Open main menu

Umberto II (Italian: Umberto Nicola Tommaso Giovanni Maria di Savoia; 15 September 1904 – 18 March 1983) was the last King of Italy. He reigned for 34 days,[1] from 9 May 1946 to 12 June 1946, although he had been de facto head of state since 1944, and was nicknamed the May King (Italian: Re di Maggio).

Umberto II
Hrh Prince Umberto of Italy, May 1944 TR1836.jpg
Umberto in May 1944
King of Italy
Reign9 May 1946 – 12 June 1946
PredecessorVictor Emmanuel III
SuccessorMonarchy abolished
Enrico De Nicola as President
Prime MinisterAlcide De Gasperi
Born(1904-09-15)15 September 1904
Castle of Racconigi, Racconigi, Kingdom of Italy
Died18 March 1983(1983-03-18) (aged 78)
Geneva, Switzerland
Burial
ConsortPrincess Marie José of Belgium
(m. 1930–1983; his death)
IssuePrincess Maria Pia
Vittorio Emanuele, Prince of Naples
Princess Maria Gabriella
Princess Maria Beatrice
Full name
Italian: Umberto Nicola Tommaso Giovanni Maria di Savoia
HouseSavoy
FatherVictor Emmanuel III
MotherPrincess Elena of Montenegro
ReligionRoman Catholicism
SignatureUmberto II of Italy signature

Umberto was the only son among the five children of King Victor Emmanuel III and Queen Elena. In an effort to repair the monarchy's image after the fall of Benito Mussolini's regime, Victor Emmanuel transferred his powers to Umberto in 1944 while retaining the title of king. As a referendum was in preparation on the abolition of the monarchy in 1946, Victor Emmanuel abdicated his throne in favour of Umberto in the hope that his exit might bolster the monarchy. But the referendum passed, Italy was declared a republic, and Umberto lived out the rest of his life in exile in Cascais, on the Portuguese Riviera.

Contents

Early lifeEdit

 
Photo of Umberto, Prince of Piedmont, prior to the First World War

Umberto was born at the Castle of Racconigi in Piedmont. He was the third child, and the only son, of King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy and his wife, Elena of Montenegro. As such, he became heir apparent upon his birth, since the Italian throne was limited to male descendants. Umberto was given the standard military education of a Savoyard prince.[2] During the crisis of May 1915, when Victor Emmanuel III decided to break the terms of the Triple Alliance by declaring war on the Austrian empire, he found himself in a quandary as the Italian Parliament was against declaring war; several times, the king discussed abdication with the throne to pass to the Duke of Aosta instead of Umberto.[3] The British historian Denis Mack Smith wrote that it is not entirely clear why Victor Emmanuel was prepared to sacrifice his 10-year-old son's right to succeed to the throne in favor of the Duke of Aosta.[4]

Umberto was brought up in an authoritarian and militaristic household and expected to "show an exaggerated deference to his father"; both in private and public Umberto always had to get down on his knees and kiss his father's hand before being allowed to speak, even as an adult,[5] and he was expected to stand to attention and salute whenever his father entered a room.[5] Like the other Savoyard princes before him, Umberto received a military education that was notably short on politics; Savoyard monarchs customarily excluded politics from their heirs' education with the expectation that they would learn about the art of politics when they inherited the throne.[6]

Umberto was the first cousin of King Alexander I of Yugoslavia. He was accorded the title Prince of Piedmont, which was formalised by Royal Decree on 29 September.[7] In a 1959 interview, Umberto told the Italian newspaper La Settimana Incom Illustrata that in 1922 his father had felt that appointing Benito Mussolini prime minister was a "justifiable risk".[8]

Career as Prince of PiedmontEdit

State visit to South America, 1924Edit

 
Prince Umberto during his visit to Chile, in 1924

As Prince of Piedmont, Umberto visited South America, between July and September 1924. With his preceptor, Bonaldi, he went to Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina and Chile. This trip was part of the political plan of Fascism to link the Italian people living outside of Italy with their mother country and the interests of the regime.

Love affairsEdit

As a young man, Umberto was mostly noted for his pursuit of handsome young officers. One of his lovers, Enrico Montanari, remembered as a lieutenant in 1927 Turin that the prince gave him a silver cigarette lighter with the inscription reading "Dimmi di si!" ("Say yes to me!").[9] Montanari recalled that he was "seduced" by the lavish gifts Umberto gave him. In a break with the traditions of the House of Savoy, Umberto was an intense Catholic, described by his biographer Domenico Bartoli as "almost to the point of fanaticism", but he was unable to resist what he called his "satanic" homosexual urges.[9] Umberto was described as a "sensuous" man who constantly craved sex, but he always felt very guilty and tormented afterward for violating the Catholic teaching that homosexuality is a cardinal sin.[9] To make up for what he called the "devastating burden" of his life, Umberto spent much time praying for divine forgiveness for his homosexuality.[9] One biographer wrote of Umberto that he was "forever rushing between chapel and brothel, confessional and steam bath."[10] He had a fondness for officers from well-off families.[9] According to the film director and aristocrat Luchino Visconti's autobiography, he and Umberto had a homosexual relationship during their youth in the 1920s.[9]

Military positions and attempted assassinationEdit

Umberto was educated for a military career and in time became the commander-in-chief of the Northern Armies, and then the Southern ones. This role was merely formal, the de facto command belonging to his father, King Victor Emmanuel III, who jealously guarded his power of supreme command from Il Duce, Benito Mussolini. By mutual agreement, Umberto and Mussolini always kept a distance. In 1926, Mussolini passed a law allowing the Fascist Grand Council to decide the succession, though in practice he admitted the prince would succeed his father.[11]

An attempted assassination took place in Brussels on 24 October 1929, the day of the announcement of his betrothal to Princess Marie José. Umberto was about to lay a wreath on the Tomb of the Belgian Unknown Soldier at the foot of the Colonne du Congrès when, with a cry of 'Down with Mussolini!', Fernando de Rosa fired a single shot that missed him.

De Rosa was arrested and, under interrogation, claimed to be a member of the Second International who had fled Italy to avoid arrest for his political views. His trial was a major political event, and although he was found guilty of attempted murder, he was given a light sentence of five years in prison. This sentence caused a political uproar in Italy and a brief rift in Belgian-Italian relations, but in March 1932 Umberto asked for a pardon for de Rosa, who was released after having served slightly less than half his sentence and eventually killed in the Spanish Civil War.

Visit to Italian SomalilandEdit

 
Portrait by Philip de László, 1928

In 1928, after the colonial authorities in Italian Somaliland built the Mogadishu Cathedral (Cattedrale di Mogadiscio), Umberto made his first publicized visit to Mogadishu, the territory's capital.[12][13] Umberto made his second publicized visit to Italian Somaliland in October 1934.[12]

Marriage and issueEdit

Umberto was married in Rome on 8 January 1930 to Marie José of Belgium (1906–2001), daughter of King Albert I of the Belgians and his wife, Queen Elisabeth, née Duchess Elisabeth in Bavaria. Umberto, who considered himself a great fashionista, personally designed his bride's wedding dress and according to a popular rumor liked to wear his bride's wedding dress in the company of his gay friends."[14] Umberto did not spent his wedding night with his bride, instead enjoying the company of a group of young men whom he gave U-shaped diamond rings.[9]

They had four children:

