried to back up my research as much as possible, but it's a short paragraph, so there are only two sources. Are there restrictions on what sources apply? It'd be good information to know.

I really want to contribute to this article, and I think the description is important information to know for the Content and Style category. Thanks for your time.

Le Panini (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Le Panini: You need to provide a clear explanation of what you want to change on the talk page in questions (i.e. "Please add the following below the final paragraph in x section" or "ab in the section xy should be ac") with reliable sources to back it up instead of just writing the paragraph you want to add. If you make the necessary changes, you can edit the template at the top of the talk page section so it says |answered=no and someone should get to it soon. JTP (talkcontribs) 21:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

A cookie for you!Edit

  In the spirit of Mr. Beast, a cookie for you. Le Panini (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Reverted EditingsEdit

Hey,I don't make something,that isn't good,i just edited some pages and you just reverted it!!!!Jon Moxley is a Wrestler from the Company All Elite Wrestling,better known as AEW and he has a finishing Move,like early Wrestlers and its name is ,,paradigm shift"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!🤨 Karabelas (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC) I gave you the german paige from Jon Moxley and I mark his finishing Move.

Extended content

Jonathan David Good (* 7. Dezember 1985 in Cincinnati, Ohio), besser bekannt unter seinem alten Ringnamen Dean Ambrose, ist ein US-amerikanischer Wrestler, der aktuell bei All Elite Wrestling unter Vertrag steht und unter dem Ringnamen Jon Moxley auftritt. Während seiner Tätigkeit bei World Wrestling Entertainment stieg Good vorwiegend als Dean Ambrose in den Ring. Seine bisher größten Erfolge sind der Erhalt der WWE Championship, der AEW World Championship, sowie die Vervollständigung des Grand Slams.

Jonathan Good Vereinigte Staaten Intercontinental Champion Ambrose im Dezember 2018. Intercontinental Champion Ambrose im Dezember 2018.

Daten Ringname Dean Ambrose Jon Moxley Namenszusätze The Lunatic Fringe Death Rider Körpergröße 193 cm Kampfgewicht 102 kg Geburt 7. Dezember 1985 Cincinnati, Ohio, *(((Finishing


Death Rider / Paradigm Shift)))))))) Trainiert von Cody Hawk, Les Thatcher Debüt Juni 2004[1] Privatleben Seit dem 9. April 2017 ist er mit der Ringkommentatorin und -interviewerin Renee Paquette (besser bekannt als Renee Young) verheiratet.

@Karabelas: Infoboxes vary between wikis, meaning that the English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia do not use the same parameters. You cannot put his finishing move in the English infobox and expect it to show up like it does in the German one, that is not how it works. JTP (talkcontribs) 21:44, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey,i don't make some wrong and you text with me,Stalker!!! Karabelas (talk) 14:11, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey,when I put bis finishing Move in the information box,don't some wrong,i just give an important Information in the box,what's your problem? Karabelas (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

@Karabelas: Where did that stalker comment come from? I don't get what is so difficult about this. It will not appear in the infobox, no matter what you do. WP:PW has been discussing ways to acknowledge finishing moves, but nothing has been decided yet. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:47, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Page revisionEdit

The page I was editing was originally in a very outdated and poorly written state for several years. Noticing nobody else had edited it any further in such a long time, I decided to do it myself, totally new to Wikipedia editing at that. I don't own the page, but neither do you. I was writing it as I'm a fan of the subject, and was re-writing it for other fans like myself that might actually appreciate the historical details. I've been spending the past 2 weeks writing, editing, and finding references to complete it. I'll accept a revised shortening of the article as long as you include sections for each year. You have skimmed far too much down, and even ignored 2018 entirely. This is way too much to cut off, there's a large portion completely missing now that visitors to the page might want to know about. Please revise once again with a decent amount of information for each year at least. Thanks.THUNDERSKULL99 (talk) 22:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@THUNDERSKULL99: The issue was that you summarized practically every event, which made the page nearly twice as long as WWE. If there were moments crucial to the promotion's history that took place in 2018 (or elsewhere, for that matter), by all means, add it. For a 10-year-old promotion, there should not be an insane amount of information. You can ask at WT:PW for help, I'm sure there are people there more familiar with the topic than me. JTP (talkcontribs) 22:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
@NotTheFakeJTP: I understand the issue, but it doesn't matter how long the WWE page is, I'm not writing it with that in mind. I'm writing it for actual fans that want a thorough history lesson of the promotion, regardless of how old the promotion is. I don't know how much or how little wiki page length is supposed to be. You said you aren't familiar with the topic yet you still made a decent amount of manual edits I noticed, that's a considerable portion for policing a page you aren't familiar with. All I'm asking is to add some of the significant things for each year rather than making it a total skim job. Unless you allow me to finish 2017 like I was currently in the middle of, (which was my final thing remaining) and then once I complete that I will cut out large portions of each section myself so that each year has just a small number of paragraphs instead, but you'll have to undo your revision first and then patiently trust me to redo them. I'll even send you a message when I complete it to let you know. Thanks.THUNDERSKULL99 (talk) 23:20, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
@NotTheFakeJTP: Nevermind. I've had enough of Wikipedia at this stage. Leave it as it is.THUNDERSKULL99 (talk) 00:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Ken AndersonEdit

Hello. Thank you for taking your time and improve the article. Maybe it's not the most popular choice, but after reading, I decided to start the GAR. I can't write a GA and, at one point, didn't meet the criteria. Also, I have asked several times for help to other members in the project. I have asked for comments in Britt Baker, just MPJ appeared. I asked for help in Carly Colon, no one cared (BTW, Colon is also a GA that doesn't meet the criteria). You asked for help with The Fink, I don't know if somebody appeared. Colabotation of the month was dropped because no one edits. If I asked for help without the GAR, I'm sure the article would still the same. English isn't my first language, so it's really hard to me to write Good Articles. Again, thanks you for your time improving the article. If you want, I can remove over detailed storylines and make it less in-universe. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

No problem. I think GAR was the way to go, the article was in pretty rough shape. JTP (talkcontribs) 22:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Nice. If you want, we can improve Carly Colon after Anderson. It's in a very bad shape too. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:59, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. After our work, I think Ken Anderson is back to a GA shape. What do you think? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
@HHH Pedrigree: Looks good to me. JTP (talkcontribs) 23:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


Why you can nominate my page for deletion RB2616 (talk) 05:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

@RB2616: If the promotion isn't notable, the titles surely aren't notable. JTP (talkcontribs) 05:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok but I make promption page later when I complete the articles completely. RB2616 (talk) 05:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

@RB2616: Personally, I don't believe the promotion is notable either, but if you think it meets WP:PWPROM, start it at Draft:Absolute Intense Wrestling. JTP (talkcontribs) 05:56, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Ok , sorry RB2616 (talk) 10:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Sesame Street is going to be Cancelled!Edit

Sesame Street is running too long! It's Old Fashioned! I want Sesame Street to be forever Cancelled! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:5620:1C88:A41B:4DB8:62F3:14A6 (talk) 05:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

And? JTP (talkcontribs) 06:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I want to end the Series right now! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:5620:1C88:A41B:4DB8:62F3:14A6 (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't understand why you're telling me this. This is irrelevant and I suggest you contribute to the encyclopedia. JTP (talkcontribs) 06:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Do you want Sesame Street to be Cancelled? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:5620:1C88:A41B:4DB8:62F3:14A6 (talk) 06:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!Edit

Wishing NotTheFakeJTP a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject noticeEdit

Hi NotTheFakeJTP, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Apologies and explanationsEdit

Hi, @ Dear NotTheFakeJTP I'm sorry, I didn't know the rules; This stands for my name and surname bryan o'tabour, I can send you a picture of my passport and ID card; But if there is a problem, I will not continue to work.WlKlPEDIAMainBot (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@WlKlPEDIAMainBot: No worries, I figured it was in good faith. I recommend submitting a username change request at WP:CHUS to avoid further confusion. JTP (talkcontribs) 14:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020Edit

Hello NotTheFakeJTP,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Request on 13:53:22, 19 June 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by YankeejessEdit

Here is the Update that still needs to get done right away On The Web Site at On The WNET Page The Old 2011 THIRTEEN PBS Logo needs to be replaced with the New 2017 THIRTEEN PBS Logo MEDIA WITH IMPACT thats On The New Web Site at thats on the top left needs to get put on right away & Would you please keep that in mind & don,t forget to go On The New Web Site at The 2017 THIRTEEN PBS Logo MEDIA WITH IMPACT is on the top left needs to get put on right away & don,t forget to take care of it right away & don,t forget to let me know when its all set & done with & don,t forget to get this problem fixed big time right away & don,t forget.

