Chinnusaikrish
_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
July 2020 edit
Hi Chinnusaikrish! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Visakhapatnam that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 15:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Andhra Pradesh Capitals edit
Everything is in order before u edited the wiki page of Andhra Pradesh.When u want to edit the article,why are u not putting the three capitals in orderwise. Just making it a mess Sai Krishna bonda (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation and Kurnool Municipal Corporation population is clearly mentioned in the Census District Hand Book. Your intentionally reducing the Population of Rajahmundry and Kurnool cities. It is not fair to do such kind of things in Public Domain. What ever I am Adding on Wikipedia page is with complete Proof. You can also go through the Pdf. edit
Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation and Kurnool Municipal Corporation population are clearly mentioned in the Census District Hand Book. You are intentionally reducing the Population of Rajahmundry and Kurnool cities. It is not fair to do such kind of things in Public Domain. What ever I am Adding on Wikipedia page is with complete Proof. You can also go through the Pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramVS1208 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Changes on Wikipedia edit
Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation and Kurnool Municipal Corporation population are clearly mentioned in the Census District Hand Book. You are intentionally reducing the Population of Rajahmundry and Kurnool cities. It is not fair to do such kind of things in Public Domain. Whatever I am Adding on Wikipedia page is with complete Proof. You can also go through the Pdf.--VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of cities in Andhra Pradesh by population.--VikramVS1208 (talk) 07:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Update on Tirupati Population edit
Hello Sai Krishna.
Tirupati city Population has been updated with Out Growths now. After updating Out Growths Tirupati Population is 469,641 1. Tirupati Municipal Corporation = 295,323 2. Cherlopalli = 6,143 3. Perur = 11,127 4. Avilala = 24,893 5. Tiruchanur = 22,963 6. Tirupati NMA = 37,968 7. Akkarampalle = 44,219 8. Mangalam = 19,318
Total = 461,954
Tirumala = 7,741 Tirumala is not included. If Tirumala is included then
461,954 + 7,741 = 469,695
This clearly mentioned in page no.1283 of 2011 census Handbook of Chittoor district. You can go through that book in page no.1283 Link for the book is mentioned in the source.--VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Reply for Rajahmundry Population edit
Hello Sai Krishna
Rajahmundry City has a total population of 476,873
1. Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation = 376,333 2. Katheru = 23,572 3. Morampudi = 15,346 4. Hukumpeta = 16,985 5. Dowleswaram = 44,637
Total = 476,873
Kakinada City has a population of 443,028
1. Kakinada Municipal Corporation = 384,182 2. Ramanayya peta = 28,369 3. Suryarao peta = 24,112 4. Chidiga = 6,365
Total = 443,028
Source for this 2011 Census District Handbook of East Godavari district. page no. 1195,1196 It is clearly mentioned in the book.
Decadal Census handbooks are Official report released by the Government of India.--VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Kurnool City Population edit
Hello Sai Krishna
Your reply for Kurnool City Population
Kurnool City population is 484,327
1. Kurnool Municipal Corporation = 457,633, 2. Mamidalapadu = 26,694,
Total = 484,327
Source for this is 2011 Census District handbook of Kurnool district. Page no.919. --VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sai Krishna
I have given you the source, published by the Government of India. I am updating the page based on this data. If you have any other valid source, published by the Government, You can add that in the source section, so that everyone can see that as valid proof.
and talking about my page, you have mentioned that I have received many warnings. That's true because I have edited without source/evidence mentioning in the page. Later I started updating with proof. Then onwards not even single warnings from Wikipedia was received. Hope You Understand.
Please Mention proof/ Source that you are following in the page so that we go through that and verify.
Thankyou.--VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Reply on Kakinada Population edit
Hello Sai Krishna.
The Out Growths of Kakinada city Ganganapalle, Sarpavaram, Vakalapudi, Turangi, were merged with Kakinada Municipal Corporation.
You can see this one in the 2011 District Census handbook of East Godavari district, in the page no.185. In that book, it is clearly mentioned that the above areas were included in the Municipal corporation of Kakinada. We are editing the page after a thorough study on 2011 Census. Hope You Understand.--VikramVS1208 (talk) 05:21, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
response for baseless editing edit
You are deliberately doing this. Even in the source mentioned by you on Kakinada smart city, in that mentioned Population of Kakinada city population is 312,583 and Kakinada metro population is 443,028. This is in the source mentioned by you itself. Just see it once before editing the page.
If you any source that Kakinada population is 509,729 mention the source so that everyone can see it.
I am giving you the source, which is released by the Government. Don't post invalid things on the page Hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramVS1208 (talk • contribs) 07:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
I am adding the M.Corp and Ogs population provided by many websites and giving the proper end result.
The sources you provided doesn't show the population of Kurnool, Rajamahendravarm and Tirupati correctly.
For your information OGs are not included in the Municipal Corporations. Know that. And Please check the page 26 of the handbook you have uploaded. It shows M.corp and OGs as separate entities of the cities and they combinely become U.A. You are intentionally combining the OGs with M.Corps to show the population as less.
You can check the population of Kakinada in the website given www.citypopulation.de/php/india-andhrapradesh.php It shows Kakinada population as 384,128 which is even bigger than Rajamahendravaram and Tirupati. But you are intentionally putting Kakinada down.
If OGs are included in M.Corps as you are saying , then Population of Kurnool, RJM and Tirupati is less than Kakinada, as population of OGs of Kakinada is bigger than their OGs.
Kurnool M.Corp population is bigger than Kakinada. Yes it is correct. I know this and I admit this. But if Ogs are included, Kakinada population is bigger than Kurnool. You know this, That is why you are not adding OGs population and changing it intentionally. You are including Ogs population of all other cities but you are not including OGs of Kakinada as you know it is bigger and will be above Kurnool.
www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/4913-kakinada-rural-east-godavari-andhra-pradesh.html Go through this website, 71644 responds to Indrapalem- part OG of Kakinada which is in the municipal corporation M. Corp population 312568 + Indrapalem Population 71644 = 384212 - This is Kakinada M. Corp's population which is even mentioned in the website. The OGs Population is 125698 which makes it combined 509,729 as how you calculated for the rest of the cities.
Population of Rajahmundry is 341,831 and OGs population is 135042 which makes it combined 476873
Population of Tirupati is 274112 and OGs population is 195529 which makes it combined 469641
Population of Kurnool is 430,214 and OGs population is 54023 which makes it combined 484327.
Population of Kakinada is 384128 and OGs population is 125698 which makes it combined 509729.
The OGs population of Kakinada, Rajamahendravaram and Tirupati are bigger than Kurnool. You have to admit this fact and That is why Kakinada comes above. At first, you removed information about the proposal for greater municipal corporation of cities and you even deleted the smart cities info too as Kurnool is not a smart city. This intention of you is not correct as I was the one who added lot information in Kurnool page. All I am doing is with sources from all websites not with only website as you referring. Understand this.
If M.corp is taken into consideration, Kurnool is big and comes 5th. But if Metro is taken, Kakinada comes 5th. - ThanksChinnusaikrish (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Kurnool municipal corporation Population is 457,633 and Mamidalapadu population is 26,694. Together Population is 484,327
I have never told Dinnedevarapadu, Pandipadu, Peddapadu, B.Thandrapadu and Pasupula are separate from Kurnool Municipal corporation. While Calculating the population, they are merged with Kurnool Municipal Corporation. They have clearly mentioned that, they are OG to Kurnool, but while calculating population, they are included in Kurnool Municipal Corporation.
1.Dinnedevarapadu 2.Pandipadu 3.B.Thandrapadu 4.Peddapadu 5.Pasupala 6.Kurnool
All together they are Kurnool Municipal Corporation and its population is 457,633. See on page no. 169
Mamidalapadu
Mamidalapdu is OG which not part of M.Corp. and its population is 26,694
Kurnool M.corp. = 457,633 Mamidalapadu = 26,694
Total = 484,327
Hope you get clarity on Kurnool City.
Coming to the Kakinada City
Vakalapudi, Turangi, Ganganapalle, Sarpavaram and OG to Kakinada. I accept that. But while calculating the population they are included in Kakinada Municipal Corporation. You can see that on the page no.185. They have kept in the bracket M.Corp.
Kakinada Municipal Corporation consists 1. Vakalapudi 2. Turangi 3. Ganganapalle 4. Sarpavaram 5. Kakinada All together they are Kakinada Municipal corporation and its population in 384,182. see on page no.1192
Chidiga
Chidiga is OG which is not a part of M.corp, and its population is 6,365. see page no. 1199
Suryaraopeta
Suryaraopeta is OG which is not a part of M.corp, and its population is 24,112. see page no.1195
Ramanayyapeta
Ramanayyapeta is OG which is not part of M.corp, and its population is 28,369. see page no. 1195
Altogether population
1. Kakinada M.Corp = 384,182 2. Chidiga = 6,365 3. Suryaraopeta = 24,112 4. Ramanayyapeta = 28,369 Total Population is 384,182 + 6,365 + 24,112 + 28,369 = 443,028
You are adding Vakalapudi, Turangi, Sarpavaram, Ganganapalle to 384,182, which is a mistake. Because they are included in M.corp. Still, you have doubt, again I am saying just see on the page no. 185. They are kept in M.Corp. , as you can see in the bracket. Their population is included in M.corp
Hope you get complete clarity on this.
VikramVS1208 (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply to Chinnusaikrish edit
You are saying that I have deleted Smart cities topic just because, there is no Kurnool in that. That is not true. I don't have any partiality to one city. I even love Kakinada as much as Kurnool. Kakinada is a beautiful city. Why should I have a partiality to one city? I deleted it because I did not notice your Reference to that. After noticing reference that I did not delete.
For your kind information, I have completed my B.tech [EEE] in JNTU Kakinada 2013-2017 batch. My name is Vikram Vasudev Reddy. You can verify if you know any friends in JNTUK. My nativity is Kurnool.
You said that Kurnool is not selected as Smart city by Central Government. That's true, But the later state government has taken 14 other cities as smart cities in which Kurnool also included. If you want proof link is mentioned in the source column.
Coming to up-gradation of Municipal corporation to Greater Municipal corporation, there is a lot of demand for many cities to upgrade to Greater M.Corp, not just Vijayawada, Rajahmundry, Kakinada. Even Tirupati, Nellore and Kurnool are in consideration for Upgradation. You have uploaded local Telugu district newspaper column as reference. If that is the thing, many times I have seen in newspapers for Kurnool, Nellore, Tirupati for up-gradation to Greater Municipal Corporation. I can Upload that as reference. But that is not the right thing to upload local Telugu newspapers as reference. We have to upload Government Published data as a reference, or National newspapers columns as reference.
Even the links you provided in my talk page shows the complete population of Kakinada 443,028. Observe clearly.
still, you have any doubts, Just see your link
Explanations for your links in my talk page.
I have told you that, Kakinada Municipal Corporation population is 384,182
In that Kakinada Municipal Corporation is spread in Two mandals. Kakinada Urban Mandal and Kakinada Rural Mandal
1. Kakinada Urban = 312,538
2. Kakinada rural = 71,644 [ Ganganapalle = 9,254 ]
[ Sarpavaram = 13,533 ]
[ Turangi = 25,001 ]
[Vakalapudi = 23,836 ]
Total = 71,644
Total = 384,182
This total Municipal Corporation which also included the population of Ganganpalle, Turangi, Sarpavaram, Vakalapudi.
Reaming part of Kakinada city, which is not part of M.corp is
1. Ramanayyapeta = 28,369 2. Suryaraopeta = 24,112 3. Chidiga = 6,365
total = 58,856
Altogether Kakinada City Population is 384,182 + 58,856 = 443,028
This data is from the website which is provided by you only, on my talk page.
You can calculate in any manner the Kakinada city population is 443,028
Hope you can get complete clarity on this topic. --VikramVS1208 (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Explanation to Kurnool city Population edit
This explanation is based on the link you provided.
1. Kurnool City = 430,214 2. B.Thandrapadu = 6,229 3. Dinnadevarapadu = 5,212 4. Laxmipuram [part] = 1,396 5. Pandipadu = 4,245 6. pasupula = 4,249 7. Peddapadu = 5,040 8. Rudravaram [part] = 1,048
Total = 457,633
So total Kurnool municipal corporation = 457,633
Mamidalapadu
Mamidalapadu Population is 26,694
So total Kurnool City population is 457,633 + 26,694 = 484,327
Hope your doubt on Kurnool and Kakinada cities' population gets clarified.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 06:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply to Chinnusaikrish on Unparliamentary language edit
No one is barking here, except you. You even don't no difference between Mandal and municipal corporation.
in the page no.9 It is clearly mentioned that, Kurnool Mandal Population, not Municipal corporation.
Kurnool Municipal Corporation is present in Both kurnool and Kallur mandal.
Dont even Know the difference between Mandal and M.corp is Childish thing.
Before barking, on others know the difference first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramVS1208 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply to Chinnusaikrish on his Immature talks in my talk page. edit
Surely I will give you full clarity on Kurnool, Rajahmundry, Tirupati cities, Just like I explained the Kakinada city Population.
Talking on 'RamuSR2212' , I don't know who actually he is. I know him, just like I know you. You are saying that it is my another account. Why Should I have a second account?
I Told my full name, My graduation details. I even told you to verify my details if you have any friends in JNTUK. Why should I speak, back behind someone, when I have verified and genuine sources?
I have seen his edits. He edits are mainly on Telanagana pages and some Andhra Pradesh pages.
Even now I am saying, you can verify my details in JNTUK. If you don't have friends in JNTUK, ask your friends' friends, anyone have friends in JNTUK.
Coming to the Population details, I got the exact point where actually you are getting confused. I will clarify you. Don't worry.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 04:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Explanation to Kurnool city Population edit
To understand the concept of Kurnool city Population, You should know some details on Kurnool city. I got the point where you are getting confused.
Kurnool city lies on two mandals. 1. Kurnool mandal 2. Kallur Mandal.
That does not mean that Kurnool mandal means complete Kurnool city. and Kallur mandal means Kurnool Rural area. Both mandals have City population and Rural population. The Eastern Part of Kurnool City comes under Kurnool mandal. [almost 65%] The western part of Kurnool City comes under Kallur mandal. [almost 35%]
You said Kurnool has a population of 406,797 which also includes Kallur and OG. That is not true. They have clearly mentioned it is Kurnool Mandal Population. Kurnool mandal does not mean Kallur. Kallur is a separate mandal.
Kurnool Mandal has both City population and Villages population. Kurnool mandal has a population of 406,797.
In that 406,797 Kurnool M.corp [Only Kurnool mandal part] = 312,835 Mamidalapadu = 26,694
Total = 339,529 this Kurnool city population in Kurnool mandal. [without Kallur mandal part]
Remaining Population is 406,797 - 339,529 = 67,268
The remaining population in Kurnool mandal is 67,268. This population is now where belongs to Kurnool city. The 67,268 completely Out of Kurnool city. Hope you get clarity on 406,797 population, which is mentioned by you.
Coming to the Kallur mandal, 144,798 population is in Kurnool M.Corp. Kallur does not have any OG. Only 144,798 belongs to Kurnool M.Corp. They are not any OG. They are directly involved in M.Corp.
Now complete Population of Kurnool City
1. Kurnool M.Corp. [Kurnool mandal part] = 312,835
2. Kurnool M.Corp [Kallur mandal part] = 144,798
3. Mamidalapadu = 26,694
Total = 484,237
You are estimating Kurnool, comparing with Kakinada. Kakinada situation is quite different here.
1.Kakinada urban mandal
2.Kakinada Rural mandal.
Kakinada urban mandal consists of Kakinada city only. No other village is present in Kakinada urban mandal.
Kakinada rural mandal consists of
1. Ganganapalle
2. Sarpavaram
3. Turangi
4. Vakalapudi. These four are included in Kakinada M.corp.
Reaming Ramanayyapeta, Suryaraopeta, Chidiga, are OG to Kakinada city.
I have already explained clearly about Kakinada. You also replied that no doubts about Kakinada City.
I am here comparing both cities parallelly so that you get more clarity
1. Kurnool M.Corp. [Kurnool mandal part] = 312,835 1. Kakinada M.Corp. [Kakinada Urban mandal part] = 312,538
2. Kurnool M.Corp [Kallur mandal part] = 144,798 2. Kakinada M.corp [Kakinada Rural mandal part] = 71,644
Total M.corp = 457,633 Total M.corp = 384,182
3. Mamidalapadu [OG] = 26,694 3. Ramanayyapeta [OG] = 28,369
4. Suryaraopeta [OG] = 24,112
5. Chidiga [OG] = 6,365
city Total = 484,237 City Total = 443,028
Source for explanation on Kurnool city Population edit
The source is taken as the 2011 census website, which is mentioned by you only.
Kurnool Mandal - www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/5259-kurnool-kurnool-andhra-pradesh.html Kallur mandal - www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/5258-kallur-kurnool-andhra-pradesh.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramVS1208 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Source for websites. edit
From the same website, mentioned by you, I found these links.
Kurnool City = 484,327 | www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/349-kurnool.html
Rajahmundry City = 476,873 | www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/348-rajahmundry.html
Tirupati City = 461,900 | www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/350-tirupati.html
Kakinada City = 443,028 | www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/351-kakinada.html
Hope your complete doubts are clarified. Still, if you have any doubts I am ready to answer.
In whichever way you calculate, the population of Kurnool will get 484,327. Even the website showing the same as 484,327
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 06:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Conveying my Regards for providing website link. edit
I have taken the source which is published by the government. 2011 Census published by Government of India. [You said it is the supreme].
My values on the population are exactly matched with the website provided by you, Except for Tirupati
For Tirupati, where I mentioned it as, 469,641 as I took Tirumala into consideration. But on the website, Tirumala was not taken into consideration. I am rectifying my mistake on Tirupati and correcting it to 461,900. which is shown on the website.
Apart from that my values on Kurnool, Rajahmundry, Kakinada are exactly matched. Thanks for providing the website link.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 06:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Explanation about Kallur mandal. edit
I did a small mistake in yesterday's reply. I told Kallur does not have OG. But Kallur actually has OG. viz.,
1. Peddapadu
2. Pandipadu
3. Laxmipuram [part]
Only some portion of Laxmipuram village is considered as OG. Remaining part of Laxmipuram village in Rural area.
I accept that I did a small mistake. Now I have explained in detail about Kallur mandal.
I never told complete Kallur mandal comes under Kurnool M.Corp. You are doing a mistake here by assuming Kallur mandal has only 144,798 Population. Actually Kallur mandal has a total population of 196,268.
Kallur mandal has a total population of 196,268, in that only 144,798 comes under Kurnool city. Remaining 51,470 comes under various villages. Those villages were completely Rural areas.
Here I am giving a complete population of Kallur mandal of 196,268.
Urban Part of Kallur Mandal
1. Kallur Urban area [Kurnool M.Corp] = 134,117
2. Peddapadu [OG] = 5,040
3. Pandipadu [OG] = 4,245
4. Laxmipuram [part] [OG] = 1,396
----------
Total = 144,798
This is about urban part of Kallur Mandal. .
Coming to the Rural part of Kallur mandal
1 A.Gokulapadu = 3,402
2 Bastipadu = 3,429
3 Bellavaram = 2,210
4 Chetla Mallapuram = 995
5 Chinna Tekur = 3,783
6 Dupadu = 1,178
7 K.Markapuram = 1,574
8 Konganapadu = 2,663
9 Laxmipuram [part] = 5,350
10 Nayakallu = 1,580
11 Parla = 5,587
12 Pedda Tekur = 3,984
13 Pusulur = 1,897
14 Remadur = 1,164
15 Salkapuram = 2,138
16 Thadakanapalle = 3,312
17 Ulindakonda = 6,504
18 Yaparlapadu = 720
----------
Total = 51,470
This about Rural population of Kallur mandal.
So Total Urban part and Rural part of Kallur mandal is
Total = 144,798 + 51,470 = 196,268
This is about complete Kallur mandal Population history. Hope you get clarification on Kallur Mandal.
You have said that you can claim, Rural and Urban mandals complete Population of Rajahmundry, Kakinada and Tirupati. You cannot claim complete rural and urban mandals. An explanation is given below.
Kakinada Urban Mandal population = 312,538 Rajahmundry Urban Mandal Population = 341,831
Kakinada Rural Mandal Population = 174,129 Rajahmundry Rural Mandal Population = 166,973
--------- ----------
486,667 508,804
Tirupati Urban Mandal population = 402,667 Kurnool Mandal Population = 406,797
Tirupati Rural Mandal Population = 117,445 Kallur Mandal Population = 196,268
--------- ----------
520,112 603,065
Above calculation of adding complete mandal population is wrong, because it contains a rural population i.e., not a part of the city.
Even if wish to do the wrong calculation, you can see the population of Kurnool as 603,065. But I wish You don't do that mistake. Kurnool city population is 484,327., but not 603,065.
You are blaming the Government website has done a mistake, that it has added the whole population of kallur mandal. Actually you did a mistake, by assuming Kallur mandal population as 144,798.
Don't blame Government, for your mistakes. It's your mistake in Calculation.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Source for Kallur mandal. edit
The sources for Kallur mandal is given below.
Source-1
www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/5258-kallur-kurnool-andhra-pradesh.html Kallur mandal
www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/5259-kurnool-kurnool-andhra-pradesh.html Kurnool Mandal
You can find details of each village population on this website.
Source-2
I am giving another government website as a source.
www.censusindia.co.in/villagestowns/kallur-mandal-kurnool-andhra-pradesh-5258
Urban Population is 144,798 and Rural population is 51,470.
You can find a complete explanation of Kallur mandal here.
Source-3
If you want the source as District Census Handbook, Refer page no.288 of Kurnool District Census Handbook, where You can find Population of each village in kallur mandal.
