User talk:Troy 07/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Thanks to you

for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I see that you've been doing a great job yourself with those vandals :) ~ Troy (talk) 00:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Egypt

I realize Putty was blocked, but that was apparently for attacking another editor, not for his contributions to the Egypt article. We have also already gone over every single source you included in your edit. From the article written by a reverend, to the AIPAC-affiliated Washington Institute for Near East Policy source, to that cruise ship company page, to the fifteen year old New York Times article, it's all been addressed. And all of them unfortunately qualify as unreliable sources. Again, see the discussion page. Cheers, Middayexpress (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The so-called "LOOKLEX Encyclopedia" source that Putty added is indeed not a reliable source. But then again, neither are any of the sources you produced, as already explained on the discussion page. Since I am apparently now responsible for Putty's actions, I have replaced the LOOKLEX source with the much more reliable Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Network. Also note that Putty never added the Egyptian government's official 6% figure to the text. He added instead the more conservative but still official CIA's, the US Department of State's, and the British government's Foreign Commonwealth Office's 10% figure. Middayexpress (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Accusations of sock puppetry

It is best not to make accusations of sock puppetry on user talk pages. Instead, if the main account has edited recently, file a request for checkuser. If you file a request and would like me to look at it for you, my talk page is available. Jehochman ^Talk 20:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm aware of getting the evidence. I'm not sure about what to do after that though, because I don't find it to be feasible to file a case every time. ~ Troy (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Strange log

That is weird. All I can think of is that the article Muscle was semi-protected at the time, and when you move a protected page you also move the protection along with it. So the vandal essentially created a new page that was semi-protected. And then when you moved it back, you also moved back the semi-protection. Does that make sense? ... discospinster _talk 01:26, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep ...~ Troy (talk)

Re: My Bad

Don't worry about it. That's a bad habit of mine, actually. Just in case you don't have Twinkle, it really helps and I reccomend it for that sort of thing. Friginator (talk) 03:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

My RFA

Hey there! Just a note thanking you for supporting my RFA which successfully passed with 60 supports, 0 opposes and 2 neutrals. I hope I'll be able to live up to everyone's expectations, and thank you for trusting me! All the best, Ale_Jrb^talk 20:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Not a problem. I've been looking after the 2008–09 Vancouver Canucks season since the preseason. I tend to watch every game, so it normally gets updated right after each game haha. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 23:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

I honestly think Wellwood is a great hockey player; too many people just discredit him because of his conditioning. Sure that's important, but he also has one of the better hockey player brains on the team. The way he can read a play is pretty fantastic. He had a strong pre-season and I was a bit surprised that he was only given one game early on, but he's definately proving himself these last two games. Should be interesting to see if he can keep it up. Burrows and Kelser...now those two are really impressing me. Quite improved from last year, and last year was a great one for both of them. I think Kesler will easily break 50-60 points this year, with Burrows not too far behind. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 20:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Re:Admin nom

Oh cool, thanks! However I think I'm going to reject (for now anyway!) I am an Oxford student and it's term time, hence I wouldn't really have time to get behind the nomination - rst20xx (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: jpgordon

Many thanks, Troy. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 04:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Troy, not only do I not mind, I appreciate your efforts greatly. Thank you. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 01:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. There's a real need in general to keep this kind of sock puppetry to a minimum. ~ Troy (talk) 01:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:St Mark's CopticChurch--TO.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:St Mark's CopticChurch--TO.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead. I have no reason to say "no". ~ Troy (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Arabic Wiki

Hey Troy, please consider adding this template to your user page, and please let others know about it:

Thanks! --Lanternix (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I think I'll pass. I don't want to cause any conflicts here. ~ Troy (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Muslim invasion of Egypt

Hello Troy 07! I would like to move the article Muslim conquest of Egypt to Muslim invasion of Egypt. I believe this is a more neutral title, and it's in accordance with the names of other articles concerning the history of Egypt, such as French invasion of Egypt, Byzantine alliance and invasion of Egypt, French Invasion of Egypt (1798), Crusader invasions of Egypt etc. What do you think? --Bomba999 (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm actually not sure. It looks like most guys don't agree on the talk page. ~ Troy (talk) 19:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back!

It's nice to see you again, and thanks for the tip.

Check your email for a laugh!

J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, you're right about that vandal. That's why I spotted his accounts-perhaps a little too obvious, eh? XD ~ Troy (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Mattai el-Meskeen

Hi, there is a link from the talk page on this article to you, but no content relevant. Roger Pearse (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

That's OK. Nice work, though :) ~ Troy (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Recent Runtshit socks

Thanks for that, I've blocked Suppressturds indef and listed the accounts at WP:RFCU/IP. Hut 8.5 10:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem!

It was my pleasure :-) - Happy editing! John Sloan (view / chat) 23:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert! John Sloan (view / chat) 01:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries =) we're all in this together! ~ Troy (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

My usertalk page

Please play somewhere else.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Unless you have something useful to say, stay away from my talk page. ~ Troy (talk) 00:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm talking about this[[1]], and the cute warning you left on my talkpage. Yopu can apologize if you made an error.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I use an anti-vandal tool; I didn't literally go and revert on your talk page as, otherwise, I would have noticed. ~ Troy (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Then please go clean your mistake up.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Done. ~ Troy (talk) 00:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Sorry if I was tesy, but you could understand my irritation. I thought it was willful and on purpose. Happy editing, sorry about my confusion.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries, I understand. As well, I apologize for adding the warning in the first place. ~ Troy (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Gad

I can only apologize. What a mess up. You reverted the edit to Balkline and straight rail by a Grawp sock and I had two windows open and I blocked you instead of the user intended. I left a very clear edit summary on the almost immediate unblock and I hope that is enough, but I'll understand if you are justifiably angry anyway. Again, sorry.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries! I've seen it happen to other people before ...but it was certainly enough to scare me for a sec. ~ Troy (talk) 02:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Glad to hear it. I've blocked quite a few users and never done that before (and hope not to do it again). Apparently developers can oversight certain types of logs (see Wikipedia:Oversight#Oversighting of log entries. I'm not sure this is available for block logs, but Id' be willing to try if you'd like.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

It's alright; I'm fine the way it is. Should the autoblock be removed, or do I wait until it expires? ~ Troy (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Done. Autoblock unblocked. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! :) ~ Troy (talk) 02:49, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Although I've also replied on my talk page, I wanted to leave a record on yours to thank you for your kind words and the Barnstar. That was very kind of you and although I'm happy to just be helping the community, that really made my day. Thank you! ZX81 ^talk 00:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing ^_^ It's people like yourself that deserve to be recognized. ~ Troy (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Muhammed Eken

I think this page should be deleted. Can you delete it as it is of no use to anyone.

Reallikeunreal (talk) 14:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. You'll have to ask an admin or nominate it for deletion. ~ Troy (talk) 00:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Special:EmailUser feature

Interesting question. First, I'll make any easy suggestion: since registered editors aren't required to provide an email address, or to enable it to receive email, there isn't any good reason to restrict incoming email filtering to just autoconfirmed accounts; everyone should be able to do it, assuming it makes sense to set up.

Second, while this is certainly feasible, in the sense that the MediaWiki software can be configured to provide such functionality, I'm not at all sure that it would be useful. I say that because I don't think that an editor has any way to anticipate spam/junk, and because - as you note - it's so easy to set up alternative accounts; even if you do block X, you're just going to get mail from new-X, and newer-X, and even-yet-newer-X.

So, what might work? One thought is to restrict outgoing email to only autoconfirmed accounts; that would make spammers and sock puppeteers work a lot harder to do their thing (which might encourage them to go elsewhere). A second, perhaps better, would be to restrict outgoing emails to a certain number (say, ten) within a certain period, such as a calendar day. (If this were implemented, I think an exception for admins, bureaucrats, checkusers, ArbComm member, and checkusers, and probably for those with rollback privileges, would make sense; these are all people who (a) might be using email a lot, and/or (b) have established a level of trust in the community which is very unlikely to be breached by email spam or other email violations.)

Finally, if this really is a problem for a lot of editors (I have no experience, personally, with this problem), and if something above seems to make sense for dealing with it, then I encourage you to post a proposal at WP:VPPR, and get some wider feedback. (And thanks for the opportunity to comment about this at an early stage!) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:02, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Arabic Wiki

Hey Troy, please consider adding this template to your user page, and please let others know about it:

Thanks! --Lanternix (talk) 04:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

{{Biased Arabic Wikipedia}}

Ah, I think I'll pass. I don't want to cause any conflicts here. ~ Troy (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Muslim invasion of Egypt

Hello Troy 07! I would like to move the article Muslim conquest of Egypt to Muslim invasion of Egypt. I believe this is a more neutral title, and it's in accordance with the names of other articles concerning the history of Egypt, such as French invasion of Egypt, Byzantine alliance and invasion of Egypt, French Invasion of Egypt (1798), Crusader invasions of Egypt etc. What do you think? --Bomba999 (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm actually not sure. It looks like most guys don't agree on the talk page. ~ Troy (talk) 19:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back!

It's nice to see you again, and thanks for the tip.

Check your email for a laugh!

J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Yeah, you're right about that vandal. That's why I spotted his accounts-perhaps a little too obvious, eh? XD ~ Troy (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Mattai el-Meskeen

Hi, there is a link from the talk page on this article to you, but no content relevant. Roger Pearse (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

That's OK. Nice work, though :) ~ Troy (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

We're all Humans here!

Isn't it interesting how it's come to this? Life started out as just single-celled organisms, which evolved by means beyond our comprehension until humans came about, with brains so advanced that we can perceive with perfect clarity the world around us and process information at universally significant depths. Well, this insane evolution and incredible reality has culminated in my particular brain telling my fingers to type on your Wikipedia user page. I'm typing right now. It's happening and you're not going to stop it, although I do figure you will act in your own best interests and REVERT this page so my inane comment no longer can be seen by other humans. I'll finish by saying the N-word. N-word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaabi (talk • contribs) 19:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Recent Runtshit socks

Thanks for that, I've blocked Suppressturds indef and listed the accounts at WP:RFCU/IP. Hut 8.5 10:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem!

It was my pleasure :-) - Happy editing! John Sloan (view / chat) 23:43, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert! John Sloan (view / chat) 01:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries =) we're all in this together! ~ Troy (talk) 01:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

My usertalk page

Please play somewhere else.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Unless you have something useful to say, stay away from my talk page. ~ Troy (talk) 00:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm talking about this[[2]], and the cute warning you left on my talkpage. Yopu can apologize if you made an error.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I use an anti-vandal tool; I didn't literally go and revert on your talk page as, otherwise, I would have noticed. ~ Troy (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Then please go clean your mistake up.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Done. ~ Troy (talk) 00:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Sorry if I was tesy, but you could understand my irritation. I thought it was willful and on purpose. Happy editing, sorry about my confusion.Die4Dixie (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries, I understand. As well, I apologize for adding the warning in the first place. ~ Troy (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Sock Case

Thanks for letting me know, I'll keep an eye on it. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 05:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

194.25.218.179

Yes, open proxy on port 80. Blocked for five years. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 03:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. ~ Troy (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Good job reverting the vandalism on my user page. I appreciate it :) Trusilver 02:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

No worries! :) ~ Troy (talk) 02:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

re: Good grief...

lol Yeah it's been fun. I was thankful that you finally let me get a couple of reverts in, I was getting tired of seeing "Cannot rollback, page was edited by Troy" ;) I'd thought about requesting semi-protection, but I knew that the Superbowl would be over soon enough and it'd all die down. Great job tonight! Cheers! Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 03:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Deductive Reasoning

What's happening with this article: I saw the ping pong edits! I have made a few changes of my own but no reaction from those other eds as yet. Can you tell me this: there has been deductive logic and deductive arguments for centuries. Now there appears to be deducutive reasoning as well When it comes down to it is deductive reasoning just reasoning using deductive arguments or am I missing something? If it IS more than that then articel deos not make that clear. If it IS NOT more than that then what need for a special article, wby not just redirect to Argument (logic) wherin deducutive arguments are discussed. Just asking, mind.--Philogo (talk) 01:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

It's actually quite simple: they're Grawp/JarlaxleArtemis socks (eg: Lord Archer (talk · contribs)). As if that wasn't enough evidence, then just take a peek my talk page log; littered with Grawp's harrassment in response (nothing uncommon these days) :) but why should it matter? Revert, ignore. If you really think something should be done, go to WP:RFP (which I probably should have done by now, but too lazy). ~ Troy (talk) 02:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Cookie

You were the eighth person to respond to me, second without a cookie. Here's some tea!

Its the Cookie Monster (talk) has given you a cup of tea, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Tea somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:WikiTea}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the tea! ~ Troy (talk) 04:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Its hard to screw up when you just copy and paste! Its the personal messages that get ya! To a long and sucessful carrer! --Its the Cookie Monster (talk) 04:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

It has been a long wiki career indeed, but perhaps success will follow ;) ~ Troy (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Note

Good day. I've just protected your user page. Feel free to contact me, or other admins if you want it lifted. Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  22:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I should be able to request unprotection once things settle down a little. ~ Troy (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

List of Coptic Churches in the United States

Hi Troy,

I respectefully disagree with your deletion of my addition to the above page. While i do agree to some extent that Wikipedia is not a directory, however there is a provision for creating lists such as this one. I'm not including any other contact details of the priests other than their name, the idea being to make the list of churches complete by identifying the priests who serve in each church.

There are many precedences in wikipedia and i can't list them all here (for example the list of bishops of the holy synod of the coptic church and other orthodox churches whether on wikipedia or orthodox wiki). It simply allows people to go to one place if they are looking for a church in the United States, find the name of the priest and contact him through looking him up on google or whitepage.

I will not undo it just yet, but please consider my point of view. If you like, as you suggested, i can split the article up into various sub-lists (for example create separate articles for each diocese listing the priests there)

your thoughts and suggestions are welcome, i'm only trying to help provide some useful information.

Regards

Nader —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadermeleka (talk • contribs) 03:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that's simply not an option, per Wikipedia guidelines. Nonetheless, it has already been discussed, and I'm not really interested in another discussion on the same thing. You have an option to create articles, but listing things like that is a no no here because this isn't the yellowpages. External links are even avoidable, although I have kept them to avoid any issues and they can be supplanted with article links, which are really the only viable option. You can feel free create articles and link them, but I can't allow you to break the policy and list things you shouldn't. Cheers, ~ Troy (talk) 04:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Semi-retired

I'm sorry on behalf of my semi-retirement. Feel free to sign your name under the "Signatures" section. It's been very pleasant working with you. Good luck to you and your Grawp/JarlaxleArtemis project. SF3 ^(talk!) 21:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

In that case, I have signed under that section. 'Tis a shame that you're too busy, but such is life. Good luck! ~ Troy (talk) 22:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, now I switched retirement positions and I am now "officially" retired. Good luck to your future editing! And by the way, how's the Grawp project you and I were working on? (Please respond on my talk page) SF3 ^(talk!) 01:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: User namespace Deletion Request

Looks like it's already been  Done by some other admins. Cheers, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 13:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Auson socks

You can just contact me on my talk page or by e-mail and I'll take care of it. Just give me a brief outline of why the user in question matches the sockpuppeteer's MO. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Not a problem :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • February 2, 2009 @ 05:17

Proposed merger of WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy and WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy

It has been proposed that the Oriental Orthodoxy project be merged into the Eastern Orthodoxy project, which would probably be retitled Eastern Christianity after the merger. Please feel free to express an opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy/Archives/2014/December#Proposed mergers shortly. the proposal has been in place for about a month and a half, and gotten very little attention, so I am contacting directly all members of the Oriental Orthodoxy project about it. Please try to respond, one way or another, within a week of this notice, to expedite matters. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 18:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Who is this user?

I got two emails indicating that requests were made by User:64.34.217.25 to change my password on the English and Arabic Wikipedia. I checked the IP here, and it seems that he has made two edits to your talk page, which looked like they were threats that were permanently deleted. Do you know who this person is? -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 00:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

It must be a Jarl/Grawp IP sock. His email abuse is quite common; all you can do is undo the abuse. ~ Troy (talk) 00:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I am not sure why I have become his target but at least I know it is not Lanternix. -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

No, I am still concerned as to whether this should be reported or not. Not sure how he found me since I did not post on your talk page. Perhaps he is looking through your contributions. Whatever the case is, I am still wondering if something can be done about it. -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 01:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I understand. I still have a feeling that if I stopped contributing, he'd just be wikistalking other users more. That's really annoying. ~ Troy (talk) 01:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Request for Help, please

Greetings Troy 07,

Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate this article into the Coptic language? Please.