Yankeejess (talk) 13:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@Yankeejess: Again, this is not the right place to request this. Please make this request at the talk page of the article in question. JTP (talkcontribs) 17:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Logo Update for WNET right awayEdit

Dear Talk Page, 6/19/2020

 Here is the Update that still needs to get done right away On The Web Site at On The WNET Page The Old 2011 THIRTEEN PBS Logo needs to get taken off right away thats because its not the sameone as the website & The New 2017 THIRTEEN PBS Logo MEDIA WITH IMPACT

thats On The New Web Site at thats on the top left needs to get put on right away & Would you please keep that in mind & don,t forget to go On The New Web Site at The New 2017 THIRTEEN PBS Logo MEDIA WITH IMPACT is on the top left needs to get put on right away & don,t forget to take care of it right away & don,t forget to let me know when its all set & done with & don,t forget to get this problem fixed big time right away & don,t forget. (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeejess (talkcontribs) 17:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@Yankeejess: This needs to be brought up at Talk:WNET, not here. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Jenkintown PosseEdit

So, Your user page doesn't mention them. Are you familiar with them? They are mentioned in this section after the name Troy Gentile, about four names from the top.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee: I am familiar with them, yes. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Zaza pachulia basketball academyEdit

You declined my article... can you help me? I dont know what to do... Porokha (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Porokha: Check out the links at the top of your draft; they give explanations such as how to format references or satisfy notability guidelines. JTP (talkcontribs) 22:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)


Thanks for letting me know. I just don't have anyone who can help me.This laptop is new so I am getting there bt by bit.Mind if you could lend a hand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweetqu (talkcontribs) 22:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Sweetqu: Wikipedia is not a platform for essays, so I recommend you abandon your sandbox and contribute elsewhere, such as Domestic violence, which is where Gender-based violence redirects to. JTP (talkcontribs) 22:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

My WBA edit requestEdit

Did you see my response to you here? Filmlover4654 (talk) 04:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Article edit requestEdit

You don't mind if you restore Amanda Bynes's years active back in the article? Because Sundayclose is apparently wasn't my time for providing sources to him countless times in the talk page of the article. 2600:1000:B04B:36A6:F592:2C9E:DBD8:BC55 (talk) 22:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

You need to take this up with the other user, not me. JTP (talkcontribs) 23:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm not going to, he's clearly violating the Wikipedia policy for sending me harassing messages to my talk page. 2600:1000:B04B:36A6:F592:2C9E:DBD8:BC55 (talk) 23:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
If you think they are harassing you, you need to take it to WP:DRN (for the content) or WP:ANI (for their behavior). Making endless edit requests about the same thing will not solve your problem. JTP (talkcontribs) 23:54, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
I did leave him an apology message on his talk page. But as always, he deleted it, which I wasn't suprised. I was just trying to be nice to him to let him know I'm sorry. Plus, I'm sorry that I took out my frustration on you. 2600:1000:B062:94D9:A97D:5BD9:9F0B:8093 (talk) 13:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Apologies for editEdit

Sir I'm so sorry for adding information that are not for sure true I just acknowledge the fact that last year after Summerslam the next event to take place was Clash of Champions so I assumed that so would be this year Crafter0406 (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

General QuestionEdit


Hope you're great

Thanks Memon KutianaWala (talk) 18:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Recent FeedbackEdit

Hello! Thank you so much for your recent feedback on the Rishi Kumar page - I added charts and changed the general tone of writing. Additionally, I added a table about the recent primary and 8 sources throughout, backing up given statements. Essentially I did my best to fix everything wrong with the article according with your comments. I also worked with my colleague who happened to be making one too (on accident) to make this one our main draft - hence, my apologies for the confusion about the many drafts.

Best, Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usademocrat12 (talkcontribs) 08:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


(Kmax12649 (talk) 17:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Can I please be allowed to edit the Palpatine page?Kmax12649 (talk) 17:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC))

@Kmax12649:   Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. This was already explained to you twice on the talk page in question. JTP (talkcontribs) 23:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!Edit

  Great edits on Wisconsin pages :) ARegularWisconsinite (talk) 16:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Article rejectionEdit

I would like to know why did you reject our article? We are a genuine user. Kindly let us know if we need some correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IAAPI Parks and Industries (talkcontribs) 06:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Accounts cannot be shared by multiple people or used for promotion. You have recommended for a block. JTP (talkcontribs) 06:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

2020-21 NBA season by team templateEdit

Sorry i jumped the gun again But there's 4 Pages created i think there will be more team pages created soon. (talk) 22:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Article rejectionEdit

It seems you are asked this a lot, but you rejected my user page with very very little information as to the issue. I would like to know what I did wrong and how to fix it.