Another page no.860. Where you can find rural population of each mandal. I repeat Rural Population of each mandal. Kurnool = 67,268 Kallur = 51,470
This 51,470 and 67,268 is only the rural population of mandal.
I have already explained to you that Kurnool Rural population is 67,268. Refer to my previous explanation if you have any doubts . .
I have given you a total of 3 valid sources. I think its more than enough to prove Kallur Mandal total population is 196,268.
That's the story of Kallur Mandal. --VikramVS1208 (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Explanation about 430,214 Figure edit
I don't understand why you are unable to understand the figure of 430,214.
I will teach you to understand the figure of 430,214.
See Kurnool City total Population is 484,327
In that 484,327 It includes Kurnool Urban area and Kallur Urban area.
Urban area means M.Corp + OG
M.Corp. OG
1. Kurnool Mandal - Kurnool M.Corp + OG = 296,097 + 16,738 = 312,835
+ + +
2. Kallur Mandal - Kurnool M.corp + OG = 134,117 + 10,681 = 144,681
-------------------------------------
Total = 430,214 + 27,419 = 457,633
Observe the above table carefully where you can get the answer for 430,214
. .
Kurnool Mandal Part
You might have a doubt that, where this 312,835 comes from. Refer to this website.
www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/5259-kurnool-kurnool-andhra-pradesh.html
In this website, it is clearly mentioned 312,835.
You might have another doubt, where this 296,097 comes from. Refer to this website.
www.censusindia.co.in/villagestowns/kallur-mandal-kurnool-andhra-pradesh-5259
In this website, it is clearly mentioned about 296,097.
You might have another doubt, where this 16,738 comes from. It is the OG of Kurnool viz.,
1. B.Thandrapadu = 6,229
2. Dinnedevarapadu = 5,212
3. Pasupala = 4,249
4. Rudravaram [part] = 1,048
----------
Total = 16,738
Kallur Mandal part
You might have another doubt where does this 134,117 and 10,681 come from. I have explained in detail about this. Refer my explanation on Kallur Mandal.
Again I am giving a detailed explanation on Kallur Mandal here
1. Kallur Urban area [Kurnool M.Corp] = 134,117
1. Peddapadu [OG] = 5,040
2. Pandipadu [OG] = 4,245
3. Laxmipuram [part] [OG] = 1,396
----------
Total = 10,681
134,117 + 10,681 = 144,681
for this refer to the website
www.censusindia.co.in/villagestowns/kallur-mandal-kurnool-andhra-pradesh-5258.
I am concluding this topic on 430,214 figure by doing the final step.
1. Kurnool M.Corp [Kurnool mandal] = 296,097
2. Kurnool M.Corp [Kallur Mandal ] = 134,117
----------
Total = 430,214
1. B.Thandrapadu = 6,229 |
2. Dinnedevarapadu = 5,212 |
3. Pasupala = 4,249 | These are Kurnool mandal OG
4. Rudravaram [part] = 1,048 |
----------
Total = 16,738
5. Peddapadu = 5,040 |
6. Pandipadu = 4,245 | These are Kallur Mandal OG
7. Laxmipuram [part] = 1,396 |
----------
Total = 10,681
So total Kurnool Municipal Corporation and OG population is
430,214 + 16,738 + 10,681 = 457,633
This how 457,633 came. This value is mentioned in the book page.no.919. of 2011 Kurnool District census book.
Mamidalapadu population is also Mentioned on the same page
Mamidalapadu = 26,694
So the total Population is 457,633 + 26694 = 484,327
refer for verification. www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/349-kurnool.html
Hope You get clarity on Kurnool city population, especially on the fig. 430,214.
Still, If you have any doubts you can ask me.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 08:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply on Immature way of thinking. edit
Now I understood your way of thinking. Till now I thought that, you did not understand the calculation of Population. My estimation is wrong. You don't want to see the Kurnool above Kakinada. That's the problem with you.
You told that Kallur mandal population is only 62,151, which is very funny. Yesterday You told that, Kallur mandal has population of 144,798. I don't know what You will say Tomorrow about kallur population. You are saying that I have taken that from some website. In that website, Kurnool mandal has a population of 110,700. Do you think that Kurnool mandal has Population of 110,700? Yesterday it self you told kurnool mandal has population of 406,797. It's very strange that Kurnool mandal has a population of only 110,700. This shows How genuine the website is.
And you comparing Kurnool with Kakinada, Rajahmundry, Tirupati. I even told you that Kallur is not a Rural mandal of Kurnool. If it is Rural mandal, then they have mentioned it Kurnool Rural Mandal, instead of Kallur mandal. Now where is mentioned it as Kurnool Rural mandal.
If you think it is a Rural mandal, Then APSRTC Main Bus stand is located in Kallur mandal. Do you think Bus stand might have build in Village area.
First you tried to confuse me, on kurnool mandal. I gave clarification on that . Next you tried with kallur mandal, again I clarified. Now your trying again with some websites. Your are saying that websites mentioned by me was private one. That is the 2011 Census website. Websites were first mentioned by you only. If that is the thing, Why did you mentioned the websites first. Yourself mentioning the websites first, and agian you are mentioning the websites as private one. Its very strange thing done by you.
You are saying that You can show the villages which comes under Rural mandals of Kakinada, Rajahmundry and Tirupati. You can mention because, those are villages and OG M.Corp. But Kallur is not a village. Kallur is part Kurnool City only. I can say that , Western part of Kurnool is called Kallur. You cam verify any friends you have IN Kurnool. As it ias city population will not be classified in to Villages. It comes under whole.