كنيسة يسوع الحقيقى هى كنيسه مستقله تم انشاؤها في بكين ، الصين فى عام 1917. وانتخب الرئيس الحالي للجمعيه الدوليه اللى هو الواعظ - يونج جي لين. : النهارده ، فيه يقارب ما بين 1،5 الى 2،5 مليون و المؤمنين في خمسة واربعين بلد في القارات الست. الكنيسة الصينية هي فرع من فرع العنصره المسيحيه اللى برزت خلال اوائل القرن العشرين. كمان هي واحدة من تلات كنايس اصليه صينيه كانت قايمة قبل استيلاء الشيوعيين من الصين فى عام 1949. هدف الكنيسه التبشير بالانجيل لجميع الامم قبل المجيء الثاني للمسيح. المباديء العشرة الأساسية:

1. الروح القدس
2. التعميد
3. غسيل الأقدام
4. العشاء الرباني
5. يوم الراحةَ
6. السيد المسيح
7. الإنجيل
8. الخلاص
9. الكنيسة
10. يوم القيامة

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 07:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jose77. It's nice to meet you too. I'd be glad to help, but to be honest, I have had some trouble myself in trying to translate into Coptic. So, I think it would make sense to try doing the numbered list first in order to get something started here soon. ~ Troy (talk) 23:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Alright then. Here is the text for the numbers. It is best displayed with the New Athena Unicode font on Firefox 3.5, as instructed in this Coptic Wikisource test page. Feel free to copy from the edit box:

1. Ⲡⲓ ̀ⲡⲛⲉⲩⲙⲁ ⲉⲑⲟⲩⲁⲃ
2. Ⲉⲡⲉⲥⲏⲧ
3. Ⲣⲁⲧ ϫⲓⲛϫⲱⲕⲉⲙ
4. Ⲉϫⲱⲣϩ ̀Ⲡⲟ̅ⲥ̅
5. Ⲉϩⲟⲟⲩ ̀ⲛϩⲏⲧ
6. Ⲓⲏ̅ⲥ̅ Ⲡⲭ̅ⲥ̅
7. Ⲉⲩⲁⲅⲅⲉⲗⲓⲟⲛ
8. Ϫⲓⲛⲛⲟϩⲉⲙ
9. Ϯⲉⲕ ̀ⲕⲗⲏⲥⲓⲁ
10. Ⲉϩⲟⲟⲩ ̀ⲛⲧⲱⲛϥ

I don't know to what extent the content body can be translated, or in which dialect (Bohairic is easier to understand now, but is farther from the original Sahidic dialect because of Greek influences). I also see that you contacted Lanternix; either one of us can attempt translating it, but I am not quite sure how his results would compare to mine. ~ Troy (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou Troy 07 for your awesome translation effort! I am very Grateful.

Here is the English version:

The "True Jesus Church" is an independent church that was established in Beijing, China in 1917. Today, there are approximately 2.5 million members in forty eight countries and six continents. The church belongs to the Pentecostal group of Christianity that emerged during the early twentieth century. They aim to preach the gospel to all nations before the Second Coming of Jesus. The ten main beliefs of the church are:

1. Holy Spirit
2. Baptism
3. Feet Washing
4. Holy Communion
5. Sabbath Day
6. Jesus Christ
7. The Bible
8. Salvation
9. The church
10. Final Judgement

Could you translate the English version into the awesome Coptic language? It may be easier to translate directly from English (because the 'communism' part has been left out)

Just try your best effort. --Jose77 (talk) 00:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Okay, here it comes:

"Ϯⲉⲕ ̀ⲕⲗⲏⲥⲓⲁ ̀ⲛⲁⲗⲏⲑⲓⲛⲟⲛ Ⲓⲏ̅ⲥ̅" ⲡⲉ ⲟⲩϮⲉⲕ ̀ⲕⲗⲏⲥⲓⲁ ⲁⲩⲧⲟⲕⲣⲁⲧⲱⲣ ⲫⲁⲓ ⲁⲥⲧⲁϩⲟ ⲉⲣⲁⲧ Ϧⲉⲛ Ⲡⲉⲕⲓⲛⲟ, Ⲕⲓⲛⲁ ϩⲛ ⲁ̿ϣ̅ⲓ̅ⲝ̅. ⲘⲪⲟⲟⲩ, ⲛⲁⲓ ⲛⲉ ⲕⲱⲧⲉ ⲃ̅ ⳽ ϣⲟ ̀ⲛϣⲟ ϣⲗⲱⲗ Ϧⲉⲛ ⲇ̅ⲏ̅ ϩⲁⲛⲕⲁϩⲓ ⲟⲩⲟϩ ⲋ̅ ϩⲁⲛⲏⲡⲉⲓⲣⲟⲥ. Ϯⲉⲕ ̀ⲕⲗⲏⲥⲓⲁ ⲑⲁ ϫⲓⲛϣⲉⲙϣⲓ ̀ⲙⲠⲉⲛⲧⲏⲕⲟⲥⲧⲟⲥ
...this is the first part-I went up to "established". I am going to have to look up place names first before I can proceed. ~ Troy (talk) 00:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Using modern Greek, I found the Coptic equivalents and inserted the appropriate diatrics. I have found that this is the best way to achieve modern Coptic text as Greek is the closest known language to Coptic which is still used to describe modern values; still pending more translating, though. ~ Troy (talk) 01:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter Issue X - July 2009 Project news The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles! Member news It was a big month for new members, with User:RandomNumberSee, User:Per Ardua, User:Muzhogg, User:Arlen22, User:Scotchorama, and User:Jaybird vt joining, bringing us up to 292 listed members. Thanks to you all, and a special welcome to our new members! Other news I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum. One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much. Related projects news The WikiProject Films has recently created a new task force for Christian films. All interested parties are welcome to join and contribute. Member contest of the month The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month. Christianity related news Pennsylvania Amish farmer jailed for outhouse violations Obama expands Bush's faith-based initiatives Relics of 39 saints found by British Museum From the Members Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page. John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC) To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 23:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Wrong

You put on a [page User_talk:82.132.136.201] a year ago that a user was the same as another IP (currently an IP I have) because they are registered to the same address as that IP, but that address is the address of an ISP. Perhaps you should make sure you know what you are talking about before trying to intimidate people with your knowledge. 82.132.136.200 (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Coptic language

When I try to view your Coptic language translation above my computer just shows lots of squares. I clearly need to download some font pack or something. I have a new laptop that runs on Windows Vista. Any suggestions? ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 20:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

To view it correctly, it should only require the New Athena Unicode font (v. 3.5). Otherwise, try following the steps outlined here. ~ Troy (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey Troy!