In the high society of Rome, there were frequent rumors that either the royal children were the products of artificial insemination or that the real father of at least the first three was Marshal Italo Balbo, a Fascist gerarca and famous aviator who was viewed as a sex symbol in Italy owing to his good looks and charm.[9] The rumors were sufficiently widespread that Balbo had to visit the Quirinal Palace to meet King Victor Emmanuel III to deny them.[9] Balbo, who opposed Mussolini's policy of allying Italy with Nazi Germany, warned the king that the Fascist secret police, the OVRA, had collected a file on Umberto's "pederasty" in order to blackmail him when he succeeded to the throne.[9] Count Galeazzo Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister, wrote in his diary after Marie José announced her second pregnancy: "I was left to understand the child will be his [Umberto's] without the intervention of doctors or syringes".[9] It is not clear how factual these rumors were, but the couple's unorthodox living arrangements—Umberto and Marie José lived apart and Umberto always announced in advance visits to his wife and was accompanied by a male friend—certainly inspired gossip.[9] Furthermore, it was widely noted in Italian elite circles that when Umberto and Marie José went on trips they always stayed in separate bedrooms.[9] The rumors did have at least some basis in fact as Marie Jose's doctor later confirmed that three out of the four royal children were conceived via artificial insemination as Umberto did not like to make love to his wife.[15]

The contrast between Umberto, who was stiff and punctilious, and the more carefree and spontaneous Marie José was also much commented upon.[16] Umberto spent much of his time with the French actor Jean Marais and the boxer Primo Carnera.[9] In 1933, when Carnera was asked what he and Umberto were doing together, he replied that "the prince had received him wearing a swimming costume and asked him to go for a swim with him in the pool. They then spent the afternoon together".[17] The Italian historian Giovanni Dall'Oroto wrote that Umberto liked Carnera without a shirt as he had a "physique fit for a king"..[18]

Under the Fascist RegimeEdit

Following the Savoyards' tradition ("Only one Savoy reigns at a time"), Umberto kept apart from active politics until he was named Lieutenant General of the Realm.[5] He made an exception when Adolf Hitler asked for a meeting. This was not considered proper, given the international situation; thereafter Umberto was more rigorously excluded from political events. In 1935, Umberto supported the war against Ethiopia, which he called a "legitimate war" that even Giolitti would have supported had he still been alive.[19] Umberto wanted to serve in the Ethiopian war, but was prevented from doing so by his father, who did however allow four royal dukes to serve in East Africa.[20] Umberto conformed to his father's expectations to behave like his father was an officer and he a soldier, obediently getting down on his knees to kiss his father's hand before speaking, but privately resented what he regarded as a deeply humiliating relationship with his cold and emotionally distant father.[5] Umberto's attitude toward the Fascist regime varied: at times he mocked the more pompous aspects of Fascism and his father for supporting such a regime, while at other times he praised Mussolini as a great leader.[21]

World War IIEdit

Umberto shared his father's fears that Mussolini's policy of alliance with Germany was reckless and dangerous, but he made no serious move to oppose Italy becoming an Axis power.[22] When Mussolini decided to enter the war in June 1940, Umberto hinted to his father that he should use the royal veto to block the Italian declarations of war on Britain and France, but was ignored.[23] After the war, Umberto criticised the decision to enter the war, saying that Victor Emmanuel was too much under "Mussolini's spell" in June 1940 to oppose it.[23] At the beginning of the war, Umberto commanded Army Group West, made up of the First, Fourth and the Seventh Army (kept in reserve), which attacked French forces during the Italian invasion of France. Umberto was appointed to this position by his father, who wanted the expected Italian victory to also be a victory for the House of Savoy, as the king feared Mussolini's ambitions.[24] The Italian offensive was a complete fiasco, and only the fact that the French signed an armistice with Germany on 21 June 1940, followed by an armistice with Italy on 24 June, saved Umberto from having his reputation destroyed by the debacle.[24] Instead he was able to present the offensive as a victory.[24] The Italian plans called for the Regio Esercito to reach the Rhone river valley, which the Italians came nowhere close to reaching, having penetrated only a few miles into France.[24]

After the capitulation of France, Mussolini kept Umberto inactive as Army commander. In the summer of 1940, Umberto was to command a planned invasion of Yugoslavia, but Mussolini subsequently cancelled the invasion of Yugoslavia in favor of invading Greece.[25] In June 1941, supported by his father, Umberto strongly lobbied to be given command of the Italian expeditionary force sent to the Soviet Union, saying that as a Catholic he fully supported Operation Barbarossa and wanted to do battle with the "godless communists".[26] Mussolini refused the request, and instead gave Umberto the responsibility of training the Italian forces scheduled to participate in Operation Hercules, the planned Axis invasion of Malta.[26] On 29 October 1942, he was awarded the rank of Marshal of Italy (Maresciallo d'Italia).[26] In October–November 1942, in the Battle of El Alamein, the Italo-German force was defeated by the British 8th Army, marking the end of Axis hopes of conquering Egypt. The Axis retreated back into Libya. In November 1942, as part of the Battle of Stalingrad, the Red Army launched Operation Uranus, which saw the Soviets annihilate much of the Italian expeditionary force in Russia and encircle the German 6th Army. The disastrous Italian defeats at Stalingrad and El Alamein turned Umberto against the war and led him to conclude that Italy must sign an armistice before it was too late.[26] In late 1942, Umberto had his cousin Prince Aimone visit Switzerland to contact the British consulate in Geneva, where he passed on a message to London that the king was willing to sign an armistice with the Allies in exchange for a promise that he be allowed to keep his throne.[26]

In 1943, Crown Princess Marie José involved herself in vain attempts to arrange a separate peace treaty between Italy and the United States. Her interlocutor from the Holy See was Monsignor Giovanni Battista Montini, a senior diplomat who later became Pope Paul VI.[16] Her attempts were not sponsored by the king and Umberto was not (directly, at least) involved in them. Victor Emmanuel III was anti-clerical, distrusting the Catholic Church, and wanted nothing to do with a peace attempt made through papal intermediaries.[26] Victor Emmanuel was also proudly misogynistic, holding women in complete contempt as he believed it was a scientific fact that women's brains were significantly less developed than men's.[26] Victor Emmanuel did not believe Marie José was competent to serve as a diplomat.[26] For all these reasons, he vetoed her peace attempt.[26] After her failure—she never met the American agents—she was sent with her children to Sarre, in Aosta Valley, and isolated from the political life of the Royal House.[16]

In the first half of 1943, as the war continued to go badly for Italy, a number of Fascist officials upon learning that the Allies would never sign an armistice with Mussolini began to plot his overthrow with the support of the king.[27] Adding to their worries were a number of strikes in Milan starting in 5 March 1943 with the workers openly criticising both the war and the Fascist regime which had led Italy into the war, leading to fears in Rome that Italy was on the brink of revolution.[27] The strike wave in Milan quickly spread to the industrial city of Turin, where the working class likewise denounced the war and Fascism.[28] The fact that during the strikes in Milan and Turin, Italian soldiers fraternized with the striking workers, who used slogans associated with the banned Socialist and Communist parties deeply worried Italy's conservative establishment.[27] By this point, the successive Italian defeats had so psychologically shattered Mussolini that he become close to being catatonic, depressed and high on various drugs while staring into space for hours on end and mumbling incoherently that the war would soon turn around for the Axis because it had to.[29] Mussolini's depressed and drugged out state led even his closest admirers to become disillusioned and to begin looking for a new leader.[30] At a meeting with the king, a near-catatonic Mussolini was barely aware of what was going on around him, forcing even Victor Emmanuel to concede that Il Duce had taken "a turn for the worse".[31] The king blamed Mussolini's mental decline on "that woman" as he called Mussolini's mistress, Clara Petacci, saying that any man who had Petacci as his mistress was bound to have problems with depression and drugs.[32] Umberto was seen as supportive of these efforts to depose Mussolini, but as Ciano (who had turned against Mussolini by this point) complained in his diary the prince was far too passive, refusing to make a move or even state his views unless his father expressed his approval first.[27] By early 1943, there was a widespread consensus among the Italian elite that Italy needed to sign an armistice with the Allies to exit a losing war, and that since Mussolini was unwilling to sign an armistice with the Allies, and the Allies unwilling to sign one with him, a new Prime Minister was needed. Senator Paolo Thaon di Revel met Victor Emmanuel to request that he dismiss Mussolini, and was refused.[33] Thaon di Revel believed that the king was unwilling to dismiss Mussolini because the latter had a file about the private life of one of the king's children that would had been very embarrassing to the royal family.[34]

