Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 NRFL Premier (September 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kezyfooty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 NRFL Premier (October 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As this article was deleted three months ago, I don't see anything that has happened since that time which would make this draft notable for Wikipedia.
CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Northern Rovers for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northern Rovers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Rovers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NZFC(talk)(cont) 17:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2021 Northern League (New Zealand) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 Northern League (New Zealand) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Northern League (New Zealand) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NZFC(talk)(cont) 04:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2021 New Zealand National League Championship for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2021 New Zealand National League Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 New Zealand National League Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

NZFC(talk)(cont) 04:41, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern League (New Zealand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Suburbs. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

WaiBOP Premiership moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, WaiBOP Premiership, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 04:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 16 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Chelsea F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystal Palace.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-scoring Premier League games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reece James.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:WaiBOP Premiership edit

  Hello, Kezyfooty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:WaiBOP Premiership, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Alex Greive article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 10:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I got it from transfermarkt which is from the match reports posted by New Zealand football. Not sure if that qualifies as being "reliable" so all good if not. Cheers Kezyfooty (talk) 23:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:2020 NRFL Premier edit

  Hello, Kezyfooty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 NRFL Premier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Distance Derby (March 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wellington Phoenix Reserves and Championship phase edit

Hey Kezyfooty, just got a question if you have a source for the comment "Wellington Phoenix Reserves gain automatic entry into the National League Championship phase due to the A-League Men requirements." in the 2022 New Zealand National League article. All I know at this stage is that the team replaced Lower Hutt, I hadn't seen or heard anything about them still being a confirmed spot for the Championship phase?— NZFC(talk)(cont) 05:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Funny enough after asking you the above, I see on NZF website they have announced the qualifying spots and confirmed Wellington Phoenix have automatic entry still. Have updated the article to reflect this now as Central actually gets 3 plus the Nix and Southern only gets 2.— NZFC(talk)(cont) 07:08, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
NZFC I was going off the regulations article they posted at the start of last season stating that "The Wellington Phoenix FC will be granted an automatic spot in the championship phase to support the youth development of the professional club and fulfil their A-League licence obligations." but I am glad to see they have now confirmed it for this season. Kezyfooty (talk) 08:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 27 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mainland Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashburton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Re:2022 Chatham Cup edit

Hi Kezyfooty - I'm a little confused as to this, given that West Hamilton are noted in the same article as still having to play their Preliminary Round match against Whakatane Town. If Whakatane win, surely West Hamilton won't be hosting anyone! Grutness...wha? 12:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Grutness:, I'm not 100% sure on it either. When NZF did the draw they pulled out West Hamilton and not alongside Whakatane. The Round 1 match also has a KO time and location (West Hamilton's ground). It looks like West Hamilton vs Whakatane should be put as a w/o, but I'm still unsure of what is happening. Cheers - Kezyfooty (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: WaiBOP Premiership (June 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScottishFinnishRadish was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Hi Kezyfooty! Thank you for your edits to 2022 OFC Women's Nations Cup squads. It looks like you've copied or moved text from one or more pages into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 13:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for fixing my mistake edit

So bit of an own goal by me on those number of matches played in each regional competition of the National League. Thanks for catching my mistake and fixing it for me.— NZFC(talk)(cont) 05:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@NZFC No worries mate :)
Kezyfooty (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of U-12 Softball World Cup edit

 

The article U-12 Softball World Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence found that this was a notable event, ad the sources in the article are from the organising body and thus not independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WBSC Europe.svg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:WBSC Europe.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022 New Zealand Central League edit

 Template:2022 New Zealand Central League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022 New Zealand National League edit

 Template:2022 New Zealand National League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022 New Zealand Northern League edit

 Template:2022 New Zealand Northern League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022 New Zealand Southern League edit

 Template:2022 New Zealand Southern League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Zealand women's national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States women's national football team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 22 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Region Football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albany.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Bay Olympic logo.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Bay Olympic logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 23 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NRFL Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandringham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:New Zealand national football team results (unofficial matches) edit

  Hello, Kezyfooty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Zealand national football team results (unofficial matches), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:WaiBOP League One edit

  Hello, Kezyfooty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:WaiBOP League One, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Infobox stats edit

Please ensure that when you update the stats you also update the time and the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. GiantSnowman 07:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay edit

 
Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 30 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NRFL Women's Premiership, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 14 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Atlantic Cup (football), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pablo Ruiz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Auckland City FC season (March 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

2024 New Zealand National League edit

Hi Kezyfooty, new to the wiki scene and gotta few questions.

  • Why does Auckland City have a "2024 Auckland City FC season", and not all the other clubs.
  • I have drafted up a similar version to 2024 NRFL Leagues for Mainland, but the question is could I include English Cup and Reta Fitzpatrick Cup both local cups to Christchurch to it?
    • Got both Men's and Women's Southern League, Premiership and Championship and also the local shields (Hurley(Mens) and Hewkey(Womens).
      • Or would separating to 2024 MF Men's League, 2024 MF Women's League, 2024 MF Cups? and is that important enough to have its own pages/articles?

Would like to say Thank you for contributions to both Mens and Womens National Leagues and As you could possible guess where I am with what I'm doing. I'm perfectly fine doing the Southern League and South Island League, if your okay with that. And if I do do something that you wouldn't agree with, you know should know how to talk with me, as well I kind don't. - StolenThought (talk) 09:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @StolenThought,
The reason I've started working on the Auckland City season is because I believe there is enough notability and they are competing in the OFC Champions League with a good chance of playing at the new FIFA club competition, whereas not many other clubs will have the required notability.
Creating one for mainland is cool. You can include the English Cup and Reta Fitzpatrick Cup as they do with the NPL Leagues in Australia (example). The leagues would probably need to be included in one page to meet notability standards.
If you're more focused on the Southern part of the National League that works well because I don't know that area that well.
Thanks Kezyfooty (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Kezyfooty,
Understood, was just asking as you had put down 2024 Wellington Olympic AFC season and 2024 Christchurch United FC season in Template:2024 in New Zealand football.
Have put down what I've done on the mainland leagues (Just waiting for more conformation) here, and realized that also the Nelson Premierships should be added due to FC Nelson last season competing for promoting to Southern League. Also found out that the Canterbury Women's leagues require qualifications, requiring two more tables 'n stuff. Reason why I asked if they could be split is due to the size/length of them, if it is/isn't a problem that's fine, and removed the scoring for making too long (could add them back as well). All good with the cups as they don't start till generally ANZAC day.
Another question, saw that in the 2023 Championship, you added discipline to the league stats. Just wondering if that could be added to the regional leagues. Asking for consistency/common grounds in the leagues, aswell as if they should also have positions by round which the Central Leagues has.
All goods doing Southern Leagues, and the same I don't know the Central and Northern areas well. - StolenThought (talk) 03:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @StolenThought, I just put Wellington and Christchurch down as they would be next most likely to have enough notability as last seasons league and cup winners.
Had a look and there's a lot of information. As long the article meets WP:FOOTYN and WP:NSPORT then that's the main thing.
You could add the discipline if you wanted to, just takes time hence why it hasn't been added before now. - Kezyfooty (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Kezyfooty. Thank you for your work on List of Pacific Games records in Olympic weightlifting. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew Sheridan edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Matthew Sheridan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 15:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply