Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 215
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 210 | ← | Archive 213 | Archive 214 | Archive 215 | Archive 216 | Archive 217 | → | Archive 220 |
Lucien Greaves
This is a significant political and religious figure as referenced by these sources: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barfbag666 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 1 December 2015
This "article" consists of a single sentence. The article's novice creator has been advised of wp:bio and now knows the proper place to draft an article is in his sandbox. Rklawton (talk) 03:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm putting the sources in a collapsed shell for space reasons. I'll reply in a moment. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Barfbag666: This was deleted as an A7, so it can't be restored through REFUND. You can ask Peridon if he'll restore it, but offhand there's really not anything to restore. It was comprised of one sentence, "Lucien Greaves (Doug Mesner) is the spokesperson and founder of the Satanic Temple." Of the sources given, few of them are the type that Wikipedia would consider to be the type that would show notability. A basic Google search by itself cannot show notability, nor can Vice. This is because Vice uses gonzo journalism, which is considered to result in dubious reliability as far as Wikipedia's purposes are concerned. Salon is somewhat questionable since they do blogs, so it's not the strongest source. The WBC isn't notability giving at all. You also use a lot of YT links, which can rarely be reliable because of several reasons: anyone can upload footage, sometimes the copyright of the footage is in question, and other reasons.
- However the biggest issue here is mostly whether or not Greaves is notable outside of the Satanic Temple. I would argue that the ST is notable enough for their own article outside of the main article on Satanism, however I'm not sure that Greaves is independently notable since most of the coverage centers upon actions he's done as the representative for the church. Of the two the ST is obviously the most notable, so I'd recommend that you look into creating an article for them first and then focus on Greaves. The church would be the highest priority, in my opinion. I'd heavily recommend that you look into getting someone from Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult to help you on this, since this will be a large undertaking. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Tokyogirl79[[User talk:Tokyogirl79| Thank you. I put a request in the "request for article" section (WP:Requested articles) for the TST, Lucien, Malcom Jerry, and Jex Blackmoore. They're significant figures to many. The logic is i personally don't have enough time to write however now i understand there's "Draft" pages that can be slowly worked at. My thought was get a minimal article up and let others beat on it a little forming it. Wiki is a group effort and all. I didn't want to go after the TST first as i'm thinking if I write that, someone else may remove it from the requested articles. One could probably spend a semester writing a whole research paper in college on that wiki adding value. I started a draft page for Lucien Greaves (i'm not sure if that format will get to a Draft page).Barfbag666 (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Textual Content
Hi, I'm working with a student (Bmars12 and they would like their article userified so they can refactor it to be added to an existing article. Moving it over the sandbox is fine as well. Thank you! -Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- It's up at User:Bmars12/Textual content now, Adam (Wiki Ed). Drmies (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks! Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Shohag Rana
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.39.26 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 1 December 2015
- Not done Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
G. A. Hauser
- G A Hauser · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
- G.A. Hauser · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
My page has been added to wikipedia simply as a bio, like many author pages. I am not using it for a 'blog', or promotion.
It does not violate copyright, as my copyright attorney was the one who had posted it. It is merely a reference page- I have no idea why your system is not allowing it.
But maybe even in wiki's world, it's who you know, not what you have accomplished in your life.
This is the simply bio he was attempting to add. There is nothing here, other than fact base descriptions of my work- Regards, GA -Author G A Hauser (talk) 16:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Who posted is not important. The pages it was copied from (both times, different pages) are copyrighted. You can fix that by following the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Not that it would make any difference the text is not suitable for an encyclopedia page. It would have to be completely rewritten. It would be better to start from scratch. -- GB fan 16:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to post, or get their agents to post, copies of their Amazon promotional profiles - see WP:Autobiography. Copyright material cannot be accepted without a formal copyright release, which is seldom worth making because simple copying the subject's own material will not make a satisfactory encyclopedia article, which should be based mainly on what others say about the subject, and requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability.
- If your agent wishes to make an article about you, they should first read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and note that they are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4) to disclose their interest in any edits where they have a COI.
- Then they should read WP:Your first article and WP:AUTHOR, assemble independent references, and use the WP:Articles for creation process to make a draft for review by uninvolved users. JohnCD (talk) 16:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Sudhish Kamath
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -43.248.69.200 (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC) Hi, My Wiki Page of many years was deleted by you earlier this year. "Sudhish Kamath is a notable film critic working with the Indian daily Newspaper The Hindu and also an Independent filmmaker. Sudhish wrote, directed and produced two independent films,one in 2006 called That Four-Letter Word and, other in 2010 called Good Night Good Morning. His third feature X, a collaborative project with 11 filmmakers is in the final post production stage and scheduled for release later this year." The deletion note said: Notability seems to have been from films. Which is not true. I have been a journalist for 20 years now and You should be able to find over 3000 articles validating it on The Hindu's official site. Here's a recent interview that will help you validate: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/interview/interview-with-criticsturnedfilmmakers-sudhish-kamath-pratim-d-gupta-and-raja-sen/article7900762.ece Your deletion has affected all the film linked pages. Kindly undelete https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudhish_Kamath Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.248.69.200 (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. -- GB fan 17:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Waterstart
I, 98.234.108.96, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.234.108.96 (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I just found restoration and deletion notices in my spam folder, sorry! I will edit the article once it is back. Sergem1 (talk) 01:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Sergem1: This was restored and never checked up on after that, so I just need some sort of assurance that it'll be improved if it's restored again. Mostly what I'm looking for is just a response, but I do have to warn you: if this is restored and it's not edited, it's unlikely that it'd be restored a third time. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Tokyogirl79: I just updated my notification preferences to make sure I don't miss anything. I will edit the draft this week, promise! Sergem1 (talk) 18:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done It's all ready to go, Sergem1. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Bunz Trading Zone
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dcalexandra (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
I was creating the page and adding content. I unintentionally deleted the content, leading to speedy deletion. I would like you to undelete the page. Thank you very much.
- Done, Dcalexandra, I moved it to Draft:Bunz Trading Zone so feel free to take your time with working on this. On a side note, if you work for or were otherwise asked to create this page by the company, you need to read over WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Farmers' Day (Ghana)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Farmers' Day (Ghana) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Davidlartey, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. David Lartey (talk) 09:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page has been moved to Draft:National Farmers' Day (Ghana). Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Simple Minds Alive and Kicking single cover.jpg
- File:Simple Minds Alive and Kicking single cover.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
Since those wanted to never tag it as unfree again, previous revisions should be undeleted to please them. -George Ho (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done revisions revealed Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Whiz Crafts Institute
dear admin, i know why you delete my page because i don't write long and useful information in my article but now i have enough information and data to write my article so can you please give me another chance to write my article please undelete my page or give me permission to write an article on Whiz Crafts Institute please contact me for any other information thanks -Itsrmn (talk) 10:05, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- You can restart this, but I cannot promise it is suitable for an article. A lower risk way is to write at Draft:Whiz Crafts Institute. The page only had a heading restating the article title. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:07, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Viability PCR
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -FCI1971 (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC) HI,
I actualized the content, and during the next days I will increase the information, however in the current form it contains useful informatin
best regards
- The page did no get deleted as Jakec declined the speedy delete requested. There is nothing for us to do here. And you can continue to edit the Viability PCR page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Andy Loo
This article does have certain significance, for example [1] and [2] (both in Chinese, my apologies) -The mediocre Wikipedian (talk to me.) 14:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Jeremy McBryde
Worth a page he isn't non notable -Kingryan227 (Decrees • Acts) 20:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Please check if there is a good reason this might have been deleted before (eg wrong person) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Jay Disney
I began a page and within minutes a "speedy deletion" notice was sent to me. I didn't have time to amend the page with the appropriate references (which I had intended to do) before the page was deleted. This speedy deletion process is EXTREMELY aggressive and assumes people are on their computers 24/7 and have time to respond immediately. LIFE doesn't allow this -- which was the case here. Before I could return to the page and provide more reference materials it was gone. "Save page" button Jaydisney (talk) 21:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC) below -Jaydisney (talk) 21:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- ^ http://www.ravellomagazine.com/patrick-swayze-mi-ha-insegnato-come-affrontare-un-dialogo-complesso-a-tu-per-tu-con-lattore-jay-disney/
- ^ www.jaydisney.com
- ^ http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2666570/?ref_=fn_al_
- ^ Reel Chicago (USA) 14 May 2013, pg. 1, by: Ruth Ratny, "Actors Showcase Best of Film Performance"
- ^ Screen Actor (USA) June 2011, Vol. 52, Iss. 2, pg. 37, by: Linda Swenson, "Outreach to Filmakers Increase SAG Jobs in Chicago"
- ^ Playback (USA) July 2012, pg. 1, by: Linda Swenson, "Members at Work"
- Done moved to Draft:Jay Disney. Are you writing about yourself? Please read WP:COI. In any case there was 2 hours before the page was deleted. I have made this a draft to give you a chance to improve the page. Note that IMDB does not count as a reliable source. And the subject's own web page is not independent for notability purposes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:15, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
DLT Solutions
Please move DLT Solutions to Draft:DLT Solutions so I can work on sourcing and cleaning up the article. Pinging speedy deleter Peridon (talk · contribs) so he is aware. -Cunard (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Cunard: Done, but please check with Peridon before restoring to the mainspace. This was a G11 as well as an A7 deletion: the language is not overtly promotional, but the whole thing reads like the company telling the world about all the products and services they offer. JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Aaron Brookner
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tcottey (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
The page Aaron Brookner was deleted a few days ago based on the proposition that he was not a person of note, although I would argue that there was much evidence provided on the contrary.
Furthermore, yesterday the Sundance Film Festival, one of the most important film festivals in the world, announced that Aaron's next film Uncle Howard would participate in the US Documentary Competition category at the 2016 festival.
There is a whole host of content now online attesting to this release from high profile film and entertainment publications. Please see the following:
Indiewire: http://www.indiewire.com/article/sundance-announces-competition-and-next-lineups-featuring-returning-favorites-and-a-secret-director-20151202 Screen International: www.screendaily.com/festivals/sundance/sundance-us-world-competition-titles-revealed/5097517.article Variety: variety.com/2015/film/news/sundance-film-festival-2015-competition-next-films-1201650705 Deadline Hollywood: deadline.com/2015/12/sundance-film-festival-2016-lineup-competition-lineup-gabrielle-union-uzo-aduba-1201648535 The Hollywood Reporter: www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sundance-obama-love-story-southside-845080 Contact Music: http://www.contactmusic.com/sundance-film-festival/news/2016-sundance-film-festival_5051575
Please help me reinstate the page for Aaron Brookner so I can update this and build upon the article. Previous work of his that has been recognised by the public includes: Producing the remastered version of Burroughs: The Movie, making the first film for iPad The Silver Goat. There are many sources online for these projects too and were referred to in the previous article.
Thank you.
- @Tcottey: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user LilaLilac (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 18:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks :@JohnCD: - I have carried out a number of updates to the page and I hope these details will be considered, as much more information will soon become available on Aaron's career and work and help to create a substantive article that feeds into a wider network of pages including Howard Brookner, Uncle Howard, Burroughs: The Movie, Robert Wilson and the Civil Wars etc.
Larry Cretul.jpg, File:Franklin Sands.jpg
Wish to keeplocal. Commons policy vagueness. See discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Geraldine_F._%22Geri%22_Thompson.jpg --Elvey(t•c) 00:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Wish to keeplocal. (November 2009 version) See discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Geraldine_F._%22Geri%22_Thompson.jpg Commons policy vagueness. --Elvey(t•c) 00:44, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Elvey: both Done. I leave you to tag with {{keeplocal}} JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. Tagging: Done. --Elvey(t•c) 19:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Madura Kulatunga
According to Wikipedia:Notability (people) we can have standalone article about Madura Kulatunga because subject meet following criteria.
- WP:BASIC if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable
- WP:CREATIVE The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.
Following Sri Lanka national newspaper articles addresses the subject Madura Kulatunga directly and in detail.
- [3] Madura's moxie : Sunday Observer (Sri Lanka) - Youth Observer : 17-May-2015 : Page 8-9
- [4] Madura Kulatunga, a commendable contribution : The Island (Sri Lanka) - Watchout : 24-May-2015 : Page 15
- [5] Madura's story : The Nation (Sri Lanka) - insight : 21-June-2015 : Page i10
- [6] A humble success story Madura Kulatunga : The Daily Mirror (Sri Lanka) - Features : 15-July-2015 : Page A12-A13
- [7] Effectively bridging the language gap : Ceylon Today - Hello : 26-July-2015 : Page 2
- [8] 'මේ වෙනකොට ලක්ෂ නවයක් මධුර ශබ්දකෝෂය බාගත කරගෙන' මධුර කුලතුංග : Dinamina - Features : 08-August-2015 : Page 20
- [9] Madura Kulatunga's Notable Achievements : The Sunday Leader - Weekend Leader : 30-August-2015 : Page 2
- [10] මධුර ඉංග්රීසි - සිංහල ශබ්දකෝෂය නිර්මාණය කළ මධුර කුලතුංග : Silumina - Guru Gedara : 27-September-2015 : Page 39
- [11] The generosity of Madura Kulatunga : The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka) - Education Times 2 : 27-September-2015 : Page 4
- [12] ඉංග්රීසි භාෂාව සිංහලයට සමීප කළ "මධුර" : Rajina - Loka Lama Dinaya : 02-October-2015 : Page 23
- [13] ඉලෙක්ට්රොනික මාධ්ය තුළින් ඉංග්රීසි සිංහලට සමීප කළ මධුර : Divaina - Features : 18-October-2015 : Page X
- [14] යටත්වීම වෙනුවට සටන් කිරීමෙන් උපන් මධුර ශබ්දකෝෂය : Irudina - Pitu 8 : 18-October-2015 : Page VIII
- [15] The Story Behind 'Madura' : The Sunday Leader - Business : 01-November-2015 : Page 28
Following Sri Lanka national Radio programs addresses the subject Madura Kulatunga directly and in detail.
- [16] RanOne FM - Negena Era : 13-November-2015 : Time 08:00 AM to 10:00 AM
Only 6 different English medium national newspaper publishers are available in Sri Lanka. All of them are published articles about subject Madura Kulatunga. Those publishers are Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Limited, Upali Newspapers, Wijeya Newspapers, Rivira Media Corporation, Ceylon Newspapers and Leader Publications. Thank you -112.134.65.241 (talk) 07:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted or redirected after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was redirected after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madura Kulatunga, it cannot be restored through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion,
user MusikAnimal (talk · contribs)user Randykitty (talk). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek restoration, a request may be made at Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)- I actually just restored the redirect and semi'd the page as IPs continued to put the article back in conflict with the outcome of the AfD. Randykitty was the closing administrator. Best — MusikAnimal talk 18:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! Link corrected above. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- I actually just restored the redirect and semi'd the page as IPs continued to put the article back in conflict with the outcome of the AfD. Randykitty was the closing administrator. Best — MusikAnimal talk 18:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
The Viking Yurt
I would like to make improvements to the webpage, such as deleting unimportant information like the dinner menu, cancellation policy, prices, and wine selection. I would also like to cite better sources and add relevant information. -Kumamot2 (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Kumamot2: Not done. This was hopelessly promotional - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising site. There is a declined draft at Draft:The Viking Yurt, and you can work on that. Read carefully the extended advice given when it was declined; it will need a pretty complete rewrite before you click the "Resubmit" button. You may find User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard helpful.
- If you are connected with the restaurant, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Fernando Colon Osorio
I, Fcco1511, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fcco1511 (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Maine. The magazine.
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Elp123 (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Maine. The magazine.
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will have to cut back the promotional tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Jay Disney
Yesterday a page was "speedily deleted" before I had the opportunity to enter enough information to satisfy Wikipedia's guidelines. An administrator (Graeme Bartlett) kindly understood the difficulty and revised it as a draft.
I have drafted the article with verifiable footnotes and now cannot ascertain how to get it OUT of draft mode in order for reconsideration. I also cannot access Mr. Bartlett's talk page (I have no idea why), which is why I have resubmitted the page here (for lack of other options).