There is a user that continuously vandalizes the article Egyptians by removing the composite picture on top. Please consider restoring this abuse because I've already reverted it twice today. Thanks! --Ⲗⲁⲛⲧⲉⲣⲛⲓⲝ^[talk] 16:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm baaack!

Hello! As you may know, I retired last spring, but I have been visiting Wikipedia much more often than I thought I would. I feel rather refreshed right now as I make this edit. Feel free to respond on my talk page. Hope you're having a great day/night! Schfifty3 02:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Reporting Vandalism by User:(nadermeleka) & (Orthopraxia)

Hello Troy,

This is BVS, We would like to report continous Vandalism by user (nadermeleka) and his friend (Orthopraxia) who are trying to delete and revert sections of the article to help them in their ultimate goals.

As you now, Weikpedia is not the place for any battles nor who is right or who is wrong (Truth Rule). They have been asked to do so for specific reasons. As you may recall we discussed this matter before and the reason they specifically choosed to contact you, is that seeing that you and I discussed this matter before, they thought they can take a boost and be one ste ahead doing that (as I may recall you are a Coptic Orthodox guy from Australia).

Please remind them one more time that Wikipedia is not a battle zone and is not the place to fight or have battles whether they think they are right or wrong or being asked to do that (Truth Rule). We have corrected this matter several times, but they insist on doing so and they have a 24 hours shifts to accomplish there goals.

Before we take the matter to another level within Wikipedia claims, we would like to ask for your help and to explain to them that they should NOT revert any information made at good faith efforts done by other users. They have been caught red-handed doing so and they admitted that. We will restore it one more time, but if they do NOT stop, then we are really asking for you help to stop this vandalism.

Wikipedia is NOT the place to attack other people good faith editing, to fight, to dispute or to claim the (Truth Rule).

If they do NOT stop, then we are asking you to take specific actions against them after giving them a warning.

Wikipedia rules need to be respected despite any church internal disputes and no matter were they stand in it.

(Orthopraxia) already received several vandalism warnings previously and is known to engage in edit wars (Check his talk).

Thank you for your help & support.

Bvs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bvs1925 (talk • contribs) 06:41, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Troy,

There is a user (Bvs1925) who continues to vandalise the page "Holy Synod of the Coptic Orthodox church" by adding fake links and incorrect name of a bishop. I warned him several times and undid his edits but he continues to add them in again. Please block him from editing this page and any other pages he has previously vandalised. I noticed he had been previously warned and blocked a few months ago from editing other pages.

Thank you in advance ~nadermeleka —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadermeleka (talk • contribs) 23:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Troy,

I conccure with Nader Meleka regarding the vandalism from user (Bvs1925) in the page "Holy Synod of the Coptic Church". Bothe Nader and I reverted his addition of an unexisting bishop "Bishop Mina" for the unexisting diocese of Fresno, but he kept on reverting back. He also put a website link as a proof for his addition, but this site, apparently has replaced (I don't know how) the original site of the Fresno parish (in question) and is only discussing accusations and internal disputes with that parish's priest, who apparently is backed up by some bishops without the knowledge of the Pope of Alexandria and has no references whatsoever with a name or proof of a consecrated bishop for that parish or the region of Fresno as claimed. Anyway, I hope that there is a way to stop this vandalism. I did not revert his last vandalism yet for you to see it yourself. I hate to see a page that I created get vandalized continuously as such. I appreciate your help. Thank you. Orthopraxia (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Troy,

I need your help regarding another attempt to vandalize the same page. This time it is (User talk: 71.195.186.130), I am not sure if it's the same person or not (using a different designation or not). I reverted several times his vandalism and made several notes for him/her to stop, but in vain. I left a message to Grim 23, who apparently had addressed a problem with that person before. If there is a way to prevent this person, please do. Thank you Orthopraxia (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Troy,

Just for your information, please read the following messages I sent to Lanternix based on his message to me and acopy I forwarded to BVS 1925. Here is the copy: Hello BVS 1925,

This message I sent to lanternix and I am forwarding a copy for your information. I hope you get the message behind the message and be aware that we are all aware of your attempts and we will take action.

P.S.: By "All", I mean all who have interest to keep Wekipedia pages free from inaccurate information or lies and a theater of personal wars within parsihes! I am in contact with many and they all agree on this cllective stance. Here is the copied message:

Hi Lanternix,

This is quite a ridiculous situation, both BVS 125 and IP Address 71.195.186.130, unless they are the same person, are engaged in a very weird and persistant vandalism in most of the pages related to the Cptic Orthodox Church by insisting of the addition of a fake or non existant bishop of an non existant diocese. I have warned them but to no avail. Here is the fact of the matter and they are aware of it, if that information was true, no one would have any mind or even thing to such an addition, everyone wants to have the number of bishops and dioceses of the Coptic orthodox Church grow every day, but to add such an information, the following need to be done: 1) To have any confirmation from theHoly Synod of the Coptic Orthodox Vhurch about such a diocese or bishop. This is non existant and they know that very well. 2) Whoever reads the contents of the so-called Fresno diocesan website, notes that there is a mojor feud among the members of the congregation of that parish (not diocese0 and the apparently imposed priest on them, to the point of having serious disagreement about several investigations done by several bishops about that feud. 3)The title of the website states that the so-called bishop is called Mina the Ischariot, which meens the treator among the ecclesiastical parlance, which in turn means that the website is created to mock the whole idea of the bishop and the diocese, by saying that the people of that parish are suffering from an imposed clergy, who is backed by some bishops as it claims, comparing him with Judas the Ischariot and have an episcopal imposition. Accordingly, this website does not proof the existance of a diocese or a bishop but mocks them. 4) It is clear that the image provided for that so-called bishop is composed or superimposed. by matching episcopal vestments on the face of that priest.

