To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
Warning dates: April 2010 - October 2013
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

Warnings

edit

April 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Marchwiel has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane Goodall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jminthorne (talk) 09:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hans Christian Ørsted, you will be blocked from editing. Jminthorne (talk) 09:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jane Goodall, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. WikiTome | Talk 09:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. REDVƎRS 10:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Chinese Cinderella has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Humphry Davy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Humphry Davy was changed by 85.115.54.180 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-05-11T09:10:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Templeton "Faceman" Peck. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 09:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diniyar Bilyaletdinov, you may be blocked from editing. GD 6041 (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Batley Bulldogs, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Northumbrian (talk) 13:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thomas John Barnardo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Case hardening of rocks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Immunize (talk) 14:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Julia Butterfly Hill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Sophie (Talk) 14:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Dryas iulia. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Sophie (Talk) 14:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dryas iulia. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sophie (Talk) 14:49, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Oskar Schindler, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 09:02, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mesothelioma has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Sammy Jones worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 09:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Charles Gildon. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Christian75 (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sinitta. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TheRetroGuy (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr (talk) 04:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Martin O'Neill, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Yousou (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

September 2010

edit

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Louis Walsh. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Maesglas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 14:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jimmy Kébé has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  – iridescent 08:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jimmy Kébé. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Jimmy Kébé. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Lincoln 10:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 14:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Beijing National Stadium worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barrow, Alaska, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. (talk) 09:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Barrow, Alaska. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. (talk) 09:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Francis Drake. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. JNW (talk) 14:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pop-up ad has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. WookieInHeat (talk) 13:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sleep Room has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 14:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Afghanistan, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Marshfield, Newport has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2011

edit

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kyle Lafferty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. Monkeymanman (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoke City F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Add92 (talk) 15:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Port Vale F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Tobyc75 (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Port Vale F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. EchetusXe 17:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012

edit

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Windows Vista. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012

edit

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Display advertising, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Sriharsh1234. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to BT Home Hub because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sriharsh1234 09:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MotorStorm: Apocalypse with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rafy talk 14:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Halo (series) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wiki13 (talk) 14:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Grand Theft Auto (series). Wiki13 (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 14:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 195.148.224.126 (talk) 09:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2013

edit

Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Flux because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Paul Lambert, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cadbury Creme Egg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aylesbury Grammar School, you may be blocked from editing. T.I.M(Contact) 18:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lykourgos-Stefanos Tsakonas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rocketrod1960 (talk) 13:01, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Demiurge1000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Oscilloscope because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 13:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oscilloscope. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 Months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013

edit

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Hastie Bell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 13:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone, to Millennium Dome because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — MusikAnimal talk 16:59, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autonet Insurance (September 13)

edit
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! 85.115.54.180, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Oriented strand board has been reverted.
Your edit here to Oriented strand board was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awxhgAMnyTs, http://www.youtube.com/user/norbord01) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Windows XP, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 15:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Information icon In a recent edit to the page Business analyst, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. — MusikAnimal talk 17:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Widr (talk) 17:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jemma Redgrave. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Widr (talk) 11:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

edit

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rudolf Hess. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nasnema  Chat  10:34, 2 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Fraud, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. Auric talk 11:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Computer accessibility, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Auric talk 11:52, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autonet Insurance (October 4)

edit
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wood gas generator, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widr (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Telecommunication, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widr (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


November 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stoke-on-Trent. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.--Michig (talk) 12:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Autonet Insurance (November 4)

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your edits to April 3

edit

Some of your edits on the page April 3 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andre Marriner, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Comic Sans MS, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RashersTierney (talk) 10:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm 2602:306:3357:BA0:4493:656B:A3BA:7236. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to S.C. Braga have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2602:306:3357:BA0:4493:656B:A3BA:7236 (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Premier League (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DraftName

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:DraftName, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CoolSkittle (talk) 15:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Paul Rachubka. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.