Open main menu


Contents

Your WikiJSci nomination of Planet Nine

Hello, The Planet Nine article has been imported to v:WikiJournal_Preprints/Planet Nine. Whenever you're ready to proceed:

  1. Fill in the "article info" template at the top (often easiest in VisualEditor)
  2. When you're ready to submit it, just fill in the authorship declaration form

Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 02:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

I am stumped by these forms. It’s not clear which editors to list because there are so many. Also, some of the fields have no apparent meaning. I can’t see what information to put where. Jehochman Talk 13:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

AnI

Whatever happens, I appreciate that you looked at the lead up, fair and detached. Ceoil

Sure. I’ll go see what they’re up to now. Please be careful. It feels like a group of editors have assembled a hit list of editors they want to remove. I’ve been trying to thwart any efforts to subvert consensus and transparency as they appear.c I would like to address Mandruss. Sorry man I personalised. We are perennially at odds on modern art images, and too often talk past each other. The conversation to date has been all (us) or nothing (you), lets try and find middle ground, maybe via a third party. >Jehochman Talk 17:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I'm aware, and thanks. From the trenches it seems as if some people are using the atmosphere created by T&S to further local wars. My problem is that I swear a lot, so am an easy target. Gulp. Paul Ceoil
  • Jehocman, I have no opinion on the merits of your closure (although the templates used were unorthodox), but could you sign it?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
It’s signed at the bottom. The observer who wonders, “Who is the shmuck that closed this thread?” will have to scan it and find my complete remarks at the bottom. Jehochman Talk 19:01, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Aha, I see now that I should always be sure to sign. It was actually just an oversight, because I was on a small screen and my eyes are having some issues. I don't want anybody to accuse me of trying to do a sneaky close. That's a fair criticism. Jehochman Talk 00:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
re: It feels like a group of editors have assembled a hit list of editors they want to remove. - I doubt you're the only one to notice this. — Ched (talk) 00:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Yeah. It seems like some of these civility workgroups have spawned mailing lists where the conversation eventually devolves to, "Okay, who should we ban to solve this problem." It starts out with the best of intentions, and devolves to back channel plotting to subvert consensus and transparency. We have to make people recognize that this dynamic is not okay. Jehochman Talk 00:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
It's been a long time since EEML - something about history and repeating? I try to AGF, but "best of intentions" is beyond my grasp, and the devolves to back channel plotting and subvert[ion] may be difficult to stop, but is definitely frowned upon. As far as the dynamics - time will tell. — Ched (talk) 01:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
There were even instances before EEML. I recall having some sort of tangential role in exposing that one. Jehochman Talk 01:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hope you like cats. I can put a puppy, if you’d prefer. Thank you for demonstrating a level head.

User:Kafka Liz a girl is no one 20:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Oh my. Thank you. I do like both cats and dogs. Jehochman Talk 20:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Jehochman".