Talk:Yoshiko Yamaguchi

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Waliham1 in topic Real mom

rating edit

Not sure why this is rated a 'B' class article. Its is full of typos and grammar errors and doesn't make any sense at many points.

A 'C' or even a 'Start' rating would be more appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.4.36.221 (talk) 05:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Infobox misuse edit

The infobox is entitled with a different name than the article title. Furthermore, it only describes her career as a singer and actress, not as a politician. It seems to be misuse of the infobox template. Am I missing something? Is there some reason for the infobox to (apparently) misrepresent her? I'm asking here pending altering the infobox. JoshuSasori (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article name edit

I suggest we change the name to "Shirley Yamaguchi", as she is better known in the English-speaking world.--Mycomp (talk) 05:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 13:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply



Yoshiko ŌtakaYoshiko Yamaguchi – It seems clear beyond debate that no one, not in the West and not in Japan, actually refers to her as Yoshiko Ōtaka. Google search results of the term reveals that it is only listed as an alias in nearly every page that has to do with her. WP:COMMONNAME therefore requires that we adopt a more commonly used name for the actress. Two potential options are "Yoshiko Yamaguchi" and "Shirley Yamaguchi"; both names are in reasonably common use in the English-speaking media, but I would like to argue for the former. Now, it's true that the latter is slightly more popular in Google search results. However, looking into Google News results for the recent news of her passing, we find that:

  • Special-interest media covering the entertainment business (Hollywood Reporter, Hollywood.com, Variety, etc.) tend to refer to her as "Shirley Yamaguchi", since she used this as a stage name in the U.S.;
  • Mainstream media, however, such as the New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian, etc. all prefer "Yoshiko Yamaguchi".

Normally the actress doesn't receive much coverage in mainstream media, but does have a number of articles written about her in the show business media. This thus explains why the name "Shirley Yamaguchi" is slightly more popular in Google Search results. Insofar as the policy at WP:COMMONNAME is concerned, however, I believe that the name most favored by mainstream media—that is, "Yoshiko Yamaguchi"—is the best name to use in an encyclopedic article. I am, however, open to debate and challenges on this opinion. Regardless of which name is chosen, however, I think we can all agree that the current one needs to go :) M. Caecilius (talk) 05:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yoshiko Yamaguchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yoshiko Yamaguchi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Real mom edit

May your soul rest in peace. Sincerely yours, Love you Waliham1 (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply