User talk:Gabriel601/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, Gabriel601! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rosiestep (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Nomination of Amb Prayer Pemu for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Amb Prayer Pemu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amb Prayer Pemu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Princess of Ara 20:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Iyanna Mayweather moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Iyanna Mayweather, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 15:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Kevin Eze moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kevin Eze, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 03:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Eze (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Princess of Ara were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kevin Eze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kevin Eze, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 18:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Gabriel601! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Princess of Ara 18:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Mlj Marine Oil & Gas moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mlj Marine Oil & Gas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Oritsewinor Kevin Olu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oritsewinor Kevin Olu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 20:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mlj Marine Oil & Gas has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mlj Marine Oil & Gas. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:49, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Timtrent I have seen your comment on this and they sound right. I was referring more on the politician article which I believe doesn’t have any issue. It’s a good article I wrote and a lot of notable references which doesn’t sound promotional and meets up WP:GNG --Gabriel601 (talk) 23:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Gabriel601, you need to submit your drafts to Articles for Creation and listen to what reviewers say about the condition of the article. They are the experts, they look at hundreds of drafts every year. They know what it takes for a new article to survive being nominated for deletion. While they might sound critical, they are trying to help you write better articles that don't get deleted and you shouldn't ignore their advice. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Good day Liz, I don’t mind submitting article for review but this was rude User_talk:Praxidicae#Why He also needs to be talked to on how to approach contributors in a polite manner.--Gabriel601 (talk) 08:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

I fear, Gabriel, that you misunderstand referencing and notability. The opinion I have just expressed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oritsewinor Kevin Olu would have been my AFC review. You deprived yourself of the chance to receive it as a review by moving it tendentiously to mainspace. No-one was able to move it back to draft because that woudl have been move warring, something which is deprecated.

Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles.

You do have time to seek to save the article by diligent research and editing. However I feel that Olu cannto be shown to pass our inclusion criteria.

Prove me wrong. Don't do it by any argument, but do it by work in the article

If I may advise you about AfD, those who seek to counter every point made have, historically, lost the discussion. Those who fire their arrow once and well may win. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for taking your time to advice. I appreciate Timtrent --Gabriel601 (talk) 08:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

It's been a difficult pleasure to offer you advice, diffiocult because you raced past the point where advice would have been easy to receive. Even so, for the future you will know differently.

I've re-read your interaction with Praxidicae. I can almost see why you were upset, but you missed something. You asked in your opening question why they did not send them to AfD. They gave a good answer to that, and then promised that they would do so if you moved them back. I am paraphrasing. You mistook their promise to do the thing you had asked their rationale for not doing previously for a threat. That is where it all went wrong. If you step away from that conversation and then analyse it as an outsider I think you will see the issue was not as you thought at first. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Well understood. Thanks once again --Gabriel601 (talk) 09:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Oritsewinor Kevin Olu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oritsewinor Kevin Olu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oritsewinor Kevin Olu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 23:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

UPE Warning

Hello Gabriel601. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Oritsewinor Kevin Olu, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Gabriel601. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Gabriel601|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Celestina007 (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Imposing I was paid to write articles is very funny of you lol. If I was being paid to write articles for me I don’t think I’m gonna be here writing articles rather I get someone doing paid editing because I’m not always active. Have got no COI of any article created by me. If I’m speaking on behalf of an article I created was because i know I did better. Birds of the same feather flocks together that is what I’m seeing from all your contributions judging editors with your close editor which I know they are your friends but anyway I just speak for myself & all have said it’s a Good faith.--Gabriel601 (talk) 07:26, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Forgive me. Is that a simple "yes" ora simple"no"? That is all we need to hear. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry Warning

Hello, Gabriel601, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

There’s no need for this kind of sock warning Celestina007 because I don’t have multiple account. You can’t be warning me for what I’m not doing. This is my only wiki account.--Gabriel601 (talk) 07:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

It’s an AGF warning, I have AGF warned you, Timtrent has been gracious enough to do same. It’s one thing to claim you have no COI or engage in socking and its a whole other thing for your actions(article creations) to betray your claim. If you continue creating promotional non notable articles that you’d be indefinitely blocked is a certainty. I wouldn’t AGF warn you again. Celestina007 (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Aje Filmworks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aje Filmworks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aje Filmworks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

This is the second article of yours that is written in a deceptive manner. You are very much on my radar. Your work is stretching my assumption of good faith towards its elastic limit.