And one more strange thing you told that, website has taken mistakenly into count. Do you think NRP [census team] is small organisation. They are headed by senior most IAS officers and you are blaming on them, that they have done mistaken. very strange.
Funny part in your recenet reply is you calculation. Actually your values on Kurnool is wrong, and to that, you not even done correct additions. Very funny.
You asked to show the 430,214. I have done it . Now you are searching another thing to misguide the things.
If you dont believe website, see in the book. There they mentioned it Kurnool M.corp population as 457,633. Dont simply say that, it is mistake. They are published buy Government. how can you say It is mistake with out any proof.
You repetedly mentioning someone with RamuSR2212. honestly speaking I dont know who actually he is. I know him just like I know you. If you have any problem with him go and solve wuth him. And dont mention some third person in betwee us.
You mentioned that, you have waited patiently for the proof. I have clarified all your doubts. My intention is not Kurnool to be top. My intention is to provide valid information to the common public. Actually You have that intention. Thats why you are searching my many websites to prove kurnool, is less. But you failed to prove. I have given every proof of population.
You even mentioned my College now. Yes, I am very proud of my college. It is the 2nd best engineering college in Andhra pradesh after Andhra University. Very few people get admission in that college. You have to get EAMCET rank of below 500 to get admission in JNTUK. Thats why, as responsible graduate from JNTUK, its my duty to rectify the mistakes. Defenetley I will rectify the mistakes on wikipedia page and correct it.
You not even mentioned any proof to me to your changes on wikipedia page. So I will Correct it. Be prepared to submit the proof you have mentioned. just like I mentione dto you.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Sources. edit
As I mentioned Kurnool M.Corp. population as 457,633. You might ask for a source. I have already told you many times. Don't worry Again mentioning. Refer page.no. 919 of Kurnool district where the population of each town in the district is clearly mentioned.
Even You can go through the page no. 286 in the book. for Kallur Mandal map. and page.no.298 for Kurnool mandal map.
There they have clearly mentioned the Kurnool M.corp part of Kurnool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikramVS1208 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
reply for invalid PDF edit
I have gone through the PDF you kept in a recent reply. It is showing only towns and villages without population. You have tried to convince Kallur is the village according to Pdf. Observe carefully, even Kurnool is mentioned as a village there. Do you think Kurnool is a village?
I suggest you, to go through the Pdfs before mentioning it to me.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Questioning how Government of India Calculations were wrong according to Chinnusaikrish. edit
You told, Government of India Calculation is wrong, and claiming your calculation is Right.
You have to prove to me how these calculations on the websites are wrong. You have to solve in the detailed calculation, not just by your words.
www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/349-kurnool.html www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/348-rajahmundry.html
www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/350-tirupati.html
www.census2011.co.in/census/metropolitan/351-kakinada.html
I repeat, You has to prove how these calculations are wrong. You have to prove in detail, not just by words.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 15:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply to Chinnusaikrish on lack of clarity on subject, Loose talk and incapable answers to questions edit
I dont have any frustration. Actually You have frustration which is very clear with your changing attitude. Loose talk is yours, which is visible by talks, as you change the population of Kallur mandal with daily one value.
Coming to Kallur mandal.
Kallur was C.T. up to only 2002. In 2002 itself Kallur was merged with Kurnool M.Corp. For your reference, I am giving a link to National Media Newspaper.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Kallur-gram-panchayats-merger-with-KMC-okayed/articleshow/406620.cms
The newspaper article was published on Feb 9 2002. You can see the date. Kallur urban area officially became, Kurnool M.Corp. in 2002. That's why I naming it as Kallur urban area. You don't have clarity on Kallur. That's why changing the population of Kallur mandal daily. First, you said, Kallur mandal population is 144,798. and asked me to show the Proof of complete kallur mandal merger with M.Corp. Then I explained clearly. Then you told Kallur mandal population is 61,000 something. Then I gave clarity on that. Now you are Saying Kallur is C.T. with 134,117. Don't change the value for tomorrow.
You told that Kurnool M.corp is 446,970 and not 430,214. You are estimation is partially correct and partially wrong. Because According to you 446,970 = 312,853 + 134,117 This 312,853 you have included OGs of Kurnool. But 134,117 of Kallur, You did not add the OG os kallur. You are adding OGs separately for Kallur after that. This show how much clarity you have on this subject.
First I never told, Kurnool M.Corp. population is 430,214. You asked for the explanation of 430,214. You can check even on the talk page. I never told that. I gave clarification only after mentioned by you, because you are asking for clarity. You asked for Kurnool city population of 484,327. and you told don't say just 457,633 + 26,694. You asked for clarification. Then I mentioned 430,214 M.Corp. and remaining OGs and Mamidalapadu, Combinely become 484,327.
even that website is first mentioned by you. Not by me. I gave clarity based on website, because you are following the website. From the first onwards, I am following Only Census books. You can even see in the source Section of page.
I gave clarity on how that 430,214 came. yesterdays reply with each and every step.
I understood You intension. You can bare kakinada being smaller than Rajahmundry and Tirupati. That's why you are adding just M.Corp and OG. You are not adding other CT in the mandal. Because if Other other CTs were added, Kakinada will be 8th place. You don't want that.
First you told Kakinada population is 509,000 some thing, Later you accepted 443,028. Now you are changing to 384,182. You don't have clarity on Kakinada city.
I have clarity on Kurnool city population. From the beginning onwards I am saying Total Population is 457,633 + 26,694 = 484,327. You can check my talk page if you have any doubts.