I am not a computer programmer and thus find much of the navigation around this site extremely confusing.
Many thanks,
Jaydisney (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, you found your way to this page which some people find a challenge. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- The article was not deleted but moved to Draft:Jay Disney. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Matthew Santoro
I see no reason for deletion of this page,if it is because he is a Youtube than a few more pages should be deleted -FrozenMaple189 (talk) 03:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- FrozenMaple189, it looks like this was deleted at AfD, however the deletion discussion itself was about a different person. There was an attempt to make a page about the YouTuber and it was ultimately deleted via the request of the person who created the article. However that said, the article seems to have had other edits from other users, so I don't know that it would have really qualified for that. I'm going to take a deeper look at this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done Most of the major edits were done by one person, but there is a reasonable enough assertion of notability here to where I'd greatly prefer that any deletion be done via AfD as opposed to a speedy deletion. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Blue Dogs
I, Jaxson1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jaxson1 (talk) 02:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Jay Disney (2)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jaydisney (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC) Yesterday a page was "speedily deleted" before I had the opportunity to enter enough information to satisfy Wikipedia's guidelines. An administrator (Graeme Bartlett) kindly understood the difficulty and revised it as a draft.
I have drafted the article with verifiable footnotes and now cannot ascertain how to get it OUT of draft mode in order for reconsideration. I also cannot access Mr. Bartlett's talk page (I have no idea why), which is why I have resubmitted the page here (for lack of other options).
I am not a computer programmer and thus find much of the navigation around this site extremely confusing.
Many thanks,
Jaydisney (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, you found your way to this page which some people find a challenge. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
The answer above is not helpful. I expected more than snark from Wikipedia.
Jaydisney (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- It wasn't deleted, it was moved to Draft:Jay Disney. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Our contributor already found it and edited the draft. However Wikiisawesome has declined the AFC submission and placed a reason and comments. You can talk to this user at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikiisawesome&action=edit§ion=new . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- To talk to me, click on my talk link, and then add a new section. However I keep an eye on this page and I have now watchlisted Draft:Jay Disney. Anyway you will have to write some more text in the draft, provide reliable independent references with substantial content on the topic, and click on the blue resubmit button. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:29, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Punchirikku Parasparam
The article was deleted within 24 hours without giving time for contesting the deletion. The deletion reasons WP:A7 and WP:G11 are meaningless as the article was about a short film in Malayalam language which has enough notability, it was produced by popular stand-up comedian of Ramesh Pisharody and the popular film actors (who are called as "superstars" there) of Malayalam cinema Mohanlal and Mammootty was part of it. It was not a short film done by some college students with a mobile phone camera. This gives enough importance to the subject. The content was sufficiently sourced with reliable sources about the theme, development, technical details and release of the film. I don't even understand why they tagged WP:G11 as it was not at all a promotional page and I don't think any content needs a NPOV. You can look at that. I made the article with much care. I had made this request as the article deleted user User:Liz is written in his user page that he may not respond immediately. There is also an important information that another user had previously created the same article which which was poorly sourced and written that was deleted for that reason. After seeing the importance of the article I recreated it with the quality which can meet the guidelines of Wikipedia. -Inside the Valley (talk) 04:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- This was deleted by @Liz: as A7 and G11 so we can't really restore it here. However that said, I would have recommended that this go to AfD rather than be speedy deleted since there were some sources in the article. If Liz doesn't mind, I wouldn't mind restoring this to your userspace. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- I cannot even find any importance of that article. The video only has 1L views, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQJQ4UIE3KY. The article fails WP:NF. Mohanlal is showing just for some seconds, also FYI Mammootty is not within that.Josu4u (talk) 10:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't mind, Tokyogirl79. If the deletion is contested, it should be discussed at an AFD so the article can be evaluated by other editors. Liz Read! Talk! 11:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I will admit that I do have some concerns about its overall notability, but the sources were just enough to make it sort of dodgy for A7 criteria. It could possibly be merged somewhere, but I'm not entirely sure where. There were a lot of big names involved and none of them are really the main character. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:07, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done I've moved this to User:Inside the Valley/Punchirikku Parasparam. The sourcing is fairly light and while there are three sources, I don't know that this is heavy enough that it'd satisfy the AfD crowds. I figure if there's more coverage in another language that can always be added. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Music For Dog People
I, Jaxson1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jaxson1 (talk) 14:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Jaxson1: this page has not yet been deleted, and if you now make any edit, that will prevent immediate deletion. This has never been submitted for review: read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (music), and when it is ready click the green "Submit" button in the template at the top of the page. JohnCD (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Fernando Colon Osorio
I, Fcco1511, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fcco1511 (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Fcco1511: - already Done in response to your request yesterday. The page is at Draft:Fernando Colon Osorio where you can work on it. This has never been submitted for review: when it is ready, you should click the green "Submit" button in the box at the top of the page. It needs better references that actually mention the subject (see WP:Notability (summary)), both to verify statements in the article, and to establish the WP:Notability of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 22:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Fernando Colon Osorio (2)
Page was deleted due to inactivity. Research Materials dating 20 years back were being obtained. Such Materials are now ready, for example original design specs, pictures of prototype 1, etc. -Fcco1511 (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- See just above. JohnCD (talk) 22:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Goldthorpe United F.C.