On 10 July 1943, in Operation Husky, the Allies invaded Sicily.[35] Just before the invasion of Sicily, Umberto had gone on inspection tour of the Italian forces in Sicily and reported to his father that the Italians had no hope of holding Sicily.[36] Mussolini had assured the king that the Regio Esercito could hold Sicily, and the poor performance of the Italian forces defending Sicily helped to persuade the king to finally dismiss Mussolini as Umberto informed his father that Il Duce had lied to him.[37] On 16 July 1943, the visiting papal assistant secretary of state told the American diplomats in Madrid that King Victor Emmanuel III and Prince Umberto were now hated by the Italian people even more than Mussolini.[38] By this time, many Fascist gerarchi had become convinced that it was necessary to depose Mussolini to save the Fascist system, and on the night of 24–25 July 1943, at a meeting of the Fascist Grand Council a motion introduced by the gerarca Dino Grandi to take away Mussolini's powers was approved by a vote of 19 to 8.[39] The fact that the majority of the Fascist Grand Council voted for the motion showed just how disillusioned the Fascist gerarchi had become with Mussolini by the summer of 1943.[28] The intransigent and radical group of Fascists led by the gerarca Roberto Farinacci who wanted to continue the war were only a minority while the majority of the gerarchi supported Grandi's call to jettison Mussolini as the best way of saving Fascism.[40]

On 25 July 1943, Victor Emmanuel III finally dismissed Mussolini and appointed Marshal Pietro Badoglio Prime Minister with secret orders to negotiate an armistice with the Allies. The king was advised by his generals that the sooner Italy signed an armistice the better, as the Regio Esercito still outnumbered the Wehrmacht in Italy in July 1943.[41] Baron Raffaele Guariglia, the Italian ambassador to Spain, contacted British diplomats to begin the negotiations. The armistice terms the king wanted involved rejecting the Allied demand for unconditional surrender; a promise that Victor Emmanuel would continue to reign as king; commitments to allow Italy to keep the part of Yugoslavia annexed in 1941 and to restore the Italian colonial empire in Libya and the Horn of Africa; and finally the Allies were to promise not to invade the rest of Italy and instead invade the Balkans and/or France.[42] The only one of these demands the Allies were willing to concede was the matter of continuing the monarchy under the grounds that was a question for the Italian people to decide and rejected the rest.[43] Badoglio went about the negotiations in a halfhearted way while allowing a massive number of German forces to enter Italy.[44] The American historian Gerhard Weinberg wrote that Badolgio as prime minister "...did almost everything as stupidly and slowly as possible", as he dragged out the secret peace talks going in Lisbon and Tangier, being unwilling to accept the Allied demand for unconditional surrender.[44] During the secret armistice talks, Badoglio told Count Pietro Acquarone that he thought he might get better terms if Victor Emmanuel abdicated in favor of Umberto, complaining that the armistice terms that the king wanted were unacceptable to the Allies.[45] Acquarone told Badoglio to keep his views to himself as the king was completely unwilling to abdicate, all the more so as he believed that Umberto was unfit to be king.[46]

On 17 August 1943, Sicily was liberated with the last Axis forces crossing over to the Italian mainland. On 31 August, General Giuseppe Castellano was secretly sent from Rome to the town of Termini Imerese in Sicily, from where to traveled on to Cassibile where he was bluntly told by U.S. General Dwight Eisenhower that the Allies were tired of Badoglio's stalling tactics and the Italians could either sign an armistice now or the Allies would end the negotiations.[47] Eisenhower added if the armistice talks were broken off, the Allies would definitely end the monarchy in Italy, which led the king to send Castellano back to Sicily with a letter accepting all of the Allied terms "in principle" without promising to actually sign an armistice, which led Eisenhower to warn that his patience was at its limit with the Italians.[48] On 3 September 1943, the British 8th Army landed on the Italian mainland at Reggio Calabria and on the same day, Castellano finally signed the Armistice of Cassibile, through the news was not made public for five more days.[49] The U.S. 5th Army landed at Salerno on 9 September 1943 a few hours after it was announced by Eisenhower on the radio that Italy had signed an armistice.[50] Adolf Hitler had other plans for Italy, and in response to the Italian armistice ordered Operation Achse on 8 September 1943 as the Germans turned against their Italian allies and occupied all of the parts of Italy not taken by the Allies.[51] In response to the German occupation of Italy, neither Victor Emmanuel nor Marshal Badoglio made any effort at organised resistance; instead the king issued a "vague and contradictory order" that was left unsigned to the Italian military and civil servants to do their best; and the court fled Rome during the night of 8–9 September 1943.[52]

Both the king and Badoglio were so intent on fleeing Rome as swiftly as possible that the they did not have the time to try to organise resistance with Badoglio openly panicking as he usually did when faced with a crisis.[53] Victor Emmanuel remained calm by contrast, but refused to take phone calls from cabinet ministers and generals who wanted to know what he wanted them to do, as he instead focused on packing up his personal possessions.[54] Through the possibility that the Germans would occupy Italy had been discussed by the king ever since he dismissed Mussolini on 25 July, no contingency plan had been made.[55] Not trusting his son, Victor Emmanuel had told Umberto nothing about his attempts to negotiate an armistice nor about his plans to flee Rome if the Germans should occupy it.[56] For the first time in his life, Umberto criticised his father, saying the King of Italy should not be fleeing Rome and only reluctantly obeyed his father's orders to go south with him towards the Allied lines.[57] The king and the rest of the royal family fled Rome via car to Ortona, to board a corvette, the Baionetta, that took them south; a small riot took place at the Ortona dock as about 200 Italian generals and colonels who had abandoned their commands unexpectedly showed up to beg the king to take them with him, through almost of them were refused permission to board, making the struggle to get to the head of the line pointless.[58] With the exceptions of Marshal Enrico Caviglia, General Calvi di Bergolo and General Antonio Sorice, the Italian generals simply abandoned their posts on the night of 8-9 September to try to flee south, which greatly facilitated the German take-over as the Regio Esercito was left without leadership.[59] On the morning of 9 September 1943, Umberto arrived with Victor Emmanuel and Badoglio in Brindisi.

In September 1943, Italy was partitioned between the south of Italy administered by the Italian government with an Allied Control Commission (ACC) having supervisory powers while northern and central Italy were occupied by Germany with a puppet Italian Social Republic (popularly called the Salò republic) headed by Mussolini holding nominal power.[60] On 12 September 1943, Mussolini, who had been imprisoned by Badoglio, was freed by a SS commando force Hitler sent to rescue him.[61] He was taken to Germany, where he delivered a radio broadcast from a Munich studio denouncing the House of Savoy for inviting into Italy an army of "Hottentos, Sudanese, mercenary Indians, American Negroes and other zoological specimens".[62] By 16 September 1943, a line had formed across Italy with everything to north held by the Germans and to the south by the Allies.[63] Because of what Weinberg called the "extraordinary incompetence" of Badoglio who like Victor Emmanuel who made no contingency plans for a German move such as Operation Achse, thousands of Italian soldiers with no leadership were taken prisoner by the Germans without resisting in the Balkans, France and Italy itself, to be taken off to work as slave labor in factories in Germany, an experience that many did not survive.[28] The way in which Victor Emmanuel mishandled the armistice was to become as almost controversial in Italy as his support for Fascism.[64] Under the terms of the armistice, the ACC had the ultimate power with the Italian government in the south being in many an analogous position to the Italian Social Republic under the Germans, but as the British historian James Holland noted the crucial difference was that: "In the south, Italy was now moving closer towards democracy".[65] In the part of Italy under the control of the ACC, which issued orders to the Italian civil servants, a free press was allowed together with freedom of association and expression.[65]

