Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Signpost/1

The Signpost edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. Hopefully someone will take this up in future making sure to cite only reliable sources. (t · c) buidhe 19:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations not up to standard for a GA. Flalf^Talk 17:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add on to this: all of the references to the wikipedia signpost violate WP:PRIMARY and WP:USERG. Good Articles should not be breaking policy or official guidelines. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 17:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As much as I hate to say it, I must agree with the above. Sources to primary sources and Wikipedia too much. I say Delist. Link20XX (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Link20XX, definitively not. There are 21 Wikipedia references out of 58, plus. So there are 37 independent sources. That's more than enough for a GA. Gerald WL 02:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]