Asked for this to be deleted by mistake sorry! - this club is notable as they have competed in the FA Cup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcco1511 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 4 December 2015
- Done. Article is restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Goldthorpe United F.C.
Asked for this to be deleted by mistake sorry! - this club is notable as they have competed in the FA Cup Kivo (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Comedy or Musical
- Golden Globe Award for Best Actress in a Motion Picture – Comedy or Musical · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
The old article (at least from 2014) was moved to a similar title, and has a lot of links. I could recreate the redirect but the admin says in the summary "If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND" -Christian75 (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Christian75, it looks like the only thing that was deleted was a redirect from the move - there's no other content. I can still restore it as a redirect if you think that it'd be a viable search term, though. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Tokyogirl79], I have recreated the redirect myself. It was deleted with a WP:G7 - but G7 says "For redirects created as a result of a page move, the mover must also have been the only substantive contributor to the pages prior to the move". Its recreated because it gives a lot of red links to a page which was moved (not deleted). Christian75 (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Yahya Butt
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Wwedxdon73 (talk) 08:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry i did'nt gave any focus on giving refrence.Please restore my page.Its an orignal Page .Sir please give me another chance i will give it a good reliable referece.Please restore it -Wwedxdon73 (talk) 08:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done I have moved this to Draft:Yahya Butt as it is not ready to be an article yet. You have to remove the promotional / marketing tone, and make this more like an encyclopedia entry. You can check with User talk:SwisterTwister when you think it is ready, or use the WP:AFC process. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:51, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Man With a Van
We now have an editor in place to create this page and will be working on it to be posted as soon as possible -GroundConnex (talk) 09:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Note there is already an article called White van man. Also only one person is allowed per Wikipedia user. If there is another person, they should register another account. Reliable sources will need to be used. And the purpose is not advertorial. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Andy Loo
- Talk:Andy Loo · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
As the article Andy Loo has been recovered, I think that the talk page, possibly containing some useful discussions, should also be undeleted. -The mediocre Wikipedian (talk to me.) 11:31, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Franco Cozzo
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Franco Cozzo · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) DazJazz (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Franco Cozzo
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note there is also a draft Draft:Franco Cozzo on a different topic! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Pat Richie
I, 192.77.237.99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 192.77.237.99 (talk) 18:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -192.77.237.99 (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Recent media coverage supplies needed sources to validate this entry. https://www.google.com/#q=nfl+post+game+prayer+circle&tbs=qdr:w
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Myke Hurley
This person is responsible for the growing interest in podcasting, had a major role in the podcasting ecosystem and has even launch a varied podcast network. His network is one of the fastest growing out there and has even been covered by Techcrunch (http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/18/relay-fm-and-the-podcast-renaissance-that-never-was/). I tried to update the page with more details, but it was already flagged for deleting. I will keep on adding more if it can come back. I assure you M. Hurley is not irrelevant at all. -74.59.91.120 (talk) 00:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leonor Anthony
I, Abrahamsahad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abrahamsahad (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Restored to Draft:Leonor Anthony. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Billy Gilde and David Christopher
Expired PROD. Requested by Holanthony at WP:DRV. -103.6.159.78 (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Already done see Billy Glide. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Expired PROD. Requested by Holanthony at WP:DRV. -103.6.159.78 (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done as the content just said: "David Christopher is a director/actor/producer of pornographic films. He was born in October of 1967, and lived for a short time in Denver, Colorado." which I would speedy delete with an A7 rationale anyway. So please write a new article with references. Credit to Obeytheipod and 7. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Anoomi
The website was temporary offline and somebody delete it... -37.46.39.143 (talk) 23:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- The article wasn't deleted because the website was temporarily offline. It was deleted because the subject doesn't meet the notability requirements in WP:GNG. So... Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anoomi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Studio East
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Studio East · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Deadwaster, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Deadwaster (talk) 22:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Bayesmendel/sandbox
I, Bayesmendel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bayesmendel (talk) 12:18, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done. That page was a blatant copyright violation of numerous sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Dynamic Media
I, Dr. Ryan S, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dr. Ryan S (talk) 15:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
I wish to edit the article, adding new independent sources so as to meet Wikipedia's sourcing requirement -Dr. Ryan S (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I believe the user is actually speaking about Draft:Dynamic Media as the linked article will not be undeleted through this process.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, McMatter, I'm sure you're right, so @Dr. Ryan S: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page Draft:Dynamic Media has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brooke Wurst
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brooke Wurst · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, FranklinHammer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FranklinHammer (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I have moved this to Draft:Brooke Wurst. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timmy Moore
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Timmy Moore · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, TimothyM96, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TimothyM96 (talk) 01:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done TimothyM96, there were several issues with this. The first is that the article was very, very unambiguously promotional - likely the result of you writing your own autobiography. The article would need a complete and total re-write to pass notability guidelines. You may have meant well, but Wikipedia is not a place to promote yourself and this was extremely promotional. Secondly, I'm not entirely sure that you would pass notability guidelines as a whole on Wikipedia. I don't mean that to sound harsh, just that the notability guidelines on here are very strict and a person needs multiple independent and reliable sources to show notability. Just appearing on a local TV news show isn't enough to show notability. You can still try making a new version of the article, but I kind of think that it's far WP:TOOSOON for you to pass WP:NBIO at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:19, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Hawk Visions/sandbox
I, Hawk Visions, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hawk Visions (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
under revisions, sources to follow} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawk Visions (talk • contribs) 05:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Addie Wagenknecht
Please move Addie Wagenknecht to Draft:Addie Wagenknecht so I can assess the current state of article, and make improvements in advance of Deletion Review. Article subject has received substantial grants/fellowships, inclusion in major museum exhibitions (e.g. MoMA), etc. Pinging AfD nominator New Media Theorist (talk · contribs) so they are aware. -Theredproject (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rahif Hakmi
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rahif Hakmi · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I, Rahif Hakmi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rahif Hakmi (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Khushiar/Mohak Meet
I, Khushiar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Khushiar (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Also please note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohak Meet. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Margaria-Kalamen Power Test
I, Spinningspark, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. An obviously notable subject, we should have an article. I was about to decline the G13 when it got deleted. SpinningSpark 19:16, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Commercialization of the Internet
The article was deleted because of "creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban" which is no reason to delete this article as it's a notable topic and of sufficient quality. -Fixuture (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
User:Drcrazy102/DRN transclusion demonstration 1
- User:Drcrazy102/DRN transclusion demonstration 1 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I was using transclusions on this page, I requested that one of the transcluded pages be CSD'd under "User request 1", which also transcluded to the demo 1 page. This page was not meant to be deleted under "User request 1". -Drcrazy102 (talk) 00:34, 10 December 2015 (UTC) PS, please ping me using {{u|Drcrazy102}}
if there are any questions. Thanks.
- Done over to you Drcrazy102. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Kandipara Askar Ali High School
This is a famous School of Mymenshingh District -Md saddam hossain (talk) 05:03, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Not done This was not deleted, however I have removed the prod template for you. You could have done that too. Anyway this article needs references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)