The Signpost was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 22 April, 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Text and/or other creative content from The Signpost was copied or moved into English Wikipedia. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments4 people in discussion
I just noticed that the editor-in-chief position is listed as "vacant". I've been editor-n-chief for about 20 months now. That's about the 3rd or 4th longest tenure of anybody in the position. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/About. Yes, I know that it's a conflict of interest, but I'll change that to "Smallbones".
Straight factual edit, thank you. (From a former COI holder.) -Pete Forsyth (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Disclosing my COI as well for changing the infobox once again. 🐶 EpicPupper(he/him | talk) 06:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Man, this article could really do with a rewrite. Oh well. jp×g 23:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Disclosing mine for this. jp×g 16:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
How is this a Good Article with so many references to Wikipedia?edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello editors, I came across this good article and found over 15 citations to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost. While these can be used for minor things that are not contentious, much of the history section is soured entirely to Wikipedia Signpost. This is a huge violation of WP:PRIMARY, and WP:USERG. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 17:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
I refuse to cite myself in mainspace but an update is necessaryedit
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Specific text to be added or removed: I have updated the history section in this diff, but have left the material commented out due to an obvious conflict of interest (I am the current editor-in-chief, and on top of that, one of the citations is to my own writing). While it is traditional for EiCs to add themselves to the infobox, this involves adding new prose to the article body, so I am requesting an edit out of an abundance of caution.
Reason for the change: Currently, the editorial history only goes up to 2015 -- much of the article is in bad shape, but this seemed quite obvious and straightforward. My guess is that any person who cares enough about the Signpost to update the article probably also cares enough to write for it, meaning we have a dire lack of qualified editors without conflicts of interest.
References supporting change: Numerous, although additional sources need to be found for a couple things that can currently only be referenced to talk pages. While citing the Signpost is within policy (per WP:ABOUTSELF), citing talk pages seems to be stretching the absolute limits of credibility, so I refuse to do it.
Without commenting on COI/OR/ABOUTSELF issues: This commented-out diff is inaccurate in parts and contradicts the timeline in the Signpost's official About page.
Go Phightins! would continue until August [2016], when the role was passed to Andreas Kolbe and Pete Forsyth. - the cited article doesn't say that regarding Andreas; to the contrary, the wording there makes it pretty clear that he had already been serving in that role ("delighted to welcome Pete Forsyth as my new co-editor-in-chief"); he had already become co-editor-in-chief in May 2016.
Also, we should avoid "currently ..." per WP:DATED.
Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:09, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@HaeB: Yeah, well, now there's two of us down here with conflicts of interest! I guess trying to iron out the timeline is a harder task than I thought, so I shall retreat to the newsroom in ignominy and try to figure it out again. jp×g 05:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
This is extra-stupid, since I was the one who linked the dates in the About section too -- I am currently doing a review of all Signpost releases anyway, so I will get to all of this in due time (so far I have gotten to 2006). I didn't actually think anyone would respond to the edit request this soon, so I figured I had a couple days to wrangle in some proper citations and go over the dates again. Serves me right! jp×g 05:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Edit request approved and implemented. SpencerT•C 21:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
My understanding (cc: JPxG) is that The Signpost is now published both on its Wikipedia URL and also on a standalone website. Is this correct and, if so, how should this standalone website be reflected in the infobox? — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 20:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