It becomes evident that the reason behind the insistance for adding such an addition in many Coptic Orthodox Church related pages on Wikipedia, is an attempt to propagate the apparent injustice imposed on that parish, by mocking the priest, by making him a bishop and the parish a diocese. So these two fellows are actually against that priest and they using Wikipedia pages as a tool of their WAR against that priest and whoever fllows him and protects him. I even suspect that they/he have created that webpage for the sake of such mokery.

So the WAR here is from these two gentlemen (or gentleman, if it's only one person) and all I, you and others are doing is stoping them/him from doing this persisting vandalism.

If they/he can provide a document or documents from the Holy Synod of the Coptic Orthodox Church about such addition, creation of a diocese, consecration of such bishop, date of consecration and by whom and where from a reliable source, then by all means this addition is welcomed. Of course you know and I know that this will never happen. I am copying this message on the User talk page of BVS 125 for his information.

I will never stop preventing the vandalism they/he are/is doing and I hope that you would do the same. If you have the means to ban them/him permanently, please do so, since obviously they have an agenda of their own. Thanks.Orthopraxia (talk) 00:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Troy, This/these people need to be stopped. thanks Orthopraxia (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello Troy,

We read Orthopraxia comments and here are our responses to it:

1) Mr. Orthopraxia is trying to analyze the Diocese of Fresno status in order to reach conclusions that leads to a truth from his own opinion (Truth Rule). Also, we are very well capable of answering his arguments, Wikipedia is not found to be a war zone or to prove one party is right and the other party is wrong (Truth Rule).

2) Orthopraxia being extremely interested in our Diocese's status raises red flags about who is behind him and what goals is he trying to achieve. He is very likely to be driven by a request of another Bishop who is supporting Bishop Mena. (And he knows who is the person we are talking about !!!). Again, Wikipedia is not the place for WAR regarding any Church internal disputes.

3) Orthopraxia, is trying to discuss the method used in choosing Bishop Mena and whether he was chosen by the members of the Diocese of through any other method? Thus taking the discussion into the root of the church well-known dispute to achieve his goal of eliminating the Diocese information from Wikipedia and scoring it.

4) The Diocese information has the right to be listed in Wikipedia despite the disagreement going on between several Bishops. We in the Diocese maintain open door policy and accept the others opinions (Please see the link to Bishop Athanasius's TV program having problems with Fr. Mena (later on Bishop Mena) and we never deleted that.

5) Orthopraxia and his friend are fellows of Bishop Ermia and trying to achieve his goals by eliminating the presence of the Diocese (because it is against their best interest).

6) We will never stop demanding our right to have the Diocese of Fresno listed in Wikipedia (because its presence is a fact) and widely known to everybody) desite attempts to deny it.

7) I (Bvs) can easily stop this silly editing war with these (2) Users, if they agree to stay away from us and abide the Wikipedia rules regarding editing other people's work and the (Truth Rule).

8) Finally, I want you to think about this (What is it for Orthopraxoia and his friend in it?), what would make them come from nowhere to start bothering the Fresno Coptic people in their diocese? Is that happening out of their goodwill? Are they making 24 hours shifts to focus on this subject out of their good nature? The answer is obvious, we in Fresno, know who is behind them and they know that we know !!!!!

9) Finally, and despite the fact of the friendship with Orthopraxia, we are still asking you to activate the Wikipedia rules regarding: a) Editing Rules for editing other user's work. b) Truth rules, c) All applicable other rules.

10) Although, we have 250 members in our diocese that can easily join Wikipedia to protect their right to have religious information on Wikipedia and get into what Orthopraxia wants to drag us to, and this will end up that he either stop his vandalism of our diocese information or will end up blocking 250 users who will come back again to defend their religion. We will not make any announcements or recommendations to the Fresno Coptic families in the diocese regarding their rights to be present in Wikipedia until you make your final decision.

11) We will also, take this matter to another level with Wikipedia because his requests are completely unacceptable. He already had (6) vandalism warnings and it makes us wonder how many warnings does it take for him to stop. We are fed up with these acts.

Thank you for your understanding.

Bvs —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bvs1925 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Coptic Language

I am an amateur linguist, and am constantly studying new languages. The Coptic language fascinates me. However, probably because of the configuration, I find myself unable to study it online. I have never found a book on the Coptic language in any bookstore. Could you possibly tell me where I could find a good one? All the best-Mk5384 (talk) 17:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Help requested

Nofri Youssefa! I would like your help on the article Al-Muizz Lideenillah. One of the users is insisting to remove any reference to the miracle of moving the Mokattam mountain, to Pope Abraam the Syrian and St Simon the Tanner, and to the conversion of Al-Muizz. Your help there would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance :) --λⲁⲛτερⲛιξ^[talk] 02:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Coptic Orthodox Churches in the United States

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Coptic Orthodox Churches in the United States. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Coptic Orthodox Churches in the United States. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Double check

Please see Talk:Our Lady of Light#Wrong redirect The two articles linked to Our Lady of Light predate Our Lady of Zeitoun by centuries! Peter Horn User talk 00:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Coptic Church — llandudo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Coptic Church — llandudo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 11:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I hope this brightens your day

Hello Troy 07, SwisterTwister has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

SwisterTwister (talk) 06:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

File:PopeDioscorosI.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PopeDioscorosI.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: May 2012

ICHTHUS

May 2012

From the Editor

This month marks the observation of Pentecost, one of the most important feast of the Christian liturgical year. It is our hope here that all of you, regardless of your religious affiliation (if any), find that the holiday, and its accompanying activities, an enjoyable and beneficial experience. We also hope that this "Birthday of the Church" is one which gives you the same joy as the birthday of yourself or your loved ones.

Ichthus is the successor to the long running WikiProject Christianity newsletter, run under the WikiProject Christianity’s Outreach department. As such, you will continue to see information about our latest featured and good articles, DYKs, as well as new members who have joined our project. You might also see links to Christianity related news from the mainstream media!

With that, I wish you all happy reading!

