Talk:SS Iowan

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Iowan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be conducting the GA review for this article, and I should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the first paragraph of the World War II section, you say "to American-Hawaiian for the former Dakotan as...". Should this be former Iowan?
     • Yes. Changed. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
   • Should the World War II section be retitled "World War II and later years" or something along those lines, since it discusses the Iowa's career from World War II until the ship was scrapped?
     • Yes. Changed. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

   • There have been a few edits by people other than you since you last edited. I don't think they changed anything major, but you may want to check.
     • The image description had been modified from USS to SS. I have changed it back to the correct USS — Bellhalla (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another nice article! There are a few minor issues with prose/MOS, which I have detailed above, as well as a concern about a few edits to the article that were made by someone other than you. I'm putting the article on hold to await replies to these. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Replies above. Thank you for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Nice job...passing article. Dana boomer (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Redirects, disambiguation, and category listings

Why didn't SS Tashkent appear in Category:World War II naval ships of the Soviet Union (when the redirect is created, it should be categorized in the Soviet categories so that people see the name appropriate for that category; the categorization coming from a redirect will be italicized in the category).

I added a disambiguation line at Tashkent and created the categorization at SS Tashkent for this article, but there are likely many similar ones in need of attention. Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SS Iowan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080107023419/http://ntic.msun.ru:80/ntic/exhibition/fesco/second/f705.html to http://ntic.msun.ru/ntic/exhibition/fesco/second/f705.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SS Iowan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081008154823/http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/1major/inactive/bethsparrowspoint.htm to http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/1major/inactive/bethsparrowspoint.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)