User talk:Spanneraol/Archive12

Michael Busch

I feel that the page Michael Busch should not have been moved to the minor league players list. It has plenty to good sources and more to come now that he is signed. This article has already passed inspection once and fits the criteria needed to be an independent page. If there is something needing to be added I would be happy to do it just please let me know. Thanks, UNC2 (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

If you would please discuss this with me I would appreciate it.UNC2 (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Busch is not notable enough on his own to have his own page. Standard practice is for players in the minors to be merged unless they have significant coverage, his is mostly standard press that most prospects receive. Spanneraol (talk) 01:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Moving players from the minor league players articles Response

Yeah they are. These players are top prospects and I make sure to provide the references to prove notability requirements.--MLBscoutDan (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't edit much so I am still trying to learn about categories to add and how to edit properly.--MLBscoutDan (talk) 22:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Top prospects dont automatically get their own articles. It needs more content and sourcing than what some of these guys have. Spanneraol (talk) 22:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I've been told in the past that top prospects don't get automatic articles. So I Know this. I've also been told by other people how much sourcing should be added. I will go based off what they have said.--MLBscoutDan (talk) 23:00, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Spanneraol. You have new messages at WilliamJE's talk page.
Message added 20:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Maybe you would like to chime in. It's whether minor league baseball categories or Notre Dame Fighting Irish Baseball players should be categorized 'Baseball players from Indiana' or whatever state the minor league players played in. A created category of yours, Salem Red Sox players, was recently changed. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Racine Belles players has been nominated for discussion

Category:Racine Belles players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Rojos del Águila de Veracruz team name in English

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Rojos del Águila de Veracruz#Team name. I believe that you have been involved in translation edits on the Rojos del Águila de Veracruz article. Previously, this article has lacked a consensus by edit on the English translation of the team name & has gone back & forth. There is now a discussion on the talk page for which I ask you to to concur or object. The current iteration seems reasonable to me. Please do not change the English translation of the name from this version until we have reached a consensus through discussion. Peaceray (talk) 23:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for fixing my typo's on Big Brother (U.S. TV series). I moved the information from a different part of the article and removed some information but didn't proofread it before saving. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

LA Dodgers

That they broke the former LA record with 102 and finished with a record 104 are distinct occurrences; I've restored the latter and fixed the former. ATS (talk) 04:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 Cincinnati Reds season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Castillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2017 Los Angeles Dodgers season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro Guerrero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

How ya doing over there?

Still breathing? You're not going into cardiac arrest, are you? Just checking. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

This game fricken sucks. I knew this wouldnt end well with McCarthy on the mound. Spanneraol (talk) 04:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

I liked him when he was a Yankee. Thought we should've resigned him. I guess that's why Cashman is in charge and I'm not. This game is intense. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

He was ok earlier in the season before he got hurt.. but he hasnt pitched in a month. Spanneraol (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Nothing like an extra inning game to test your depth. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

You'll get em on Friday. Maybe. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

I was actually expecting to lose this one with Verlander pitching.. but the way it happened stings.Spanneraol (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Understood. I knew we were going to lose Game 6 of the ALCS so it didn't sting. I thought we'd hit Charlie Morton, so that did. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

You've just gotta hang in for one more night! – Muboshgu (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Yep.. I feel better about our chances now. Spanneraol (talk) 03:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Oof. Sorry there. I just got home. 101 traffic. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Roberts left Darvish in the game way too long.. never should have let him pitch to Springer. Spanneraol (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Why do you prefer the NY Times link to the MLB one? Spanneraol (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

MLB season articles

Hello. I just wanted to let you know of a policy WP:BOLDTITLE. After going through some 2017/2018 MLB articles, I've noticed you are linking the very first sentence, which is bolded. Per the policy mentioned, we should avoid that. For future reference, please keep this in mind. Thanks, Corky ^{Buzz by the Hornet's Nest} 22:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

possessives take apostrophes

Greets, Spanner. You got me wondering after you removed the apostrophe I'd put into the world series entry: "Locally, each team's flagship radio station...."