John Carter, Asst. Editor

P.S. Please click here to add the new Christianity-related topics Noticeboard to your watchlist to follow the latest discussions relevant to WikiProject Christianity and subprojects.

Help Bring Wikipe-tan "into the fold"

As many of you may know, our unofficial mascot, dear Wikipe-tan, hasn't yet indicated any particular beliefs. However, yes, as we all know, ahem, some people might object to our beloved mascot running around in a French maid outfit. People do talk, you know. ;) If anyone might be able to develop an image of the dear lady in a image more, well, "Christian," I would like to see perhaps a vote for next month as to which, if any, image of the dear girl we might make our own unofficial mascot. Please post your images here.

By John Carter

Christianity in other wikis

As many of you might now, there are a large number of other Wikimedia Foundation projects, including WikiSource, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, WikiQuote, and others. I certainly believe that Wikibooks and Wikiquote might be among the more directly relevant sister projects. If any of you can think of any particular efforts in these other projects which you think would benefit from more input, please let us know here, so we can help spread the word around.

By John Carter

Spotlight on the Outreach department

Ichthus will spotlight a different subproject or workgroup of WikiProject Christianity. This edition will spotlight on our vital Outreach department. This comparatively small, but vital, project unit is dedicated to welcoming new editors to Wikipedia and the Christianity related content, and to providing information to the various project members, in forms like this newsletter.

The scope of articles with which this group deals is truly enormous, and, given the wide variety of material with which we deal, we would very much welcome the input of more individuals, particularly individuals who are particularly knowledgeable of the less well-known and less frequently monitored articles related to Christianity.

Speaking personally, I would be very, very gratified if we were to have this become a very, very large and active unit, with members from the broad spectrum of Christian beliefs, practices, and groups. The broader the spectrum and areas of expertise of members we have, the better we will be able to help manage the content. Please consider whether you believe you might be able to contribute in this vital area.

By John Carter

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
EdwardsBot (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Ichthus: June 2012

ICHTHUS

June 2012

Membership report

The parent Christianity WikiProject currently has 331 active members. We would like to welcome User:Sanju87, User:Psalm84, User:Zegron, User:Jargon777, User:Calu2000, User:Gilderien, User:Ronallenus, Thank you all for your interest in this effort. If any members, new or not, wish any assistance, they should feel free to leave a message at the Christianity noticeboard or with me or other individual editors to request it.

From the Editor

Ichthus is one of the ways that the WikiProject Christianity’s Outreach department helps update our members. We have recently added some new sections to the newsletter. Please let us know what you think of the new departments, and if there are any other suggestions for departments you would like to see. And if you have anything you would personally like to add, by all means let us know. The talk page of the current issue is probably the best place to post such comments.

With that, I wish you all happy reading!

P.S. Please click here to add the new Christianity noticeboard to your watchlist to follow the latest discussions relevant to WikiProject Christianity and subprojects.

Church of the month

by Berthold Werner Saint Catherine's Monastery, Mount Sinai

Vote for the project mascot

We had last month asked our members to help "bring into the fold" Wikipe-tan as the project's mascot. Voting will take place this month for which image we should adopt at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Outreach/Wikipe-tan. Please take a moment to review the images and vote for whichever is your favorite, or, if you so prefer, suggest an additional one.

By John Carter

DYK

• ...that Anna of Kashin, a Russian medieval princess, was twice canonized as a holy protectress of women who suffer the loss of relatives?

Calendar

Thie coming month includes days dedicated to the honor of Beheading of John the Baptist, Saints Peter and Paul, the Nativity of John the Baptist, and Saint Barnabas.

Featured content and GA report

Alec Douglas-Home recently achieved FA status. This picture, in the Church of the Month section, was recently promoted to Featured Picture status. Our thanks and congratulations to all those involved.

Wikimedia Foundation report

Wikisource currently has many old texts available, most of them in the public domain. This is a potentially very valuable source for several things, including for instance links to Biblical verses, because we know that it will, basically, be around as long as we are.

By user:John Carter with inspiration from History2007

Christian art

This section would include a rather large image of a specific work of art, with a link to the most directly relevant article.

Suggestion: Resurrection of Christ, an English 15th century Nottingham alabaster. Groups of painted relief panels were sold via dealers to churches on a budget , who had wood frameworks made to hold them locally. From a huge new donation of images from the Walters Art Museum to Commons, see

By Johnbod

Spotlight

A new WikiProject relating directly to Christian history is being developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian history. Also, a group specifically devoted to the Mennonites and other Anabaptists is now up and running at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Anabaptist work group. Anyone interested in assisting with the development of these groups and topics is more than welcome to do so.

By John Carter

I believe

... in the statements contained in the Nicene Creed. I believe that the Bible is one of the two defining bases for belief. The other is the Sacred tradition, which provides us with means of interpreting the Scriptures, as well as some teachings which have been handed on by God outside of the scriptures. I believe that the Magisterium has been empowered to fill this interpretative function. I believe that clerical celibacy is a rule that should generally be followed. I am a member of the Catholic Church.

By John Carter

Help requests

Please let us know if there are any particular areas, either individual articles or topics, which you believe would benefit from outside help from a variety of other editors. We will try to include such requests in future issues.

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
EdwardsBot (talk) 02:56, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Ichthus: July 2012

ICHTHUS

July 2012

Membership report
The parent Christianity WikiProject currently has 336 active members. We would like to welcome User:Emilymadcat, User:Toa Nidhiki05, User:DonutGuy, and User:RCNesland, Thank you all for your interest in this effort. If any members, new or not, wish any assistance, they should feel free to leave a message at the Christianity noticeboard or with me or other individual editors to request it.

From the Editor
Ichthus is one of the ways that the WikiProject Christianity’s Outreach department helps update our members. We have recently added some new sections to the newsletter. Please let us know what you think of the new departments, and if there are any other suggestions for departments you would like to see. And if you have anything you would personally like to add, by all means let us know. The talk page of the current issue is probably the best place to post such comments.

With that, I wish you all happy reading!

P.S. Please click here to add the new Christianity noticeboard to your watchlist to follow the latest discussions relevant to WikiProject Christianity and subprojects.

Church of the month

by User:JaGa Mission Santa Clara de Asis

Vote for the project mascot
We had last month asked our members to help "bring into the fold" Wikipe-tan as the project's mascot. Voting will take place this month for which image we should adopt at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Outreach/Wikipe-tan. Please take a moment to review the images and vote for whichever is your favorite, or, if you so prefer, suggest an additional one.

By John Carter

Calendar
Thie coming month (mid-July through mid-September) includes days dedicated to the honor of Mary Magdalene, James, son of Zebedee, Ignatius Loyola, Saint Dominic, Joseph of Arimathea, and the Transfiguration of Jesus.

Featured content and GA report
Grade I listed churches in Cheshire was recently promoted to Featured List status. This picture was recently promoted to Featured Picture status. Bartolome de las Casas and Edmund the Martyr were promoted to GA level this past month. Our thanks and congratulations to all those involved.

Wikimedia Foundation report

Wikibooks welcomes the development of textbooks of all kinds, children's books, recipes, and other material. It currently has just under 2500 books, including several Wikijunior books for the 12 and under population. There is, at present, not even a book on Christianity. Anyone interested in helping develop such a textbook is more than welcome to do so.

By John Carter

Christian art

The portrait of Sir Thomas More by Hans Holbein the Younger.

By John Carter

Spotlight
A new WikiProject relating directly to Christian history is being developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian history. Anyone interested in assisting with the development of these groups and topics is more than welcome to do so.

By John Carter

I believe
... in the tradition of Thomas the Apostle, Mar Addai, and Saint Bartholomew. I believe that Jesus had two essences (or natures), human and divine, unmingled, that are everlastingly united in one personality. I am a member of the Assyrian Church of the East.

By John Carter

---

Help requests
Please let us know if there are any particular areas, either individual articles or topics, which you believe would benefit from outside help from a variety of other editors. We will try to include such requests in future issues.

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
EdwardsBot (talk) 15:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - December 2012

ICHTHUS

December 2012

Membership report
The parent Christianity WikiProject currently has 350 active members. We would like to welcome our newest member, User:Harishrawat11. Thank you all for your interest in this effort. We would be able to achieve nothing here without the input of all of you. If any members, new or not, wish any assistance, they should feel free to leave a message at the Christianity noticeboard or with me or other individual editors to request it.

From the Editor
Ichthus is one of the ways that the WikiProject Christianity’s Outreach department helps update our members. This newsletter is one of the ways we do try to help people keep up with the project. We would always welcome any input for things to be included in it or additional editors to keep it going. Please let us know if there are changes you would like to see in the format, or if there are any particular things you would like to see included. And if you have anything you would personally like to add, by all means let us know. The talk page of the current issue is probably the best place to post such comments.

With that, I wish you all happy reading!

P.S. Please click here to add the new Christianity noticeboard to your watchlist to follow the latest discussions relevant to WikiProject Christianity and subprojects.

By John Carter

Church of the month

This image of The Baptistry of Saint John in Pisa by User:NotFromUtrecht

was recently promoted to Featured Image. Thank you and congratulations for the great image!

Contest of the month
As I imagine many of our editors will be editing at a greatly reduced level for the next few weeks, what with the Christmas and New Year's holidays coming, there is no specific content-related contest this month. The contest, if anything, is to make the most of the season, in whatever way, if any, you deem appropriate.

Calendar
This coming month (mid-December through mid-January) includes the Advent season, and one of the two greatest holidays of the Christian year, Christmas. Other major feasts in the next month include those of the Feast of the Epiphany, Baptism of the Lord, Saint Stephen, Thomas the Apostle, Holy Innocents, John the Evangelist, Gregory of Nazianzus, Basil the Great, Saint Genevieve, Elizabeth Ann Seton, and Saint Sava.

Featured content and GA report
Since the last report, Anne Hutchinson nominated by User:Sarnold17 was promoted to FA. Grade I listed churches in Lancashire by User:Peter I. Vardy was promoted to Featured List. The image in the Church of the Month and Christian art sections of this newsletter were promoted to Featured Picture status. Come to the Well by User:Toa Nidhiki05 and others, and Dwight Christmas by User:Gen. Quon and others were promoted to GA level. DYKs featured this past month include King's Chapel, Gibraltar, by User:Prioryman, Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (Albany, New York) by User:Daniel Case, Tingsted Church by User:Ipigott and User:Rosiestep, St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York) by User:Daniel Case, Stubbekøbing Church by User:Ipigott and User:Rosiestep, Notre Dame Cathedral (Phnom Penh) by User:Bloom6132, and St. James' Church, Cardington by User:Peter I. Vardy. Our profoundest thanks and congratulations to all those involved!

Christian art

The nave of the Parish Church of Urtijëi. This image was created by User:Moroderen. Thank you, Moroderen!

Spotlight

In the spirit of Christmas, the spotlight for the coming month might actually best be on those people closest to you. We know that a lot of our editors here are associated in some way or another with schools, and many if not most of them are going on rather extended breaks for the holidays. This can give some of us a chance to meet up with old friends, spend time with our families and those close to us, and, in a sense, "recharge" for the new year. So, for all of you who are in some way part of that group, we wish you the very best of holidays. We hope you all return to editing after the holidays with your spirits lifted and with your energies at peak level. There are some small matters in development here as well, and it is our hope that some of them will be ready come the next newsletter. But, until then, we wish you all the happiest and holiest (if appropriate) holidays.

---

Help requests
Please let us know if there are any particular areas, either individual articles or topics, which you believe would benefit from outside help from a variety of other editors. We will try to include such requests in future issues.

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
EdwardsBot (talk)

• EdwardsBot (talk) 02:33, 20 December 2012 (UTC)