During the years 1943-45, the Italian economy collapsed with much of the infrastructure destroyed, inflation rampant, the black market becoming the dominant form of economic activity, and food shortages reducing much of the population to the brink of starvation in both northern and southern Italy.[66] In 1943-44, the cost of living in southern Italy skyrocketed by 321% while it was estimated that people in Naples needed 2, 000 calories per day to survive while the average Neapolitan was doing well if they consumed 500 calories a day in 1943-44.[67] Naples in 1944 was described as a city without cats or dogs which had all been eaten by the Neapolitans while much of the female population of Naples turned to prostitution in order to survive.[68] As dire as the economic situation was in southern Italy, food shortages and inflation were even worse in northern Italy as the Germans carried out a policy of ruthless economic exploitation.[69] Since the war had that Mussolini had involved Italy in 1940 had become such an utter catastrophe for the Italian people by 1943, it had the effect of discrediting all those associated with the Fascist system.[70] The statement from Victor Emmanuel in late 1943 that he felt he borne no responsibility for Italy's plight, for appointing Mussolini prime minister in 1922 and for entering the war in 1940 further increased his unpopularity and led to demands that he abdicate at once.[71]

In northern Italy, a guerrilla war began against the fascists, both Italian and German, and most of the guerrilla units fighting under the banner of the National Liberation Committee (Comitato di Liberazione Nazionale-CLN) were very strongly left-wing and republican.[72] Of the six parties that made the CLN, the Communists, the Socialists and the Action Party were republican; the Christian Democrats and the Labour Party were ambiguous on the "institutional question"; and only the Liberal Party was committed to preserving the monarchy, through many individual Liberals were republicans.[73] Only a minority of the partisan bands fighting for the CLN were monarchist, and none were led by a prince of the House of Savory.[72] After the war, Umberto claimed that he wanted to join the partisans, and only his wartime duties prevented him from doing so.[72] The Italian court relocated itself to Brindisi in the south of Italy after fleeing Rome.[56] Many Italian monarchists like Benedetto Croce and Count Carlo Sforza in the fall of 1943 pressed for Victor Emmanuel III to abdicate and for Umberto to renounce his right to the succession in favor of his 6-year-old son with a regency council to govern Italy as the best hope of saving the monarchy.[74] Sforza who tried to interest the British members of the ACC in this plan as he called Victor Emmanuel a "despicable weakling" and Umberto "a pathological case", saying neither were qualified to rule Italy, but given the unwillingness of the king to abdicate, nothing came of this plan .[75] At a meeting of the leading politicians from the 6 revived political parties on 13 January 1944 in Bari, the demand was made that the ACC should force Victor Emmanuel to abdicate to "wash away the shame of the past".[76] Beyond removing Victor Emmanuel, which everyone at the Congress of Bari wanted, the Italian politicians differed with some calling for a republic to be proclaimed at once; some willing to see Umberto succeed to the throne; others wanting Umberto to renounce his claim to the throne in favor of his son; and finally those who were willing to accept Umberto as lieutenant general of the realm to govern in place of his father.[76] Since northern and central Italy were still occupied by Germany, it was finally decided at the Bari conference that the "institutional question" should be settled only once all of Italy was liberated, so all of the Italian people could have their say.[76]

RegencyEdit

In the Salò republic, Mussolini returned to his original republicanism and as part of his attack on the House of Savoy, Fascist newspapers in the area under the control of the Italian Social Republic "outed" Umberto, calling him Stellassa ("Ugly Starlet" in Piedmontese language).[77] The Fascist newspapers reported in lucid, sensationalist, and in a decidedly homophobic way Umberto's various relationships with men as a way of discrediting him.[77] It was after Umberto was "outed" by the Fascist press in late 1943 that the issue of his homosexuality came to widespread public notice.[77]

As the Allies freed more and more of Italy from the Salò regime, it became apparent that Victor Emmanuel was too tainted by his previous support of Fascism to have any further role. A sign of how unpopular the House of Savory had become was that on 28 March 1944, when the Italian Communist leader Palmiro Togliatti returned to Italy after a long exile in the Soviet Union, did not press for an immediate proclamation of a republic as expected as Togliatti wanted to the monarchy to continue as the best way of winning the Communists support after the war.[78] For the same reason, Sforza wanted a republic as soon as possible, arguing the House of Savoy was far too closely associated with Fascism to enjoy moral legitimacy, and the only hope of establishing a liberal democracy in Italy after the war was a republic.[78] By this point, the Badoglio government was so unpopular with the Italian people that Umberto was willing to accept the support of any party with a mass following, even the Communists.[78] The fact that contrary to expectations that Togliatti and Badoglio got along very well led to widespread fears amongst liberal-minded Italians that a Togliatti-Badoglio duumvirate might emerge, forming an alliance between what rapidly was becoming Italy's largest mass party and the military.[79]

Under strong pressure from Robert Murphy and Harold Macmillan of the ACC at a meeting on 10 April 1944, Victor Emmanuel transferred most of his powers to Umberto.[80] This status was formalized after Rome was liberated in June, when Victor Emmanuel transferred his remaining constitutional powers to Umberto, naming his son Lieutenant General of the Realm. However, Victor Emmanuel retained the title of King. During his period as Regent, Umberto saw his father only three times, partly out of a bid to distance himself and partly because of tensions between father and son.[72] Mack Smith wrote that Umberto was: "More attractive and outgoing than his father, he was even more a soldier at heart, and completely inexperienced as a politician...In personality less astute and intelligent than his father...less obstinate, he was far more open, affable and ready to learn".[81]

As Regent, Umberto initially made a poor impression on almost everyone as he surrounded himself with Fascist-era generals as his advisers, spoke of the military as the basis of his power, frequently threatened to sue for libel anyone who made even the slightest critical remarks about the House of Savoy, and asked the ACC to censor the press to prevent the criticism of himself or his father.[82] The British foreign secretary Sir Anthony Eden wrote after meeting Umberto in a message to London that he was "the poorest of poor creatures", and his only qualification for the throne was that he had more charm than his charmless father.[82] The historian and philosopher Benedetto Croce who was serving in the cabinet of Marshal Pietro Badoglio called Umberto "entirely insignificant" as he found the crown prince to be shallow, vain, superficial, and of low intelligence, and alluding to his homosexuality stated his private life was "tainted by scandal".[82] The diplomat and politician Count Carlo Sforza wrote in his diary that Umberto was completely unqualified to be king as he called the crown prince "a stupid young man who knew nothing of the real Italy" and "he had been as closely associated with fascism as his father. In addition he is weak and dissipated, with a degenerate and even oriental disposition inherited from his Balkan mother".[82] Sam Reber, an American official with the ACC, who had known Umberto before the war, met the prince in Naples in early 1944 and wrote he found him "greatly improved. The Balkan playboy period was over. But he has a weak face and, to judge by first meeting, has not, I should say, the personality to inspire confidence and devotion in others".[82] More damaging, Victor Emmanuel let it be known that he regretted handing over his powers to his son, and made clear that he felt that Umberto was unfit to succeed him as part of a bid to take back his lost powers.[82]

After Togliatti and the Communists entered the Badoglio cabinet, taking the oaths of loyalty to Umberto in the so-called Svolta di Salerno ("Salerno turn"), the leaders of the other anti-Fascist parties felt they no choice, but to join the cabinet as to continue to boycott it might lead Italy to being open to Communist domination.[78] The other parties entered the cabinet on 22 April 1944 in order to preempt the Communists who joined the cabinet on 24 April.[83] The Christian Democratic leader Alcide De Gasperi believed in 1944 that a popular vote would ensure a republic immediately, and sources from the Vatican suggested to him that only 25% of Italians favored continuing the monarchy.[84] The Catholic Church was in favor of Umberto, who unlike his father, was a sincere Catholic who it was believed would keep the Communists out of power.[84] However, De Gasperi admitted that though the monarchy was a conservative institution, "it was difficult to answer the argument that the monarchy had done little to serve the interests of the country or people during the past thirty years".[84] The power of the Badoglio government, based in Salerno, were very limited, but the entry of the Communists, followed by representatives of the other anti-Fascist parties into the Badoglio cabinet in April 1944 marked the moment when as the British historian David Ellwood noted:"...anti-Fascism had compromised with the traditional state and the defenders of Fascism, and this compromise had been engineered by the Communist Party. A quite new phase in Italy's liberation was opening".[85] Besides for the "institutional question", the principle responsibility of the Italian government was reconstruction of the liberated areas of Italy.[86] As the Allies pushed northwards, aside from the damage caused by the fighting, the retreating Germans systematically destroyed all of the infrastructure, leading to a humanitarian disaster in the liberated parts.[87]

Umberto's own relations with the Allies were strained by his insistence that after the war Italy should keep all of its colonial empire, including Ethiopia and the parts of Yugoslavia that Mussolini had annexed in 1941.[88] Both the British and Americans told Umberto that Ethiopia had its independence restored in 1941 and would not revert to Italian rule, while the Allies had promised that Yugoslavia would be restored to its pre-war frontiers after the war. Umberto later stated that he would have never signed the peace treaty of 1947 under which Italy renounced its empire.[88] On 15 April 1944, in an interview with The Daily Express, Umberto stated his hope that Italy would become a full Allied power, expressing his wish that the Regia Marina would fight in the Pacific against Japan and the Regio Esercito would march alongside the other Allied armies in invading Germany.[89] In the same interview, Umberto stated that he wanted post-war Italy to have a government "patterned on the British monarchy, and at the same time incorporating as much of America's political framework as possible".[89] Umberto admitted that in retrospect his father had made grave mistakes as king and criticised Victor Emmanuel for a suffocating childhood where he was never permitted to express his personality or hold views of his own.[90] In the same interview, Umberto stated that his hope was to make Italy a democracy by executing "the vastest education programme Italy has ever seen" to eliminate illiteracy in Italy once and for all.[90]

A few days later, on 19 April 1944, Umberto in an interview with The Times complained that the ACC was too liberal in giving Italians too much freedom as the commissioners "seemed to expect the Italian people to run before they could walk".[89] In the same interview, Umberto demanded the ACC censor the Italian press to end the criticism of the royal family, and claimed he had no choice, but to support Mussolini because otherwise he would have been disinherited.[89] Finally, Umberto made the controversial statement that Mussolini "at first had the full support of the nation" in bringing Italy into the war in June 1940, and Victor Emmanuel III had only signed the declarations of war because "there was no sign that the nation wanted it otherwise. No single voice was raised in protest. No demand was made for summoning parliament".[89] The interview with The Times caused a storm of controversy in Italy with many Italians objecting to Umberto's claim that the responsibility for Italy entering the war rested with ordinary Italians and his apparent ignorance of the difficulties of holding public protests under the Fascist regime in 1940.[91] Sforza wrote in his diary of his belief that Victor Emmanuel, "that little monster", had put Umberto up to the interview with the aim of discrediting his son.[92] Croce wrote:

"The Prince of Piedmont for twenty-two years has never shown any sign of acting independently of his father. Now he is simply repeating his father's arguments. He chooses to do this at the very moment when, having been designated lieutenant of the kingdom, he ought to be overcoming doubt and distrust as I personally hoped he would succeed in doing. To me it seems unworthy to try to unload the blame and errors of royalty on the people. I, an old monarchist, am therefore specially grieved when I see the monarchs themselves working to discredit the monarchy".[92]

Various Italian politicians had attempted to persuade the Allies to revise the armistice of 1943 in Italy's favor under the grounds that there was a difference between the Fascist regime and the Italian people, and Umberto's statement that the House of Savoy bore no responsibility as he asserted that that the Italian people had been of one mind with Mussolini in June 1940 was widely seen as weakening the case for revising the armistice.[93]

Most of the Committee of National Liberation (CLN) leaders operating underground in the north tended to lean in a republican direction, but were willing to accept Umberto temporarily out of the belief that his personality together with widespread rumors about his private life would ensure that he would not last long as either Lieutenant General or as king should his father abdicate.[94] After the liberation of Rome on 6 June 1944, the various Italian political parties all applied strong pressure on Umberto to dismiss Badoglio who had loyally served the Fascist regime until the royal coup on 25 July 1943, which resulted in the moderate socialist Ivanoe Bonomi being appointed prime minister.[95] On 5 June 1944, Victor Emmanuel formally gave up his powers to Umberto, finally recognizing his son as Lieutenant General of the Realm.[96] After the liberation of Rome, Umberto received a warm welcome from ordinary people when he returned to the Eternal City.[92] Mack Smith cautioned that the friendly reception that Umberto received in Rome may have been due to him being a symbol of normalcy after the harsh German occupation as opposed to genuine affection for the prince.[92] During the German occupation, much of the Roman population had lived on the brink of starvation, young people had arrested on the streets to be taken off to work as slave labor in Germany while the Fascist Milizia together with the Wehrmacht and SS had committed numerous atrocities.[97] Badoglio by contrast was greeted with widespread hostility when he returned to Rome, being blamed by many Italians as the man together with the king who were responsible for abandoning Rome to the Germans without a fight in September 1943.[98]

Umberto had ordered Badoglio to bring in members of the Committee of National Liberation (CLN) into his cabinet after the liberation of Rome to broaden his basis of support and ensure national unity by preventing the emergence of a rival government.[84] Umberto moved into the Quirinal Palace while at the Grand Hotel the Rome branch of the CLN met with the cabinet.[84] Speaking of behalf of the CLN in general, the Roman leadership of the CLN refused to join the cabinet as long it was headed by Badoglio, but indicated that Bonomi was an acceptable choice as prime minister for them.[84] General Noel Mason-MacFarlane of the ACC visited the Quirinal Palace and convinced Umberto to accept Bonomi as prime minister under the grounds that the Crown needed to bring the CLN into the government, which required sacrificing Badoglio.[84] As Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin were willing to see Badoglio continue as prime minister, seeing him as a force for order, Umberto could had held out for him, but as part of his efforts to distance himself from Fascism, agreed to appoint Bonomi prime minister.[84] Reflecting the tense "institutional question" of republic vs. monarchy, Umberto when swearing in the Bonomi cabinet allowed the ministers to take either their oaths to himself as the lieutenant general of the realm or to the Italian state; Bonomi himself chose to take his oath to Umberto while the rest of his cabinet chose to take their oaths only to the Italian state.[84] Churchill especially disapproved of the replacement of Badoglio with Bonomi, complaining that in his view that Umberto was being used by "a group of aged and hungry politicians trying to intrigue themselves into an undue share of power".[84] Through the Allied occupation, the Americans were far more supportive of Italian republicanism than the British with Churchill in particular believing the Italian monarchy was the only institution that was capable of preventing the Italian Communists from coming to power after the war.[99]

Unlike the conservative Marshal Badoglio, the socialist Bonomi started to move Italian politics in an increasing democratic direction as he argued that King Victor Emmanuel III who had only turned against Mussolini when it was clear that the war was lost was unfit to continue as king.[95] On 25 June 1944, the Bonomi government, which like the Badoglio government, ruled by royal degree as there was no parliament in Italy, had a royal degree issued in Umberto's name promising a Constituent Assembly for Italy after the war.[100] As Umberto continued as regent, he surprised many after his rocky start in the spring of 1944 with greater maturity and judgement than was expected.[90] Croce advised him to make a break with his father by choosing his advisers from the democratic parties, and it was due to Croce's influence that Umberto appointed Falcone Lucifero, a socialist lawyer as Minister of the Royal House.[84] Lucifero suggested reforms such as reducing the number of aristocrats and generals at the court as while bringing in people from all the regions of Italy instead of just Piedmont to make the court more representative of Italy.[84]

