User talk:Doniago/Archive 99

Archive 95

←

Archive 97

Archive 98

Archive 99

Archive 100

Archive 101

→

Archive 105

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
165		Operation Peter Pan (talk)	Add sources
1,798		The Mummy Returns (talk)	Add sources
205		Jean Passepartout (talk)	Add sources
2,833		Paul Giamatti (talk)	Add sources
21		The Bridge of San Luis Rey (1944 film) (talk)	Add sources
8		Rendition (Torchwood) (talk)	Add sources
51		Wold Newton family (talk)	Cleanup
1,603		Ennio Morricone (talk)	Cleanup
44		Daniel Alomía Robles (talk)	Cleanup
248		Gummy candy (talk)	Expand
11,731		September 11 attacks (talk)	Expand
1,004		Damian Wayne (talk)	Expand
24		Fragments (Torchwood) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
301		Diegetic music (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
70		Montgomery Bell Academy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
15		New York Film Critics Online (talk)	Merge
6		Oliva Ascolana del Piceno (talk)	Merge
2		1994 World Allround Speed Skating Championships (talk)	Merge
818		Simon Callow (talk)	Wikify
63		Rudy Giuliani during the September 11 attacks (talk)	Wikify
6		Virginia Willis (talk)	Wikify
2		Re-Edition Texts: Heart of Darkness (talk)	Orphan
4		My Heart of Darkness (talk)	Orphan
1		James Young Geddes (talk)	Orphan
8		Agnotocastor (talk)	Stub
7		Digital Chameleon (talk)	Stub
11		Erciyes Ski Resort (talk)	Stub
9		Apocalypse Oz (talk)	Stub
136		Tom Schulman (talk)	Stub
14		The Bridge of San Luis Rey (1929 film) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:36, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl

Hello,

Is there are reason why this edit was reverted outside of poorly written. I can understand not accepting the "Captain Barbossa"/"Hector Barbossa" trivia, but the rest is fair to add. Especially when the source is in the film itself. The order of cast members in particular should be accurate as that's how it was in the first two minutes of the end credits, to save confusion I'm not referring the cast list but the opening of the end credits. As far as the sourcing, I find it odd given the same sources are used in another article here on Wikipedia. Surely, some of the information I added could have been of good use? 69.245.96.48 (talk) 19:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

If the source is the film itself, then there's no reason to add this information in any case. Pertinent details can appear in the Plot section, and the Cast section should be focusing on real-world information anyway; it's not a place to drop fancruft. I won't revert you again at this time, but don't be surprised if another editor does. DonIago (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Understandable. However, if a revert does happen, I'll still readd the information that isn't plot-related. Whereas the roles played by certain characters (i.e. saying a character talks about this before doing that) that I can see being taken out. 69.245.96.48 (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Administrative action review on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Cast section format in Jurassic World Dominion

Doniago, I need you to take a look at the cast section format of Jurassic World Dominion and look at the cast section in diff here. Then go to the article's talk page here to express your opinion about it. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Asking me specifically to weigh in could be construed as canvassing, and I'm consequently uncomfortable doing so. DonIago (talk) 04:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Good point. Nevermind. Besides, I reverted to status quo. BattleshipMan (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Second 3RO

Hello @Doniago: I took upon previous 3RO provider [1] to take out second 3RO. But you reverted [2] the second request, can you undo this, or do you have objection to this? Thanks Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 03:38, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

A 3O request is inappropriate once more than two editors are involved in the discussion. It is literally for requesting a third opinion. If you feel additional input is needed at that point, you should pursue other forms of dispute resolution. Hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 03:39, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Reverted Star Trek edit

My edit pointed at another page (Star Trek (1971 video game) full of references. Cherry-picking a reference to also add to the page linking to it is redundant. Susan Davis (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

If there's another page already full of references, then it should be easy enough to copy one of them. See WP:CIRCULAR. DonIago (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Request for third opinion reverted

Hello, I posted a 3O request on 14 Jun for a dispute at Talk:27 Club but it was reverted. I understand the discussion may have appeared to involve more than 2 editors because it's located under a topic heading that other editors had previously contributed to. However, the dispute is about a related but separate topic, involving only me and one other editor. More context... The original topic discussion — a list criteria proposal I'd made — is complete, after I conceded there wasn't clear editor support for it. In conceding, I described the list edits I would make to comply with the status quo list criteria. Another editor reverted those edits and he and I have been disputing his rationale for 2 weeks, with no progress.

After my 3O request was reverted, I split off the separate dispute discussion to its own topic heading to make it clearer, but the other editor immediately reverted that — which doesn't appear to me to be in good faith. I'd like to ask you the favor of taking a second look at considering this dispute for 3O. I'm happy to move it to another venue if you still recommend that. Thanks! Goffman82 12:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I haven't looked at this thoroughly, in part because I'm unfamiliar with the subject matter, but I think it might have been better or would be better for you to create a sub-heading for the issues under dispute rather than creating a new full section for them (and clearly recap the points of contention that only involve two editors)...that would make it clearer as to what's specifically under dispute for which only two editors are involved, though it might behoove you to ask the editor with whom you're in dispute, in that thread, whether they agree that a third opinion is needed, assuming you can't reach a consensus between the two of you. In any case, 3O has a pretty bright-line rule that editors only get involved in disputes where only two editors are involved, so when it appears that there's more than two editors who've participated in the thread, that will usually get the request delisted.

Otherwise, or if you can't even reach an agreement that there's two editors involved in the current dispute and that a third opinion is needed, I'd encourage you to review WP:DR, which provides other options for dispute resolution.

Hope this is helpful! DonIago (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips. Ironically a 3rd editor finally weighed in on the dispute after I posted to your talk page. (Not an uninvolved editor, however.) I'll take your advice and proceed to another DR venue. Is your sub-heading suggestion to split off the existing dispute content under its own sub-heading or to start a new sub-heading, with a re-cap, as the place for the dispute to continue? Goffman82 18:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I should really have said sub-section rather than sub-heading to avoid confusion. Perhaps something named "Current dispute status - additional opinions needed" with a paragraph of, "It's my understanding that at this point our dispute is over X versus Y. I feel X is appropriate for reasons 1, 2 and 3, while Editor Q appears to feel that Y is more appropriate for these reasons..." Something where if you do request a third opinion, someone can wade right in from that section break without necessarily needing to read up on the preceding text. Perhaps it's lazy of me, but I know that when I consider weighing in with a third opinion, I don't want to have to read weeks or months worth of prior text just to get a basic understanding of the dispute. I will read it, to get the deeper context and such, but I'm more inclined to chime in if there's a synopsis readily available. DonIago (talk) 18:53, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
32		Star Marianas Air (talk)	Add sources
84		Rafael Hernández Airport (talk)	Add sources
525		Yama (talk)	Add sources
53		MNG Airlines (talk)	Add sources
24		Brannigan, Begin Again (talk)	Add sources
348		Juan Santamaría International Airport (talk)	Add sources
161		Crysis Warhead (talk)	Cleanup
1,686		Surfside condominium collapse (talk)	Cleanup
94		Family Guy (franchise) (talk)	Cleanup
529		LATAM Airlines Group (talk)	Expand
107		Futurama (video game) (talk)	Expand
38		The Sting (Futurama) (talk)	Expand
746		Ryanverse (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
286		Eastern Airlines, LLC (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,812		Demon (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
180		Avianca El Salvador (talk)	Merge
312		Czech Airlines (talk)	Merge
178		Flight length (talk)	Merge
138		Animal worship (talk)	Wikify
111		Iran Airtour (talk)	Wikify
91		Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport (talk)	Wikify
3		Augusto Conte Mac Donell (talk)	Orphan
3		Bahia Massoundi (talk)	Orphan
2		Anerneq (talk)	Orphan
18		Saureil (talk)	Stub
7		Northeastern International Airways (talk)	Stub
29		Tailwind Air Service (talk)	Stub
162		Bryan Burk (talk)	Stub
26		Daily Air (talk)	Stub
39		Yamaduta (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

nice one on the revert

hulu is a reliable source when the information in question is said to originally come from hulu, especially when the provided reference points to the updated information.

im glad you were a good enough person to realize your error and take it upon yourself to make the necessary correction.

thank you kind sir. Snarevox (talk) 17:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Reversion to The Living Daylights edit

Hello. Thank you for explaining your reversion to my edits of The Living Daylights. I disagree with your assessment that my edit added excessive detail to the plot summary for the following reasons, but I am new to Wikipedia editing and I would love to hear your thoughts about this.

• The reverted version is inaccurate, as I describe in the note accompanying my original edit. Bond does not return to Whitaker's estate "to kill Whitaker."
• The plot summary is well written, and I believe my edits to the plot summary are the minimum (or very nearly the minimum) amount of changes necessary to accurately convey the essential plot points that take place at Whitaker's estate toward the end of the movie: Bond returns to confront Koskov, Bond kills Whitaker, Pushkin arrests Koskov. If any part of that portion of the summary provides unnecessary detail, it is the point that Koskov is to be returned to Moscow "in the diplomatic bag," which was in the original version of the plot summary that you deem acceptable.
• My edit adds 14 words to a 693-word plot summary. I don't believe that this is an excessive addition by any standard, especially given that it corrects the misleading description of the plot in the original version of the summary. 76.138.175.183 (talk) 05:45, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