You've suggested that the apostrophe isn't needed, but English punctuation is pretty clear that "team's" is correct: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_possessive#Nouns_and_noun_phrases>.

Why do you think the plural "teams" should follow the word "Each"?

Will-o-the-west (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

I don't even recall doing that.. i dont think i would have made just that one edit... Spanneraol (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jesús Castillo (baseball)

The article Jesús Castillo (baseball) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor league baseball player

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Happy Thanksgiving!

	I hope you like cranberry sauce
	If not, you can trade it in for two slices of pumpkin pie. I wanted to wish you a Happy Thanksgiving, and I'd like also to thank you for all the time and energy you spend on seemingly thankless maintenance tasks. Your work does not go unnoticed or unappreciated. Lepricavark (talk) 05:49, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jesús Castillo (baseball) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesús Castillo (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesús Castillo (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spanneraol. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

"tis the season...."

Hello Spanneraol: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ―Buster7 ☎ 19:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Timber Wolf Page

Why did you remove my edit to the Timber Wolf page? albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally Known as Al Gordon 17:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

It was vandalism.. you removed the info box, the categories, the references, the lead paragraph and much of the content of the article without explanation. Spanneraol (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

It wasn't "vandalism." it was an accident that I apologized for.

albabe - The Writer/Artist Formally Known as Al Gordon 18:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

I understand that now, but that's what i thought when i undid the edit. Spanneraol (talk) 18:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 11:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Dave Stewart

Spanneraol,

Is that info about the transvestite prostitute really relevant and appropriate? It seems more like something for the salacious gossip sites and tv shows rather than for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.115.203 (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC) I guess it is a bit jarring to have the entirety of his "personal life" be that he is married with kids and got caught with a prostitute (transvestite!) one night. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.14.77.143 (talk) 20:20, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

I would check with Wiki TOS regarding discrimination and inflammatory statements (attacking gender minorities). Including the fact that he was arrested for solicitation is questionable, but the mention of the prostitute’s gender only serves as aspersion, as innuendo regarding Stewart’s sexuality. I don't see any other reason inclusion of the prostitute's gender would be relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by New york art editor (talk • contribs) 17:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

It was a noteworthy incident that received media coverage so should be included as any other arrest would be. As to nothing else being listed in his personal life section, that certainly can be remedied by adding more stuff to that section. Spanneraol (talk) 19:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

89th Academy Awards Performers

All performers who are officially part of the ceremony are to be listed under the Perfomers table, regardless of the intent of the performance. Just because Jimmy Kimmel was host doesn't mean that hosts don't also do performances during Oscar ceremonies. Billy Crystal always performed the opening number every time he hosted, and those performances always got Crystal listed in the Performers table in the articles about his Oscar ceremonies. Even Seth MacFarlane is listed as a performer in the article about the 85th Academy Awards, for the songs that he sang when he hosted, despite the fact that those performances were done just for laughs. Greggens (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Thats not proper because they arent real performances.. Especially this one... It was a one off gag not a whole performance... listing it separately by itself is just idiotic and defies the purpose of that section. It's separate than MacFarlane who performed a whole song and dance number. Spanneraol (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dennis Mannion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Mannion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Mannion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ralston Cash

The article Ralston Cash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:49, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Edits to Juan Pierre entry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pierre)

I placed a comment to you on my Talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkughen (talk • contribs) 03:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Minnesota Twins 1965 season page edit block

Hello and good day. I have made additions to this page but won't let me add Dick Stigman in the "other pitchers" section. It says it is not constructive, but other team pages have all position players and pitchers in those charts but won't let me enter him. Maybe you can help me on this. His stats are on the Baseball Reference team page. Thank you and have a good weekend.2601:581:8000:21B0:304C:CD3D:3958:6A95 (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Glasnow

Need a source before changing teams. Enigma^msg 20:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

I was in the process of adding that when you reverted. Spanneraol (talk) 20:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

What makes a box office bomb and was The Wizard of Oz one?

