138.162.8.58

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

12:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
PrimeBOT (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Welcome!

Hello 138.162.8.58! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (138.162.8.58) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 22:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Conflict of Interest

Hello, 138.162.8.58. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Note: Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines, especially before editing any articles related to the US gov't or military. Thank you- wolf 22:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Contents

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
May 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rhabdomyolysis, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rhabdomyolysis was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-16T12:49:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Redwood National and State Parks. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Redwood National and State Parks was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) deleting 35002 characters on 2008-05-17T19:10:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of reflexes (alphabetical). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Abrech (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dermot MacMurrough, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  S3000  ☎ 13:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. June 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Felching has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. 21655 ταλκ/01ҁ 19:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to taurine, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deli nk (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. BillCJ (talk) 00:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC) August 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Orgy worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.T Pearson (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of unusual deaths, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC) November 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Subaru Impreza WRX STI has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC) December 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Elonka Dunin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC) January 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Full Tilt Poker, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Full Tilt Poker was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-06T20:06:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC) February 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —macy 23:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alice's Adventures in Wonderland was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) deleting 40449 characters on 2009-02-18T23:42:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to North America, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: North America was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-20T14:03:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC) March 2009 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Badass, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Badass was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-26T16:30:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC) April 2009 Dear 138.162.8.58, Some of your edits on the page 1976 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are: The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page. If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 03:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matthew McConaughey, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Matthew McConaughey was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-21T18:29:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Mansfield, Texas. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Velveeta has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC) This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Enigmamsg 22:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC) This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Jonah Goldberg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Uncle Dick (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC) May 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JNW (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Spleen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. |→ Spaully₪† 20:04, 10 May 2009 (GMT) 20:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. July 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Schrödinger's cat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 10:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Transfer function, you will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth(talk|contribs) 20:44, 21 July 2009 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Challenge coin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. FASTILY (TALK) 18:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC) This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Augusta, Lady Gregory. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. –Türî∂n 08:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Your edits to October 28 Dear 138.162.8.58, Some of your edits on the page October 28 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are: No Wikipedia page has been linked to. If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC) August 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Species. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JMM|Whatup!? 14:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Your edits to September 7 Dear 138.162.8.58, Some of your edits on the page September 7 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are: The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page. If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC) September 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Department of Defense Police. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 15:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Hugh Hefner, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alansohn (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at My Super Sweet 16, you will be blocked from editing. Keith D (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Your recent edit to My Super Sweet 16 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC) October 2009 Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul (SSN-708). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -MBK004 18:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Proton pack has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Anna Lincoln 07:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC) November 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Racism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Floquenbeam (talk) 15:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --ElKevbo (talk) 19:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC) December 2009 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Paine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 13:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jacksonville, Florida. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 22:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC) January 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Control engineering has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --RrburkeekrubrR 14:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Find a Grave. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cassandra 73 (talk) 20:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when: editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with; participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam). Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. This concern is expressed because your IP address is registered to Navy Network Information Center, Jacksonville Florida, and as an agency of the United States Military, may have interest or involvement in the case concerning Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Wildbear (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Vandalism Please do not vandalize my user page. Furthermore, please do not re-add unencyclopedic content to the Battlefield: Bad Company 2 article. You cannot use yourself as a reference, that is in violation of the policy regarding reliable sources. Also, you should always avoid addressing readers of an an article directly, such as "you". Eik Corell (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Your recent edits Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Final warning This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did multiple times with User talk:Eik Corell's user page (example). Additionally, take edit wars to personal talk pages or the article's talk page, even if you feel you are correct. --Teancum (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC) About BFBC 2 This is Link 486. After reading your edits to the demo section of the article, I noticed that they contained some spelling and grammatical errors. I will try to restore the information you provided, and will do my part to improve it. I do apologize for not giving an explanation as to what I did; I must admit that I myself would not like it if someone else deleted my edits without giving reason. Also, my gamertag is SanguineLlama (I'm on my 1-month Gold trial right now, so I'll have to get a membership card before long). If you want to play a few rounds, send an invite my way. Link 486 (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2010 (UTC) February 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Yu-7 torpedo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Curry, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gene Omission (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron 12. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. --GnoworTC 19:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page John Curry. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC) March 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gay (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Gavia immer (talk) 04:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings. May 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Quarterback U, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Quarterback U was changed by 138.162.8.58 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-05-14T03:15:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Knee pad. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. N419BH 05:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC) June 2010 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wasilla High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Asher196 (talk) 19:23, 15 June 2010 (UTC) July 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page New Orleans Saints has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. KuRiZu (talk) 17:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC) Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to USS Vandegrift (FFG-48). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -MBK004 03:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC) August 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Samwell (entertainer), did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please: Click here to submit a false positive report. Edit this page and remove this message. Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 09:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC) This is to inform you that I've begun a thread at the Administrator's Notice Board for Incidents that concerns the IP address you're using to access Wikipedia. Based on a review of edits emanating from this IP address, it appears to be in use to evade a block levied on another IP address for repeated vandalism. Details can be found by searching for this IP address at the Administrator's Notice Board for Incidents.  – OhioStandard (talk) 01:49, 21 August 2010 (UTC) September 2010 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. October 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ariel Sharon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. since when is using medical terminology POV? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. The recent edit you made to Florida High Speed Rail constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. Puffin Lets talk! 16:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC) November 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:'N Sync, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 18:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC) December 2010 Your submission at Articles for creation Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. →GƒoleyFour (GSV) 01:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC) December 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Robert Schimmel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 02:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joel McHale, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CliffC (talk) 04:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. January 2010 Chernobyl disaster Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. I did not accept your proposed edit to Chernobyl disaster for a couple of reasons. First, you did not provide a link or other information about a reliable third party source that supports the claim. Secondly, Wikipedia articles are not just random collections of information and without some context (also supported by sources) there doesnt seem to be any value to the reader in adding the content to the article. Active Banana (bananaphone 16:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC) January 2011 Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to United States Navy, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. fnlayson (talk) 14:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. April 2010 Reply Hello. You have a new message at yasht101's talk page. Yasht101 01:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC) September 2012 USS Laboon Hi, I noticed that you made an edit to the USS Laboon page. If you have concerns about an article, please state them on the article's talk page, or be bold and make the changes yourself. I encourage you to make a user account if you wish to edit Wikipedia further, as it allows you to be easier recognized, create articles and several other things. Silvrous Talk 17:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC) October 2012 Hello, I'm Thebestofall007. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kyō Kara Ore Wa!! because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thebestofall007 (talk) 23:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. December 2012 Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to De Leon Springs, Florida because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 09:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. January 2013 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at USS Asheville (SSN-758). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mojoworker (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. February 2013 Hello, I'm Don4of4. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Havertown, Pennsylvania, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Don4of4 [Talk] 20:33, 14 February 2013 (UTC) April 2013 Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ultimate (sport) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. August 2013 My cute what? Or, you meant, "you're cute"? :D Well, thanks. --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 22:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez concern Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC) September 2013 Your article submission Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez Hello 138.162.8.58. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez. The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Jose (Irizarry) Martinez}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC) October 2013 MOH If you feel that's the case, then feel free to revert my edits however you think is best. Czolgolz (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC) November 2013 Hello, I'm CanadianLinuxUser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Wayne Williams, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC) December 2013 Hello, 138.162.8.58. You have new messages at Cuprum17's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hello, 138.162.8.58. You have new messages at Cuprum17's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kumioko, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Thats terrific I'll comment at the ANI thread. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm Skarebo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ronnie Spector, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Skarebo (talk) 11:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC) Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 19:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. February 2014 NinaGreen comments @NinaGreen:, @Maggie Dennis:. Good message and comments to the WMF. I agree with most of what you said. Especially your complaints about the WMF and the utter complacency for dealing with abusive admins. Your complaint is further evidenced by the locking down of your user talk page so only established editors can edit it. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 20:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC) ANI Discussion about me @Djsasso:, @AGK: And of course now I am blocked by an Arb with the excuse that I am socking so that I cannot comment in the discussion about me. That will ensure I cannot defend myself. And I already told you AGK that this is a proxy IP used by thousands of people in the navy. I did not create that username or several others that you blocked accusing them of being me. The checkuser program is garbage and always has been. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 18:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC) @AGK: BTW, as proof that the Checkuser tool is a complete piece of shit and does more collateral damage than it helps. PaladinNJ (talk · contribs) was blocked by AGK and accused of being me. That account was create way back in August of 2011 and has only edited a few times in the span of 3 years. None of the articles even match my editing pattern which was mostly Military history stuff. Any idiot that did the slightest due diligence can see it isn't me. But since I am a completel troll these days, let me offer this. Why don't you use the checkuser tool and go back the maximum time it will hold on the 138 series of IP's and block them all accuseing them of being me. Of course your going to block dozens to hundreds of editors but who cares about that here. I mean hell, if I am going to be accused of socking, just to discredit me why not go ahead and do it. In fact I will just fess up, every new account created in the last 2 years was me, working from various IP's around the world. Just go ahead and block them all now and get it overwith. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 18:41, 26 February 2014 (UTC) @AGK: and now I'll get the silent treatment just because you have all the power and I am completely helpless to do anything on this site. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC) @AGK: So I'm guessing by your silence at this point you are refusing to accept you made a mistake in blocking those other accounts and accusing them of being me. Its pretty obvious that a couple aren't me (although I could see the argument about the ones that didn't edit). I would complain about the problem but there is no one who cares about innocent editors getting blocked. Your in Arbcom so no one is going to do anything even if it was proved to be incorrect. Its just another example of admins on this site doing stuff half assed without bothering to actually look into the history. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2014 (UTC) AGK — Beeblebrox — Carcharoth — Floquenbeam — Newyorkbrad — Salvio giuliano:. Since this error in judgement relates to an Arbcom member and the checkuser tool, I'll ping some of the Arbcom members and see if they will review this case. If you want to block me, that's fine, but when you block innocent editors and accuse them of being me, that is a major problem. I have already identified which accounts were mine and why I created them. 138.162.8.57 (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Checkuser actions are reviewed by the audit subcommittee, not the full committee, and will not be discussed on-wiki. You may contact them by email. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC) @Beeblebrox: Thanks, but given my standing on the project, the fact that AGK is an Arb and at least half the Audit submcommitte has commented that I be thrown out of the project, I think we both know it would be a complete waste of my time. But I wanted it to be on record that I have a major problem with the collateral damage being caused by the checkuser tool. I know its garbage and I think most people who have ever seen it in action know (or should know). I know for a fact AGK blocked at least half a dozen accounts and accused them of being me. I can't help but wonder how many other innocent accounts were blocked and accused of being another editor. I bet its in the hundreds. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Kumioko, I was about to ask you a few questions, since it doesn't look like this IP is blocked, and I don't understand why you can't edit ANI, but .... no. I honestly think it's time to move on to something else. You know it too, I know you do. As I've said before, elsewhere, we owe you gratitude for years of contributions, and I'm sorry to see the long slide from disheartened to disgruntled to disruptive never got reversed. I still have some hope that after a long break, it might someday still be reversed. But this is just no good for anyone, not productive for anyone, not going to help or educate or clarify or protect or defend anything. You're not being an underdog speaking truth to power, you're just not letting go even though you know in your heart, and have in fact said several times, that you know it's time to leave and participate in something else. I don't know, Simple, Commons, Wikidata, Wikia, ... get a new perspective. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC) @Floquenbeam: Your right and I have. I have done more than 20, 000 edits a month since August over at Wikia. Edits that could have been done here. They want and need the help and I am happy to do that because this site doesn't. I also tried editing some of the other Media wiki sites but I found some of the same admins who have a strangle hold here are also there. So I had to go to Wikia to continue to edit. I honestly don't think anyone on this site even cares how toxic the environment has become or has any desire to fix it. I have completely lost all respect for the project because they continue to refuse to do anything about the abusive editors and admins they know and have admitted are here. Arbcom doesn't care and they are the only ones with the power to do anything. And we both know Wiki never forgets; if I waited 1000 years and came back, I would still be treated like a dirtbag but that's because all editors are treated like dirtbags until they get the tools and the title of admin they are just expendible and that is not how this project or any project should work. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Comment to Demiurge1000 @Demiurge1000: I just wanted to comment about your vote. I have been blocked so I cannot reply but I wanted to let you know that I have made direct statements about specific admins and their abuse. The problem is I was immediately called out for "personal attacks". So I cannot name names because then they'll say I was attacking but if I don't give specific details of abuse then some like you say its empty hand waiving so I'm screwed either way. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 20:55, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Comment to PaladinNJ @PaladinNJ: I just wanted to say sorry you got accused of being me. I tried to tell them you weren't and frankly its pretty obvious by looking at the history of the account but I have been critical of the Admins and policy on this site so they just want me gone and they don't care how many editors they have to trample to purge me from the project so they can continue to by bullies and abusers. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Apologize to Taylorburks @Taylorburks: Greetings Taylorburks, I just wanted to apologize for you getting blocked and being accused of being me. I have tried to explain that to the Admin/Arb that blocked you but they don't care how many editors they trample to get rid of me and my criticism of the abuse and bullying that go on within the project. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Apologize to SaseVegas14 @SaseVegas14: I just wanted to take a moment to apologize to you for getting blocked and accused of being me. I have been very critical of some of the abusive policies and admins on this site and using the case in point, they don't care how many innocent editors they trample to get me thrown out of the project. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2014 (UTC) Apologize to A Cefaratti @A Cefaratti: Greetings A Cefaratti, I just wanted to take a minute to apologize to you for getting you blocked and being accused of being me. I have been very vocal on this site of abusive admins and bullies and they are trying very hard to get rid of me. Sorry you got caught in the middle. 138.162.8.58 (talk) 21:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC) April 2017 Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. An edit that you recently made to Abdullah II of Jordan seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. June 2017 Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to John Peyton (U.S. politician), especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 18:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. July 2017 Hello, I'm TheMagnificentist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to HSC-3— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - TheMagnificentist 14:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC) Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did with this edit to James J. Smith. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - TheMagnificentist 14:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC) October 2017 Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that in this edit to Engineering duty officer, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kim (Korean surname). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 13:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Beetlejuice. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC) Blocked for 3 years This account has been blocked for 3 years effective 15 December 2017. - theWOLFchild 22:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC) (Non-administrator comment)

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Naval Supply Systems Command, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.

Additional note

Please don't add unneeded spacing to infoboxes. Thank you - wolf 22:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of List of living Medal of Honor recipients for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of living Medal of Honor recipients, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of living Medal of Honor recipients until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

---