WP:FILMPLOT recommends that plot summaries should not exceed 700 words. Given that you yourself claim that you only went slightly over that limit, can you not find a way to keep the summary from exceeding that? DonIago (talk) 05:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Is that the specific reason that the edit was reverted? If so, then yes it should be easy enough to make the changes and stay within a 700 word limit. 76.138.175.183 (talk) 05:58, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Other editors might have other issues with it, but my interest in your edits wouldn't have been piqued if the word-count had stayed at or under 700 words. DonIago (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Veep on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
6		Boris Vipper (talk)	Add sources
9		Themes in Torchwood (talk)	Add sources
1,156		Dancing with the Stars (American TV series) (talk)	Add sources
25		Countrycide (talk)	Add sources
1,856		Jurassic Park (novel) (talk)	Add sources
183		Marvel Masterworks (talk)	Add sources
569		Kung Pow! Enter the Fist (talk)	Cleanup
37		Fantasia: Music Evolved (talk)	Cleanup
365		Monkeybone (talk)	Cleanup
323		Spider-Man (1977 film) (talk)	Expand
177		The Sneetches and Other Stories (talk)	Expand
15		Hunches in Bunches (talk)	Expand
289		Abigail Williams (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
19		They Keep Killing Suzie (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		Reset (Torchwood) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20		Merlin in comics (talk)	Merge
926		Higher education (talk)	Merge
15		Tree of Peace (World War I) (talk)	Merge
122		Stephanie (film) (talk)	Wikify
20		Regent Releasing (talk)	Wikify
69		Fantasia (franchise) (talk)	Wikify
7		Alireza Azmandian (talk)	Orphan
3		Ben-Ami Finkelstein (talk)	Orphan
2		Amna Guellali (talk)	Orphan
5		1997 Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards (talk)	Stub
7		Dr. Seuss' Fix-Up the Mix-Up Puzzler (talk)	Stub
13		My Book about ME (talk)	Stub
14		Robot Dreams (short story) (talk)	Stub
52		Let's Start a War (talk)	Stub
16		Andrew Collins (footballer, born 1965) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Hey.

Why did you revert my edits? The episodes are real. How are they "unsourced" to you? 2600:8801:3:D800:ECFA:DE67:DA13:C457 (talk) 16:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Please review WP:IPCV; you must include a source that draws a connection between the episodes and the film. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Okay, the Aqua Teen episode does parody the movie. The fact that it contains parodies, yet you don't allow people like myself to contribute is absolutely hypocritical. I've been editing since 2006, and I'm tired. Also, please do not revert the fixed grammar errors.--2600:8801:3:D800:ECFA:DE67:DA13:C457 (talk) 16:35, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nobody's preventing you from contributing. I linked you to the policy in question that requires that you provide a source. If you have an issue with my reverting you without you providing a source, take it to the article's Talk page or pursue dispute resolution. Additionally, in your more recent edits you repeated a source that doesn't actually reference Aqua Teen, which at best is erroneous and at worst disingenuous. DonIago (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
801		Socialist Republic of Romania (talk)	Add sources
3,388		John Dillinger (talk)	Add sources
18		Strictly Sinatra (talk)	Add sources
23		Friend or Foe? (game show) (talk)	Add sources
28		Extreme Dodgeball (talk)	Add sources
76		Derek Deadman (talk)	Add sources
24		Interpretation (philosophy) (talk)	Cleanup
1,664		Dead by Daylight (talk)	Cleanup
291		ID3 (talk)	Cleanup
12		Rock Monster (talk)	Expand
178		Lake Placid 2 (talk)	Expand
4,725		Uganda (talk)	Expand
248		Hill Valley (Back to the Future) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Victoria Station (play) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
104		High Stakes Poker (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
124		The Kingdom Keepers (talk)	Merge
72		Horror icon (talk)	Merge
529		Motion capture (talk)	Merge
495		Nigel Havers (talk)	Wikify
860		Gene Siskel (talk)	Wikify
29		Chester Mystery Plays (talk)	Wikify
3		Bulgantamir Sergelenbaatar (talk)	Orphan
2		Bethel v Hillyard (talk)	Orphan
2		Arne Espeland (talk)	Orphan
3		Confluence Trail (talk)	Stub
7		In the Red (novel) (talk)	Stub
54		Neil Canton (talk)	Stub
86		Mike Barker (producer) (talk)	Stub
932		Goodbye (upcoming film) (talk)	Stub
11		George Gipe (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Fixing an incorrect birthdate Of Tony Sirico

If you go to Facebook and search on Robert Sirico’s account go to July 8th post. It’s about the funeral about his brother Tony Sirico he posted that July 29th is incorrect birthdate. Tony Sirico the actor is born on July 24th not July 29th! All I did was correct the misinformation of the incorrect birthdate that someone on here made. LIWProWrestling (talk) 13:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

When you updated his article you didn't provide a source, so you must have expected that your edit might be reverted. The birthdate that currently appears on his article is also sourced, so the proper course of action would be to initiate a discussion at the article's Talk page, not simply assume that the source you found is right and the existing source is wrong. DonIago (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)