User talk:Bobbychan193/Archive 2

< Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3 >

All Pages:

1 -  2 -  3 -  ... (up to 100)

Date range: August to October 2019

July 2019 GOCE drive bling

		The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Star
		This barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copy edits totaling over 100,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copyediting 60 articles during the GOCE July 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Words, 2nd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copyediting 70,884 total words during the GOCE July 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copyediting two long articles during the GOCE July 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 1st Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copyediting 40 old articles during the GOCE July 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Great to see another editor going for the top award! The drive had the highest editor participation since May 2015, and brought the copy editing backlog to a record low of 585 articles! Much thanks for taking part! – Reidgreg (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Appreciate it Reidgreg! Thanks again! —Bobbychan193 (talk) 00:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you for accepting my request at GOCE Mediran (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

GOCE

Hi Bobbychan, I saw you recently asked for a copyedit of Ding Junhui for a potential GA push, and it's nice to see another editor working on GAs for snooker articles. I wasn't sure if you are aware, but A-class isn't really a thing anymore (at least it isn't for the snooker wikiproject, last time I saw it, it was in military articles), but I'd be more than willing to review the article when it's finished. I have a number of GAs open (as well as reviews for that matter) and just wanted to support your work on snooker articles. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:04, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

@Lee Vilenski: A-class articles are a thing in the scope of WikiProject China, but the assessment page seems to be a little outdated (and there are only two A-class articles in WikiProject China). However, I'm definitely prioritizing GAN. Currently, I don't know if I'm ready to get fully involved in WikiProject Snooker, but I support your active involvement. Thanks for your support as well; I'll let you know when the article is ready for GA review. Bobbychan193 (talk) 20:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Chetsford (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification and information. —Bobbychan193 (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Andrew Yang on JRE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Yang on JRE.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Thank you for the notification. Yesterday I was similarly informed by JJMC89, so I posted a question here, but it did not get answered. I was wondering if you or anyone else could answer it. Thanks. Bobbychan193 (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

You're right, there's really no workaround in terms of the specific images. When your main purpose is improving the visual flow of an article, you're pretty much limited to free images. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:14, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Andrew Yang Second Debate (July 2019).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Yang Second Debate (July 2019).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Andrew Yang on The Ben Shapiro Show.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Andrew Yang on The Ben Shapiro Show.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Andrew Yang on JRE.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Yang on JRE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Andrew Yang on The Ben Shapiro Show.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Yang on The Ben Shapiro Show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Andrew Yang Second Debate (July 2019).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Yang Second Debate (July 2019).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vietnam and the World Bank

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vietnam and the World Bank you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 20:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Endorsement thing

Hey Bobby, I just wanted to say something, how is donating and attending an event not a sign of endorsement, because donating to a single campaign or going to a rally for a candidate seems like support or endorsement to me, am i wrong or not?, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) But a person (or entity) can donate to or attend rallies for multiple candidates, can't they? – Reidgreg (talk) 16:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

As Reidgreg stated, any person can donate to multiple candidates. The same applies to attending events or rallies. As an example, Jack Dorsey has donated to both Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang. See the talk page discussion for more information. There have been lengthy discussions regarding this; feel free to add your own stance on this on the talk page. Bobbychan193 (talk) 17:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

If you're going to remove an edit for not being a proper endorsement, please don't remove other edits by the same user unless they have the same issue. Possibly by accident, you removed 2 edits instead of 1 but only identified a problem in the second one.javery (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2019 (HST)

@Javery: You’re right, my mistake. I didn’t realize there were two edits. Thanks for the heads-up. I will fix the citation formatting later. Bobbychan193 (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 blitz bling

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copy edits totaling over 10,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vietnam and the World Bank

The article Vietnam and the World Bank you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vietnam and the World Bank for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Ding Junhui

@Baffle gab1978: Thanks for the notification. I think Twofingered Typist already started copy editing the article. Not sure why they didn’t add a {{working}} template though. Regardless, you might want to double check with them so the two of you don’t do unnecessary double-work. Bobbychan193 (talk) 00:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

From the history it looks like TT has been fixing duplicate wikilinks and doing other gnoming tasks. We haven't conflicted anyway. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:05, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi again, I've added three {{Citation needed}} templates in the Achievements section where references are needed. Also, is becoming a patron of a football club (final paragraph) an achievement? Good luck with your proposed GAN or ACN nomination. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Baffle gab1978: Thanks!! I’ll take a look at the things you mentioned later. Thanks again! Bobbychan193 (talk) 02:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Sun Yang

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the GOCE of the article Sun Yang has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

It's likely not important for a GA review but there are inconsistencies in the citation formats that need to be resolved at some point. It is usual to include a Website or Publisher field in a citation. Many citations in this article have neither. I did fix some that were a mess. I have left the distance descriptors 100 metre, 200 metre etc... as they appear in the article though after browsing the web there are arguments to be made for 200-metre race, 200 metres etc... I'm sure Wikipedia has a Competitive Swimming committee or task force that has set up agreed upon standards. (Smiling.) I also left a short bit about doping issues in the 2013–2015 chronology section so that it is complete even though there is a separate section later. You may disagree with this.

