Talk:Eenadu

Poll

Kindly consider the fact that media in Andhra Pradesh devoid of "objective point of view".

I'd propose a Media Rating Service similar to CRISIL in financial industry.

The Media Rating Service should rate media in order to stop propagating "sarcasm and hypocrisy" in the society.

Kindly poll your opinion here http://www.blogpoll.com/poll/view_Poll.php?type=java&poll_id=91558

Sincerely, Known 15:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes there is every need for media rating. Media(Read few media houses) in Andhra pradesh is highly biased.

NPOV

There is no such thing as an objective point of view.

http://www.rhetorica.net/bias.htm

Great

Should I be asking reason behind making the above statement? It is imperative that one need to mention what "objective point of view" is. Hey forgot .. I see your username as MAAPARTY - what is MAAPARTY? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.107.0.73 (talk) 02:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Eenadulogo.gif

Image:Eenadulogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:51, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

pichi munda kodaka —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.110.11 (talk) 14:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Is Eenadu against Visakhapatnam?

Although Eenadu was founded in Visakhapatnam, it appears to be against Visakhapatnam in its present form. I heard it from many people. Why? This is highly unfair. Visakhapatnam is also the largest city in the state and the largest contributor to the treasury and exchequer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.243.98 (talk) 23:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC) 182.71.243.98 (talk) 23:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eenadu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407092737/http://mruc.net/irs2012q1-topline-findings.pdf to http://mruc.net/irs2012q1-topline-findings.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Updation of infobox Image

@Chinnusaikrish, You have updated the infobox with a new image, as part of reverting other's reverts of your edits. when there is no such need. If you are interested in updating with a new image, please discuss your rationale here. Do not change or revert the article until a consensus is reached in the discussion as that is the process to be followed. Thanks. Arjunaraoc (talk) 11:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)