Box office bomb defines poor performance during its theatrical run. Whether it becomes successful later isn’t part of that definition. To put it in another way, what defines a box office bomb is low performance and unprofitable during it’s theatrical run. Smaller or independent films don’t expect to be big box office hits, so making any profit would be a good they - and they won’t be considered a bomb. High expectations are usually at the heart of being considered a bomb. It used to be you could almost tell when a film wasn’t expected to do well, when advertising was high. As for The Wizard of Oz, it didn't turn a profit until a re-release in 1949. The shooting and promotional budget at the time was MGM’s highest ever, nearly 3 million dollars, a pittance when compared to today’s costs. But remember in 1939, the average ticket price was less than .25¢. Ten years later it was less than .40¢. Today’s movie ticket costs 20X what it did in 1939, and the cost of making making them, even greater. In 1939, the only other diversion to going to the movies, was reading or listening to the radio. Only New York had live performances (theater, bars and night clubs, sports) as other form of competitive entertainment dollars. We were still in the midst of emerging from the decade old Depression. So that I think it’s fairly clear that it initially bombed, so that’s a reasonable definition. It was ahead of its time, and it didn’t actually make money until a decade after its release.

Is a film not considered a huge flop if it doesn't make money during its domestic theatrical release? Well sort of. Probably one of the greatest exceptions to this question is Disney's Fantasia. It was a financial disaster (generally speaking, It WAS considered a huge flop since it didn’t make money during its domestic release.) when released. It did not recover its production costs even though critically acclaimed. Yet over time it became, as of 2012, the 22nd highest grossing film. BornonJune8 (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Just failing to make money does not make one a "bomb".. it would have to lose a LOT of money for that to be the case.. and your lists were ridiculous.. you included small films and movies that were fairly successful. And no DOMESTIC theatrical is not the thing anymore.. worldwide box office is far more important. Spanneraol (talk) 02:20, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Is a movie's worldwide gross important now, to some degree yes (especially in China), but it varies from film to film. However, the movie quality and popularity is a lot connected now with success in US/Canada box office. Hollywood studios can’t afford to bring so much as a dollar of foreign box office back to the United States thanks to tax laws. For studios, successful tentpoles are the movies that cover production expenses in “domestic” box office. Studios invest enormous money into the “tentpoles” - inflated-budget productions, that are expected to pull the enormous cash at the box office. If they are able to recover the production and marketing cost (which can go from $150 to $300 million) from the domestic gross alone, it ensures huge profits and happy investors, who would likely finance further projects. This is usually preferred to the “overseas” returns, as they are largely unpredictable, often delayed and generally carry a smaller gross percentage reaching the final destination. BornonJune8 (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

That's simply not true anymore. Many movies have done really well overseas and not so much domestically and earned sequels as a result. I know the business, don't presume to lecture me. Spanneraol (talk) 01:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

How exactly is it not true anymore!? Give me some clear-cut examples of movies that have done really well overseas but not so much domestically and have therefore, earned sequels as a result! BornonJune8 (talk) 04:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't have time to really research it right now, but one example off the top of my head is Pacific Rim which did so-so business domestically but was a huge hit overseas and wound up with a sequel. Spanneraol (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Hey man I need your help

How do I figure out the number of people who went to a certain baseball game?PhoenixRancor (talk) 7:14, September 1 2018 (UTC)

The attendance figures for major league games are included in the box scores. Spanneraol (talk) 13:47, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

2018 National League West tie-breaker game

If you don't mind my asking, why were the edits to 2018 National League West tie-breaker game reverted without comment? Surely MLB's branding for the game, reflecting its importance as such that they thought it needed a logo, is more illuminating than a four year old, unrelated picture of the stadium in which it took place? The stadium itself is linked a couple lines down in the Infobox. Thanks! SixFourThree (talk) 19:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)SixFourThree

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 National League Division Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Digital Pictures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3DO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Spanneraol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Marvel Comics publications (A–M), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin Richards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Peace Dove Christmas

