User talk:Nousernamesleft/archive5
Archives |
---|
Archive 1 (December 2006 - January 2008) |
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nousernamesleft/archive5. |
AIME
editOh, wow. Good luck, I hope you get into the USAMO! Midorihana~いいですね? はい! 10:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
April GA Newsletter
editThe April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 04:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cabal
editCan you email me a copy of all the deleted cabal pages? I won't restore it, it is just for another wiki. For proof, heres my userpage. Nothing444Go Irish! 21:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Admin Coaching
editThe reason why I asked User:Jj137 to coach me was because I know him/her very well and I trust him/her. I really don't know you much yet. But I would kindly take your offer. Please take a look at this page. Thanks!--RyRy5 Got something to say? 01:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I think I know someone that I trust more. Not that I don't trust you, I just know the other admin better. I will see if I would still want you to be my coach. But you can just be an unofficial coach for now. Is that Ok with you?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 02:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. Also, I think you remember but, for Q3. Should I talk about my deletion of my adoption program?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 02:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. Oh, may I suggest you creating a status telling wheather your online or offline (please startr a new section on my talk page). Questions?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 02:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. Also, I think you remember but, for Q3. Should I talk about my deletion of my adoption program?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 02:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
GA Review of group (mathematics)
editHi, thanks for your reviewing the above article. I feel, that the issues you raised have been addressed. Can you please have a look at the talk page there and tell what you think. If you have the time, please do take it to criticize stuff more concretely if this is possible (e.g. the redundancy statement). I may renominate the article, if you do not object. I was a bit surprised that you closed the GA review immediately after your assessment (which includes, as you write, only points suggested by a automated process and hence do not always cover the actual state of the article). Thanks again, Jakob.scholbach (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hello, it's me again. I have now addressed the issues you raised (including footnotes and redundancy) and hope you consider them solved. I also worked a bit on the global shape, hopefully an improvement as well. Do I have to renominate the article for GA? Or do you just have another look? Merci again for your review. Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:34, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Look, I voted for delete, but what on earth are you doing closing an open AFD discussion after 24 hours and deleting the article? AFD discussions run for five days for very good reasons. As an admin, you should be cognizant of the deletion policy - clearly you are not. And don't give me WP:SNOW - the discussion wasn't obvious or unanimous. Nor quote WP:BLP at me, as the article contained no BLP violations. By short circuiting the deletion policy, you think you may be simply speeding things up, but any complaint to DRV will see the article restored post-haste because you closed the discussion way too early. Please stick to the five day rule in future. Neıl ☎ 17:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- I gave you the link - Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_discussion - "The discussion lasts at least five days". It's also mentioned in Wikipedia:Guide_to_deletion#Overview ("a period usually no less than five days") and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion (second sentence). Neıl ☎ 11:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nousernamesleft,
Thanks for contributing to the Wikipedia Signpost tutorial series, and thanks for offering to write additional articles. However, we have run out of tutorials to use in the Signpost! If you have time, it would be great if you could make a start with some of the topics that you have claimed, but not yet finished. Thanks! enochlau (talk) 23:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
2nd Admin Coach Decided
editYes I am accepting you to be my official admin coach. I replied to your message on the coaching page thing (I hope you are watchlisting that page).--RyRy5 Got something to say? 01:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Can I have an example of a non-biography baseball artcle? BTW, I have written 4 biography articles (baseball related) and 1 non-biography article (non-baseball related).--RyRy5 Got something to say? 01:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Short featured article
editHi I noticed your comment on Giggy's blog. In case you don't notice there, the shortest featured article that I know of is Indian Standard Time. There may be others though. Majorly (talk) 22:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Gimme a yell when you put Donegal fiddle tradition up for PR/FAC. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 23:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Questions
editI was just reverting vandals until I caught you on RC. I will post questions on my Admin Coaching page and would like you and JJ to answer them . It will be added shortly.--RyRy5 Talk to RyRy 02:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Admin Coaching Questions
editI have posted a qusetion at my Admin Coaching page. Feel free to review my answer. I would also like you to answer it yourself. You may also post questions for me anytime as a practice RFA. Also, do you think I should create a page (Example:User:RyRy5/Admin Coaching/Questions) for only answering and reviewing questions? Thanks.--RyRy5 Talk to RyRy 03:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'll answer your questions. But what do you think of a page like the following to add all your questions and comments about my answers. Something like this::User:RyRy5/Admin Coaching/Questions. Also, what do you think of my answer to the diff between a ban and a block?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 20:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Question4 answered. Please review.--RyRy5 Got something to say? 20:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- I redesigned the Admin Coaching page. Take a look and please comment them on my talk. Also, Animum did write those questions.--RyRy5 Got something to say? 23:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh. Anyway, I answered another question. Feel free to review. I'll be working on the AFD and the mainspace for most this day. I am trying to reach my 1000 mainspace edit. I only have about 930+.--RyRy5 Got something to say? 23:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- I redesigned the Admin Coaching page. Take a look and please comment them on my talk. Also, Animum did write those questions.--RyRy5 Got something to say? 23:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Question4 answered. Please review.--RyRy5 Got something to say? 20:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
RFA thanks
editThanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence § t/e 17:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
editSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:11, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
RFA Thanks
editThank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Sharkface217 19:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Reply
editI am going to improve articles. But I do have to revert on occasions. I think I will try to improve that article and other baseball articles. Any comments or suggestions?--RyRy5 Got something to say? 20:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
FA Review
editI responded in the FA review. I believe that the article is acceptable now, but in terms of interests and background, a minor expansion of his work is needed. Ottava Rima (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Opinion?