Yrrah2 (talk) 09:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Yrrah2: You didn't submit a userpage, you submitted a draft, which requires approval before going into articlespace. Userpages do not require such approval. JTP (talkcontribs) 16:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)


Hello. Could you please move the Chicks on the Right radio show article back to where it was? It was put in my page area as a kind of placeholder because it was previously deleted. If you look at the history at my talk page, you will see the progression. It was moved there so I could work on it and improve it and it wouldn't be speedy deleted. There's an editor who has already made a note at the top of the draft page to get it speedy deleted. Please move it. I worked really hard on it yesterday to bring it up to Wiki standards. Many sources were added, a lot of new information was added, and the wording was improved along with some inconsistencies corrected. It would be a shame if it was just deleted and gone after all that work. I think it deserves to be re-considered as a permanent article. Thank you. A4M2 Alaska4Me2 (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@Alaska4Me2: You should not submit the article for consideration if you are still working on it. You should keep it in your sandbox if you wish to continue working on it. JTP (talkcontribs) 16:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice. I was done working on it, which is why I submitted it. Are you suggesting I give it more time? A4M2 Alaska4Me2 (talk) 16:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
@Alaska4Me2: Your page doesn't qualify for speedy deletion. The policy excludes...content that has been moved to user space or converted to a draft for explicit improvement. You have nothing to worry about if you believe you have since proven that it meets notability guidelines. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Addressing bias (Robert E. Lee Academy)Edit

I noticed that you helped correct some issues on General Robert E. Lee's page and there is currently an ongoing dispute regarding NPOV on the below page: If you have time to review it, I would certainly appreciate it. BillHPike and Jacona are very experienced editors but based on their edits to this schools page along with dozens of other private school pages they have edited, they simply do not appear to have a NPOV. You can see it at Fritzsmith20 (talk) 13:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)The Results are In

Pending page or notEdit

Hello @NotTheFakeJTP:. You rejected my International Wrestling Cartel draft 2 months ago over citation and source issues. I've since fixed those, reached out and learned a lot from the community, and specified the page. I also wasn't clear if the page was successfully resubmitted for another review. I asked you last month but didn't get an answer. In the two months the pending review count hasn't changed. I wanted to know if you could answer me, let me know what, if anything, is now wrong with the page, and help me move along with submission.

ZanderGabriel (talk) 18:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@ZanderGabriel: It's submitted. All you need to do at this point is wait for a review and possible feedback. JTP (talkcontribs) 00:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello @NotTheFakeJTP:. I have to ask, it's been over 2 months since your initial rejection. My place in line for approval has only increased. How is that possible? Why is my page not being reviewed? I understand the reasons you rejected it and I've since fixed those issues, but you rejected it within a few days of submission. How is this incredibly short page taking more than even a week to review? I can't help but jump to the conclusion that this is some sort of hazing. Please let me know how this page can be prioritized in review. Thanks.

ZanderGabriel (talk) 20:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!Edit

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December NewsletterEdit

Hello NotTheFakeJTP,


Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge fourth anniversaryEdit

  The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
This maple leaf is awarded to NotTheFakeJTP for writing the article Toronto Defiant during the fourth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:San Francisco CalHeatEdit

Hi there,

I hope all is well. Thank you for taking the time to review our submission.

I've added more references from independent sources. I'm hoping this is fine now. Our club is the largest in the United States, and also the current reigning US national champion, in an Olympic Sport supported by the USOPC.

Thanks again for your support in helping us have more exposure on the net.

Best, SFC — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination DriveEdit

Hello NotTheFakeJTP:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 3100 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021Edit

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello NotTheFakeJTP,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog driveEdit

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!Edit

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a listEdit

Hi NotTheFakeJTP! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed on the AFC's participants list, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months. Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to regain access to the AFCH script, you can do so at any time by visiting WT:AFCP. Thank you for your work at AFC, and if you start editing Wikipedia again we hope you will rejoin us. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)