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

Happy Holidays. ―Buster7 ☎ 00:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for 2018 National League Central tie-breaker game

On 23 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 National League Central tie-breaker game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one-game playoffs for the National League West and National League Central in 2018 marked the first time that Major League Baseball had two tie-breaker games in the same season? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2018 National League Central tie-breaker game), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for 2018 National League West tie-breaker game

On 23 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 National League West tie-breaker game, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one-game playoffs for the National League West and National League Central in 2018 marked the first time that Major League Baseball had two tie-breaker games in the same season? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2018 National League West tie-breaker game), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

17th Visual Effects Society Awards

Thank you for your assistance in building the article. Rusted AutoParts 17:59, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SonomaStompers.png

Thank you for uploading File:SonomaStompers.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Olmecas de Tabasco.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Olmecas de Tabasco.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pacific Association Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pacific Association Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabe Suárez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabe Suárez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabe Suárez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Merklinger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Merklinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Merklinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lepricavark (talk) 05:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jana and Gavin Grazer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana and Gavin Grazer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana and Gavin Grazer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Edward Paredes

Thanks for that correction on the source, my bad on that. Interesting how they still haven't officially assigned him to a team though. Bmg916 (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Probably working on things in extended spring for now. Spanneraol (talk) 20:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Drey Jameson

Saw you were apart of the discussion of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brennan Malone and was wondering if you could look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drey Jameson. I've redirected it since I posted on there since he signed. Thanks! Malmmf (talk) 11:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony Hernandez (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony Hernandez (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Adam9007 (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Kyle Garlick

On 28 June 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kyle Garlick, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kyle Garlick set the single-season home run record for the Cal Poly Pomona Broncos? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kyle Garlick. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kyle Garlick), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't appreciate your tone

Please in future stop acting very narcissistic your not special, if you actually read the sources I linked and tried understanding the point I was trying to make this wouldnt have escalated, anyway your not in any position to say who gets a block and who doesn't you were engaging in the exact same behavior with me. Hhggtg3279 (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

"Will Swanner" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Will Swanner. Since you had some involvement with the Will Swanner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Peter James (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Titans edit

I wanted to ask, off-articlespace, where you obtained your edit summary sourcing. I am having a few issues with presenting a plot summary for an episode which has not been broadcast yet. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

That episode has been broadcast. It is available right now on the DC Universe app. Spanneraol (talk) 17:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Okay, but how does the average editor verify that your episode summary is accurate? The reason why plot summaries don't have to be cited is that they are molded by editorial view of the primary source. If that source is only available to a select few, it becomes more difficult for collaborative editing to take place, right? Why are we in a hurry? If the content is notable enough for inclusion, will it not be notable after general airdate? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Is there some other airdate you are referring to? The show is DC Universe exclusive so this is the airdate. Spanneraol (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Since you have verified that the source of your summary is from viewing the primary source, I don't need to ask anything further. Thanks. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 National League Division Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Eaton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kristopher Negrón, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Titans (2018 TV series)

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. -- /Alex/₂₁ 14:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:GeorgeBell.jpg

The file File:GeorgeBell.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

"Fayetteville Highlanders" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fayetteville Highlanders. Since you had some involvement with the Fayetteville Highlanders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Crisis on Infinite Earths (Arrowverse), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

I know how to use the preview button, thanks.. which edits are you concerned with? Spanneraol (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

The 15 edits in a row yesterday (22 if you include the others interspersed by only two editors), and the 12 today (again, interspersed). -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Kept finding new things to fix and didn't want to get to get messed up by someone else doing an edit in the meantime causing a conflict. Spanneraol (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hence my above post. Constant edits cause more conflicts on the other editor's end as well. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

No.. if you take awhile to make an edit then someone else can post in the meantime and you lose all the work you have done. Spanneraol (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Exactly what I'm talking about. If someone makes an article-wide edit, then someone else (above post) who makes a massive number of quick-fire edits makes the first editor lose all the work they have done. -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)