I note Celestina007 has asked you a formal question above about Paid Editing that is mandatory to answer. I was about to do the same myself. I am also concerned that they are asking about use of multiple accounts or co-ordinating others to create an effect. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

I’m not saying for you to believe or have a good faith on my end Timtrent because I’m not being paid off to write any articles. I write for impact and not for money. Studying me is a waste of time with the intentions I’m not what I’m saying but the truth is that I am what I’m saying I am.--Gabriel601 (talk) 07:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

As long as you walk the walk as well as talking the talk, I am content. Please continue to do so. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iyanna Mayweather (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iyanna Mayweather and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iyanna Mayweather, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Obidike Chukwuebuka

Hello, Gabriel601. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Obidike Chukwuebuka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:P Clothing

Hello, Gabriel601. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:P Clothing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Guchi (musician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guchi (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guchi (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

• Gabriel601, I've done what I can to rescue this article. I believe she's notable, and so do others. I'll also see what I can do about Draft:Iyanna Mayweather, since the rejection is based partly on the writing style, and I can help with that. But I make no promises on whether she's notable independent of her father; I'll have to look for sources on her performing career. If you see this note, courage, and see whether you can find more sources on either of them. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank You Yngvadottir. I can see I have been off from Wikipedia for about 2 months now. I had to take my time to study what have been going on while I was off, today. I hope you are doing greatly?. I have been undergoing some hard time personal challenges in life I had to take a break to focus because it doesn’t worth the much typing trying to tell Celestina007 that I am not a paid job person. I am getting better in health & also regarding the draft Draft:Iyanna Mayweather i will work on that & also looking forward to your contribution. Thanks once again & to other editors for their good impact towards my journey on contributing to the wikipedia platform.--Gabriel601 (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome, glad I was able to help, and welcome back! Seeing the notice at the bottomof this page, I did some work on P Clothing, so you should have another 6 months now to find more sources. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Portable (musician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Portable (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kevin Eze

Hello, Gabriel601. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kevin Eze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portable (musician) has been accepted

Portable (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 10:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Filmymantra Media moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Filmymantra Media, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filmymantra Media (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Filmymantra Media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iyanna Mayweather (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iyanna Mayweather and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Ada-George Road moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ada-George Road, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 15:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ada-George Road (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by B.Korlah was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ada-George Road and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

B.Korlah (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choba, Port Harcourt (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Choba, Port Harcourt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choba, Port Harcourt (September 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Choba, Port Harcourt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Choba

It’s a learning process. Looking at other similar articles is always a good way to learn. Remember if you’re uncertain or need help there are plenty of experienced editors that you can ask. We do have work in real life so sometimes we can’t drop everything and respond right away but we usually can get back to you. Happy editing my friend. Dan arndt (talk) 10:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Dan and I saw your contribution regarding the article. You did well.--Gabriel^t@lk 11:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Choba, Port Harcourt has been accepted

Choba, Port Harcourt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: P Clothing (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:P Clothing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 07:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Genesis (restaurant) (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Genesis (restaurant) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ada-George Road has been accepted

Ada-George Road, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 16:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Remove of tag

Hello I remove the Tag it seems the article deleted is different from the article deleted. Sett22 Feel free to talk😀 13:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Why do I just feel you have a multiple account here on Wikipedia. I will advise you don’t remove the speedy tag once again. --Gabriel (talk to me ) 13:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

I edited it because I seems like the article is different and you accused me of sockpuppetry Sett22 Feel free to talk😀 14:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion, CSD G5s

Hello, Gabriel601,

I see you are using Twinkle to tag pages for speedy deletion which is great. One thing I'll mention is that when you tag pages CSD G5, the work of a ban evading editor, in the field for this G5 criteria when you use Twinkle, please put the username of the sockmaster, not the sockpuppet. It's a small thing but when anyone looks at the deletion rationale for the page, they should be able to see who the sockmaster was that was evading their block and go look at that SPI, it's not as important to know which sockpuppet created the deleted article.

Thanks for your contributions to the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Oh thanks for the telling me!. It really helps my knowledge today. --Gabriel (talk to me ) 22:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Surprise

I have surprise for your action versus article Ivan Pauletta: but are you sure? Forza bruta (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I did a Google search and no English reference were found but you can go ahead on its AFD discussion.--Gabriel (talk to me ) 19:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I suggest to you a search in Italian language and Croat languge and Indian languge or Spanish language: English language is spoken by only a part of the world.--Forza bruta (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Curbon7 has made it clear to me using the reference WP:NONENG so I request and await a withdraw, cheers. --Gabriel (talk to me ) 20:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Speed Darlington (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Speed Darlington and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 00:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)