As for Ding Junhui, I simply forgot to tag the article that I was working on it, so you got two copy edits for the price of one.

Best of luck moving forward with the article.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Sorry for the delayed reply. Thanks for your help TT! Appreciate it. Bobbychan193 (talk) 01:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ding Junhui

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ding Junhui you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Bobbychan193. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Kang Woo Kyu.
Message added 00:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ding Junhui

The article Ding Junhui you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ding Junhui for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ding Junhui

The article Ding Junhui you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ding Junhui for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 08:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Congrats! I see this isn't your first, but the second (I'm guessing) of many. Let me know if there is anything more I can do. Great to see someone expanding and promoting cue sport articles. I know you work on articles about Chinese BLPs, there are obviously other snooker players from China (Such as Yan Bingtao), but there are also some world champion pool players that could do with some attention. I don't know the difference from China to the Chinese Taipei (there's probably political stuff there), but Ko Pin-yi, Ko Ping-chung, Liu Shasha, Han Yu are all world champions who are basically just stubs at the moment, if you wanted something to work on.

Congrats once again. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

@Lee Vilenski: Thanks for your help! I’ll definitely look into improving more snooker-related articles when I get a chance to. Bobbychan193 (talk) 16:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The War on Normal People

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The War on Normal People you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The War on Normal People

The article The War on Normal People you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The War on Normal People for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Requests archiving bot

Bobbychan, I appreciate the work you do around the GOCE, but I'd appreciate if you didn't create false requests to test the bot. The bot has already been tested with a range of test cases in a sandbox area. We want this live trial to run with real-world information and not be subject to false information which is going to have to be deleted from the record and which clutters up the edit history when we review the data from the trial period. There's a lot of discussion about this already, and would appreciate if you discuss before jumping in on something like this. Thanks for the attention, though. – Reidgreg (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry for being rude earlier. I was feeling a bit pressured to get the edit notice live, which I should have done last week. BTW, the markup code in the edit notice is there so that one click will insert the code into the edit window, or at least that's what it's supposed to do. I only tested it on a couple browsers, and the text insertion point may have to be moved to the bottom of the edit window so the code is inserted at the correct place. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

@Reidgreg: You’re right, that’s my bad. I was originally planning to delete the dummy request from the archive after bot archives it, but I didn’t take into consideration clogging up the edit history. I’ll take a more hands-off approach now, and let you, the other GOCE coordinators, and the BRFA team handle things. As for the template, I didn’t realize what you originally had allowed for a one-click process like that. Sorry for the trouble. Bobbychan193 (talk) 18:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The War on Normal People

The article The War on Normal People you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The War on Normal People for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019. June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated! June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here. August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585. Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent. September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

India Article

I didn't list this in my article count as it is a September request and ineligible. I wanted to be sure it was completed before it appeared as a TFA in early October on the WP main page. Thanks,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE drive bling

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copyediting 14 articles during the GOCE September 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 3rd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to Bobbychan193 for copyediting 12 old articles during the GOCE September 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Endorsment?

Why has this not listed yet? Doesn't this qualify as an endorsment? And if not, why? https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1143996007383875584?lang=en — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.12.218.8 (talk) 21:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

I will add it. Bobbychan193 (talk) 22:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2011 Gansu school bus crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Good Article Backlog Drive Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thanks for your participation in the September 2019 GA Backlog drive. Your 2 reviews made a difference. The work of editors like you helped bring down the unreviewed backlog by over 35%. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Addison's disease/GA1

Bobbychan193, for future reference, the best thing to do when the nominator of a GAN opens the review themselves is to tag it for speedy deletion (which I have just done here), and then post a note to the nominator's talk page explaining why they should not open the review page—that is for the eventual reviewer to do. Usually, when the review is opened by the nominator, it's because they don't understand the GA nomination process, so also pointing them to WP:GANI is helpful.

Once the original page has been speedily deleted, the next step is to adjust the GA nominee template to remove the "onreview" status and remove the review transclusion from the talk page, since the review page no longer exists. (But wait until the review page has been deleted; otherwise, the bot will just transclude it again.) Also pinging Lee Vilenski; better not to close such a page, just let it be speedily deleted. For this particular nomination, I'll wait until the review page is deleted, and then reset the GA nominee template's page number back to 1. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 03:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: Got it, thanks. Bobbychan193 (talk) 03:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)