editI have decided to mainly work on creating articles for the Red Sox WikiProjecct for the next week. The articles I plan to create are listed here. Opinions wanted. Thanks.--Ryan (talk) 00:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
editSorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Re:Adoption
editI see your point. I guess I should mentor him. I think I have learned enough about wikipedia (from other comments and because I have been reading wikipedia policies almost non-stop the past 3 days). Also, I'm sure your a good editor who can watch over my mentoring. Any comments?--RyRy5 (talk) 03:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Adoption
editYou seem lika a great user. I would like to be adopted by you. Do you take on adoptees? Nothing444 12:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2006itest.jpg}
editThank you for uploading Image:2006itest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I added a notice near the bottom (2 actually). Care to join?--RyRy5 (talk) 19:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the FA-Team
editThank you for signing up to the FA-Team spirit. As you know we've been working hard to help others create several featured articles on latin-american literature. Your advice on how we can maximise our enthusiasm to create great articles for the benefit of wikipedia would be much appreciated. I'm sure you are watchlisting the FA-Team page: please watchlist any missions and contribute to any discussions which interest you. Geometry guy 20:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I have been expanding articles pretty much the entire week. May I have your suggestions/opinions on Justin Masterson, the article I expanded most?--RyRy5 (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm actually going to nominate the article when Masterson makes it to the majors, or if the article is very well written and meets the criteria, I may nom it at his Triple-A stage which should be around semptember.--RyRy5 (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thank spam
editSignpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editHello Nousernamesleft. Would you mind being my admin coach? My subpage is at User:editorofthewiki/Adminship. Editorofthewiki 01:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Do you think it is ready for WP:GA?--RyRy5 (talk) 02:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well I'll work on it.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ wikify) 22:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Coaching
editWhat's left in my admin coaching? ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 22:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, no problem. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 22:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- There's a GA going for Battle of Marion. Take a look at it. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 02:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- What else do you want me to do right now? ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 20:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Cimas
editHave you been keeping up with the information involving User talk:Cimas? Take a look at User:Redmarkviolinist/Stress to see how I handled this issue. It has a post from Administrator's noticeboard, my talk page, and Cimas's talk page. Tell me how I handled it and what I could've done better. Thanks, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 01:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the constructive criticism. Although you have to understand that I was getting a little frustrated with all the prejudice about age. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 02:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. (Again). Also, take a look at a few of these. User:Pumagirl7-doesn't edit too much, User:Princess Janay. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 02:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Gathra
editHello! :) In March, Gathra was nominated for deletion. At the time, there was no suitable page for this article to be redirected to, so based on the consensus, you deleted the article. I have created a new page, List of Dungeons & Dragons 3.0 edition monsters, which which would be a proper destination to merge and/or redirect the article to. I'm wondering if it's possible to restore the original article, and turn it into a redirect, thus preserving the edit history? BOZ (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
editThe April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I believe I have implemented your fixes. Thanks for taking the time to review! Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 18:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mathlinks logo.gif)
editThanks for uploading Image:Mathlinks logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Portal dev request
editNousernamesleft: I noticed that you developed the Portal:Nebraska, in a spectacular fashion. I'm wondering if you might be able/interested in putting together the same for Portal:Omaha? You can get an idea of the amount of content possible at the category list on the project page. Thanks for considering it. • Freechild'sup? 23:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Good news. I'll look forward to seeing it come online - don't hesitate to let me know if there's any info or w/e you may need. • Freechild'sup? 21:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
You asked for it!
edithttp://giggyisms.blogspot.com/2008/05/not-another-fac.html :D dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 02:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Emile Lemoine
editHi. Checking one of your references (Number 12: Chidume, Charles E. (2001). "Equilibrium Points For a System Involving M-Accretive Operators". Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 44 (1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) I cannot find any reference to Emile Lemoine, symmedians or triangle geometry. Could you please explicitly quote the article (that I have in front of my eyes)? Thanks. Randomblue (talk) 20:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
So you're telling me you cited a reference without actually reading it? For what other references have you done this? Talking about this specific one, I have access to all the articles from the web, but all the articles seem to be very technical. Please select a few from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=PEM&volumeId=44&issueId=01 and I'll check them out (I've checked the first two). Randomblue (talk) 22:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Also, why is the Francœur prize a "Notable award"? Randomblue (talk) 22:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, then please remove the reference. Talking about references, I have access to most databases since I'm a student at Cambridge University (if you need an article I"ll be happy to help you out). As for the Francoeur prize, when I google search it ""Francœur prize"" I get less than a hundred results... I'll check the Bulletin of the AMS tomorrow. However, I still feel that "notable" is POV, maybe remove that as well.