Umberto in September 1944 vetoed an attempt by the Bonomi government to start an investigation of who was responsible for abandoning Rome in September 1943 as he feared that it show his father was a coward.[101] The same month, Badoglio who was kept on as an adviser by Umberto made an offer to British and the Americans on behalf of the regent in September 1944 for Italy to be governed by a triumvirate consisting of himself, Bonomi and the former prime minister Vittorio Orlando which purge the prefects in the liberated areas who were "agents of Togliatti and Nenni" with Fascist-era civil servants.[101] Badoglio also spoke of Umberto's desire not to lose any territory after the war to Greece, Yugoslavia and France.[101] Badoglio's offer was rejected as Admiral Ellery W. Stone of the ACC was opposed to Umberto's plans to have Bonomi share power with Badoglio and Orlando as upsetting the delicately achieved political consensus for no other reason than to increase the Crown's power.[102][103]

In October 1944, Umberto in an interview with the New York Times stated he favored a referendum to decide whatever Italy was to be a republic vs. a monarchy, instead of having the "institutional question" decided by the national assembly that would write Italy's post-war constitution.[104] Umberto's interview caused some controversy as it was widely feared by the republican parties that a referendum would be rigged, especially in the south of Italy.[105] In the same interview, Umberto mentioned his belief that after the war that monarchies all over the world would move towards the left, and stated that under his leadership Italy would go leftwards "in an ordered, liberal way" as he understood "the weight of the past is the monarchy's greatest handicap", which he would resolve by a "radical revision" of the Statuto Albertino.[106] Umberto spoke favorably of Togliatti as he was "clever, agreeable, and easy to discuss problems with".[106] In private, Umberto said he found Togliatti "to be a very congenial companion whose intelligence he respected, but was afraid that he suited his conversation according to his company".[101]

By late 1944, the question of whatever it was the CLN or the Crown that represented the Italian people came to a head.[107] On 25 November 1944, Bonomi resigned as prime minister, saying he could not govern owing to his difficulties with the CLN, and as the politicians could not agree on a successor, Umberto used the impasse to reassert the Crown's powers.[105] The crisis ended on 12 December 1944 with Umberto appointing a new government under Bonomi consisting of ministers from four parties, the most important of which were the Communists and the Christian Democrats.[108] In response to objections from the CLN, Bonomi in practice accepted their claim that they represented the Italian people rather than the Crown while still swearing an oath of loyalty to Umberto as the Lieutenant General of the Realm when he took the prime minister's oath.[107] An attempt by Umberto to have Churchill issue a public statement in favor of the monarchy led Macmillan to warn Umberto to try to be more politically neutral as regent.[105] However, Churchill during a visit to Rome in January 1945 called Umberto "a far more impressive figure than the politicians".[109] As a gesture to promote national unity after the traumas of the war, in June 1945, Umberto appointed as prime minister a prominent guerrilla leader, Ferruccio Parri.[72]

In December 1945, Umberto appointed a new more conservative government under Alcide De Gasperi.[110] One of the first acts of the new government was to announce the High Commission for Sanctions Against Fascism would cease operating as of 31 March 1946 and to start purging from the liberated areas of northern Italy civil servants appointed by the CLN, restoring the career civil servants who had served the Fascist regime back to their former posts.[111] Over the opposition of the left-wing parties who wanted the "institutional question" resolved by the Constituent Assembly, De Gasperi announced that a referendum would be held to decide the "institutional question".[112] At the same time, Italian women were given the right to vote and to hold office for the first time, again over the opposition of the left-wing parties, who viewed Italian women as more conservative than their menfolk, and believed that female suffrage would benefit the monarchist side in the referendum.[112] The monarchists favored putting off the referendum as long as possible, out of the hope that a return to normalcy would cause the Italians to take a more favorable view of their monarchy while the republicans wanted a referendum as soon as possible, hoping that wartime radicalization would work in their favor.[112]

King of ItalyEdit

 
King Umberto II of Italy visiting Cairo

Umberto earned widespread praise for his role in the following three years with the Italian historian Giuseppe Mammarella calling Umberto a man "whose Fascist past was less compromising" than that of Victor Emmanuel and who as lieutenant general showed certain "progressive" tendencies.[113] In April 1946, a public opinion poll of registered members of the conservative Christian Democratic party showed that 73% were republicans, a poll that caused immense panic in the monarchist camp.[114] The American historian Norman Kogan cautioned the poll was of Christian Democratic members, which was not the same thing as Christian Democratic voters who tended to be "...rural, female, or generally apolitical".[115] Nonetheless, the poll led to appeals from Umberto to the ACC to postpone the referendum, leading to the reply that the De Gasperi cabinet had set the date for the referendum, not the ACC.[116] The possibility of losing the referendum also led to the monarchists to appeal to Victor Emmanuel to finally abdicate.[117] De Gasperi and the other Christian Democratic leaders refused to take sides in the referendum, urging Christian Democratic voters to follow their consciences when it came time to vote.[118]

In hopes of influencing public opinion ahead of a referendum on the continuation of the monarchy, Victor Emmanuel formally abdicated in favour of Umberto on 9 May 1946 and left for Egypt.[103] Before departing for Egypt, Victor Emmanuel saw Umberto for the last time, saying farewell in a cold, emotionless way.[103] The Catholic Church saw the continuation of the monarchy as the best way of keeping the Italian left out of power, and during the referendum campaign Catholic priests used their pulpits to warn that "all the pains of hell" were reserved for those who voted for a republic.[119] The Catholic Church presented the referendum not as a question of republic vs. monarchy, but instead as a question of Communism vs. Catholicism, warning to vote for a republic would be to vote for the Communists.[114] On the day before the referendum, 1 June 1946, Pope Pius XII in a sermon on St. Peter's Square that was widely seen as endorsing Umberto said: "What is the problem? The problem is whether one or the other of those nations, of those two Latin sisters [elections were taking place in France on the same day] with several thousands of years of civilization will continue to learn against the solid rock of Christianity,...or on the contrary do they want to hand over the fate of their future to the impossible omnipotence of a material state without extraterrestrial ideals, without religion, and without God. One of these two alternatives shall occur according to whether the names of the champions or the destroyers of Christian civilization emerge victorious from the urns".[118] Umberto believed that the support from the Catholic Church would be decisive and that he would win the referendum by a narrow margin.[120] As a king, Umberto attempted to make wide use of the powers of royal pardon, trying to pardon thousands of criminals as a bid to win popularity (through Parliament blocked most of these pardons) while likewise making equally wide use of his power to grant titles of nobility as during his short reign he awarded thousands of titles of nobility to various local notables in bid to win the support of regional elites.[121] The De Gasperi cabinet accepted Umberto as king, but refused to accept the normal appellation for Italian kings "by the grace of God and the will of the people".[122]

In northern Italy, which had been the scenes of the guerrilla struggle against the Italian Social Republic and the Germans, much of the population had been radicalized by the struggle, and feelings were very much against the monarchy.[72] Kogan wrote Victor Emmanuel's flight from Rome was "bitterly remembered" in the Nord as an act of cowardice and betrayal by the king who abandoned his people to the German occupation without a fight.[123] The socialist leader Sandro Pertini warned Umberto not to campaign in Milan as otherwise he would be lynched by the Milanese working class if he should appear in that city.[72] Republican cartoonists mericessly mocked Umberto's physical quirks as the American historian Anthony Di Renzo wrote that he was: "Tall, stiff, and balding, he had smooth, clean-shaven blue cheeks, thin lips, and a weak chin. Dressed in military uniform, decorated with the Supreme Order of the Most Holy Annunciation, he seemed more like a majordomo than a major-general".[124] On the campaign trail, Umberto was received with much more friendliness in the south of Italy than in the north.[103] People in the Mezzogiorno loved their king, who on the campaign trail in Sicily showed an encyclopedic knowledge of Sicilian villages which greatly endeared him to the Sicilians.[125] Umberto's principle arguments for retaining the monarchy were it was the best way to revive Italy as a great power; it was the only institution capable of holding Italy together by checking regional separatism; and it would uphold Catholicism against anti-clericalism.[126] The republicans charged that Umberto had done nothing to oppose Fascism with his major interest being his "glittering social life" in the high society of Rome and Turin, and that as a general knew that Italy was unready for war in 1940, but did not warn Mussolini against entering the war.[127]

Mack Smith wrote that he called "some of the more extreme monarchists" expressed doubts about the legitimacy of the referendum, claiming that millions of voters, many of them pro-monarchist, were unable to vote because they had not yet been able to return to their own local areas to register.[128] Nor had the issue of Italy's borders been settled definitively, so the voting rights of those in disputed areas had not been satisfactorily clarified. Other allegations were made about voter manipulation, and even the issue of how to interpret the votes became controversial, as it appeared that not just a majority of those validly voting but of those votes cast (including spoiled votes), was needed to reach an outcome in the event the monarchy lost by a tight margin.

In the 2 June 1946 referendum, a 52% majority voted to make Italy a republic. The conservative, rural Mezzogiorno (southern Italy) region voted solidly for the monarchy while the more urbanised and industrialised Nord (northern Italy) voted equally firmly for a republic.[120] In northern Italy, which had been ruled by the Italian Social Republic, the charges of homosexuality made against Umberto had an impact on the voters, causing at least some conservatives to vote for the republic.[129] From his exile in Egypt, where King Farouk had welcomed him as a guest, Victor Emmanuel expressed no surprise at the result of the referendum as he always viewed Umberto as a failure who was unfit to be king, and claimed that the monarchists would have won the referendum if only he had not abdicated.[120] Umberto himself had expected to win the referendum and was deeply shocked when the majority of his subjects chose a republic.[120]

The republic was formally proclaimed four days later, ending Umberto's brief 34-day reign as king. Umberto at first refused to accept what he called "the outrageous illegality" of the referendum, and took his deposition badly.[120] In his last statement as king, Umberto refused to accept the republic, saying he was the victim of a coup d'état by his ministers and the referendum had been rigged against him.[120][130] In response, De Gasperi who became acting president replied in a press statement:

"We must strive to understand the tragedy of someone who, after inheriting a military defeat and a disastrous complicity with dictatorship, tried hard in recent months to work with patience and good will towards a better future. But this final act of the thousand-year old House of Savoy must be seen as part of our national catastrophe; it is an expiation, an expiation forced upon all of us, even those who have not shared directly in the guilt of the dynasty".[120]

Some monarchists advocated using force to prevent a republic from being proclaimed, even at the risk of a civil war, but Mack Smith wrote that: "Common sense and patriotism saved Umberto from accepting such counsel".[131] Umberto rejected the advice that he should go to Naples, proclaim a rival government with the intention of starting a civil war in which the Army would presumably side with the House of Savoy under the grounds that "My house united Italy. It will not divide it".[132] The monarchy of the House of Savoy formally ended on 12 June 1946, and Umberto left the country. Prime Minister Alcide de Gasperi assumed office as Italy's interim Head of State. At about 3 pm on 13 June 1946, Umberto left the Quirinal Palace for the last time with the servants all assembled in the courtyard to see him off and many were in tears.[133] At the Ciampino Airport in Rome, as Umberto boarded the air plane that was to take him to Lisbon, a carabiniere grabbed him by the hand and said: "Your Majesty, we will never forget you!”[134]

HomosexualityEdit

 
The Prince and Princess of Piedmont in 1930

Some academics have explored Umberto's homosexuality.[135] As early as the 1920s, Mussolini had collected a dossier on his private life for purposes of blackmail. Certainly during the war, newspapers asserted that Umberto was homosexual, and information continued to be spread in the lead-up to the post-war referendum on the monarchy in the hope of influencing the outcome. It is, however, unclear to what extent such rumours could be substantiated. Umberto's custom of giving a fleur-de-lis made of precious stones to favoured young officials in his entourage was well known, and Umberto's lovers may have included Luchino Visconti and Jean Marais;[136] there was a former army lieutenant who published details of Umberto's advances to him.[137] Except for public appearances, Umberto and Maria José generally lived apart.[138]

In exileEdit

Umberto II lived for 37 years in exile, in Cascais, on the Portuguese Riviera. He never set foot in his native land again; the 1948 constitution of the Italian Republic not only forbade amending the constitution to restore the monarchy, but until 2002 barred all male heirs to the defunct Italian throne from ever returning to Italian soil. Female members of the Savoy family were not barred, except queens consort. Relations between Umberto and Marie José grew more strained during their exile, and in effect their marriage broke up with Marie José moving to Switzerland while Umberto remained in Portugal, though as Catholics neither filed for divorce.[16]

He traveled extensively during exile, and was often to be seen in Mexico visiting his daughter Maria Beatrice.

At the time when Umberto was dying, in 1983, President Sandro Pertini wanted the Italian Parliament to allow Umberto to return to his native country. Ultimately, however, Umberto died in Geneva and was interred in Hautecombe Abbey, for centuries the burial place of the members of the House of Savoy.[139] No representative of the Italian government attended his funeral.

Titles, styles and honoursEdit

Styles of
King Umberto II
 
Reference styleHis Majesty
Spoken styleYour Majesty
Alternative styleSire

Titles and stylesEdit

  • 15 September 1904 – 29 September 1904: His Royal Highness Prince Umberto of Savoy
  • 29 September 1904 – 9 May 1946: His Royal Highness The Prince of Piedmont
  • 9 May 1946 – 12 June 1946: His Majesty The King of Italy
  • 12 June 1946 – 18 March 1983: His Majesty King Umberto II of Italy

At birth, Umberto was granted the traditional title of Prince of Piedmont. This was formalised by Royal Decree on 29 September 1904.[7]

HonoursEdit

National honoursEdit

Foreign honoursEdit

AncestryEdit

Patrilineal ancestryEdit

  1. Humbert I of Savoy, 980–1047
  2. Otto of Savoy, 1015–1057
  3. Amadeus II of Savoy, 1039–1080
  4. Humbert II of Savoy, 1070–1103
  5. Amadeus III of Savoy, 1095–1148
  6. Humbert III of Savoy, 1135–1189
  7. Thomas I of Savoy, 1176–1233
  8. Thomas II, Count of Piedmont, 1199–1259
  9. Amadeus V, Count of Savoy, 1251–1323
  10. Aimone, Count of Savoy, 1291–1343
  11. Amadeus VI, Count of Savoy, 1334–1383
  12. Amadeus VII, Count of Savoy, 1360–1391
  13. Amadeus VIII, Duke of Savoy, 1383–1451
  14. Louis, Duke of Savoy, 1402–1465
  15. Philip II, Duke of Savoy, 1438–1497
  16. Charles III, Duke of Savoy, 1486–1553
  17. Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy, 1528–1580
  18. Charles Emmanuel I, Duke of Savoy, 1562–1630
  19. Thomas Francis, Prince of Carignano, 1596–1656
  20. Emmanuel Philibert, Prince of Carignano, 1628–1709
  21. Victor Amadeus I, Prince of Carignano, 1690–1741
  22. Louis Victor, Prince of Carignano, 1721–1778
  23. Victor Amadeus II, Prince of Carignano, 1743–1780
  24. Charles Emmanuel, Prince of Carignano, 1770–1800
  25. Charles Albert of Sardinia, 1798–1849
  26. Victor Emmanuel II of Italy, 1820–1878
  27. Umberto I of Italy, 1844–1900
  28. Victor Emmanuel III of Italy, 1869–1947
  29. Umberto II of Italy, 1904–1983[163]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Ian Locke (1999). Magnificent Monarchs. MacMillan. p. 16. ISBN 978-0330-374965. Fact Attack series
  2. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.182-183.
  3. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.210-211.
  4. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.211.
  5. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.272.
  6. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.271-272.
  7. ^ a b "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 3 September 2017. Retrieved 19 January 2016.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  8. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.254.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Dall'Oroto, Giovanni "Umberto II" from Who's Who in Contemporary Gay and Lesbian History, London: Psychology Press, 2002 p. 453.
  10. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  11. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.265.
  12. ^ a b R. J. B. Bosworth. Mussolini's Italy: Life Under the Fascist Dictatorship, 1915-1945. p. 48. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
  13. ^ Peter Bridges. Safirka: An American Envoy. p. 71. Retrieved 6 April 2014.
  14. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  15. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  16. ^ a b c d "Queen Marie Jose of Italy". The Daily Telegraph. 29 January 2001. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  17. ^ Dall'Oroto, Giovanni "Umberto II" from Who's Who in Contemporary Gay and Lesbian History, London: Psychology Press, 2002 p. 454.
  18. ^ Dall'Oroto, Giovanni "Umberto II" from Who's Who in Contemporary Gay and Lesbian History, London: Psychology Press, 2002 p. 454.
  19. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.271.
  20. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.271.
  21. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.272-273.
  22. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.287.
  23. ^ a b Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.291.
  24. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.292.
  25. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.293.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h i Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.298.
  27. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.300.
  28. ^ a b c Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.485
  29. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.302.
  30. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.302.
  31. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.302.
  32. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.302.
  33. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.299.
  34. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.299.
  35. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.594
  36. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.303.
  37. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.303.
  38. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.35.
  39. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.597
  40. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.597
  41. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.307
  42. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.309
  43. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.309
  44. ^ a b Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.598
  45. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.310.
  46. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.310.
  47. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.312-313
  48. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.313
  49. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.313
  50. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.599
  51. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.315-316.
  52. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.316-318.
  53. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.317.
  54. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.317-318.
  55. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.318.
  56. ^ a b Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.318-319.
  57. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.318.
  58. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.318
  59. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.318
  60. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.485-486.
  61. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.319.
  62. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.319.
  63. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.601
  64. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.5
  65. ^ a b Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.250.
  66. ^ Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.192-193, 242-243, & 396-396.
  67. ^ Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.242.
  68. ^ Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.243.
  69. ^ Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.192-193
  70. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.7
  71. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p.62-63
  72. ^ a b c d e f g Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.336.
  73. ^ M.L.K "Republic versus Monarchy in Italy" p.305-313 from The World Today, Vol 2, Issue 7, July 1946 p.307.
  74. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.322-323.
  75. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.323.
  76. ^ a b c Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.324.
  77. ^ a b c Dall'Oroto, Giovanni "Umberto II" from Who's Who in Contemporary Gay and Lesbian History, London: Psychology Press, 2002 p. 534.
  78. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.326-327.
  79. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.88.
  80. ^ Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.249.
  81. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.325 & 330.
  82. ^ a b c d e f Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.325.
  83. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 68
  84. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.332.
  85. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.89.
  86. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World In Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 p.487
  87. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World In Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 p.487
  88. ^ a b Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.341.
  89. ^ a b c d e Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.328.
  90. ^ a b c Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.331.
  91. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.328-329.
  92. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.329.
  93. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 63
  94. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.88-89.
  95. ^ a b Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.727.
  96. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 72
  97. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 70
  98. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.95.
  99. ^ Gerhard Weinberg, A World in Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.727-728.
  100. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 73
  101. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.334.
  102. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.105.
  103. ^ a b c d Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.338.
  104. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.333-334.
  105. ^ a b c Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.335.
  106. ^ a b Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.333.
  107. ^ a b Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.449
  108. ^ Holland, James Italy's Year of Sorrow, 1944-1945, New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008 p.449-450
  109. ^ Ellwood, David Italy 1943-1945, Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1985 p.219.
  110. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.34-35
  111. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.35
  112. ^ a b c Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.36
  113. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 112
  114. ^ a b Norman Kogan A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.37
  115. ^ Norman Kogan, A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.37
  116. ^ Norman Kogan A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.37
  117. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.37
  118. ^ a b Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 114
  119. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.339.
  120. ^ a b c d e f g Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.340.
  121. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.338.
  122. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.338.
  123. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.34
  124. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  125. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  126. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.338-339.
  127. ^ Giuseppe Mammarealla Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943-1965, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966 p. 62
  128. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.339-341.
  129. ^ Dall'Oroto, Giovanni "Umberto II" from Who's Who in Contemporary Gay and Lesbian History, London: Psychology Press, 2002 p. 452-453.
  130. ^ Kogan, Norman A Political History of Postwar Italy, London: Pall Mall Press, 1966 p.38
  131. ^ Denis Mack Smith, Italy and Its Monarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press p.339
  132. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  133. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  134. ^ Di Renzo, Anthony (14 May 2014). "Re di Maggio: Pasquino forgives King Umberto II". L'Italo-Americano. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
  135. ^ Giovanni Dall'Orto in Aldrich, Robert; Wotherspoon, Garry Who's Who in Contemporary Gay and Lesbian History: From World War II to the Present Day, Routledge, London 2001, p452
  136. ^ A. Petacco, Regina: La vita e i segreti di Maria Jose, Milan, 1997
  137. ^ Enrico Montanari, La lotta di liberazione, cited in: Silvio Rossi, Il vizio segreto di Umberto di Savoia, Extra, I 1971 n. 4 (25 March), pp. 1–4.
  138. ^ S. Bertoldi, L'ultimo re, l'ultima regina, Milan, 1992
  139. ^ Roy Palmer Domenico, Remaking Italy in the Twentieth Century, (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2002), 101-102.
  140. ^ a b "Photographic image" (JPG). 2.bp.blogspot.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  141. ^ a b c d "King Umberto wearing 4 Italian Orders" (JPG). S-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  142. ^ a b c d "King Umberto as heir wearing 4 Italian Orders". Media.gettyimages.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  143. ^ a b c d e f "King Umberto wearing 5 Italian and 1 Belgian Order(s)". 2.bp.blogspot.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  144. ^ a b c d e "King Umberto wearing 5 Italian orders" (JPG). C7.alamy.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  145. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). 2.bp.blogspot.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  146. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). S-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  147. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). C7.alamy.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  148. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). 1.bp.blogspot.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  149. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). Farm8.staticflickr.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  150. ^ a b "The Constantinian Order's Relationship with the Savoy Dynasty of Italy - Sacred Military Constantinian Order of St. George". Constantinian.org.uk. 4 October 2012. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  151. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). C7.alamy.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  152. ^ a b c "King Umberto wearing Bulgarian, Yugoslavian and British Orders" (JPG). S-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  153. ^ Jørgen Pedersen (2009). Riddere af Elefantordenen, 1559–2009 (in Danish). Syddansk Universitetsforlag. p. 466. ISBN 978-87-7674-434-2.
  154. ^ a b c d "King Umberto wearing Greek and Spanish Orders" (JPG). 40.media.tumblr.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  155. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). 1.bp.blogspot.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  156. ^ ww2awards.com.
  157. ^ "Umberto II : Who, What, Where, When". servinghistory.com. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
  158. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). I022.radikal.ru. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  159. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). S-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  160. ^ "Toison Espagnole (Spanish Fleece) - 20th century" (in French), Chevaliers de la Toison D'or. Retrieved 2018-09-26.
  161. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). Farm8.staticflickr.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  162. ^ "Photographic image" (JPG). S-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
  163. ^ "Umberto I Biancamano, conte di Savoia". Geneall.net. Retrieved 13 December 2017.

Further readingEdit

External linksEdit

Umberto II of Italy
Born: 15 September 1904 Died: 19 March 1983
Regnal titles
Preceded by
Vittorio Emanuele III
King of Italy
9 May 1946 – 12 June 1946
Monarchy abolished
Alcide da Gasperi
as interim head of state
Titles in pretence
Monarchy abolished — TITULAR —
King of Italy
12 June 1946 – 18 March 1983
Reason for succession failure:
monarchy abolished
Succeeded by
Vittorio Emanuele