I dont have any frustration, because I have clarity from first onwards. You can see How politely I behaved with you. But you are not deserving that.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Reply to Chinnusaikrish for not answering, how 2011 census websites are wrong. edit
You did not answer how 2011 websites are wrong in the calculation according to you. You are saying simply with words. I have t prove it. Otherwise, you have to accept those websites are correct.
Till, You show those websites are wrong, I will follow those. That's why I am changing the pages according to the 2011 Census.
As a responsible graduate of JNTUK, it's my responsibility to rectify mistakes of Wikipedia page, which is public domain.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Regarding RamuSR2212 edit
I have clarified you many times on this issue.
RamuSR2212 has mentioned you only once 4-5 days back.
You also mentioned RamuSR2212 4-5 days back. Then I did not respond on that with you. Because You might have some personal issues within him. I did not bother issues between you. Please talk to him and solve.
I have responded on RamuSR2212 with you, only after repeated mentions by you. Again I don't know who actually he is.
And don't mention his name again with me.
--VikramVS1208 (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020 edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Star Maa New Logo in Telugu.jpg listed for discussion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Star Maa New Logo in Telugu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SP013 (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Star Maa New Logo in Telugu.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Star Maa New Logo in Telugu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gemini TV HD New Logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gemini TV HD New Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Zee Telugu HD New logo.png edit
Thanks for uploading File:Zee Telugu HD New logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gemini TV HD logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gemini TV HD logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
October 2020 edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andhra Pradesh, you may be blocked from editing. Stop with this disruptive edits of yours. Not only your edits are original researches, the names are not even commonly used. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 05:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- Referring to your edit summary [1], people do not call Tamil Nadu as 'Tamil' either, so comparing Himachal Pradesh with Uttar Pradesh doesn't make any sense. Also this section talks about the historical use of the name Andhra. If you want to add anything more, add in that section with WP:RS. Also as per WP:BRD you should be the one discussing in the talk page. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Bullets and indentation edit
Dear brother Chinnusaikrish, In RM, new comment and recommendations should start with a bullet and end with a sign, see WP:RMCOMMENT for more. Adding more than one bullet unnecessary.
Also the replies should be threaded and indented, like this:
- :Hello
- ::Hi bother
- :::What are you doing
- ::::Going for lunch
- :::::Okay, call you later!
- ::::Going for lunch
- :::What are you doing
- ::Hi bother
I have fixed it for you now but I hope you can learn this soon! Thank you! -- Ab207 (talk) 08:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gemini Movies HD New logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gemini Movies HD New logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gemini Movies Old logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gemini Movies Old logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TejaTVlogo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:TejaTVlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Adding a typo edit
Hi, are you sure you meant to do [2] ϢereSpielChequers 23:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021 edit
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Rajahmundry. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Article title cannot be undermined, please go through MOS:BOLDLEAD and Template:Infobox settlement. Ab207 (talk) 13:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Rajahmundry, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per MOS:BOLDLEAD and Template:Infobox settlement, the article title will appear first. Please do not try to override COMMONNAME, let the move discussion end. Ab207 (talk) 12:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 edit
Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to RRR (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please see this discussion. BOVINEBOY2008 21:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
August 2021 edit
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to RRR (film), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. -- DaxServer (talk) 07:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at RRR (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BOVINEBOY2008 13:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at RRR (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
There's already a post on WP:ANI to bring your edits to the attention of administrators and you've continued to push your preference despite talk page consensus against you. Enough, that's not how Wikipedia works. Ravensfire (talk) 13:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Edit warring on RRR edit
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on RRR (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:This is a poster of Roudram Ranam Rudhiram film.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please add the appropriate fair use tag and rationale.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- DaxServer (talk) 10:29, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Names in movie plots edit
Hi. We have a policy called MOS:FILMPLOT, which asks not to add names of the actors and actresses in the "Plot" section, as it's duplicating the "Cast" section. You can see the correction I made to Maharathi (2007 film) here Special:Diff/1037157874. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Could you cleanup your edit at Sri Anjaneyam (Special:Diff/1026277263)? -- DaxServer (talk) 21:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Roudram Ranam Rudhiram (RRR) Poster.jpg edit
_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Roudram Ranam Rudhiram (RRR) Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
_Poster.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
ANI edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Chinnusaikrish. Thank you. -- DaxServer (talk) 21:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chinnusaikrish reported by User:Ravensfire (Result: ). Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 13:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC) This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Eenadu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- DaxServer (talk) 16:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gemini TV New logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gemini TV New logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Central Universities in AP edit
Yesterday in Parliament Ycp MPs are asked to central ministers How many Central Universities in the Andhra Pradesh. The Minister Replied to Ap Has Total 6 Central Universities. But Wikipedia mentioned only 3 Central Universities. Please Update Remaining 3 Central Universities 117.209.213.169 (talk) 03:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
September 2022 edit
Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eenadu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Eenadu. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is your final warning from me. Do not add content without sources which is WP:OR. Do not remove sourced content that is not WP:UNDUE. If you continue to do so, I'll report you at WP:ANI — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- Also, continuing this revert cycle [and restoring the WP:OR material] is edit warring and could lead to your account being blocked — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:40, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry edit
Does the account Sk9676 (talk · contribs) belong to you? If so, you need to read WP:SOCK. Multiple accounts are not allowed for malicious purposes. If the account is a legitimate alternate account, you need to declare it as put forth in that policy document. Please reply to this message — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Notice edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
December 2022 edit
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sakshi (newspaper), you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:24, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Edit removal edit
Hello user, Edit Wikipedia only with a neutral tone and refrain from the edits as you did on Nara Lokesh 456legend(talk) 11:38, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Dear user, before editing a article kindly ensure that you are providing necessary reliable sources supporting your changes. You edited a content that is already reached a consensus in the respective talk page. Kindly reach to the consensus before you edit. Referring to your edit on Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly456legend(talk)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Dear user, you are required to reach to the concensus before any further edit on the respective talk pages. Refrain from edition and make sure that you are aware of the Wikipedia guidelines, referring to your recent edits on N. Chandrababu Naidu and Nara Lokesh have been reverted. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:|article's talk page]], and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 456legend(talk) 18:49, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of cities in Andhra Pradesh by population edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of cities in Andhra Pradesh by population, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:48, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
June 2023 edit
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sakshi (newspaper), you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gemini Movies New logo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Gemini Movies New logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Sakshi (newspaper) edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sakshi (newspaper), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Nara Lokesh edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nara Lokesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023 edit
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Sakshi (newspaper), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 02:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arjunaraoc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sakshi (newspaper) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Do not revert without discussing your perceived bias etc on talk page. You may be blocked if you do so. Arjunaraoc (talk) 11:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 edit
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Eenadu, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arjunaraoc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sakshi (newspaper) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Your restoration of your edits without responding to warnings on your talk page is not acceptable. Arjunaraoc (talk) 11:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arjunaraoc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sakshi (newspaper) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. I have restored to the version before your previous edits, as your edits are perceived as biased by myself and other editors. You have not responded to the earlier warning notices on your talk page. As an example, the updation of image when it is not required feels like bias. Similarly updation of image for Eenadu when it is not required, with a cover page highlighting the news about Jaganmohan reddy's success is also bias. If you want to improve the article, you are welcome to do with independent sources free of bias. Please do it incrementally by editing section by section over a week, so that others can review and collaborate. Thanks. Arjunaraoc (talk) 11:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Sakshi (newspaper) edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sakshi (newspaper), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:47, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Eenadu Telugu newspaper front page.jpg edit
A tag has been placed on File:Eenadu Telugu newspaper front page.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Arjunaraoc (talk) 11:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Sakshi (newspaper) edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sakshi (newspaper), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
None of the sources mentioned in the article talk about the constituency as "P. Gannavaram". There is a village and a mandal called P. Gannavaram, but that doesn't mean that the constituency's name will be changed. Please move the article back to the name mentioned on the official ECI delimitation documents. Thanks and happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- You'll have to undo the move for Gannavaram, Krishna Assembly constituency after that, in order to disambiguate correctly. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- There are no "Gannaravam, Krishna Assembly Constituency" and "Gannavaram, Konaseema Assembly Constituency" names in the official ECI delimitation documents as well. Please observe that. Both are notified as "Gannavaram", Choice is left to us. And the constituency is even called as P. Gannavaram by the people. So, it becomes easy if P. Gannavaram remains as the name here. Chinnusaikrish (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- For Wikipedia, facts have to be verifiable, i.e. present in offline or online reliable sources. The district name is added to differentiate the constituencies from each other, per WP:INCONSTNAME, which is a well-discussed guideline. With only Gannavaram and P. Gannavaram folks won't know which is which at first glance. Do reconsider. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:25, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Eenadu Telugu newspaper front page.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Eenadu Telugu newspaper front page.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Gannavaram, Konaseema Assembly constituency, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Sakshi (newspaper) edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sakshi (newspaper), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Disruptive edits edit
Stop the kind of disruptive and POV pushing edits like you have done at Sakshi page. If you continue such edits, you will be banned from editing. Nikh Nori (talk) 08:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Nara Lokesh edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nara Lokesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
N Chandrababu Naidu edit
You should have restored my version, since it was immediately done after your edits and was date maintenance only [3]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
ANI notice edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is user:Chinnusaikrish. Thank you. El_C 09:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- The user @456legend has been on a spree of inserting malicious content in the page Sakshi(Newspaper). The content he added seemed too away from representing a page properly since it had only non-neutral content which was rectified by me. The same user presented neutrality in the page Eenadu and reverted many edits there which seemed non-neutral but he didn't do the same for the page Sakshi(Newspaper). There was no conversation started by him on the talk page as well regarding the same issue for any consensus. I request you to follow and observe these. Thank you ~ Chinnusaikrish (talk) 09:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Sakshi (newspaper) edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sakshi (newspaper), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chinnusaikrish edit
@Chinnusaikrish you were advised by the clerk to declare your alternative accounts on you userpage. Following that please add {{User alternative account name|Sk9676}} on Chinnusaikrish and {{User alternative account name|Chinnusaikrish}} on Sk9676 which will appear as
 | This user has an alternative account named Sk9676. |
| | This user has an alternative account named Chinnusaikrish. |
on respective userpages. ShaanSenguptaTalk 09:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Nara Lokesh edit
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nara Lokesh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024 edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at N. Chandrababu Naidu.
Your removal of almost all information from the lead section while leaving information about this politician's arrest in order to highlight it as his "present status" is contrary to policy, and if you do it again, I will ask that you be blocked from editing. —Alalch E. 06:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Alalch E.: Hi, we can't jump directly to the final warning, let it start with levels as shown in the Twinkle. --iMahesh (talk) 04:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Arjunaraoc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andhra Pradesh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please discuss your proposed edits on talk page, in view of your history of POV pushing over the past year. Arjunaraoc (talk) 10:02, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andhra Pradesh. I asked you to discuss on talk page and you reverted my edit without discussion. This is not acceptable. In view of your past history of POV pushing, you will be reported to admins for necessary action, if you continue to vandalise the article. Arjunaraoc (talk) 06:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)