" Bulletins of the AMS; i.e. volume 5 number 8, volume 13, number 6" what articles specifically? Randomblue (talk) 23:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
From what database did you find "Lemoine, Émile. La géométrographie ou l'art des constructions géométriques. (1903), Scientia, Paris (in French)"? Or did you even get it from a database? Cheers. Randomblue (talk) 00:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I created the article which is a DYK and I was wondering what infobox I should use. Also, is it ready for GA anytime soon in your opinion? -- RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 23:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any ideas on an infobox that can be added? -- RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 00:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
All seems addressed, thanks for taking a look. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 01:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 01:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your recent WP:FL. In case you do not know, we are running an experiment to choose the List of the Month and Lists of the Day for June. Feel free to nominate your list at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/Nominees/200807 for consideration next month to be the July LOTM or a LOTD. If you would like to support this experiment the most important thing you can do is come by and vote at User:TonyTheTiger/List of the Day/voting/200806. My talk page is always open.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Just to say hai
editTinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 11:01, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Lemoine
editHi nousernameleft,
I'm searching through my university library and they don't seem to have "Sur la mesure de la simplicité dans les constructions géométriques (1888)". However, they have "Sur la mesure de la simplicité dans les tracés géométriques (1889)". From what source did you compile the list of notable works? Also, Lemoine seems to have done quite a bit of work on probability as papers such as "Sur une question de probabilité (1884)", "Quelques questions de probabilités résolues géométriquement" and "Questions de probabilités et valeurs relatives des pièces du jeu des échecs" seem to suggest. The article makes no reference of this whatsoever. Finally, where can I find the paper where Lemoine postulated his conjecture concerning primes ("Goldbach, Lemoine, and a Know/Don't Know Problem" (September 1984). Mathematics Magazine 48: 195–203. Mathematical Association of America.)? Did you get it off the internet or a library? Thanks. Randomblue (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Left a message on the Emile Lemoine talk page after today's excursion to the "rare books" department of the Cambridge University library.
Rfb participation thanks
editHello, Remainder(Usernames) = 0.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support, and I hope that if I do decide to run again in the future, I still will not have gotten any worse :) -- Avi (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
FAC revisit
editPlease revisit Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Diorama (album) and correct your declaration to conform with the instructions at WP:FAC (declaration bolded first, followed by commentary and sig). While I've seen your declaration on my first read-through of the FAC, because you've buried it at the end of a statement, I can't guarantee I will notice it on subsequent read-throughs. Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
WBOSITG's RfA
edit- I know, I've heard most of them =P It'll make this place more interesting! Thanks again for the congrats, weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 03:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanks!
editRfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 05:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Re:Some notes
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Lemoine
editThanks for the effort in addressing my comments. Sorry about the fact tags, I though you'd handle the problem faster. There are still issues:
- "create a standard and methodological system" methodological yes, but why standard? This seems to be OR.
- "in his description" what are you referring to exactly (I mean, in the sentence)?
- In his description of the system I mean. I could remove the phrase to make it less opaquely. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- "[his] abstract relation of equations to tetrahedrons and triangles" Isn't the relation of an equation to the object it is referring to always abstract?
- "During this period, he published an article in the local journal" Why is the journal a "local journal"? This seems to be OR.
- That was a mistake on my part, sorry. It mentioned a city in the same sentence - "It was while yet a boy in his teens at La Fleche, that, in 1858, he published a short note in the Nouvellee Annales de Mathematiques" - and I misread. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- "Lemoine was a founding member of the Association Française pour l'Avancement des Sciences" could you give the specific page for this fact?
- "such as the Société Mathématique de France, the Journal de Physique, and the Société de Physique, all in 1871" Ok for the société but what about Journal de physique and société de physique? Could you give page references (for the precice date)?
There may be more to come. Randomblue (talk) 19:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- For both of the last two, page 30 of the Smith ref #1. I may be misinterpreting the sentences, but it seems to imply that it all happened in 1871. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 01:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thought I'd drop by and ask for you to look over Gilberto Gil (which just failed its recent FAC) for MOS problems or other issues, as I saw you at WP:FAT and have also seen your great FAC comments. --Kakofonous (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Admin Coaching
editHi,
Im highly interested in admin coaching, as i would like to become an admin in the near future and also to learn about an admins roles, dutys and ethics. Following instuctions on the coaching page it was suggested that I contact an admin who hasnt got any coachees instead of waiting for things to be done for me. I was wondering if you had the time to admin coach me, I look foward to your reply, Cheers Prom3th3an (talk) 08:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! I've tried too remove all the 'also' and 'some' terms throughout, cut down on the caption wordiness by a phrase or two, and added the 'but'. About the plot citations, I only added them to the places I thought might be more contentious plot points- some fans list "the Art", for example, as "the Art of Writing" and tried to change it earlier; also, there's some contention about whether he truly left the player with no way off the Age. Normally, I don't put citations in the plot at all, I just thought it would be better to do so in certain areas. Once again, thanks for your comments. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
The FA-Team
editHi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 18:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)