Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Falan Andrea 2 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Falan Andrea. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution.  Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC) Please consider placing the template:Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Falan Andrea

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Falan Andrea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no content in the page and an wikipedia article already exists for the same topic

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nirdis (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Hello, Nirdis, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


July 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Sri Lankan musicians have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 18:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nirdis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 21:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 15:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CodeLyoko was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still fails WP:MUSICBIO, seeing its been declined 4 times without much improvement, I am rejecting the article
CodeLyokotalk 17:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea (July 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qwerfjkl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Qwerfjkltalk 21:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit
 

Hello Nirdis. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Falan Andrea, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nirdis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nirdis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 20:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not compensated for my edits. I'm just a big fan of Falan Andrea. Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 15:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please don't go removing maintenance tags from the page, as you have done for the fourth time on this article. You have not made any edits to address the issues with your last removcal. Doing so is disruptive as the sources included don't lead her to meet the general notability guideline. I'll leave it for someone else to add back the notability tag, but if they add it I warn you not to remove it without making substantial improvements. Doing so again may be seen as disruptive. I have added a maintenance tag to address the issue of the article being written from a fan's point of view. For example, "Falan faced it really well, not getting her music career or decency affected by it" is not from a neutral point of view. This, with many other sentences, need improvement to be encyclopedic. If you do remove this tag, then it will disadvantage the article as this places it in cleanup categories designed to allow other editors to improve on your work to make the article more encyclopedic. Removal of the tag may also be seen as disruptive, as in it's current state the article needs improvement. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I get it. Thank you very much.

Nirdis (talk) 13:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you please help me to write this article in a neutral point of view? I changed the sentence you mentioned. I can not find another issue. If you can, please help. Thank you. Nirdis (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Examples:
  • Just after the win, there was an immense backlash on social medias questioning Falan's win and making false accusations of her, from the angry fans of the first runner-up of the competition. should really be something like After she won the competition she received criticism for how she sang, what she wore and for in the opinion of the critics not being talented enough to be crowned the winner. However, this sentence needs further sourcing as the source that was included was an interview. Ideally something which isn't an interview needs to be included to source this sentence.
  • She is the winner of ninth season of popular Sri Lankan reality show Derana Dream Star should really be something like She won the ninth season of the Sir Lankan reality show Derana Dream Star. The important change is the removal of "popular" as the source does not say that this particular show is popular.
I've gone around the article to mark places for improvement or made the changes needed. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for your help. Nirdis (talk) 18:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

I want to know can we add youtube videos as references? Nirdis (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Depends. If it's reliable it should be okay. That means something like a news organisation YouTube video, however, textual references are generally used over video. Also I've added back the fan point of view as the win sentence isn't from a neutral point of view. Things like "immense backlash" isn't from a neutral point of view. I suggest that you leave removing the maintenance tags to other editors. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:59, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. I made the changes to article to be in neutral point of view. Can you please consider removing the maintenance tag? Thank you very much again. Nirdis (talk) 12:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you please remove the maintenance tag? Thank you Nirdis (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

The major fan point of view issues have been addressed, but as several statements are unsourced I've replaced it with the {{BLP more sources}} tag as biographies of living persons, because they cover a living person, need to have reliable sources supporting information in the article. For example, Her first original song is a collaboration with Pop Punk, named "Me Dase Mage Wedana" which was released in May, 2020. is unsourced so needs a source. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 14:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay. Thank you very much. I'll try to find mire reliable sources. Nirdis (talk) 08:02, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Falan Andrea moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Falan Andrea, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition it appears you have a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI concern,please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move the article into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 TT me 15:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea 2 (December 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Portal:Sri Lanka, you may be blocked from editing. --Chanaka L (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

So sorry. That kind of actions will never happen again. That was a mistake. Nirdis (talk) 09:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Falan Andrea 4. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

So sorry. That kind of actions will never happen again. Nirdis (talk) 09:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

So sorry. That kind of actions will never happen. Nirdis (talk) 10:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Falan Andrea Jansen moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Falan Andrea Jansen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, you appear to have a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI concern, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Do not move the article into mainspace yourself.Onel5969 TT me 11:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Due to your COI/UPE, do not move the article back into mainspace yourself. You must go through the AfC process. If you continue your disruptive editing, it could lead to you getting blocked. Onel5969 TT me 11:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you want to move articles like this to draft space, there are articles which have like one reliable reference. I found some articles that you have contributed only have one reference. Why you don't move them to draft space? Nirdis (talk) 12:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

This article has no UPE/COI matter. All of the sentences are in neutral point of view. If there is can you just show me where they are and you can see this is not a very little article. I spend my time on it. It's not fair that you move articles like this. Nirdis (talk) 12:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted your move. Moving to mainspace again would be considered move warring which may lead to you being blocked. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

What's all of your issue with this article? There are articles which have very little references. Nirdis (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

That Onel5969 should be clearly reported. Nirdis (talk) 13:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dreamy Jazz and Onel5969 per WP:DRAFTOBJECT I think if and when Nirdis moves it back again, it will likely need to be resolved at AfD. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe Nirdis is entitled to an AfD. I'd struggle to see it passing AfD since the current version is no better than the repeatedly declined and, eventually, rejected draft anyway. The sources are poor. I agree that WP:UPE is at play here as well. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Spiderone - from prior experience, the one exception to DRAFTOBJECT is if you are dealing with UPE. This particular editor clearly has a UPE conflict, far beyond that of a "diehard fan". UPE should always go through AfC. Onel5969 TT me 13:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Fair, I didn't know that existed, but I think a AfC review would probably help as there have been multiple AfC declines by many editors so far. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh I'm not paid. I'm just a diehard fan of Falan Andrea. But I believe my article is in very very neutral point of view. Nirdis (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

UPE. Is it okay to use smiley faces?? 🤣🤣🤣 Nirdis (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

You people choose one well written article to fight with. There are hundreds of them very poorly written and with like one reference. I think you people are not suitable as administrators. Nirdis (talk) 13:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please wait for an AfC reviewer to judge the article. If it's good, it'll be accepted. If there are issues with it, these will be pointed out. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

This Onel5969 person couldn't point out one sentence that supports his COI/UPE concern, but just keeps talking about it. I think they have been paid for removing this article. Others should look into that matter. Nirdis (talk) 14:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dreamy Jazz please note that this has been moved back to mainspace again - now at Falan Andrea Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falan Andrea Jansen (December 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nirdis. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 15:54, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Falan Andrea Jansen. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 05:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Falan Andrea 1

edit

  Hello, Nirdis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Falan Andrea 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Falan Andrea

edit

  Hello, Nirdis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Falan Andrea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply